nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.12.2012 | Original Research

Impact of solitary single glandular appearance on tumor recurrence in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy

verfasst von: Susumu Saigusa, Yasuhiro Inoue, Koji Tanaka, Yuji Toiyama, Kohei Matsushita, Mikio Kawamura, Yoshinaga Okugawa, Junichiro Hiro, Keiichi Uchida, Yasuhiko Mohri, Masato Kusunoki

Erschienen in: Journal of Radiation Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Tumor regression grading (TRG) reportedly has a prognostic value in rectal cancer patients who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, TRG is difficult to evaluate objectively. The aim of this study was to identify pathological features associated with clinical outcome, compared with conventional TRG, following preoperative CRT.

Methods

A total of 67 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer underwent preoperative CRT and curative surgery. The association of two pathological features, solitary single glandular appearance (SSGA) and superficial viable cancer cells (SVCC), with clinicopathological variables was investigated, and the clinical significance of these features was compared to conventional TRG. Moreover, transcriptional analyses were performed on residual cancer cells associated with these pathological features.

Results

Of the 67 patients, 34.3 and 74.6 % had detectable SSGA and SVCC, respectively. Patients with tumor recurrence had a significantly higher frequency of SSGA (P < 0.001). There were significant correlations among each TRG, SSGA, and SVCC. Postoperative stage, lymph node metastasis, JSCCR TRG, Rödel TRG, and SSGA were significantly associated with a poor probability of recurrence-free survival. Multivariate analysis indicated that the presence of SSGA is an independent prognostic factor for tumor recurrence (P = 0.0033). In transcriptional analysis, residual cancer with SSGA had significantly higher levels of LGR5 and GLUT1 gene expression than those without SSGA.

Conclusion

SSGA may be a useful predictor of tumor recurrence for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative CRT.

Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRef

Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Cohen AM et al (2005) Long-term oncologic outcome following preoperative combined modality therapy and total mesorectal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg 241:829–836, discussion 836–828PubMedCrossRef

Gerard JP, Chapet O, Nemoz C et al (2004) Improved sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer with high-dose preoperative radiotherapy: the Lyon R96-02 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 22:2404–2409PubMedCrossRef

Dhadda AS, Dickinson P, Zaitoun AM et al (2011) Prognostic importance of Mandard tumour regression grade following pre-operative chemo/radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 47:1138–1145PubMedCrossRef

Bujko K, Michalski W, Kepka L et al (2007) Association between pathologic response in metastatic lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and risk of distant metastases in rectal cancer: an analysis of outcomes in a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67:369–377PubMedCrossRef

Rödel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T et al (2005) Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8688–8696PubMedCrossRef

Vecchio FM, Valentini V, Minsky BD et al (2005) The relationship of pathologic tumor regression grade (TRG) and outcomes after preoperative therapy in rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:752–760PubMedCrossRef

Topova L, Hellmich G, Puffer E et al (2011) Prognostic value of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 54:401–411PubMedCrossRef

Berger C, de Muret A, Garaud P et al (1997) Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer: predictive factors of tumor downstaging and residual tumor cell density (RTCD): prognostic implications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:619–627PubMedCrossRef

10.

Bateman AC, Jaynes E, Bateman AR (2009) Rectal cancer staging post neoadjuvant therapy—how should the changes be assessed? Histopathology 54:713–721PubMedCrossRef

11.

Yoshikawa R, Kusunoki M, Yanagi H et al (2001) Dual antitumor effects of 5-fluorouracil on the cell cycle in colorectal carcinoma cells: a novel target mechanism concept for pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy. Cancer Res 61:1029–1037PubMed

12.

Fowler JF (1989) The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 62:679–694PubMedCrossRef

13.

Viani GA, Stefano EJ, Soares FV, Afonso SL (2011) Evaluation of biologic effective dose and schedule of fractionation for preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: meta-analyses and meta-regression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80:985–991PubMedCrossRef

14.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2006) General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Kanehara & Co, Tokyo

15.

Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73:2680–2686PubMedCrossRef

16.

Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A (1997) Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:19–23PubMedCrossRef

17.

Saigusa S, Tanaka K, Toiyama Y et al (2009) Correlation of CD133, OCT4, and SOX2 in rectal cancer and their association with distant recurrence after chemoradiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3488–3498PubMedCrossRef

18.

Bijwaard KE, Aguilera NS, Monczak Y et al (2001) Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay for cyclin D1 expression: utility in the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma. Clin Chem 47:195–201PubMed

19.

Collette L, Bosset JF, den Dulk M et al (2007) Patients with curative resection of cT3-4 rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy: does anybody benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy? A trial of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiation Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 25:4379–4386PubMedCrossRef

20.

van den Brink M, Stiggelbout AM, van den Hout WB et al (2004) Clinical nature and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision with or without preoperative radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22:3958–3964PubMedCrossRef

21.

Chapet O, Romestaing P, Mornex F et al (2005) Preoperative radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma: which are strong prognostic factors? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:1371–1377PubMedCrossRef

22.

Kaminsky-Forrett MC, Conroy T, Luporsi E et al (1998) Prognostic implications of downstaging following preoperative radiation therapy for operable T3–T4 rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42:935–941PubMedCrossRef

23.

Jorgensen TJ (2009) Enhancing radiosensitivity: targeting the DNA repair pathways. Cancer Biol Ther 8:665–670PubMed

24.

Maity A, McKenna WG, Muschel RJ (1994) The molecular basis for cell cycle delays following ionizing radiation: a review. Radiother Oncol 31:1–13PubMedCrossRef

25.

Coleman CN (1988) Hypoxia in tumors: a paradigm for the approach to biochemical and physiologic heterogeneity. J Natl Cancer Inst 80:310–317PubMedCrossRef

26.

Overgaard J (2007) Hypoxic radiosensitization: adored and ignored. J Clin Oncol 25:4066–4074PubMedCrossRef

27.

Deorukhkar A, Krishnan S (2010) Targeting inflammatory pathways for tumor radiosensitization. Biochem Pharmacol 80:1904–1914PubMedCrossRef

28.

Zeki SS, Graham TA, Wright NA (2011) Stem cells and their implications for colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:90–100PubMedCrossRef

29.

Baumann M, Krause M, Hill R (2008) Exploring the role of cancer stem cells in radioresistance. Nat Rev Cancer 8:545–554PubMedCrossRef

30.

Kuremsky JG, Tepper JE, McLeod HL (2009) Biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:673–688PubMedCrossRef

31.

Barker N, van Es JH, Kuipers J et al (2007) Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 449:1003–1007PubMedCrossRef

32.

Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ et al (2009) Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459:262–265PubMedCrossRef

33.

Barker N, Ridgway RA, van Es JH et al (2009) Crypt stem cells as the cells-of-origin of intestinal cancer. Nature 457:608–611PubMedCrossRef

34.

Takahashi H, Ishii H, Nishida N et al (2011) Significance of Lgr5(+ve) cancer stem cells in the colon and rectum. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1166–1174PubMedCrossRef

35.

Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ (2004) Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat Rev Cancer 4:891–899PubMedCrossRef

36.

Chung FY, Huang MY, Yeh CS et al (2009) GLUT1 gene is a potential hypoxic marker in colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer 9:241PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Impact of solitary single glandular appearance on tumor recurrence in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy
verfasst von: Susumu Saigusa
Yasuhiro Inoue
Koji Tanaka
Yuji Toiyama
Kohei Matsushita
Mikio Kawamura
Yoshinaga Okugawa
Junichiro Hiro
Keiichi Uchida
Yasuhiko Mohri
Masato Kusunoki
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Journal of Radiation Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1948-7894
Elektronische ISSN: 1948-7908
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-012-0018-y

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Impact of solitary single glandular appearance on tumor recurrence in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy