nach oben

Erschienen in:

10.02.2017 | Innovation and Improvement: Implementation Science Workshop

Implementation Science Workshop: Barriers and Facilitators to Increasing Mammography Screening Rates in California’s Public Hospitals

verfasst von: Cassidy Clarity, BA, Gato Gourley, MSc, Courtney Lyles, Phd, Sara Ackerman, PhD, MPH, Margaret A. Handley, PhD, MPH, Dean Schillinger, MD, Urmimala Sarkar, MD, MPH, Joseph Conigliaro, MD, MPH, FACP

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

ᅟ …

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

The Delivery System Reform Incentive Program: Transforming Care Across Public Hospital Systems. Oakland, CA: California Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems. 2011.

Hsia J, Kemper E, Kiefe C, et al. The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women’s Health Initiative. Prev Med. 2000;31(3):261–270.CrossRefPubMed

Coburn N, Fulton J, Pearlman DN, Law C, DiPaolo B, Cady B. Treatment variation by insurance status for breast cancer patients. Breast J. 2008;14(2):128–134.CrossRefPubMed

Halpern MT, Bian J, Ward EM, Schrag NM, Chen AY. Insurance status and stage of cancer at diagnosis among women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2007;110(2):403–411.CrossRefPubMed

Fayanju OM, Jeffe DB, Elmore L, Ksiazek DN, Margenthaler JA. Breast cancer patients’ experiences within and outside the safety net. J Surg Res. 2014;190(1):126–133.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yu XQ. Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer survival: relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment and race. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:364.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lobb R, Ayanian JZ, Allen JD, Emmons KM. Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis among low-income women with access to mammography. Cancer. 2010;116(23):5487–5496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Byers TE, Wolf HJ, Bauer KR, et al. The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States : findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study. Cancer. 2008;113(3):582–591.CrossRefPubMed

Taplin SH, Barlow W, Urban N, et al. Stage, age, comorbidity, and direct costs of colon, prostate, and breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(6):417–426.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Ayanian JZ, Kohler BA, Abe T, Epstein AM. The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(5):326–331.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Schootman M, Jeffe DB, Lian M, Gillanders WE, Aft R. The role of poverty rate and racial distribution in the geographic clustering of breast cancer survival among older women: a geographic and multilevel analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(5):554–561.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Shi R, Mills G, McLarty J, Burton G, Shi Z, Glass J. Commercial insurance triples chances of breast cancer survival in a public hospital. Breast J. 2013;19(6):664–667.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Niu X, Roche LM, Pawlish KS, Henry KA. Cancer survival disparities by health insurance status. Cancer Med. 2013;2(3):403–411.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

The Safety Net Institute. CAPH/SNI Partnership with UCSF - Launches PHoENIX. [Web page]. 2015; http://safetynetinstitute.org/2013/11/07/caphsni-partnership-with-ucsf-launches-phoenix/. Accessed June 17, 2015.

15.

Fogarty International Center. Frequently Asked Questions about Implementation Science. 2013; http://www.fic.nih.gov/News/Events/implementation-science/Pages/faqs.aspx. Accessed November 5, 2015.

16.

Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS & Performance Measurement. 2015; http://www.ncqa.org/HEDISQualityMeasurement.aspx. Accessed March 25, 2015.

18.

CFIR Research Team. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research Guide. http://cfirguide.org/. Accessed May 27, 2015.

19.

Rycroft-Malone J. The PARIHS framework—a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. J Nurs Care Qual. 2004;19(4):297–304.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999.

22.

Mandelblatt JS, Yabroff KR. Effectiveness of interventions designed to increase mammography use: a meta-analysis of provider-targeted strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8(9):759–767.PubMed

23.

Dolan NC, McDermott MM, Morrow M, Venta L, Martin GJ. Impact of same-day screening mammography availability: results of a controlled clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(4):393–398.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Davis NA, Lewis MJ, Rimer BK, Harvey CM, Koplan JP. Evaluation of a phone intervention to promote mammography in a managed care plan. Am J Health Promotion. 1997;11(4):247–249.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Bodiya A, Vorias D, Dickson HA. Does telephone contact with a physician’s office staff improve mammogram screening rates? Fam Med. 1999;31(5):324–326.PubMed

26.

Lantz PM, Stencil D, Lippert MT, Beversdorf S, Jaros L, Remington PL. Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(6):834–836.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Defining the PCMH. The Patient Centered Medical Home [Webpage]. 2015; http://pcmh.ahrq.gov/page/defining-pcmh. Accessed May 27, 2015.

28.

Baker DW, Liss DT, Alperovitz-Bichell K, et al. Colorectal cancer screening rates at community health centers that use electronic health records: a cross sectional study. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015;26(2):377–390.CrossRefPubMed

29.

McAlearney AS, Robbins J, Hirsch A, Jorina M, Harrop JP. Perceived efficiency impacts following electronic health record implementation: an exploratory study of an urban community health center network. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(12):807–816.CrossRefPubMed

30.

DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):50–60.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(3):464–471.CrossRef

32.

Scott JT, Rundall TG, Vogt TM, Hsu J. Kaiser Permanente’s experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study. BMJ. 2005;331(7528):1313–1316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20(6):64–78.CrossRef

34.

Lyles CR, Aulakh V, Jameson W, Schillinger D, Yee H, Sarkar U. Innovation and Transformation in California’s Safety Net Health Care Settings: An Inside Perspective. Am J Med Qual. 29 2013.

35.

Pourat N, Davis AC, Salce E, Hilberman D, Roby DH, Kominski GF. In ten California counties, notable progress in system integration within the safety net, although challenges remain. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(8):1717–1727.CrossRef

36.

Cunningham P, Felland L, Stark L. Safety-net providers in some US communities have increasingly embraced coordinated care models. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(8):1698–1707.CrossRef

37.

Robins LS, Jackson JE, Green BB, Korngiebel D, Force RW, Baldwin LM. Barriers and facilitators to evidence-based blood pressure control in community practice. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013;26(5):539–557.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Richardson JE, Abramson EL, Pfoh ER, Kaushal R. Bridging informatics and implementation science: evaluating a framework to assess electronic health record implementations in community settings. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:770–778.PubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010;5:14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Implementation Science Workshop: Barriers and Facilitators to Increasing Mammography Screening Rates in California’s Public Hospitals
verfasst von: Cassidy Clarity, BA
Gato Gourley, MSc
Courtney Lyles, Phd
Sara Ackerman, PhD, MPH
Margaret A. Handley, PhD, MPH
Dean Schillinger, MD
Urmimala Sarkar, MD, MPH
Joseph Conigliaro, MD, MPH, FACP
Publikationsdatum: 10.02.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3929-2

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Epiploic Appendagitis: A Benign Process at Risk of Unnecessary Hospitalization and Interventions

Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study

Capsule Commentary on Shortell et al., A Multilevel Analysis of Patient Engagement and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Care Practices of Accountable Care Organizations

Capsule Commentary on Kim et al., Disparities in Hypertension Associated with Limited English Proficiency

Breast Density Notification Legislation and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: Early Evidence from the SEER Registry