Background
Soman (pinacolyl methylphosphonofluoridate, GD) is a G-series nerve agent that rapidly and irreversibly binds to acetylcholinesterase, causing excess acetylcholine accumulation in the central and peripheral nervous systems, which results in cholinergic crisis. A consequence of this cholinergic crisis is rapid induction of status epilepticus (SE) that can continue unabated for many hours [
1]. The duration of this seizure activity increases the magnitude of neuropathology [
2,
3] with the hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus and piriform cortex being the most severely affected [
4,
5]. Although initial injury occurs rapidly, a robust neuroinflammatory response can exacerbate damage to the brain over time. Neuroinflammation is a key factor in pathology development in other models of SE [
6,
7] as well as following nerve agent-induced seizure [
8‐
11].
An early component of neuroinflammation is the recruitment and activation of circulating neutrophils to areas of injury. Neutrophil infiltration is an important step in the development of neuropathology following seizure [
6,
12,
13]. Once through the blood-brain barrier, the respiratory burst of neutrophils can exacerbate the initial injury through indiscriminate protease damage to surrounding healthy tissues [
14]. Infiltrating neutrophils are directed to and activated in injured brain regions by chemokines. For example, the chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1 or GRO KC) directs neutrophils to injured tissues [
15] and propagates the neuroinflammatory response by inducing the synthesis of acute phase response cytokines interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in those cells [
16]. Similarly, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α functions to recruit and activate granulocytes (including neutrophils) in damaged brain regions [
17‐
19]. Because inflammatory chemokines are up-regulated in many SE models [
20‐
22], these factors likely play a role in this model as well.
Most studies of neuroinflammation following seizurogenic nerve agent exposure have centered on transcript changes [
8,
23,
24] or limited protein changes [
10]. Recently, however, we have reported the upregulation of multiple acute phase cytokines in this GD model [
11]. In this study, we quantified the protein levels of the neutrophil chemoattractant and activating factors CXCL1, MIP-1α, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), using multiplex immunoassays in brain tissue lysates following GD exposure up to 72 hours after SE onset. Additionally, cell-specific chemokine expression and neutrophil infiltration were investigated in damaged brain regions (i.e. piriform cortex, hippocampus and thalamus). CXCL1 and MIP-1α concentrations were significantly increased in all three brain regions investigated, while no change was observed in G-CSF or GM-CSF. CXCL1 and MIP-1α predominantly localized to neurons and either endothelial cells (CXCL1) or microglia (MIP-1α). Expression also preceded and positively correlated to significant neutrophil infiltration in these brain regions. These data are the first to show upregulation and cellular expression of chemokines and the ensuing influx of neutrophils in damaged brain regions following GD-induced SE.
Discussion
Neuroinflammation is almost ubiquitous following brain injury, though little is known about this process following damage caused by GD-induced SE. As part of the inflammatory process, resident and systemic inflammatory cells migrate to areas of injury guided by concentration gradients of chemokines and growth factors. This study describes the temporal and regional protein changes of four neutrophil activating and chemotactic factors in the brain, the expression of significantly upregulated factors in resident brain cells, quantification of neutrophil infiltration into the brain, and the correlation between chemokine expression and neutrophil infiltration. Significant expression of two chemokines, CXCL1 and MIP-1α, immediately preceded neutrophil infiltration in brain regions damaged by SE (i.e., the piriform cortex, hippocampus and thalamus). Both chemokines were primarily expressed by neurons; however, CXCL1 was also expressed in endothelial cells, and MIP-1α was also expressed in activated microglia. These data are the first to show the temporal, regional and cellular protein expression of chemokines, consequent neutrophil infiltration and the relationship between these two events following nerve agent exposure and subsequent SE.
Of all the resident brain cell types, neurons appear most susceptible to GD-induced SE damage as shown by substantial neuronal cell death in the piriform cortex, thalamus and portions of the hippocampus [
5,
27]. Therefore, it is not surprising that neurons become the focal point of the inflammatory response. In fact, the neurons most vulnerable to GD-induced SE, including those in layer II of the piriform cortex [
28], strongly expressed both CXCL1 and MIP-1α. Injured neurons have the ability to produce chemokines to recruit and activate inflammatory cells following injury [
29‐
31], and we have now shown expression of CXCL1 and MIP-1α in the GD-induced SE model as well.
Astrocytes did not express CXCL1 or MIP-1α in any brain region despite concurrent neuronal injury. CXCL1 expression by astrocytes does occur following various central nervous system (CNS) insults [
32‐
34], and this expression appears to be dependent on neuronal damage [
35]. Similarly, MIP-1α is expressed by astrocytes in SE [
36] and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis models [
37,
38]. Though it is unknown exactly why chemokine expression in this model is incongruent with other CNS injury paradigms, it is apparent that chemokine expression is likely insult specific [
39], and neutrophil recruitment may not be the main function of astrocytes in this model or at this point in pathology progression. Further, cytokine expression is prominent in both astrocytes (IL-6) and microglia (IL-1) in this model and may function to modulate the neuroinflammatory process rather than to recruit inflammatory cells [
11].
Despite a lack of expression in most microglia, MIP-1α was expressed by a number of activated microglia and prominently expressed by those with a dystrophic morphology. MIP-1α expression by active microglia following brain injury has been previously observed [
40], though little is known about dystrophic microglia or the expression of inflammatory factors by this morphological type. It is known that dystrophic microglia appear exclusively in progressive neurodegenerative disease states such as Alzheimer's and Huntington's disease and are indicative of concurrent and subsequent neuronal degeneration [
41‐
43], a condition that is accelerated in this model. We have previously shown that another important neutrophil chemoattractant [
44] and upregulator of neutrophil infiltration endothelium adhesion molecules [
45], IL-1β, was also localized to dystrophic microglia [
11]. Therefore, dystrophic microglia appear to have a prominent role in the recruitment and activation of neutrophils following prolonged SE induced by GD.
Lastly, significant CXCL1 expression precedes a significant influx of neutrophils into vulnerable brain regions (<6 hours in the piriform cortex and hippocampus and <12 hours in the thalamus; Figures
1 &
5). A less definitive positive correlation exists for MIP-1α, likely because MIP-1α is highly pleiotropic and also modulates the chemotaxic and activation properties of other leukocyte cell types [
46,
47]. Though there is a strong positive correlation between CXCL1 concentration and consequent neutrophil influx, this relationship does not appear to be proportional. For example, while we observed the highest concentrations of CXCL1 in the hippocampus, this region had the fewest number of infiltrating neutrophils. In contrast, the piriform cortex had the lowest concentration of CXCL1 but had some of the highest numbers of infiltrating neutrophils.
Though little is known about regional differences in brain chemokine expression, there are several variables that may influence the relationship between chemokine concentration and neutrophil infiltration. First, region specific neutrophil infiltration may rely on other cytokine induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC) family members. For example, CXCL1, also known as CINC-2β, was not found to be a major contributing factor in brain neutrophil infiltration following direct IL-1β injection into the brain compared to CINC-1 and CINC-2α [
48]. It should be noted, however, that individual chemokine involvement is likely injury specific and these CINCs may not be active in this model. Second, differential IL-1β brain expression may play a role. We have previously documented regional differences in brain IL-1β concentration, an important promoter of neutrophil adhesion, in this model [
11]. No significant expression of IL-1β was observed in the hippocampus whereas significant increases in IL-1β were observed in the piriform cortex and thalamus that correspond to neutrophil influx. However, IL-1α, an IL-1 isoform that can similarly increase CXCL1 expression and cellular adhesion molecules [
49], was significantly increased and may serve a similar role as IL-1β in this model. Lastly, differential expression of CXCL1 receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, and the associated vascular cell surface glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), may account for the observed discrepancy between CXCL1 expression and neutrophil infiltration. GAGs are essential for forming chemotactic gradients [
50] and affect chemokine binding to their associated G-protein-coupled receptors [
51]. Because different chemokines bind with varying affinities to different GAGs [
50] and GAG and CXCL1 receptor expression are highly dependent on the location, type and subset of the cell [
52‐
56], varying rates of neutrophil infiltration are possibly at different neuroinflammatory foci dictated by these complex interactions.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
EAJ and RKK both participated in developing the study concept and experimental design. EAJ analyzed data, wrote the manuscript and participated in acquisition of data. TLD, MAG, CEG and AIKC acquired and analyzed data and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read, edited and approved the final manuscript.