Introduction
Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, multiple virus variants have emerged that differ from the original virus by mutations in different genes. Some variants have been shown to possess altered biological properties that increase their transmissibility and/or ability to evade pre-existing immunity after convalescence or vaccination. As a result, some SARS-CoV-2 variants have rapidly expanded on a local or global level and challenged our efforts to control the pandemic through vaccination programs and containment strategies. To quickly respond to newly emerging variants that may become future drivers of the pandemic, it is important to constantly monitor SARS-CoV-2 diversity in different regions of the world and to identify virus variants with altered biological properties. The frequency of SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein mutations is high, and the neutralizing activity of some vaccines and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against mutant South African strains is low [
1‐
3]. Mutant strains of the virus in the United Kingdom, the United States, Brazil, South Africa, and other regions have attracted widespread attention. However, few studies have focused on mutant strains in Portugal. In this study, virus strains containing the N501Y mutation in Portugal were traced. Initially discovered in December 2021, UK variants and other additional variants spread to Portugal. To further understand the biological activity of SARS-CoV-2 epidemic strains in Portugal, we used a pseudovirus system with a vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) vector to simulate the circulating viruses and analyzed the effect of mutations on transmission, infectivity, and antigenicity.
Materials and methods
Reagents
The main reagents, cells, and monoclonal antibodies used in the study are shown in Table
1.
Table 1
Cell lines and reagents
HEK-293T | Our laboratory |
Huh7 | Our laboratory |
Vero | Our laboratory |
LLC-MK2 | Our laboratory |
293T-ACE2 | Sino Biological |
mAb | Source |
03-1F9 | Beijing Biocytogen Co., Ltd. |
09-7B8 | Beijing Biocytogen Co., Ltd. |
09-4E5-1G2-2H10 | Beijing Biocytogen Co., Ltd. |
03-10D12-1C3 | Beijing Biocytogen Co., Ltd. |
03-10F9-1A2 | Beijing Biocytogen Co., Ltd. |
11D12-1 | Beijing Biocytogen Co., Ltd. |
05-9G11-1G1 | Beijing Biocytogen Co., Ltd. |
CB6 | Laboratory of Jinghua Yan |
X593 | Laboratory of Xiaoliang Xie |
HB27 | Sino Biological |
Reagent name | Source |
Lipofectamine3000 Transfection Reagent | Invitrogen |
Bright-Glo Fluorescence Detection Reagent (substrate) | Promega |
PE anti-DYKDDDDK Tag Antibody | Biolegend |
Hygromycin B | Gibco |
Mouse sera
The mouse sera used in this study were maintained in our laboratory. Expression plasmid constructs encoding the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or S1, S2, or RBD region alone were used to immunize BALB/c mice to obtain serum for the testing of mutant pseudoviruses. The BALB/c mice were divided into four groups: S1 (n = 10), S2 (n = 10), RBD (n = 10), and full-length S (n = 15). Serum samples from five mice were combined and labeled S1-1, S1-2, S2-1, S2-2, RBD-1, RBD-2, S-1, S-2, and S-3. The animal research protocol was approved by the Animal Welfare Ethical Review Committee of the National Institute of Food and Drug Control.
Plasmid construction
Mammalian codon optimization was performed on the plasmid expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (GenBank accession number: MN908947). This gene was then inserted into the eukaryotic expression vector pcDNA3.1 at the BamHI and XhoI sites and designated as WuHan-1.
A total of 14 plasmids for expression of the ACE2 receptor were constructed, including the ACE2 receptors of human (BAB40370.1), mink (QNC68911.1), dog (MT663955), cat (MT663959), pangolin (XP_017505746.1), pig (NP_001116542.1), rat (ABN80106.1), bat (KC881004.1), cow (NP_001019673.2), rabbit (MT663961), ferret (MT663957), sheep (XP_011961657.1), civet (AY881174.1), and monkey (MT663960). A FLAG tag (GACTACAGAGACGATGATAAG) was inserted at the 3' end. The 14 ACE2 sequences were codon-optimized and synthesized by General Biologicals Co., Ltd. (Taiwan). Each ACE2 sequence was inserted into the eukaryotic expression vector pRP[Exp]-EGFP-CMV at the BamHI and XhoI sites to obtain plasmids expressing the ACE2 proteins of different species.
Mutant construction
Point mutations were introduced into the WuHan-1 plasmid to construct 19 mutants: D614G, A222V+D614G, B.1.1.7, S477N+D614G, P1162R+D614G+A222V, D839Y+D614G, L176F+D614G, B.1.1.7+L216F, B.1.1.7+M740V, B.1.258, B.1.258+L1063F, B.1.258+N751Y, S477N, D839Y, L176F, L216F+D614G, M740V+D614G, L1063F+D614G, and N751Y+D614G. The point mutations were introduced as described in our previous study [
4,
5]. Briefly, PCR amplification was performed using the WuHan-1 plasmid as a template. The PCR product was digested overnight with DpnI (NEB) and used to transform competent
E. coli DH5α cells. Then, the cells were spread onto plates and incubated overnight at 37°C. A single colony was selected and sequenced to confirm the successful generation of the mutation. Primers corresponding to the mutation sites are shown in Table
2.
VSV-P-F | ATGGATAATCTCACAAAAGTTCGTGAGTATCT |
VSV-P-R | CTACAGAGAATATTTGACTCTCGCCTGATTGTACA |
D614G-F | TGCTGTACCAGGGCGTGAATTGCACCGAGGT |
D614G-R | ACCTCGGTGCAATTCACGCCCTGGTACAGCA |
M740V-F | AGCGTGGACTGCACCgtgTACATCTGCGGCGACA |
M740V-R | TGTCGCCGCAGATGTAcacGGTGCAGTCCACGCT |
L216F-F | TCTGGTGAGAGACttcCCTCAGGGCTTCAGCGCCCT |
L216F-R | AGGGCGCTGAAGCCCTGAGGgaaGTCTCTCACCAGA |
N751Y-F | ACCGAGTGCAGCtacCTGCTGCTGCAGTACGG |
N751Y-R | CCGTACTGCAGCAGCAGgtaGCTGCACTCGGT |
L1063F-F | CGCTCCACATGGCGTGGTGTTCttcCACGTGACCT |
L1063F-R | AGGTCACGTGgaaGAACACCACGCCATGTGGAGCG |
P1162R-F | AGAATCACACCAGCcgaGACGTGGACCTCGGT |
P1162R-R | ACCGAGGTCCACGTCtcgGCTGGTGTGATTCT |
A222V-F | CCTCAGGGCTTCAGCGTGCTGGAGCCTCTGGTGGA |
A222V-R | TCCACCAGAGGCTCCAGCACGCTGAAGCCCTGAGG |
D839Y-F | TTCATCAAGCAGTACGGCtatTGCCTAGGTGATA |
D839Y-R | TATCACCTAGGCAataGCCGTACTGCTTGATGAA |
L176F-F | TACGTGAGCCAGCCTTTCttcATGGACCTGGA |
L176F-R | TCCAGGTCCATgaaGAAAGGCTGGCTCACGTA |
S477N-F | TACCAGGCCGGCAATACACCGTGTAATGGCGTGGA |
S477N-R | TCCACGCCATTACACGGTGTATTGCCGGCCTGGTA |
A570D-F | CAACAATTCGGCAGAGACATCGACGACACCACAGATGCTGTAAGAGAC |
A570D-R | GTCTCTTACAGCATCTGTGGTGTCGTCGATGTCTCTGCCGAATTGTTG |
D1118H-F | ACGAGCCTCAGATCATCACCACCCACAATACCTTCGTGAGCGGCAA |
D1118H-R | TTGCCGCTCACGAAGGTATTGTGGGTGGTGATGATCTGAGGCTCGT |
69-70del-F | CGTGACCTGGTTCCACGCCATCAGCGGCACCAATGGCACCAAGAGATTC |
69-70del-R | GAATCTCTTGGTGCCATTGGTGCCGCTGATGGCGTGGAACCAGGTCACG |
N501Y-F | AGAGCTACGGCTTCCAGCCTACCTACGGCGTGGGCTACCAGCCTTACAG |
N501Y-R | CTGTAAGGCTGGTAGCCCACGCCGTAGGTAGGCTGGAAGCCGTAGCTCT |
N501Y-F | AGAGCTACGGCTTCCAGCCTACCTACGGCGTGGGCTACCAGCCTTACAG |
N501Y-R | CTGTAAGGCTGGTAGCCCACGCCGTAGGTAGGCTGGAAGCCGTAGCTCT |
P681H-F | CTACCAGACCCAGACCAATAGCCACAGAAGAGCCAGAAGCGTGGCCAGCC |
P681H-R | GGCTGGCCACGCTTCTGGCTCTTCTGTGGCTATTGGTCTGGGTCTGGTAG |
S982A-F | TACTCAACGACATCCTGGCGAGACTGGACAAGGTGGAGGCCGA |
S982A-R | TCGGCCTCCACCTTGTCCAGTCTCGCCAGGATGTCGTTGAGTA |
T716I-F | CAATAATAGCATCGCCATCCCTATCAATTTCACCATCAGCGTGACCAC |
T716I-R | GTGGTCACGCTGATGGTGAAATTGATAGGGATGGCGATGCTATTATTG |
145del-F | GACCCTTTCCTGGGTGTTTATCATAAGAACAACAAGAGCTGGATGG |
145del-R | CCATCCAGCTCTTGTTGTTCTTATGATAAACACCCAGGAAAGGGTC |
N439K-F | CTGCGTGATCGCGTGGAACTCTAAGAACCTGGACTCGAAAGTTGGAGGC |
N439K-R | GCCTCCAACTTTCGAGTCCAGGTTCTTAGAGTTCCACGCGATCACGCAG |
Preparation of ACE2-overexpressing cells
Cells expressing the ACE2 receptors of different species were prepared. Lipofectamine 3000 transfection reagent and 30 μg of receptor plasmid were used to transfect HEK-293T cells in T75 flasks, yielding ACE2 receptor-overexpressing cells. After culturing in the same medium that was used for HEK-293T cells at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 h, the expression of the labeled ACE2 gene on the cell surface was evaluated by flow cytometry. Approximately 1 × 106 cells per tube were treated with 1 μg of PE-labeled anti-labeled antibody (biological preparation) per mL.
Preparation of pseudoviruses
SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviruses with spike mutations were constructed as described previously [
4,
5]. The day before transfection, the concentration of HEK-293T cells was adjusted to 5–7 × 10
5 cells/mL, followed by incubation overnight at 37°C and 5% CO
2. When the cells reached 70%–90% confluence, the culture medium was removed by aspiration, and the cells were infected with 15 mL of VSV-ΔG-G* pseudovirus with a concentration of 7 × 10
4 TCID
50/mL. At the same time, cells were transfected with 30 μg of the S protein expression plasmid using Lipofectamine 3000 and cultured in an incubator at 37°C and 5% CO
2. After 4–6 h, the cell culture medium was discarded, the cells were washed twice with PBS containing 1% FBS, and 15 mL of fresh medium was added to the T75 cell culture flask, which was placed in a 37°C incubator with 5% CO
2 for 24 h. The supernatant (containing SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus) was then collected.
Quantification of pseudoviruses
Pseudovirus RNA was extracted using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). An RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen) was used to obtain viral DNA by reverse transcription. RT-PCR was performed using TBGreen premixed ExTaqII (Takara). The virus copy number was calculated using the P protein gene plasmid of VSV as a standard. Primer sequences are shown in Table
2.
Detection of infection
Cells (3 × 104/100 µL) were added to each well of a 96-well cell culture plate, followed by the addition of 100 µL of the pseudovirus. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2, chemiluminescence was monitored.
The volume of the supernatant in each well was adjusted to 100 µL, followed by the addition of 100 µL of luciferase substrate and cell lysis buffer (PerkinElmer, Fremont, CA, USA). After 2 min, 150 µL of the lysate was transferred to an opaque 96-well plate. A PerkinElmer EnSight plate reader was used to detect the luminescence signal, and data were recorded as relative luminescence units (RLU). The virus copy number calculated as described above was used to convert the RLU value to the copy number.
Neutralization test
Luciferase gene expression was measured to determine the inhibitory effect of mAbs and serum on pseudovirus entry. The sample was serially diluted by a factor of three (initial dilution, 30-fold), with a total of six dilutions, and 50 μL of the virus suspension was added to each well. Each 96-well plate included six virus control wells (no antibody/serum) and six cell control wells (no virus/antibody). The 96-well plate was incubated at 37°C for 1 h, followed by the addition of 3 × 10
4 Huh7 cells (100µL) to each well. After incubation for 24 h at 37°C and 5% CO
2, luminescence was measured. The Reed–Muench method was used to calculate the 50% effective concentration (EC
50) [
4].
Immunization of mice
For protein immunization, mice were inoculated subcutaneously with purified SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein, S1 region peptide, or S2 region peptide and alum adjuvant (20 μg of protein), three times at 7-day intervals. Blood samples were collected 7 days after the third immunization. Ten mice were immunized with each protein, and serum samples from five mice in each group were pooled for analysis.
For plasmid immunization, mice were inoculated intramuscularly by electroporation with SARS-COV-2 S full-length plasmid (50 μg), three times at 7-day intervals. Blood samples were collected 7 days after the third immunization. A total of 15 mice were immunized, and serum samples from five mice were pooled for analysis.
Discussion
Coronaviruses have the longest genomes among RNA viruses and are highly prone to mutations. Because of the global health impact of SARS-CoV-2, real-time monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 mutations is essential. The need for biosafety level three laboratories, the infection risk for operators, and the shortage of experimental equipment have limited the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. In this study, the VSV system was used to construct pseudoviruses harboring high-frequency SARS-CoV-2 mutations circulating in Portugal, including D614G, A222V+D614G, B.1.1.7, D839Y+D614G, P1162R+D614G+A222V, S477N+D614G, and L176F+D614G, as well as mutations found in UK strains, including B.1.1.7+L216F, B.1.1.7+M740V, B.1.258, B.1.258+L1063F, and B.1.258+N751Y. The infectivity and antigenicity of the constructed pseudoviruses were analyzed.
There was no significant difference in infectivity between the Portuguese high-frequency mutants and the D614G mutant pseudovirus (a ratio >4 was defined as a significant difference). Previous studies have shown that compared with D614G, the infectivity of B.1.1.7 in cells containing the hACE2 receptor showed no significant difference, which is consistent with the results of this study [
6]. In the current study, the infectivity of B.1.1.7 did not change significantly after addition of the M740V or L216F mutation. When cells overexpressing receptors of different species were infected with the constructed pseudoviruses, the infectivity of all mutant pseudoviruses was higher in cells harboring the mouse ACE2 receptor. This is consistent with the results of Gu and colleagues [
7].
During the ongoing pandemic, the emergence of various SARS-CoV-2 mutants has become a major issue. Mutants may have a stronger transmission capacity or the ability to evade neutralizing monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. This may reduce the protective effects of vaccines or neutralizing mAbs developed based on the original genotypes. Nie and colleagues found that the neutralization effect of an antiserum against the South African epidemic strain was reduced against the 501Y.V2 variant [
4]. We speculate that established vaccines prepared against WuHan-01 may have reduced neutralizing activity against current strains circulating in Portugal. Because the mutation sites in the epidemic strains circulating in Portugal are located in different regions of the spike protein, we used the SARS-CoV-2 spike full-length plasmid and RBD, S1, and S2 peptides to immunize mice, and serum was collected. In this analysis, serum neutralizing activity did not differ among the pseudoviruses.
Interestingly, for the majority of high-frequency mutant viruses circulating in Portugal (i.e., A222V+D614G, B.1.1.7, D839Y+D614G, P1162R+D614G+A222V, S477N+D614G, and L176F+D614G, but not B.1.1.7 and S477N+D614G), immune escape from the mAbs used in this study was not observed. The antigenicity of B.1.1.7 and derived viruses with combined mutations (M740V+B.1.1.7 and L216F+B.1.1.7), and B.1.258 and derived viruses with combined mutations (B.1.258+L1063F and B.1.258+N751Y) differed. The mutant viruses exhibited immune escape with MAbs 03-1F9, 2H10, 03-10D12-1C3, 03-10F9-1A2, 11D12-1, CB6, and HB27. The epitopes of 03-10D12-1C3 and CB6 include amino acid 501 [
8]. The pseudoviruses that exhibited immune escape all contained the N501Y mutation, and the results of this experiment were consistent with the expected results. The epitopes for the other mAbs are still unknown, but we speculate that the mutation at position 501 may be the cause of immune escape. The neutralizing activity of various RBD mAbs was significantly reduced. Previous studies have shown that the N501Y mutation affects the antigenicity of the S protein. Because this site is located in the RBD region, most mAbs are directed against the RBD. Therefore, pseudoviruses containing the N501Y mutation will undergo immune escape or a decrease in the protective effects of the mAb will be observed [
6,
9,
10]. The mutant virus B.1.258 (containing the mutations N439K and Δ69-70Del) also exhibits immune escape from the mAb HB27 [
11]. Although the specific epitope of HB27 is unknown, it is predicted to be concentrated within the RBD region [
12], potentially explaining the observed immune escape by S477N+D614G, and the corresponding single point mutant S477N showed immune escape from mAb 09-7B8. Nie and coworkers found that the 09-7B8 epitope was located in the RBD region [
12], which is consistent with the results of this study. At present, the S477N mutation accounts for 5.0% of mutant strains circulating in Portugal. With the exception of X593 and 05-9G11-1G1, immune escape by individual mutant strains was observed with all of the mAbs evaluated in this study. To ensure the protective effects of vaccines, cocktail therapies are recommended against SARS-CoV-2 mutant strains [
13,
14]. We should also continue to monitor SARS-CoV-2 mutations in different regions in real time, and select mAbs for the corresponding mutations to ensure immune protection according to the epidemic situation regarding mutant strains in different regions. It is vital that epidemic prevention and control measures are adjusted in real time.
Our laboratory has studied mutant strains from South Africa, the United Kingdom, and Brazil, and this study extends our analysis to mutant strains from Portugal. The results are important for SARS-CoV-2 mutation tracking and provide data for SARS-CoV-2 epidemic prevention and control.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.