Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease that affects predominantly multiple peripheral joints. Although the exact mechanisms that contribute to the pathogenesis are still largely unknown, it is well accepted that numerous inflammatory cells such as T and B cells, fibroblast-like synoviocytes, antigen-presenting cells, and their extensive production of proinflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-15, IL-17, and IL-18, are implicated [
1].
IL-32, a recently described cytokine produced mainly by NK cells, T lymphocytes, epithelial cells, and blood monocytes stimulated by IL-2 or IFN-γ, has recently emerged as an important player in innate immune responses [
2,
3]. This proinflammatory cytokine is a strong inducer of other proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2) [
3‐
5]. More recently, it was shown that IL-32 increases IFN-γ production by PBMCs [
6,
7]. IL-32 might play an important role in inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases and RA [
8‐
10]. IL-32 is highly expressed in RA synovial tissues but not in OA synovial biopsies. Microarray studies in cultured FLSs obtained from patients with RA have shown that the IL-32 gene is one of the most prominently expressed in RA FLSs [
11]. Synovial expression of IL-32 is strongly correlated with that of TNF-α and IL-1β but also with the severity of joint inflammation.
Current evidence indicates that FLSs, which constitute the synovial lining, are key actors in pannus formation and the subsequent destruction of cartilage and bone in the joint [
12]. Activation of FLSs may be linked either to the cytokine environment, to cell-to-cell contacts, or to interactions between pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs). Bacterial products, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or peptidoglycan, are known to activate FLSs by interacting with PRRs present on these cells [
13,
14]. A large number of PRRs, such as TLR2, TLR4, and TLR3, are expressed by FLSs, and their expression is increased in response to inflammatory stimuli [
15,
16].
FLSs exert a pro-inflammatory activity, essentially by synthesizing cytokines, chemokines, prostanoids, and nitric oxide (NO) [
12]. Secretion by FLSs of some cytokines, like IL-6, IL-8, and B-cell-activating factor is regulated by TNF-α, IFN-γ, and PAMPS [
17,
18]. We therefore investigated the effect of innate immune stimulation by ligands of TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, and cytokines such as TNF-α and IFN-γ, on IL-32 expression by FLSs.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Human FLSs were isolated from synovial tissues from four different RA and OA (osteoarthritis) patients at the time of knee-joint arthroscopic synovectomy, as described previously [
19]. The diagnosis conformed to the revised criteria of the American College of Rheumatology [
20]. Normal FLSs were isolated from synovial tissues obtained with arthroscopic biopsy. Informed consent was provided according to the Declaration of Helsinki and obtained from all patients. Approval by the ethical committee of the Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg was obtained. FLS cultures were made as previously described [
21]. Experiments were performed between the third and the ninth passages. Cell number and cell viability were checked by the MTT test, as described elsewhere [
22].
Stimulation of cells
FLSs (106 cells) were stimulated with 2 ml of medium alone or medium containing IFN-γ (0.1 ng/ml), TNF-α (10 ng/ml) (R&D Systems, Lille, France), LPS from Salmonella abortus equi (Sigma, St. Quentin Fallavier, France) (1 μg/ml), BLP (EMC Microcollections GMBH, Tübigen, Germany) (1 μg/ml), and poly I:C (Invivogen, Toulouse, France) (10 μg/ml). After a 4- or 24-h incubation period, total RNA was extracted by using TRIzol according to the manufacturer's instructions. FLS (2 × 105 cells) were stimulated with 1 ml of complete medium containing the various activators for 24 h. An IL-32α- specific ELISA test was obtained from Biolegend (Ozyme, Saint Quentin en Yveline, France). IL-32 release was measured with ELISA with the monoclonal antibody KU32-56 as a capture antibody and the biotinylated monoclonal antibody KU32-52 as the detection antibody, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Biolegend, Ozyme, Saint Quentin en Yveline, France). The IL-6-specific ELISA test was from R&D Systems.
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA isolated from FLSs was reverse transcribed by using the First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions (In Vitrogen). Real-time quantitative RT-PCR was performed in a total volume of 20 μl by using a SensiMix Plus SYBR (Quantace; Corbett Life Science, Sydney, Australia) and gene-specific primers:
IL-32: 5'-TGAGGAGCAGCACCCAGAGC-3'
and 5'-CCGTAGGACTGGAAAGAGGA-3'
IL-32α: 5'-CTGAAGGCCCGAATGCACCA-3'
and 5'-CCGTAGGACTTGTCACAAAA-3'
IL-32β: 5'-CTGAAGGCCCGAATGCACCAG-3'
and 5'-GCAAAGGTGGTGTCAGTATC-3'
IL-32γ: 5'-TGACATGAAGAAGCTGAAGGC-3'
and 5'-CATGACCTTGTCACAAAAGCTC-3'
IL-32δ: 5'-TCTCTGATGACATGAAGAAGCT-3'
and 5'-GCAAAGGTGGTGTCAGTATC-3'
GAPDH: 5'-GGTGAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGA-3'
and 5'-GAGGGATCTCGCTCGCTCCTGGAAGA-3'
IRF-1: 5'-AAAAGGAGCCAGATCCCAAGA-3'
and 5'-CATCCGGTACACTCGCACAG-3'
IRF-3: 5'-AGCAGAGGACCGGAGCAA-3'
and 5'-AGAGGTGTCTGGCTGGGAAA-3'
IL-32 isoforms were reverse transcribed and amplified. Amplification products were detected as an increased fluorescent signal of SYBRGreen during the amplification cycles. Results were obtained by using SDS Software (Perkin Elmer) and evaluated by using Excel (Microsoft). Melting-curve analysis was performed to assess the specificity of PCR products. Results were normalized to GAPDH and expressed as the fold change compared with samples from cells incubated in medium.
Immunostaining and confocal microscopy
FLSs (5 × 104 cells/well; IbiTreat slides) were stimulated with medium containing the various activators. After a 16-h incubation-period, cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde, 4%, at 4°C, washed with PBS, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X100 in PBS, pH 7.4, for 10 min. FLSs were incubated with goat anti-IL-32 antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) overnight at 4°C and then with FITC rabbit anti-goat antibodies for 1 h at 25°C. Fluorescence was analyzed with confocal microscopy.
Detection of cellular IL-32α
FLSs (2 × 104 cells) were seeded into 96-well plates and then incubated for 16 h and 24 h in 200 μl of complete medium containing the different activators. Cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, pH 7.4, for 20 min. Free aldehyde groups were quenched with NH4Cl, 50 mM, in PBS, pH 7.4, for 20 min. Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation in PBS containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% saponin for 30 min at 37°C. The cells were then incubated with biotinylated anti-IL-32α antibodies (Biolegend; Ozyme, Saint Quentin en Yveline, France) for 2 h. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm.
Transfections
The siRNA duplexes used in our study were designed to target sequences for human
IRF-1 [GenBank: NM_002198] gene. Four selected siRNA oligonucleotides consisting of sequences of 21 nucleotides were supplied by Dharmacon (Perbio Science, France). Transient transfection of FLSs with siRNA (100 n
M) was performed by using the Human Dermal Fibroblast Nucleofactor kit from Amaxa, as previously described [
23]. FLSs were then plated in 24-well plates (2 × 10
5 cells per well). All assays were performed 48 h after transfection. The control was carried out with the Dharmacon siControl nontargeting siRNA consisting of a four-oligonucleotide pool. Transfection efficiency was evaluated with the PmaxGFP control vector.
Statistical analysis
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. The significance of the results was analyzed with Wilcoxon's test. The P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Discussion
The synovial expression of IL-32, a potent proinflammatory cytokine, is increased in RA and correlated with disease activity [
10]. A recent study demonstrated that resident cells of joints, FLSs, which secrete proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8 but not TNF-α or IL-1β, secrete high levels of IL-32 [
26,
27]. The expression of cytokines by FLSs is regulated, at least partly, by innate immunity. However, little is known regarding the innate-immune-related regulation of IL-32 by FLSs. We demonstrated that proinflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of RA, as well as stimulation of various TLR receptors, result in the expression of IL-32 by FLSs, key target and resident cells of RA. Moreover, a synergistic interaction between IFN-γ and PAMPs for IL-32 induction was observed. We demonstrated that synergy between TNF-α and IFN-γ was related to the induction of IRF-1.
We first confirmed studies from Mun
et al. [
26] and Shoda
et al. [
27], demonstrating that activation of FLSs with TNF-α caused IL-32 synthesis and release. The ability of IFN-γ to induce IL-32 production in epithelial cells and monocytes was previously reported by Kim
et al. [
3]. IFN-γ is produced in RA by either by CD4
+ T cells, or by subsets of CD8
+ CD40L T cells or CD4
+T cells, which express KIR2DS2 and NKG2D receptors. Immunohistochemical studies have shown the reinforced expression of Stat proteins in rheumatoid synovial tissues, which suggests the importance of the IFN-γ/JAK/Stat pathway [
28,
29]. Moreover, under most conditions in RA, IFN-γ release correlates with TNF-α production [
30]. We therefore assessed the role of IFN-γ in IL-32 synthesis and secretion by FLSs. Exposure to IFN-γ increased IL-32 mRNA transcription and protein release, as demonstrated for TNF-α. In RA FLSs, IFN-γ is unlikely to function as a direct inducer of proinflammatory cytokines synthesis, such as that of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 [
17]. Thus, these data suggest that IFN-γ, by means of IL-32 release, might play an important role in the amplification of inflammatory reactions in RA.
An important issue relevant to this study is represented by the induction of IL-32 mRNA transcription in response to LPS, BLP, and poly I:C. This effect was particularly significant in response to BLP and poly I:C at 4 h, with a decrease at 24 h corresponding to a kinetic different from the one obtained with IFN-γ and TNF-α. However, this is frequently observed with certain cytokines such as TNF-α. These findings are not concordant with results from Netea's group [
7] on activated PBMCs, showing that TLR2 and TLR3 ligands did not induce an increase in IL-32 release. In keeping with their results, we also observed that LPS was a moderate inducer of IL-32 expression in RA FLSs.
IL-32 is transcribed as six alternative splice variants. Splice variants are quite unusual for cytokines, but they exist in other cytokines such as IL-15 and IL-1F7. The four spliced variants are expressed in TNF-α-stimulated RA FLSs, but their respective roles in RA pathogenesis remain to be determined [
31]. In this study, we observed that β, γ, and δ isoforms were transcribed in FLSs activated with either TNF-α, IFN-γ, BLP, or poly I:C. The β and δ isoforms were moderately induced by LPS.
Interestingly, we demonstrated that IL-32α mRNA is upregulated in response to TNF-α and poly I:C and that this variant is only cell associated in FLSs and never released. This is in agreement with a study in PBMCs showing that IL-32α expression is upregulated in response to
Mycobacterium tuberculosis and remained cell associated [
7]. This effect might depend on cell-type, because IL-32α can be released by some epithelial cells lines in response to IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-1β [
9].
IFN-γ and TNF-α are cytokines characterized by complex reciprocal effects. They synergize to increase collagen synthesis by dermal fibroblasts or glycosaminoglycans synthesis by lung fibroblasts, and they are tightly involved in the inflammatory response during septic shock [
32,
33]. An important result is that IRF-1 is required for the synthesis of IL-32 by TNF-α. Its role in IFN-γ signaling is well known, but not in TNF-α signaling. We also showed that this effect is specific, as IRF-1 does not play any role in IL-6 synthesis. Of note in the present study, TNF-α exerts a synergistic effect on IFN-γ- induced IL-32 mRNA, which is related to IRF-1 upregulation. The expression of IL-32 mRNA was considerably reduced (70%) after inhibition of IRF-1 in FLSs activated with a combination of TNF-α and INF-γ.
Unexpectedly, release of IL-32 protein, was not increased after TNF-α and IFN-γ stimulation, but the intracellular expression of the IL-32α was upregulated. Similar results were obtained in epithelial cells, in which a combination of TNF-α and INF-γ increased IL-32α expression [
9]. Knowledge of the role of intracellular IL-32 is still limited, but IL-32α may play a role as a cytoplasmic protein. Recently it was demonstrated that IL-32α acts synergistically with NOD-specific peptidoglycans for the release of inflammatory cytokines [
5].
Concomitant stimulation with IFN-γ and other TLR ligands also increased IL-32 mRNA expression and protein release, but the mechanism involved in these synergies remains to be identified. We demonstrated that they are not related to IRF-1, converse to the synergy between IFN-γ and TNF-α. Thus, these concomitant stimulations did not upregulate IRF-1, and IRF-1 silencing did not inhibit the synergy between IFN-γ and PAMPs for IL-32 induction. A hallmark of tissue injury is the turnover of extracellular matrix components, which can subsequently act as DAMPs. Increased accumulation of fragmented hyaluronan was noticed in several autoimmune diseases. Hyaluronan fragments signal through TLR2 and TLR4 in macrophages, and tenascin-C activates TLR4 in macrophages and FLSs [
34,
35]. Moreover, RNA release from necrotic cells acts as and endogenous TLR3 ligand for the stimulation of proinflammatory cytokines release [
36]. Therefore, our data raise the possibility that triggers, including bacterial components, of endogenous ligands may promote IL-32 synthesis and release by activating TLR pathways.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
GA and LS designed and performed all experiments and drafted the manuscript. EC and ME assisted in designing the study. JS conceived the study. JEG edited the manuscript. DW conceived the study and drafted and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.