Interferon regulatory factor (IRF) 3 is critical for the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

EAE was actively induced in 8- to 12-week-old female C57BL/6 mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and irf3 ^−/− mice by subcutaneous injection of 150 μg of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG_35–55) in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) medium containing 5 mg/ml Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Bordetella pertussis toxin (PT) was administered intraperitoneally (200 ng/mouse) on day 0 and day 2. To adoptively transfer EAE, C57BL/6 or irf3 ^−/− mice were immunised subcutaneously with 200 μg of MOG_35–55 in CFA medium at four sites on the back. Mice were sacrificed after 9 to 12 days, and their lymph nodes and spleens were retrieved. Cells were cultured (spleens and lymph nodes combined) at a density of 8 × 10⁶ cells/ml in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS) and penicillin-streptomycin, L-glutamine, 2-mercaptoethanol, 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid and sodium pyruvate in 150 × 25–mm Petri dishes. Cells were cultured for 3 days with IL-23 (20 ng/ml) at 37°C recovered, and CD4⁺ cells were purified with anti-CD4-conjugated magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Surrey, UK). Cells were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and 5 × 10⁶ cells were injected via the tail vein into recipient mice. PT was injected intraperitoneally (200 ng/injection) on day 0 and day 2. Mice were scored daily for clinical signs of disease according to the following scale: partial limp tail, 0.5; full limp tail, 1; limp tail and waddling gait, 1.5; paralysis of one hindlimb, 2; paralysis of one hindlimb and partial paralysis of other hindlimb, 2.5; paralysis of both hindlimbs, 3; ascending paralysis, 3.5; paralysis of trunk, 4; moribund, 4.5; death, 5. Cumulative scores were calculated by adding together all daily scores for an individual mouse to yield a single cumulative score value for each mouse. All studies were performed with the approval of the institutional animal care and use committee of Thomas Jefferson University (Philadelphia, PA, USA) or in compliance with the UK Home Office and approved by the Queen’s University Ethical Review Committee.

Spinal cords were removed from the mice after transcardial perfusion with PBS. Mononuclear cells were isolated by Percoll gradient centrifugation. Pooled cells were cultured for 4 hours in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS and stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (50 ng/ml), ionomycin (500 ng/ml) and GolgiPlug protein transport inhibitor (1 μg/10⁶ cells; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

Spleens were harvested from wild-type (WT) and irf3 ^−/− mice, and single-cell suspensions were prepared following erythrocyte lysis. Cells were cultured at a density of 2 × 10⁶ cells/ml in X-VIVO 15 medium (Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA) or Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium and activated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies or with MOG_35–55 (25 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of the following cytokines and antibodies for 3 days as indicated: transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) (2 ng/ml), IL-6 (20 ng/ml), TNF-α (10 ng/ml), IL-1β (10 ng/ml), IL-23 (10 ng/ml), IL-12 (10 ng/ml) and anti-IFN-γ (10 μg/ml) for 3 days. CD4⁺ and CD4⁻ cells were purified prior to culture by immunomagnetic separation (Miltenyi Biotec) and cultured in various combinations as indicated.

Flow cytometric analysis of splenocytes and mononuclear cells from the CNS was performed as previously described [18]. Briefly, cells were washed and blocked with anti-CD16/anti-CD32 antibodies. Blocked cells were stained for 20 minutes in the dark with fluorescence-labelled antibodies to a range of cell surface markers (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA). For intracellular staining, cells were washed, fixed and permeabilised using FIX & PERM cell permeabilisation reagents (Caltag Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Cells were intracellularly stained for IL-17 and IFN-γ. Data were acquired on a FACSAria or FACSCanto system (BD Biosciences) and analysed using FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA).

Splenocytes from EAE experiments were cultured for 72 hours ex vivo with MOG_35–55 (25 μg/ml) or anti-CD3/anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml) at a density of 2 × 10⁶ cells/ml in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS, penicillin-streptomycin, L-glutamine and nonessential amino acids. Supernatant cytokine concentrations from all splenocyte cultures were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IL-17; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Splenocytes were cultured for 48 hours with MOG_35–55 (25 μg/ml) or anti-CD3/anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml) at a density of 2 × 10⁶ cells/ml in X-VIVO 15 medium. T cell proliferation was measured by [³H]thymidine incorporation as previously described [19].

Clinical scores were tested for statistical significance by comparing areas under the curve for each animal and comparing groups with a nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Cytokine production and proliferative responses of WT and irf3 ^−/− mice were compared using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test.

To investigate the role of IRF3 in CNS autoimmune inflammation, we induced EAE in WT and irf3 ^−/− mice with MOG_35–55 in CFA medium. Surprisingly, we consistently observed significantly less severe disease in irf3 ^−/− mice (Figure 1A). Disease incidence was also significantly lower in irf3 ^−/− groups (Table 1), as were maximal and cumulative clinical scores in five independent experiments (Figures 1B and 1C). These data indicate that IRF3 contributes to the pathogenesis of EAE.

To investigate potential roles of IRF3 in EAE pathogenesis, we examined CNS inflammatory infiltrates. We observed fewer total cells in pooled spinal cords of irf3 ^−/− mice with EAE than in their WT counterparts (Figure 2A). We analysed infiltrates by flow cytometry and observed slightly lower proportions of both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ cells in the CNS of irf3 ^−/− mice (Figure 2B). Given the central role for CD4⁺ T cells in EAE pathogenesis, we examined the helper T cell subsets in the CNS infiltrate. We observed a lower proportion of both Th1 (CD4⁺IFN-γ⁺) and Th17 (CD4⁺IL-17⁺) cells, as well as CD4⁺ cells, producing both IFN-γ and IL-17 in irf3 ^−/− mice (Figure 2C).

We next examined the peripheral immune response in spleens of immunised WT and irf3 ^−/− mice. We observed significantly lower proliferative responses to polyclonal stimulation in splenocytes of irf3 ^−/− mice (Figure 3A). There was also a trend towards reduced antigen-specific proliferation to MOG_35–55 (Figure 3A). We next examined cytokine production in splenocytes activated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 or with MOG_35–55. Expression of IL-17 was significantly lower in splenocytes from irf3 ^−/− mice that were polyclonally activated or activated with MOG_35–55 (Figure 3B), suggesting that IRF3 may play a role in IL-17 production by T cells.

As both Th1 and Th17 cells were found at lower frequencies in the CNS of irf3 ^−/− mice with EAE than in the WT mice (Figure 2C), we investigated the impact of IRF3 deficiency on Th1 and Th17 differentiation in vitro. Consistently, IRF3 deficiency resulted in increased proportions of Th1 cells (CD4⁺IFN-γ⁺) in all conditions tested (Figure 4A). Conversely, proportions of Th17 cells (CD4⁺IL-17⁺) were lower in irf3 ^−/− cultures than in WT cultures in Th17-polarised cultures (Figure 4A), the only condition in which robust IL-17 expression was observed (TGF β + IL-6 + IL-1β + anti-IFN-γ). These findings demonstrate that IRF3 mediates helper T cell polarisation with opposing supportive and inhibitory effects on Th17 and Th1 differentiation, respectively. Thus, although proportions of both Th1 and Th17 subsets were reduced in the CNS of mice with EAE (Figure 2C), it is likely that reduced Th17 development was a limiting factor in the development of EAE in irf3 ^−/− mice. Of note, certain Th17 polarisation experiments included neutralising anti-IFN-γ antibody to ensure that differences were not due to the observed increase in IFN-γ production in the absence of IRF3 (Figure 4A). We also examined additional Th17-polarising cytokine cocktails that support de novo differentiating (TGF-β + IL-6 + IL-1β + TNF-α) and differentiated (IL-23) Th17 cells, and we consistently observed less IL-17 production in IRF3-deficient cultures (Figure 4B). These data provide strong evidence that IRF3 is involved in Th17 cell development and function.

To investigate the role of IRF3 specifically in Th17-cell pathogenicity, we used a Th17-biased model of adoptively transferred EAE. WT and irf3 ^−/− donors were immunised with MOG_35–55 in CFA medium, and peripheral lymphoid organs were harvested and reactivated with antigen in vitro in the presence of exogenous IL-23. CD4⁺ cells were purified and transferred intravenously to naive recipient WT mice. Strikingly, irf3 ^−/− CD4⁺ cells failed to induce EAE in any recipient animal in three independent experiments (Figure 4C and Table 2). These findings demonstrate a key role for IRF3 in the pathogenicity of Th17 cells in EAE. Interestingly, as purified CD4⁺ T cells (WT or irf3 ^−/−) were transferred to WT recipients, the findings from this study could have pointed towards a central role for direct, T-cell intrinsic IRF3 activity in influencing Th17 differentiation and pathogenicity. However, transfer of WT CD4⁺ cells to irf3 ^−/− recipients also failed to induce clinical EAE in any animals in two replicate experiments (Figure 4C and Table 2), suggesting that T-cell extrinsic mechanisms are also involved in the lack of disease observed in IRF3-deficient recipients of WT CD4⁺ T cells.

Thus, we sought to address whether CD4⁺ T cell intrinsic or extrinsic IRF3 activity influenced Th17 differentiation. Splenocytes and lymph nodes from WT and irf3 ^−/− mice were harvested 7 days after immunisation with MOG_35–55. CD4⁺ and CD4⁻ fractions were prepared by immunomagnetic purification and co-cultured in combinations in which IRF3 deficiency was restricted to CD4⁺ cells, CD4⁻ cells, all cells or none. Cultures were reactivated with MOG_35–55 in Th17-polarising conditions. Strikingly, IL-17 production was impaired when all cells were deficient in IRF3 and when CD4⁻ cells were deficient in IRF3, but not when only CD4⁺ cells lacked IRF3 (Figure 4D). These data show that, during antigen activation of CD4⁺ T cells, IRF3 activity in non-CD4⁺ T cells is required for maximal Th17 responses.

The findings of these studies are surprising, considering that type I IFN has been found to be protective in EAE in studies of IFN-α/β receptor–deficient mice and IFN-β-deficient mice [15‐17]. Furthermore, we have previously shown that activation of TLR3 with polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid, which signals via IRF3, suppresses relapsing–remitting EAE in SJL mice [20]. This was also shown in chronic EAE by Tzima et al. [13]. However, these paradoxical findings may be explained in part by findings reported by Axtell et al. [21], who showed that, though IFN-β suppressed EAE in a Th1 model, the severity of EAE in an IL-23-driven Th17 model was in fact exacerbated by IFN-β. As signalling through IRF3 results in IFN-β production, IRF3 deficiency may abrogate such an exacerbating effect of IFN-β, particularly in IL-23-driven autoreactive T cells. In addition, Al-Salleeh and Petro have shown that the IL-23p19 promoter contains a binding site for IRF3 [22], and Smith et al. have reported increased IRF3 binding to the IL-23p19 promoter in monocytes taken from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus [23]. In a recent study of the inhibition of IL-23 by morphine, Ma et al. reported inhibition of IRF3 phosphorylation and suggested that this may underlie the observed inhibition of IL-23 [24]. Of note, however, we observed impaired IL-17 responses in cultures supplemented with IL-23; thus, a lack of IRF3-driven IL-23 does not completely explain the decreased Th17 responses in our studies. In addition to recent discoveries pertaining to IL-23, IRF3 has been shown to inhibit Th1 responses by binding to the Il12b promoter and negatively regulating Il12b expression [25]. Indeed, irf3 ^−/− dendritic cells infected with vesicular stomatitis virus induced enhanced Th1 responses in naive syngeneic recipients associated with increased Ifng expression [25]. Similarly, in our present study, we observed enhanced Th1 differentiation during in vitro T cell activation in non-polarised and Th1- and Th17-polarising conditions.

It is tempting to speculate that such enhanced Th1 development in the absence of IRF3 inhibited Th17 development in our cultures. However, it is noteworthy that neutralisation of IFN-γ in our cultures did not restore Th17 polarisation in irf3 ^−/− cultures to levels of WT cells.