The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-018-9734-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Healthy eating, physical activity and smoking interventions for low-income groups may have small, positive effects. Identifying effective intervention components could guide intervention development. This study investigated which content and delivery components of interventions were associated with increased healthy behavior in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for low-income adults.
Data from a review showing intervention effects in 35 RCTs containing 45 interventions with 17,000 participants were analysed to assess associations with behavior change techniques (BCTs) and delivery/context components from the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist. The associations of 46 BCTs and 14 delivery/context components with behavior change (measures of healthy eating, physical activity and smoking cessation) were examined using random effects subgroup meta-analyses. Synergistic effects of components were examined using classification and regression trees (meta-CART) analyses based on both fixed and random effects assumptions.
For healthy eating, self-monitoring, delivery through personal contact, and targeting multiple behaviors were associated with increased effectiveness. Providing feedback, information about emotional consequences, or using prompts and cues were associated with reduced effectiveness. In synergistic analyses, interventions were most effective without feedback, or with self-monitoring excluding feedback. More effective physical activity interventions included behavioral practice/rehearsal or instruction, focussed solely on physical activity or took place in home/community settings. Information about antecedents was associated with reduced effectiveness. In synergistic analyses, interventions were most effective in home/community settings with instruction. No associations were identified for smoking.
This study identified BCTs and delivery/context components, individually and synergistically, linked to increased and reduced effectiveness of healthy eating and physical activity interventions. The identified components should be subject to further experimental study to help inform the development effective behavior change interventions for low-income groups to reduce health inequalities.
Stamatakis E. Obesity, eating and physical activity. In: Bajekal M, Osborne V, Yar M, Meltzer M, editors. Focus on health London. London: Office for National Statistics/Palgrave Macmillan; 2006. p. 47–61.
Scottish Government. Equally well: report of the ministerial task force on health inequalities. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office; 2008.
Gruer L, Hart CL, Gordon DS, et al. Effect of tobacco smoking on survival of men and women by social position: a 28 year cohort study. BMJ. 2009;338:480. CrossRef
Hiscock R, Judge K, Bauld L. Social inequalities in quitting smoking: what factors mediate the relationship between socioeconomic position and smoking cessation? J Public Health. 2011;33:39–47. CrossRef
White M, Adams J, Heywood P. How and why do interventions that increase health overall widen inequalities within populations? In: Barbones S, editor. Health, inequality and public health. Bristol: Policy Press; 2009. p. 65–81.
Avenell A, Broom J, Brown T, et al. Systematic review of the long-term effects and economic consequences of treatments for obesity and implications for health improvement. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1–182. CrossRef
Orwin RG. Evaluating coding decisions. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, editors. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1994. p. 150–1.
Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48. PubMed
Dombrowski SU, Sniehotta F, Avenell A, et al. Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review. Health Psychol Rev. 2010;6(1):7–32. CrossRef
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins J, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009. CrossRef
Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and regression trees. California: Wadsworth & Brooks. Monterey; 1984.
National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Behavior change: individual approaches (PH 49). January 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph49. Accessed 1 June 2017.
Gardner B. A review and analysis of the use of ‘habit’ in understanding, predicting and influencing health-related behaviour. Health Psychol Rev. 2014:1–19.
Pothoff S, Presseau J, Sniehotta FF, Johnston M, Elovainio M, Avery L. Planning to be routine: habit as a mediator of the planning-behaviour relationship in healthcare professionals. Implement Sci. 2011;12(1):24. CrossRef
Kushner RF. Obesity management. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2007;36:19. CrossRef
Dombrowski SU, Sniehotta FF, Avenell A, Johnston M, MacLennan G, Araújo-Soares V. Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioral interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review. Health Psychol Rev. 2012;6(1):7–32. CrossRef
Dombrowski SU, Sniehotta FF, Avenell A, Coyne JC. Towards a cumulative science of behavior change: do current conduct and reporting of behavioral interventions fall short of best practice. Psychol Health. 2007;22:869–74. CrossRef
Hoffman TC, Erueti C, Glasziou PP. Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f3755. CrossRef
The Clinical Practice Guideline Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update Panel, Liaisons, and Staff. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: update a U.S. public health service report. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):158–76.
Foster C, Hillsdon M, Throrogood M, et al. Interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;1:14651858.
deBruin M, Viechtbauer W, Hospers HJ, et al. Standard care quality determines treatment outcomes in control groups of HAART-adherence intervention studies: implications for the interpretation and comparison of intervention effects. Health Psychol. 2009;28:668–74. CrossRef
- Interventions to Promote Healthy Eating, Physical Activity and Smoking in Low-Income Groups: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Behavior Change Techniques and Delivery/Context
Eleanor R. Bull
Stephan U. Dombrowski
- Springer US
- International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Official Journal of the International Society of Behavioral Medicine
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-7558