Case definition
Definition of invasive Haemophilus influenzae (Hi) cases required hospitalisation for a systemic infectious disease (e.g. meningitis, pneumonia, epiglottitis, septicaemia, cellulitis, septic arthritis) in paediatric hospitals in Germany with isolation of Hi from a normally sterile body site such as blood or cerebrospinal fluid.
Data sources
Cases of invasive Hi infections in children younger than 10 years were collected from a hospital-based surveillance system (Hospital-ESPED) and a laboratory-based surveillance system (Laboratory-ESPED) over the period 1998–2005. Both systems are voluntary but require active reporting: the absence of cases has to be reported as well and reminders for missing reports are included on a monthly basis.
In Hospital-ESPED, physicians from all paediatric hospitals in Germany report incident cases of a number of rare conditions on a monthly basis since 1992 to a central study office[
22]. Reporting on Hi was included since 1998. These reports provide information on an identification number for Hospital-ESPED, location of the reporting hospital, date of birth, age at disease onset, sex, date of disease onset, bacteriologic serotype, detection material, potential predisposing conditions and outcome as well as vaccination information.
For isolation of respective pathogens paediatric hospitals send specimen of body tissue to microbiological laboratories. From 1998–2005, all laboratories throughout Germany serving the paediatric hospitals were asked to report any detection of Hi in physiologically sterile materials in children to Laboratory-ESPED. Collected data were comparable to Hospital-ESPED: identification number for the sample as given by the laboratory, patient's month and year of birth, 3-digit postal code of patient's residence, sex, date of sample arrival at laboratory, bacteriologic serotype, material, and whether an isolate was sent to the National
H. influenzae Consulting Laboratory for capsule typing, and bacteriologic serotype if available. From 2001 onwards, possible predisposing conditions and clinical information, were also collected by tracing each patient back to the reporting hospital [
23].
Cultural confirmation was performed in the local laboratories participating in the surveillance programme according to their routine procedures. Local laboratories also performed PCR testing for capsule type on recovered isolates when available. Laboratories were encouraged to send their specimens to the National
H. influenzae Consulting Laboratory at the Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Johannes-Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany. Capsular typing was performed by slide agglutination using a commercial kit (
Haemophilus influenzae Agglutinating Sera (a-f); Murex Biotech Ltd., Dartford, UK). The capsular type was confirmed by molecular typing with the primers and methods recommended by the European
Haemophilus Reference Unit [
24]. First, the capsular gene bexA and the b-specific capsular gene were detected by PCR in order to identify b
--mutants. If bexA was present the specific gene for the capsular types a-f was detected by PCR. The biotype was determined as described by Kilian [
25]. If slide agglutination and PCR results were discordant, PCR results were considered final. If samples for the case were not sent to the reference laboratory but local typing results were available, they were considered final; if samples for the case were sent to the reference laboratory, the reference laboratory results are considered final. If no typing was performed, the case is considered "untyped".
The linkage between the two sources was done by hand applying defined matching rules and using the following patient characteristics: month and year of birth, sex, region of residence (ie, county and federal state vs. address of the hospital), and date of disease onset.
Analyses
To describe annual trends in the different Hi serotypes we used all cases detected in the two surveillance systems from January 1998 to December 2005. Trends in cases with Hib, non-type b and untyped Hi infections were analysed using a Poisson model. Differentiation in capsulated and uncapsulated non-type b cases was not performed due to the low number of capsulated cases. Since information on potential predisposing conditions and clinical outcome was only available from January 2001 onwards for both sources, we restricted the description of the clinical characteristics for the different serotypes to those cases. For comparison between children with Hib, capsulated non-b and uncapsulated infections, a global test of difference was performed. If results were significant (p < 0.001), cases with capsulated and uncapsulated non-type b infections were pairwise compared to cases with Hib infections.
The study received the positive vote by the ethics committee of the medical faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich.