Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2019

03.05.2019 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Is age and socioeconomic status associated with preference for birth mode in nulliparous women in China?

verfasst von: Yanhong Ming, Rong Huang, Wei Zhou, Bin Wang, Hongping Yu, Jun Zhang, For the Shanghai Birth Cohort

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the association between sociodemographic factors and preference for birth mode in nulliparous women in China.

Methods

A total of 4606 women before or in early pregnancy were recruited from 2013 to 2016 in the Shanghai Birth Cohort Study. Generalized linear regression was used to examine the association of sociodemographic characteristics with preferred birth mode and actual cesarean section (CS) without clinical indications in 2713 nulliparous women, and the changes from preference of vaginal birth to actual CS without clinical indications in 2369 nulliparous women.

Results

After controlling for potential confounders, preference for CS was associated with older maternal age [31–34 years: adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56–4.78; ≥ 35 years: 6.27, 3.28–12.01, p for trend < 0.0001] and lower level of education (below junior college vs college or above: 1.51, 1.10–2.09). Older maternal age (≥ 35 years: 3.37, 1.74–6.50), born in city or township (city vs countryside: 3.18, 1.93–5.24; township vs countryside: 1.97, 1.06–3.66), and lower level of education (below junior college vs college or above: 1.38, 1.01–1.88) were significantly associated with a CS without clinical indications. Women who preferred vaginal birth but had an actual CS without clinical indications were more likely to be older (≥ 35 years: 4.30, 1.44–12.83) and born in city (city vs countryside: 2.89, 1.33–6.30).

Conclusions

Older age, lower education level, and being born in city or township were risk factors for CS without clinical indication in China.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlström A, Lindgren H, Hildingsson I (2013) Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case–control study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 120(4):479CrossRef Karlström A, Lindgren H, Hildingsson I (2013) Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case–control study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 120(4):479CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Souza J et al (2010) Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med 8(1):71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Souza J et al (2010) Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med 8(1):71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Curran E et al (2015) Research review: birth by caesarean section and development of autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 56(5):500–508CrossRefPubMed Curran E et al (2015) Research review: birth by caesarean section and development of autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 56(5):500–508CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rusconi F et al (2017) Mode of delivery and asthma at school age in 9 european birth cohorts. Am J Epidemiol 185(6):465–473CrossRefPubMed Rusconi F et al (2017) Mode of delivery and asthma at school age in 9 european birth cohorts. Am J Epidemiol 185(6):465–473CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Betrán AP et al (2016) The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One 11(2):e0148343CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Betrán AP et al (2016) The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One 11(2):e0148343CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hou L et al (2014) Cesarean delivery rate and indications in mainland China: a cross sectional study in 2011. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 49(10):728–735 Hou L et al (2014) Cesarean delivery rate and indications in mainland China: a cross sectional study in 2011. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 49(10):728–735
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y et al (2014) A descriptive analysis of the indications for section in mainland China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14(1):1–9CrossRef Liu Y et al (2014) A descriptive analysis of the indications for section in mainland China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14(1):1–9CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Y, Tao H, Cheng Z (2015) Caesarean sections in Beijing, China—results from a descriptive study. Gesundheitswesen 78(01):e1–e5CrossRefPubMed Hu Y, Tao H, Cheng Z (2015) Caesarean sections in Beijing, China—results from a descriptive study. Gesundheitswesen 78(01):e1–e5CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J et al (2008) Cesarean delivery on maternal request in southeast China. Obstet Gynecol 111(5):1077CrossRefPubMed Zhang J et al (2008) Cesarean delivery on maternal request in southeast China. Obstet Gynecol 111(5):1077CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Angeja A et al (2006) Chilean women’s preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 113(11):1253–1258CrossRef Angeja A et al (2006) Chilean women’s preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 113(11):1253–1258CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzoni A et al (2011) Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG 118(4):391–399CrossRefPubMed Mazzoni A et al (2011) Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG 118(4):391–399CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Torloni MR et al (2013) Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13(1):78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Torloni MR et al (2013) Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13(1):78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang L et al (2016) Patterns and associated factors of caesarean delivery intention among expectant mothers in China: implications from the implementation of China’s New National Two-Child Policy. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 13(7):686CrossRef Wang L et al (2016) Patterns and associated factors of caesarean delivery intention among expectant mothers in China: implications from the implementation of China’s New National Two-Child Policy. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 13(7):686CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Blomberg M, Tyrberg RB, Kjolhede P (2014) Impact of maternal age on obstetric and neonatal outcome with emphasis on primiparous adolescents and older women: a Swedish Medical Birth Register Study. BMJ Open 4(11):e005840CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blomberg M, Tyrberg RB, Kjolhede P (2014) Impact of maternal age on obstetric and neonatal outcome with emphasis on primiparous adolescents and older women: a Swedish Medical Birth Register Study. BMJ Open 4(11):e005840CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramachandran N et al (2015) Obstetric and perinatal outcome of elderly mothers aged 35 years and above: a comparative study. Int J Res Med Sci 3(1):214–219 Ramachandran N et al (2015) Obstetric and perinatal outcome of elderly mothers aged 35 years and above: a comparative study. Int J Res Med Sci 3(1):214–219
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng XL et al (2012) Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Org 90(1):30–39ACrossRefPubMed Feng XL et al (2012) Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Org 90(1):30–39ACrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu KH, Liao PJ, Hwang CJ (2008) Factors affecting Taiwanese women's choice of cesarean section. Soc Sci Med 66(1):201CrossRefPubMed Hsu KH, Liao PJ, Hwang CJ (2008) Factors affecting Taiwanese women's choice of cesarean section. Soc Sci Med 66(1):201CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SI, Khang YH, Lee MS (2004) Women's attitudes toward mode of delivery in South Korea—a society with high cesarean section rates. Birth 31(2):108CrossRefPubMed Lee SI, Khang YH, Lee MS (2004) Women's attitudes toward mode of delivery in South Korea—a society with high cesarean section rates. Birth 31(2):108CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Davari M et al (2014) The relationship between socioeconomic status and the prevalence of elective cesarean section in nulliparous women in Niknafs Teaching Centre in Rafsanjan, Iran. Womens Health Bull 1(2):e20044 Davari M et al (2014) The relationship between socioeconomic status and the prevalence of elective cesarean section in nulliparous women in Niknafs Teaching Centre in Rafsanjan, Iran. Womens Health Bull 1(2):e20044
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Faisalcury A et al (2017) The relationship between indicators of socioeconomic status and cesarean section in public hospitals. Rev Saúde Pública 51:14 Faisalcury A et al (2017) The relationship between indicators of socioeconomic status and cesarean section in public hospitals. Rev Saúde Pública 51:14
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellerstein S, Feldman S, Duan T (2015) China's 50% caesarean delivery rate: is it too high? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 122(2):160CrossRef Hellerstein S, Feldman S, Duan T (2015) China's 50% caesarean delivery rate: is it too high? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 122(2):160CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Is age and socioeconomic status associated with preference for birth mode in nulliparous women in China?
verfasst von
Yanhong Ming
Rong Huang
Wei Zhou
Bin Wang
Hongping Yu
Jun Zhang
For the Shanghai Birth Cohort
Publikationsdatum
03.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05140-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.