Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Die Folgen des Klimwandels haben einen direkten Einfluss auf die Primärversorgung in Deutschland: Hitzeschutz insbesondere bei älteren Patienten, die Zunahme von Infektionen und die Verlängerung der Allergiesesaison spielen medizinisch eine bedeutsame Rolle. Aber auch in der Prävention und der Aufklärung der Patienten kommt den Hausärztinnen und -ärzten eine besondere Rolle zu. Direkt aus der Praxis berichtet im Live-Webinar am 13. Mai von 18 bis 19 Uhr unser Experte Dr. med. Robin Maitra.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Cardiology Reports
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports 4/2022

19.02.2022 | Psychological Aspects of Cardiovascular Diseases (IM Kronish , Section Editor)

Is Sedentary Behavior a Novel Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease?

verfasst von: Andrea T. Duran, Emily Romero, Keith M. Diaz

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Review the most recent evidence on the role of sedentary behavior in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Recent Findings

Prospective cohort studies continue to suggest a relationship between sedentary behavior and CVD, but the dose–response association, and the implications of sedentary pattern (vs. total volume) and context on CVD risk require further investigation. Most recent evidence suggests that physical activity influences the association between sedentary time and CVD risk, and that replacing sedentary time with other movement behaviors yields cardiometabolic benefits. Short-term intervention studies have further demonstrated that interrupting prolonged sitting with bouts of physical activity can elicit acute improvements on cardiometabolic biomarkers and vascular function relative to prolonged, uninterrupted sitting, albeit limited evidence exists on the long-term effects.

Summary

More conclusive evidence regarding the implications of sedentary time on CVD risk is warranted before the optimal sedentary behavior reduction prescription for the prevention of CVD can be elucidated.
Literatur
1.
Virani SS, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(8):e254–743.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association’s strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010;121(4):586–613.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Powell KE, et al. The Scientific Foundation for the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd Edition. J Phys Act Health, 2018: p. 1–11.
4.
Authors/Task Force M, et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts): Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(11): p. NP1-NP96.
5.
World Health Organization, Global health risks : mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks., W.H. Organization, Editor. Geneva: World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland. 2009.
6.
Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18–209.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Wilmot EG, et al. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012;55(11):2895–905.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Dunstan DW, et al. Too much sitting—a health hazard. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;97(3):368–76.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
Diaz KM, et al. Patterns of Sedentary behavior and mortality in U.S. middle-aged and older adults: a national cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(7):465–75.
11.
Du Y, et al. Trends in adherence to the physical activity guidelines for Americans for Aerobic activity and time spent on sedentary behavior among US adults, 2007 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(7):e197597.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Matthews CE, et al. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(7):875–81.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Prince SA, et al. A comparison of the effectiveness of physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions in reducing sedentary time in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2014;15(11):905–19.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Davies SAF, McBride M, Calderwood C. UK Chief Medical Officers' Physical Activity Guidelines. Chief Medical Officers: Chief Medical Officers 2019.
15.
World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health, W.H. Organization, Editor. Geneva, Switzerland. 2010;58.
16.
Ministry of Health, Eating and Activity Guidelines for New Zealand Adults: Updated 2020. 2020, Ministry of Health: Wellington.
17.
Australian Government Department of Health, Physical activity and exercise guidelines for all Australians. Department Health Website. 2021.
18.
Tremblay MS, et al. Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 Suppl 3):S311–27.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Fuzeki EL, Vogt BW. [German National Physical Activity Recommendations for Adults and Older Adults: Methods, Database and Rationale]. Gesundheitswesen. 2017;79(S01):S20–28
20.
Colberg SR, et al. Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):2065–79.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Committee PAGA. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report, D.o.H.a.H. Services, Editor. Washington, DC. 2018.
22.
Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Sedentary behavior and health: update from the 2018 physical activity guidelines advisory committee. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1227–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
24.
Tremblay MS, et al. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Endorsed by The Obesity S, et al. Sedentary behavior and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134(13):e262–79.
26.
Garber CE, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–59
27.
28.
29.
30.
Yu L, et al. Sedentary behavior and the risk of cardiac-cerebral vascular diseases in southern China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(44):e12838.
31.
Dempsey PC, et al. Associations of context-specific sitting time with markers of cardiometabolic risk in Australian adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(1):114.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Lee Y, et al. Association of sedentary time and physical activity with the 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2014–2017. Korean J Fam Med. 2020;41(6):374–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Bellettiere J, et al. Associations of sitting accumulation patterns with cardio-metabolic risk biomarkers in Australian adults. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0180119
34.
Smith P, et al. The relationship between occupational standing and sitting and incident heart disease over a 12-year period in Ontario. Canada Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(1):27–33.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Jefferis BJ, et al. Does total volume of physical activity matter more than pattern for onset of CVD? A prospective cohort study of older British men. Int J Cardiol. 2019;278:267–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Dohrn IM, Welmer AK, Hagströmer M. Accelerometry-assessed physical activity and sedentary time and associations with chronic disease and hospital visits — a prospective cohort study with 15 years follow-up. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):125.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Bellettiere J, et al. Sedentary behavior and cardiovascular disease in older women: the Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health (OPACH) Study. Circulation. 2019;139(8):1036–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Evenson KR, Wen F, Herring AH. Associations of accelerometry-assessed and self-reported physical activity and sedentary behavior with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;184(9):621–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
40.
Ekelund U, et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4570.
41.
Patterson R, et al. Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(9):811–29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Pandey A, et al. Continuous dose-response association between sedentary time and risk for cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(5):575–83.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Dempsey PC, et al. Prospective associations of accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary time with incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality. Circulation. 2020;141(13):1113–5.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Healy GN, et al. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(4):661–6.PubMedCrossRef
45.
• Loh R, et al. Effects of interrupting prolonged sitting with physical activity breaks on blood glucose, insulin and triacylglycerol measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020;50(2): p. 295–330. Findings from this meta-analysis of short-term interventions suggest that breaking up prolonged, uniterrupted sedentary time with bouts of physical activity attenuates glucose and insulin.
46.
Saunders TJ, et al. The acute metabolic and vascular impact of interrupting prolonged sitting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018;48(10):2347–66.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Corraini P, et al. Effect modification, interaction and mediation: an overview of theoretical insights for clinical investigators. Clin Epidemiol. 2017;9:331–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
49.
Chastin SF, et al. Combined effects of time spent in physical activity, sedentary behaviors and sleep on obesity and cardio-metabolic health markers: a novel compositional data analysis approach. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139984.
50.
•• Ekelund U, et al. Do the associations of sedentary behaviour with cardiovascular disease mortality and cancer mortality differ by physical activity level? A systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis of data from 850 060 participants. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(14):886–94. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bjsports-2017-098963. Epub 2018 Jul 10. PMID: 29991570. Findings from this meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies suggest that different levels of physical activity attenuate the dose-response association between self-reported sedentary behavior and CVD mortality.
51.
Stamatakis E, et al. Sitting time, physical activity, and risk of mortality in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(16):2062–72.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Ballin M, et al. Associations of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time with the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction or all-cause mortality in 70-year-old men and women: a prospective cohort study. Sports Med. 2021;51(2):339–49.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, Bauman A, Lee IM. Lancet physical activity series 2 executive committe; Lancet sedentary behaviour working group. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1302-10. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(16)30370-1. Epub 2016 Jul 28. Erratum in: Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):e6. PMID: 27475271.
54.
Del Pozo-Cruz J, et al. Replacing sedentary time: meta-analysis of objective-assessment studies. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(3):395–402.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Whitaker, KM, et al. Associations of accelerometer-measured sedentary time and physical activity with prospectively assessed cardiometabolic risk factors: the CARDIA study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(1):e010212.
56.
57.
Takagi H, et al. Meta-analysis of the relation of television-viewing time and cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124(11):1674–83.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Thorp AA, et al. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996–2011. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):207–15.PubMedCrossRef
59.
van Uffelen JG, et al. Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(4):379–88.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Garcia JM, et al. Types of sedentary behavior and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in blacks: the Jackson heart study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(13):e010406.
61.
Møller SV, et al. Multi-wave cohort study of sedentary work and risk of ischemic heart disease. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016;42(1):43–51.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Stamatakis E, et al. Is the time right for quantitative public health guidelines on sitting? A narrative review of sedentary behaviour research paradigms and findings. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(6):377–82.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Hamer M, et al. Association between TV viewing and heart disease mortality: observational study using negative control outcome. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020;74(4):391–4.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zhuang Z, et al. Association of physical activity, sedentary behaviours and sleep duration with cardiovascular diseases and lipid profiles: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Lipids Health Dis. 2020;19(1):86.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
65.
Bahls M, et al. Physical activity, sedentary behavior and risk of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021.
66.
Bey L, Hamilton MT. Suppression of skeletal muscle lipoprotein lipase activity during physical inactivity: a molecular reason to maintain daily low-intensity activity. J Physiol. 2003;551(Pt 2):673–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
Hamilton MT, Hamilton DG, Zderic TW. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007;56(11):2655.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Kump DS, Booth FW. Alterations in insulin receptor signalling in the rat epitrochlearis muscle upon cessation of voluntary exercise. J Physiol. 2005;562(Pt 3):829–38.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Thosar SS, et al. Sitting and endothelial dysfunction: the role of shear stress. Med Sci Monit. 2012;(12):Ra173–Ra1780.
70.
Padilla J, et al. Adjusting flow-mediated dilation for shear stress stimulus allows demonstration of endothelial dysfunction in a population with moderate cardiovascular risk. J Vasc Res. 2009;46(6):592–600.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Restaino RM, et al. Endothelial dysfunction following prolonged sitting is mediated by a reduction in shear stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016;310(5):H648–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
72.
Padilla J, et al. Impact of acute exposure to increased hydrostatic pressure and reduced shear rate on conduit artery endothelial function: a limb-specific response. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297(3):H1103–8.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Restaino RM, et al. Impact of prolonged sitting on lower and upper limb micro- and macrovascular dilator function. Exp Physiol. 2015;100(7):829–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
Morishima T, et al. Prior exercise and standing as strategies to circumvent sitting-induced leg endothelial dysfunction. Clin Sci (Lond). 2017;131(11):1045–53.CrossRef
75.
Padilla J, Fadel PJ. Prolonged sitting leg vasculopathy: contributing factors and clinical implications. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017;313(4):H722–H8.
76.
McManus AM, et al. Impact of prolonged sitting on vascular function in young girls. Exp Physiol. 2015;100(11):1379–87.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Morishima T, et al. Prolonged sitting-induced leg endothelial dysfunction is prevented by fidgeting. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016;311(1):H177–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
78.
Thosar SS, et al. Effect of prolonged sitting and breaks in sitting time on endothelial function. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(4):843–9.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Dempsey PC, et al. Sitting less and moving more: implications for hypertension. Hypertension. 2018;72(5):1037–46.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Carter S, et al. Sedentary behavior and cardiovascular disease risk: mediating mechanisms. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2017;45(2):80–6.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Paterson C, et al. The effects of acute exposure to prolonged sitting, with and without interruption, on vascular function among adults: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020;50(11):1929–42.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Zheng C, et al. Effect of sedentary behavior interventions on vascular function in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31(7):1395–410.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Brierley ML, et al. The effectiveness of sedentary behaviour reduction workplace interventions on cardiometabolic risk markers: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2019;49(11):1739–67.PubMedCrossRef
84.
• Hadgraft NT, et al. Effects of sedentary behaviour interventions on biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk in adults: systematic review with meta-analyses. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(3): p. 144. Findings from this meta-analysis of free-living longer-term interventions suggest that targeting reductions in sedentary behavior alone or combined with increased physical activity exhibits improvements in several cardiometabolic biomarkers.
85.
Chase J-AD, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to reduce sedentary behavior among older adults. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(5):1078–85.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Gibbs BB, et al. Association of standing with cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2021.
87.
Henriksen EJ. Invited review: effects of acute exercise and exercise training on insulin resistance. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93(2):788-96.
88.
Cardoso CG Jr, et al. Acute and chronic effects of aerobic and resistance exercise on ambulatory blood pressure. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(3):317–25.CrossRef
89.
Pescatello LS, et al. Assessing the existing professional exercise recommendations for hypertension: a review and recommendations for future research priorities. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(6):801–12.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Chobanian AV, et al. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–72.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Mancia G, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Blood Press. 2014;23(1):3–16.PubMedCrossRef
92.
Pescatello LS, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and hypertension. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(3):533–53.
93.
Jelleyman C, et al. The effects of high-intensity interval training on glucose regulation and insulin resistance: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(11):942–61.PubMedCrossRef
94.
Tonoli C, et al. Effects of different types of acute and chronic (training) exercise on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2012;42(12):1059–80.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Is Sedentary Behavior a Novel Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease?
verfasst von
Andrea T. Duran
Emily Romero
Keith M. Diaz
Publikationsdatum
19.02.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-022-01657-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Current Cardiology Reports 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Invasive Electrophysiology and Pacing (E. Kevin Heist, Section Editor)

Interference by Modern Smartphones and Accessories with Cardiac Pacemakers and Defibrillators

Nuclear Cardiology (V Dilsizian, Section Editor)

Artificial Intelligence to Improve Risk Prediction with Nuclear Cardiac Studies

New Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease (AA Bavry and MR Massoomi, Section Editors)

AngioVac for Minimally Invasive Removal of Intravascular and Intracardiac Masses: a Systematic Review

Interventional Cardiology (SR Bailey and T Helmy, Section Editors)

Vascular Closure: the ABC’s

Ischemic Heart Disease (D Mukherjee, Section Editor)

Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement to Predict Hypertension-Related Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality

In Memoriam

In Memory of Kanishka Ratnayaka

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

10.05.2024 Hypercholesterinämie Nachrichten

Patienten mit Arteriosklerose-bedingten kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen, die trotz Statineinnahme zu hohe Triglyzeridspiegel haben, profitieren von einer Behandlung mit Icosapent-Ethyl, und zwar unabhängig vom individuellen Risikoprofil.

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

10.05.2024 Periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit Nachrichten

In den USA ist erstmals eine bioresorbierbare Gefäßstütze – auch Scaffold genannt – zur Rekanalisation infrapoplitealer Arterien bei schwerer PAVK zugelassen worden. Das markiert einen Wendepunkt in der Geschichte dieser speziellen Gefäßstützen.

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise