We read with great interest the paper by Deminger et al. [1] reporting determinants of radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Intriguingly, the authors found bisphosphonate exposure during follow up to be a predictor of spinal radiographic progression in women. Correctly, the authors declared that their results are based on few observations and should be interpreted with caution. Indeed, it is known that the prevalence of osteoporosis, the main indication for bisphosphonate use, is high in AS patients [2] and associated with radiographic progression of the disease [3].
Unfortunately, the study presented lacks data on osteoporosis prevalence, bone mineral density, vertebral fractures, or bone turnover markers in the patients enrolled. Considering the pathophysiology of the disease, there’s rationale for a positive rather than negative effect of bisphosphonates. First, they lower bone resorption, which is known to be elevated at least in the early stages of AS. Second, suppression of bone resorption by bisphosphonates would lead, through the coupling of osteoclast and osteoblast activity, to later inhibition also of bone formation and to an increase in serum sclerostin [4], an inhibitor of the anabolic bone Wnt pathway and which has been described to be low in AS and negatively correlated to the development of syndesmophytes [5].
Anzeige
Although interesting, the conclusion of the authors might send an alarming message on bisphosphonate use in AS that could worsen an already low treatment rate of osteoporosis and vertebral fracture in those patients, complicating their disability. In our opinion the hypothesis that the association observed was due to more severe bone loss in those patients who show radiographic progression and that leads to the use of bisphosphonates should be considered and further investigated.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Anzeige
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.