25.04.2016 | Review Article
Is there evidence for better health care for cancer patients in certified centers? A systematic review
Erschienen in: Journal of Public Health | Ausgabe 4/2016
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Aim
Certification is a means to enhance quality of care in oncology. This systematic review examines whether treatment in a certified center leads to an improvement of patient-relevant outcomes.
Methods
Publications addressing certification in oncology between 1 January 2004 and 26 March 2015 were included in a systematic literature review. Main outcome parameters were patients' overall survival and/or improvement in quality of life.
Results
One systematic review, 5 narrative reviews and 34 primary studies were included. No randomized controlled studies were found. All studies showed a high risk of bias. Three publications analyzed the effect of certification on survival of cancer patients. Quality of life was evaluated in one study. Studies addressing patient satisfaction showed consistent high ratings in both certified and non-certified facilities.
Conclusion
In order to improve certification processes, focusing on patient-relevant endpoints such as quality of life, survival time and patient satisfaction would allow concentrating on patient-centered needs and simplify the process of certification. Those working in the certification process should strive for an independent evaluation of their programs including patient-relevant outcome parameters.
Anzeige