Skip to main content
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasenclever D, Kurch L, Mauz-Körholz C, Elsner A, Goergi T, Wallace H, et al. qPET—a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014;41:1301–8.PubMedCrossRef Hasenclever D, Kurch L, Mauz-Körholz C, Elsner A, Goergi T, Wallace H, et al. qPET—a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014;41:1301–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Boktor RR, Walker G, Stacey R, Gledhill S, Pitman AG. Reference range for intrapatient variability in blood-pool and liver SUV for 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 2013;54:677–82.PubMedCrossRef Boktor RR, Walker G, Stacey R, Gledhill S, Pitman AG. Reference range for intrapatient variability in blood-pool and liver SUV for 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 2013;54:677–82.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Interim FDG PET scans in lymphoma: SUV measurement error may impair qPET methodology
verfasst von
Eric Laffon
Roger Marthan
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 11/2014
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2879-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2014

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2014 Zur Ausgabe