Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive joint disease that presents with chronic degeneration of articular cartilage and other deleterious bone-related changes, and conservative management of the disease is largely ineffective at reducing pain and increasing function [
1]. Orthobiologic therapies have emerged as minimally invasive alternatives to traditional surgical options, largely consisting of autologous preparations derived from blood, bone marrow, or adipose tissues [
2]. Bone marrow concentrate (BMC), primarily comprised of a nucleated cell-rich population (buffy coat), has been safely used to treat a variety of musculoskeletal conditions, including knee OA [
3,
4]. Intra-articular BMC injections may provide improvements in both pain and function in patients suffering from symptomatic OA [
5].
Autologous BMC treatment has been shown to yield better results than exercise therapy for patients with moderate to moderate–severe knee OA [
6], and additional studies have reported BMC to be superior when compared with other minimally invasive treatment options, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) [
7,
8]. Meanwhile, some have reported arthritic knees treated with BMC to have similar outcomes to those treated with HA [
9] or even saline placebo [
10]. Connective tissue progenitor cells, also referred to as mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), are thought to be a key component of BMC associated with favourable clinical outcomes [
11]. Positive relationships with respect to CFU-F concentration, measured using the colony-forming unit fibroblast (CFU-F) assay, and clinical outcome have been reported for orthopaedic procedures. A nearly threefold increase in CFU-F concentration was found in tibia nonunion fractures successfully treated with BMC compared to failures [
12]. Similarly, patients treated with BMC for moderate to severe discogenic low back pain reported greater reductions in pain when receiving BMC containing higher concentrations of colony-forming cells [
13].
Currently, the clinical importance of progenitor cells when treating knee OA with BMC is unknown. The aim of the present study was to identify individuals with moderate to severe knee OA that were treated with autologous BMC and monitored for changes in self-reported function, pain, and percent improvement up to one year post-treatment using a patient registry. Cryopreserved BMC samples were used to obtain an estimation for the progenitor cell content of the injectates used for treatment, and the resultant sample cellularity was compared with patient-reported outcomes. Other investigators have found a positive relationship between patient-reported outcomes and autologous BMC injections containing higher concentrations of progenitor cells for other orthopedic conditions [
12,
13]; thus, we hypothesized a similar relationship exists for treating knee OA with BMC.
Materials and methods
Patients treated for symptomatic knee OA at an outpatient orthopedic clinic were enrolled into an IRB approved patient registry (OHRP #IRB00002637) designed to track clinical outcomes and adverse events for autologously derived, musculoskeletal treatments. Informed consent was provided prior to entering the registry, and upon enrollment, patients were prospectively tracked using an electronic data capturing system (Dacima Software, Montreal, Quebec) that administers pre-treatment baseline and follow-up questionnaires at one, three, six, 12, and 24 months and annually thereafter. Patient-reported outcomes of interest include the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the Numeric Pain Scale (NPS), and a modified Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score (percent improvement). For the study cohort, we only utilized outcome questionnaires up to the 12-month time point.
Inclusion criteria for the present study were patients aged 35–85, having a physical examination consistent with moderate to severe knee OA, based on a Kellgren-Lawrence or Park classification grade II or greater on radiographs or MRI, respectively [
14,
15], providing responses to baseline and six month and/or 12-month outcome questionnaires from the patient registry, and having a cryopreserved BMC sample available for laboratory analysis. Exclusion criteria included any knee injections within three months or knee surgery within sixmonths of the BMC treatment, the presence of inflammatory or autoimmune joint-affecting diseases, quinolone- or statin-induced myopathy/tendinopathy, current involvement in health-related litigation, condition related to worker’s compensation case, bleeding disorders, taking anticoagulants or immunosuppressive medications, and/or history of chronic opioid use.
Processing, counting, and injection of bone marrow concentrate (BMC)
Utilizing ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance, bone marrow was aspirated from the posterior superior iliac spine into heparinized syringes using a small-volume, multi-site technique [
16,
17]. The autologous bone marrow aspirate (BMA) (60 to 120 mL in total) was manually processed into BMC (1.5 to 6.2 mL) by trained laboratory personnel, as previously detailed [
18]. A component of the processing quality assurance (QA) protocol requires a small fraction of BMC (< 0.2 mL) to be set aside for cellular analysis and subsequent cryopreservation. An automated haematology analyzer (ABX Micros 60, Horiba Medical, France) was used to obtain a complete blood count for each BMC sample, and the white blood cell parameter was used as a representative measurement for the concentration of total nucleated cells [
19]. The remaining portion of reserved BMC was cryopreserved at a concentration of ten million cells per mL using cryopreservation medium containing 30% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) by volume and a controlled rate freezing process [
20].
All patients were encouraged to cease the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs two weeks prior to and several weeks following BMC treatment. Under sterile conditions, patients received an intra-articular or intra-articular plus intraosseous injection(s) of BMC into the affected joint space via imaging guidance. Additionally, based on the patient’s clinical presentation and imaging findings, they may have received further injections into the supporting structures (i.e., ligaments, tendons, meniscus) if these structures were also diseased, damaged, or injured. Further, intra-articular injections of prolotherapy and concentrated leukocyte poor PRP were performed two to four days prior to (prolotherapy) and following (PRP) BMC treatment [
21]. Patients with suspected ligamentous instability based on clinical indications were fitted for a hinged unilateral unloader knee brace or a patellar stabilizer brace (Breg, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) and instructed to wear the brace during weight bearing activity for four weeks. If patients experienced substantial post-procedural pain, opioid rescue medication was prescribed for up to five days. Patients were advised to avoid activities that caused a worsening of pain throughout their stepwise rehabilitation protocol, which began with rest and household/community ambulation. Progression of physical activities consisted of pool or low impact exercise, followed by walking, resistance training and jogging, and ultimately advancing to full functional activity. While face-to-face physical therapy sessions were encouraged, they were not required.
Cryopreserved BMC samples were removed from cryogenic storage and rapidly warmed at 37°C for two minutes. Thawed BMC samples were promptly diluted tenfold in pre-warmed complete culture medium (CCM) containing 10% FBS and 1 ng per mL human fibroblast growth factor, counted using an automated cell counter (TC20, BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) and trypan blue, and directly plated within standard six well tissue culture plates at two separate cell densities, 10×103 and 30×103 viable nucleated cells per cm2. Following 72 hours of culture, non-adherent cells were removed by washing, and the remaining adherent cells were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 with biweekly replacement of CCM.
After a 14-day culture period, the plates were washed and stained for colonies using crystal violet in methanol. A CFU-F was defined as any colony greater than 1 mm in diameter and containing a minimum of 100 cells. All colonies were counted by two independent observers. To determine CFU-F frequency, colony counts were averaged across wells and divided by the number of plated cells per well, and the CFU-F concentration was calculated by multiplying the CFU-F frequency of the cryopreserved sample by the nucleated cell concentration, as measured prior to cryopreservation [
20].
Statistical analysis
Patient-reported outcomes were compared over time by fitting a mixed-effects model with Geisser–Greenhouse correction and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. Patients reporting overall favorable outcomes (responders) to autologous BMC therapy were characterized as meeting or exceeding both the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of nine points for LEFS and 40% improvement for SANE at the 6-month follow-up (the 12-month follow-up was used for three patients not reporting 6-month functional outcomes), based on previous studies [
13,
22,
23]. Patient demographics and BMC cellularity were compared between responders and non-responders using unpaired
t tests with Welch’s correction. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the concentration of CFU-F for best differentiating responders from non-responders [
24]. Reported mean outcomes of knees treated both above and below the identified target CFU-F concentration were compared against the LEFS MCID and SANE > 40% thresholds using one-sample
t tests. Results were considered significant at
P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Discussion
Patients report considerable reductions in pain, increases in function, and general overall improvement up to one year following treatment with autologous BMC for moderate to severe knee OA, consistent with our previous results and those of others [
6‐
8,
25]. The most important finding of the present study is the increased cellularity (nucleated cell concentration, CFU-F frequency, and CFU-F concentration) measured within the BMC injectates provided to patients responding favorably compared with those that did not. Some have suggested that the progenitor cell content of BMC, as measured using a CFU-F assay, contributes to positive clinical outcomes. Patients treated with BMC injections having > 2×10
3 CFU-F per mL reported faster and greater reductions in discogenic pain associated with lumbar degenerative disc disease [
13], and a higher average CFU-F concentration, > 1.5×10
3 CFU-F per mL, was found in the BMC of successfully treated tibial nonunion compared to treatment failure [
12]. The present study determined a concentration of 18×10
3 CFU-F per mL to best differentiate responders from non-responders for knee OA treatment.
Recently, our group detailed an alternative approach to the CFU-F assay that utilizes cryopreserved BMC in lieu of freshly obtained BMC, enabling the establishment of a biobank for the retrospective analyses of potential connective tissue progenitor cells for comparison with patient-reported outcomes [
20]. To our knowledge, this is the first time the CFU-F concentration within BMC, obtained retrospectively from cryopreserved patient samples, has been reported with respect to outcomes associated with treatment for knee OA. Reported differences in CFU-F concentrations between our group and others is likely attributed to several laboratory factors. For example, BMC prepared by trained laboratory processors in our facility is three to five times more concentrated with respect to nucleated cells than BMC prepared by standard bedside devices [
26]. Further, our group utilizes a low plating density to obtain the highest number of CFU-F, as recommended by others [
27]. In contrast, similar studies report their plating density to be eightfold higher, which may be suboptimal for quantifying CFU-F [
12,
28]. Both laboratory factors contribute to BMC with greater CFU-F concentrations than those reported by others to date.
The predictive power of the progenitor cell concentration within BMC to discriminate patient outcomes, as calculated using the area under the ROC curve is, 68%, indicating that false negative and false positive results are expected. Notably, a considerable portion of responding knees (17 of 46, 37%) were treated with BMC having fewer than 18×10
3 CFU-F per mL (false negative). There may be factors present within BMC other than connective tissue progenitor cells, which contribute to the healing response. Elevated levels of the anti-inflammatory molecule, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein (IRAP), which is thought to improve OA through the inhibition of pro-inflammatory interleukin-1β (IL-1β) signaling have been found at increased levels in BMC [
29]. Others have suggested the ratio of connective tissue progenitor to mononuclear cells within BMC may be another important and overlooked factor that contributes to healing [
30]. In comparison, a smaller number of non-responding knees (6 of 26, 23%) received BMC injections having more than 18×10
3 CFU-F per mL (false positive). Additional investigation is necessary to better determine patient candidacy for BMC treatment of knee OA to help exclude those patients unlikely to respond, regardless of progenitor cell content.
Being a retrospective analysis of clinical treatment registry data from a single multi-physician, interventional orthopaedic pain practice, the present study is characterized by inherent heterogeneity. Variation in patient knee OA severity, BMC volume and cellularity, primary injection type (intra-articular and/or intraosseous), unilateral vs bilateral knee treatment, whether supporting structures (i.e., ligaments, tendons, meniscus) warranted concurrent treatment, participation in post-treatment physical therapy, and receiving additional injections, among others, must be considered when interpreting the results. The present study is small and preliminary in nature; no sample size or power calculations with respect to progenitor cell content were undertaken beforehand, as currently available CFU-F data, using our laboratory approach is limited. Some patients in the cohort were lost to follow-up (up to 15% at 12 months), resulting in missing data at that time point, and while a strong correlation between fresh and cryopreserved BMC with respect to the number of CFU-F has been previously demonstrated, it is possible that the cryopreservation and cryorecovery processes adversely affect the outgrowth of some colonies [
20,
31]. Additional, well-controlled prospective studies are needed and would be essential to determining how the various biological components of BMC, including colony-forming connective tissue progenitor cells, contribute to tissue healing in the context of moderate to severe OA of the knee.
In conclusion, this is the first study to retrospectively assess CFU-F concentrations from autologous BMC samples for the purpose of relating progenitor cell content with patient-reported outcomes for knee OA. Overall, responders to treatment had greater concentrations of nucleated cells and colony-forming progenitor cells. Further investigation is warranted to more accurately classify patients that will be responders to treatment based on the cellularity of their BMC.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.