Erschienen in:
29.07.2017 | Original Article
The “old” 15 mm renal stone size limit for RIRS remains a clinically significant threshold size
verfasst von:
Hanan Goldberg, Dor Golomb, Yariv Shtabholtz, Shlomi Tapiero, German Creiderman, Avi Shariv, Jack Baniel, David Lifhshitz
Erschienen in:
World Journal of Urology
|
Ausgabe 12/2017
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the performance of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the 1–2 cm renal stone size range in comparison to smaller stones.
Materials and methods
From a data base of 3000 ureteroscopies between 2004 and 2014, 635 consecutive patients underwent RIRS for renal stones. Patients were divided to three groups according to their renal stone size (<10, 10–15, 15–20 mm). Preoperative, operative, stone free rate (SFR) and follow-up data were analyzed and compared.
Results
The SFR for the three groups was 94.1, 90.1 and 85%, respectively. Patients with renal stone size above 15 mm had a statistically significantly lower SFR. The efficiency quotient calculated for stones larger and smaller than 15 mm was 83.9 vs. 91.8%, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean operative time and hospital stay were longer for patients with renal stones larger than 15 mm (73.6 ± 29.9 vs. 53 ± 19.4 min, p < 0.01 and 2.2 ± 2 vs. 1.8 ± 1.8 days, p = 0.031, respectively). Moreover, the complication rate was almost two times higher (10 vs 5.4%, p = 0.08). Concomitant ureteral stones and older age were independent predictors of failure in the large stone group.
Conclusions
While the overall SFR following RIRS for renal stones up to 2 cm is generally high, the SFR for 15–20 mm stones is significantly lower, with a longer operating time and hospital stay, and a higher complication rate.