Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 9/2015

Open Access 01.09.2015 | Original Article

Incidental durotomy in spine surgery: first aid in ten steps

verfasst von: Luca Papavero, Nils Engler, Ralph Kothe

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 9/2015

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

Introduction

Incidental durotomy (ID) is the most common complication of spine surgery. Revision procedures, ossification of the yellow ligament, or synovial cysts are well-known risk factors. The size, shape, and severity of ID are unpredictable, ranging from a pinpoint hole to a several centimeters large dural laceration with transected fibers following the slippage of a cutting burr. Furthermore, the occurrence of ID is always unexpected. Intra-operative management is often based on a steep learning curve rather than a structured scheme.

Purpose

To provide an intra-operative ten-step closure technique (10ST) for IDs of varying severity.

Methods

A database of 4020 consecutive surgeries for lumbar degenerative disease over the past 4 years was searched for ID. The records of 176 patients were analyzed. Two dural repair techniques were compared: the “individual” technique (InT) and the 10ST.

Results

The overall prevalence of ID was 4.4 %. The prevalence was lowest in virgin micro-discectomies (1.7 %) and ranged from 3.6 % in decompression for spinal canal stenosis up to 14.5 % in revision procedures. All surgeries were performed with the aid of a microscope. Among 107 primary surgeries, the InT achieved a single-stage closure of the ID in 96 procedures (89.7 %). Among 20 virgin surgeries, the 10ST was successful in all cases (P = 0.21). Among 42 re-do procedures following failed attempts to stop cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, the InT achieved single-stage closure in 36 procedures (85.7 %). The 10ST was successful in all 26 cases (P = 0.03). The follow-up was 1 year.

Conclusions

The 10ST should be considered for successful single-stage closure in primary repair of ID.

Introduction

Data concerning the relationship between the years of attending experience and the rate of ID are conflicting. Some authors have reported an inverse relationship [1, 2], whereas others have reported “a baseline rate of durotomies unrelated to years of training” [3]. One explanation for the discrepancy is that situations favoring ID are better anticipated and prevented with increasing surgical experience. On the other hand, experienced surgeons have to deal with higher risk procedures, such as revision surgery or complex spine surgery [4, 5].
The prevalence of ID in spine surgery varies widely. In virgin lumbar surgery, the prevalence of ID ranges from 3 to 5 %; whereas in lumbar revision procedures, it ranges from 7 to 17 % [3, 6, 7, 8]. The variation may be due to the difference between microsurgical procedures and conventional open techniques. However, ID is thought to be the most common complication of spine surgery, with the lumbar area as the most frequent location [3, 7]. Primary repair of ID is the first choice treatment and, if successful, the long-term clinical outcome is excellent [3, 911].
Specific features of ID are:
1.
Unpredictable size, shape, and severity—the injury may range from a pinpoint hole of the thecal sac to a several centimeter large dural laceration with transected caudal fibers following the slippage of a cutting burr (Fig. 1).
 
2.
Unexpected occurrence, especially at the beginning of a surgeon’s career—intra-operative management relies more on an emotionally intense and steep learning curve than the step-by-step implementation of a treatment plan.
 
Traditionally, ID closure has not been a structural part of the teaching program for spinal trainees at our institution. In 2010, a ten-step guideline with the acronym “Bird Dove, MD” was introduced as a tutorial in the residency program.
The goal of the present study was to compare the efficacy of the 10ST with the InT of the “old days”. These latter techniques varied slightly amongst the surgeons but they had the following features in common:
  • No intradural patching of the ID to stop the pulsatile force of CSF
  • Direct closure of the dural tear by suturing or indirect closure by patching
  • Epidural fibrin glue and/or free muscle or fat tissue
  • Fascial closure but no deep anchoring of ae pedicled paraspinal muscle flap
  • CSF drainage cephalad to the ID when the Valsalva maneuver had shown some CSF spillage not controlled by other means.

Methods

Patients

Data from 4020 surgeries performed for lumbar degenerative diseases between February 2007 and May 2013 were analyzed. A total of 176 patients (100 females, 76 males, mean age 58 years) enclosing 13 patients with persistent lumbar CSF fistula referred to us from other Spine Centers were treated for ID in 195 surgical procedures. Several patients needed a second and few even a third look to get a successful closure of the ID. Six board-certified orthopedic surgeons and two board-certified neurosurgeons performed the surgeries. The intraspinal part of the surgery was performed routinely with the aid of a microscope. In 149 procedures, the surgeons repaired the ID with the InT with which they felt most confident. The 10ST was applied in 46 procedures. The patients were examined clinically 1 year after the last surgery.

Statistical analysis

Significance was evaluated using the Student-Fisher t test and established as P ≤ 0.05.

Ten-step closure technique

The intra-operative repair of an ID started by positioning the patient so that the CSF leak was the highest point of the surgical situs (Fig. 2).
A microscope and selected instruments (Fig. 3) were useful in our hands. To localize the CSF leak whenever the dural tear was not obvious, fluorescein was injected intrathecally a spinal level above the surgical situs. A collagen fleece with human thrombin and fibrinogen on one side (Tachosil®, Takeda GmbH, Germany) provided a tight dural closure up to a pressure of 62 cm H2O.
The 10ST, summarized by the acronym “Bird Dove, MD”, was applied as follows
1. Bone removal until you see the whole dural tear
Although this step may seem obvious, in our experience, it is the most common cause of unsuccessful ID repair. As shown in Fig. 4, the dural injury caused by a slipped cutting burr may well exceed the directly offended area and continue underneath the lamina due to the pulling force of the instrument. In addition, in surgery using a tubular retractor the ID may be partially hidden by bone. Therefore, an enlargement of the approach should be considered whenever the border of the dural defect is not completely apparent (Fig. 5).
2. Intradural look
This step is especially important in traumatic dural lesions in which the defect may be associated with intradural bone fragments or hematoma—both should be removed. In ID following laceration with a cutting burr, adaptation of transected fibers should be attempted. We used monofile stitches 7/0 or 10/0 or small wrappings with the hemostatic collagen fleece. The end-to-end matching of the right stumps is always a challenge.
3. Repone the fibers
Small cottonoids and low power suction may be helpful to repone Ω-like extruded fibers
4. Do an inside patch if necessary
This step is highly recommended in defects exceeding 5 mm. The hemostatic and sealing surface of the collagen fleece is yellow (riboflavin). Tailor the inside patch roughly 2 mm larger than the dural gap. The yellow surface should face towards the dura (i.e., outside). The advantages of this inside patching are twofold, as the spinal cord and/or fibers are protected during dural closure. Furthermore, the pulsatile CSF pushes the fleece against the dura, increasing the sealing effect.
5. Dural closure
This step has already been described extensively in the literature [5, 1219]. Primary closure with Prolene 5/0 or 7/0 is our first choice. Whenever access is very limited and hampers the needle holder, an alternative option is non-penetrating clips, which are usually used in vascular anastomoses, applied by a rotatable shank (AnastoClip™VCS®, LeMaitre Inc., USA) [2022]. If the dural clips cannot be approximated tightly, the defect is covered by a synthetic dural (e.g., DuraGen, Integra Life Sciences Corp., USA) or fascial graft.
6. Outside patch
A hemostatic collagen fleece overlapping the borders of the ID is pushed gently with the yellow surface towards the dura. Due to the presence of the inside patch, no pulsatile force will detach the outside patch from the dura (Fig. 4d).The combination of steps 4 and 6 is nicknamed “the sandwich technique”. Epidural fibrin glue is also a well-known option. However, the results are questioned and cases of epidural compression have been reported [13, 14, 23].
7. Valsalva maneuver
The positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is raised up to 40 cm H2O and maintained at that level for 30 s. If no CSF leaks out, the repair may be assumed to be effective. This test may be enhanced in equivocal cases by the injection of fluorescein one cranial level from the lesion site.
8. Epidural pedicled muscle flap
The importance of this step cannot be over-emphasized. Although all of the previous steps have failed, the gentle epidural packing (not compression) with muscle tissue prevents CSF from spilling out into a dead space. Even after repeated lumbar punctures, the epidural fat and yellow ligament prevent CSF fistulae because of the lack of an epidural dead space. Tailoring of the muscle flap is shown in Fig. 6. The pedicle of the muscle flap should be anchored into the depth to the spinous process or to the next available bony structure to become uncoupled from the tension of the paravertebral muscles during gait.
9. Multilayer closure
Deep stitches through the bony midline structures further reduce the dead space. A subfascial drain is avoided, though other authors favor it [24]. The superficial layers are closed by back-and-forth sutures and compression dressing enhances their adherence during the first postoperative hours.
10. Drainage of lumbar CSF if necessary
This step is more an exception than a rule. A lumbar CSF drainage may be used if the closure of the ID, mostly in cases of severe lacerations, is not perfectly tight during the Valsalva maneuver. Lumbar CSF drainage results in CSF hypotension, which may be helpful in revision surgeries for CSF fistulae. We advocate short (3–5 days) but intense (bearable headache, 300–500 ml/daily) drainage.
Postoperative care: ventilation until the next day is indicated whenever tight control of the PEEP is necessary. In this cohort of patients, it was necessary in only three cases, enclosing the “worst case” described later. Bed rest is usually limited to 24 h but may be prolonged if a lumbar CSF drain is placed. Analgesics are administered generously to prevent abdominal pressure. Stool softeners may also be required.

Results

The intraspinal part of all 4020 surgeries was performed with the aid of a microscope. The overall prevalence of ID was 4.4 %. The prevalence was lowest in virgin micro-discectomies (1.7 %), and varied from 3.6 % in decompression for spinal canal stenosis up to 14.5 % in revision procedures. Spinal revision surgery was the most frequent cause (37 %) of ID repair, followed by decompression of lumbar spinal canal stenosis (32 %), fixation procedures (16 %), removal of disc herniation (13 %), and resection of synovial cysts (2 %).
Among 107 primary surgeries, the InT achieved single-stage closure of the ID in 96 procedures (89.7 %). Among 20 virgin surgeries, the 10ST was successful in all cases (P = 0.21). Among 42 re-do procedures following failed attempts to stop the CSF leakage, the InT achieved single-stage closure in 36 procedures (85.7 %) and the 10ST was successful in all 26 cases (P = 0.03) (Fig. 7).
The following “worst case” report elucidates how the 10ST may be helpful in difficult dural repair.
A vigorous 92-year-old gentleman underwent micro-discectomy of a large disc herniation at L5/S1 causing excruciating leg pain resistant to CAT-guided infiltrations and 3/5 weakness of the left-sided plantar flexion. The pain disappeared immediately after surgery and the weakness decreased significantly. Two weeks after the initial surgery, a re-do surgery was necessary to remove an interlaminar epidural abscess that had eroded 1 cm2 of the dura. Despite the still intact arachnoid being covered with a sealing collagen fleece, a percutaneous CSF leak developed. Unfortunately, two further revisions could not stop the CSF leak. The patient faced a fifth surgery within 9 weeks. The hope in this dramatic scenario was that antibiotic therapy controlled the infection.
The fourth revision procedure started with a resection of the spinous process and L5 lamina. The cleared disc space at L5/S1 was packed with bone chips mixed with a fragmented antibiotic collagen fleece. Fluorescein revealed patency of the axillary dural tear, which was sealed with an intradural and extradural sealant collagen fleece. A large pedicled flap of the right-sided paravertebral muscle was swung onto the epidural area. A tight multilayer closure of the soft tissues was performed (Fig. 6b, d). A CSF drain was inserted at the L4/L5 level. Postoperative ventilation was continued in the ICU over 1 week and the CSF drain was retained for 2 weeks. The subsequent clinical course was complicated by pneumonia and gastric perforation. Both adverse events were treated successfully. The patient was discharged 3 months after the first surgery in reasonably good health.

Discussion

In the past, different surgeons at our clinic have treated ID in different ways due to the unexpected occurrence and unpredictable severity of ID. In addition, in revision surgery, dural closure, especially of larger defects, was often hampered by extensive scar tissue. Similarly, re-do surgery after failed attempts to stop CSF leakage was challenging because of the previous aggressive action of CSF on tissues. A couple of tools proved to be helpful in improving the quality of ID closure.
The injection of fluorescein has been associated in the literature with complications, such as seizures, and even one death has been reported. However, the single dose of fluorescein that was administered was 100 mg or more in the cases with major complications, and even higher than 500 mg in the mortality case [20]. In a prospective multi-center study, the concentration of the fluorescein solution was lowered to 5 % and the maximum dose limited to 50 mg diluted with 9 ml CSF and injected slowly. Not even minor adverse effects were reported in 53 patients [21]. The patient has to be informed that the urine will be greenish in color for a couple of days.
The use of collagen fleece with human thrombin and fibrinogen was recommended by the manufacturer to achieve hemostasis. The elasticity of the wet fleece and its sealing side effect were able to withstand pressures of up to 46 mmHg (or 62 cm H2O), making it very helpful in patching the ID from the intradural and extradural surface. Compared to hydrogel-type sealants, the fleece offers the advantage of an intrinsic structural support, which is especially useful for intrathecal application. The intradural covering of the dural tear protects the spinal cord, as well as the caudal fibers, during the dural closure. Furthermore, the closing function is reinforced by the pulsatile force of the CSF.
The superiority of the 10ST in single-stage repair of complex revision surgery for ID led us to assume that a structured scheme and cadaver lab training before the ID occurs can prepare spinal surgeons, especially trainees, for better handling of the ID.
One limitation of this report is that the 10ST has not been validated by a prospective or randomized study design. The reason for this is that each ID is very specific, as our “worst case” report showed, and often not comparable with other occurrences. The only common feature is the CSF leak. The second limitation is that the ID cohorts in primary surgery differed markedly in size. Therefore, the comparison of the two treatment options did not reveal any significant difference. Nevertheless, the fact that none of the 46 10ST procedures failed proves the efficacy of the checklist, especially if we consider that single-stage closure was obtained in 26 re-do surgeries, even after multiple unsuccessful attempts to stop the CSF leak.
The strength of this study is that it stresses the need to approach ID with a structured to-do list of surgical steps. We are not aware of this approach being used in a previous publication.

Conclusions

ID is the most common complication of lumbar spinal surgery. Prevention by carefully planning the sequential surgical steps is of utmost importance. After ID has occurred, intra-operative management tailored to the specific dural tear is the key to prevent a revision procedure for CSF leakage. The 10ST for ID revision results in a significantly higher rate of single-stage dural closure compared to conventional techniques.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Dieter Witt for supporting this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung PC (1988) Complications in the first 40 cases of microdiscectomy. J Spinal Disord 1:306–310CrossRefPubMed Leung PC (1988) Complications in the first 40 cases of microdiscectomy. J Spinal Disord 1:306–310CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiese M, Krämer J, Bernsmann K et al (2004) The related outcome and complication rate in primary lumbar microscopic disc surgery depending on the surgeon’s experience: comparative studies. Spine 4:550–556CrossRef Wiese M, Krämer J, Bernsmann K et al (2004) The related outcome and complication rate in primary lumbar microscopic disc surgery depending on the surgeon’s experience: comparative studies. Spine 4:550–556CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat McMahon P, Dididze M, Levi AD (2012) Incidental durotomy after spinal surgery: a prospective study in an academic institution. J Neurosurg Spine 17:30–36CrossRefPubMed McMahon P, Dididze M, Levi AD (2012) Incidental durotomy after spinal surgery: a prospective study in an academic institution. J Neurosurg Spine 17:30–36CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi Y, Sato T, Hyodo H et al (2013) Incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery: risk factors and anatomic locations. J Neurosurg Spine 18(2):165–169CrossRefPubMed Takahashi Y, Sato T, Hyodo H et al (2013) Incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery: risk factors and anatomic locations. J Neurosurg Spine 18(2):165–169CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein NE (2007) The frequency and etiology of intraoperative dural tears in 110 predominantly geriatric patients undergoing multilevel laminectomy with noninstrumented fusions. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(5):380–386CrossRefPubMed Epstein NE (2007) The frequency and etiology of intraoperative dural tears in 110 predominantly geriatric patients undergoing multilevel laminectomy with noninstrumented fusions. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(5):380–386CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker GA, Cizik AM, Bransford RJ et al (2012) Risk factors for unintended durotomy during spine surgery: a multivariate analysis. Spine J 12(2):121–126PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Baker GA, Cizik AM, Bransford RJ et al (2012) Risk factors for unintended durotomy during spine surgery: a multivariate analysis. Spine J 12(2):121–126PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Guerin P, El Fegoun AB, Obeid I et al (2012) Incidental durotomy during spine surgery: incidence, management and complications. A retrospective review. Injury 43(4):397–401CrossRefPubMed Guerin P, El Fegoun AB, Obeid I et al (2012) Incidental durotomy during spine surgery: incidence, management and complications. A retrospective review. Injury 43(4):397–401CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalevski SK, Peev NA, Haritonov DG (2010) Incidental dural tears in lumbar decompressive surgery: incidence, causes, treatment, results. Asian J Neurosurg 5(1):54–59PubMedCentralPubMed Kalevski SK, Peev NA, Haritonov DG (2010) Incidental dural tears in lumbar decompressive surgery: incidence, causes, treatment, results. Asian J Neurosurg 5(1):54–59PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai A, Ball PA, Bekelis K et al (2012) Surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial: does incidental durotomy affect outcome? Spine 37(5):406–413PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Desai A, Ball PA, Bekelis K et al (2012) Surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial: does incidental durotomy affect outcome? Spine 37(5):406–413PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai A, Ball PA, Bekelis K et al (2011) SPORT: does incidental durotomy affect long-term outcomes in cases of spinal stenosis? Neurosurgery 69(1):38–44PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Desai A, Ball PA, Bekelis K et al (2011) SPORT: does incidental durotomy affect long-term outcomes in cases of spinal stenosis? Neurosurgery 69(1):38–44PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones AA, Stambough JL, Balderston RA et al (1989) Long-term results of lumbar spine surgery complicated by unintended incidental durotomy. Spine 14(4):443–446CrossRefPubMed Jones AA, Stambough JL, Balderston RA et al (1989) Long-term results of lumbar spine surgery complicated by unintended incidental durotomy. Spine 14(4):443–446CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruban D, O’Toole JE (2011) Management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E15CrossRefPubMed Ruban D, O’Toole JE (2011) Management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E15CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jankowitz BT, Atteberry DS, Gerszten PC et al (2009) Effect of fibrin glue on the prevention of persistent cerebral spinal fluid leakage after incidental durotomy during lumbar spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 18(8):1169–1174PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jankowitz BT, Atteberry DS, Gerszten PC et al (2009) Effect of fibrin glue on the prevention of persistent cerebral spinal fluid leakage after incidental durotomy during lumbar spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 18(8):1169–1174PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulder M, Crosier J, Dunn R (2009) Cauda equina compression by hydrogel dural sealant after a laminotomy and discectomy: case report. Spine 34(4):E144–E148CrossRefPubMed Mulder M, Crosier J, Dunn R (2009) Cauda equina compression by hydrogel dural sealant after a laminotomy and discectomy: case report. Spine 34(4):E144–E148CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Sangani PK et al (2000) Incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine 25(20):2263–2267CrossRef Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Sangani PK et al (2000) Incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine 25(20):2263–2267CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosacco SJ, Gardner MJ, Guille JT (2001) Evaluation and treatment of dural tears in lumbar spine surgery: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 389:238–247CrossRefPubMed Bosacco SJ, Gardner MJ, Guille JT (2001) Evaluation and treatment of dural tears in lumbar spine surgery: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 389:238–247CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan MH, Rhin J, Steele G et al (2006) Postoperative management protocol for incidental dural tears during surgery: a review of 3183 consecutive degenerative lumbar cases. Spine 31(22):2609–2613CrossRefPubMed Khan MH, Rhin J, Steele G et al (2006) Postoperative management protocol for incidental dural tears during surgery: a review of 3183 consecutive degenerative lumbar cases. Spine 31(22):2609–2613CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Eismont FJ, Wiesel SW, Rothmann RH (1981) Treatment of dural tears associated with spinal surgery. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 63:1132–1136 Eismont FJ, Wiesel SW, Rothmann RH (1981) Treatment of dural tears associated with spinal surgery. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 63:1132–1136
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Keerl R, Weber RK, Draf W et al (2004) Use of sodium fluorescein solution for detection of cerebrospinal fluid fistulas: an analysis of 420 administrations and reported complications in Europe and the United States. Laryngoscope 114:266–272CrossRefPubMed Keerl R, Weber RK, Draf W et al (2004) Use of sodium fluorescein solution for detection of cerebrospinal fluid fistulas: an analysis of 420 administrations and reported complications in Europe and the United States. Laryngoscope 114:266–272CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Felisati G, Bianchi A, Lozza P et al (2008) Italian multicentre study on intrathecal fluorescein for craniosinusal fistulae. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 28(4):159–163PubMedCentralPubMed Felisati G, Bianchi A, Lozza P et al (2008) Italian multicentre study on intrathecal fluorescein for craniosinusal fistulae. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 28(4):159–163PubMedCentralPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Park P, Leveque JC, La Marca F et al (2010) Dural closure using the U-clip in minimally invasive spinal tumor resection. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:486–489CrossRefPubMed Park P, Leveque JC, La Marca F et al (2010) Dural closure using the U-clip in minimally invasive spinal tumor resection. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:486–489CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein NE (2010) Dural repair with four spinal sealants: focused review of the manufacturers’ inserts and the current literature. Spine J 10(12):1065–1068CrossRefPubMed Epstein NE (2010) Dural repair with four spinal sealants: focused review of the manufacturers’ inserts and the current literature. Spine J 10(12):1065–1068CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang JC, Bohlmann HH, Riew DK (1998) Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine: management and results after a two-year-minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 80:1728–1732CrossRef Wang JC, Bohlmann HH, Riew DK (1998) Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine: management and results after a two-year-minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 80:1728–1732CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Incidental durotomy in spine surgery: first aid in ten steps
verfasst von
Luca Papavero
Nils Engler
Ralph Kothe
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3837-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

European Spine Journal 9/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

TEP mit Roboterhilfe führt nicht zu größerer Zufriedenheit

15.05.2024 Knie-TEP Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Operationsrobotern für den Einbau von Totalendoprothesen des Kniegelenks hat die Präzision der Eingriffe erhöht. Für die postoperative Zufriedenheit der Patienten scheint das aber unerheblich zu sein, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.