Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 8/2016

10.03.2016 | Original Article

Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years

verfasst von: Guillaume Riouallon, Benjamin Bouyer, Stéphane Wolff

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Little is known about the long-term status of patients operated for spine deformities. The aim of this study was to determine the survival of primary fusion in adult idiopathic scoliosis and identify the risk factors of revision surgery.

Methods

Adult patients who underwent primary fusion for idiopathic scoliosis between 1983 and 2011 were included in a continuous monocentric retrospective series. Any additional surgery was registered for survival analysis. Survival and follow-up were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and an analysis was performed to identify the risk factors of revision surgery.

Results

This series included 447 women (86.5 %) and 70 men (13.5 %) reviewed after a mean follow-up of 7 years (range 0–26.4). Mean age was 44.4 years. Fusion was performed on a median 11 levels (range 3–15); revision rate was 13 % (CI 10–17), 18 % (CI 14–23) and 20 % (CI 16–26) at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Revision surgery was associated with age, anterior release, length of fusion, the inferior limit of fusion, post-operative sagittal balance and junctional kyphosis. The length of fusion (HR 1.13 per vertebrae fused, p = 0.007) and the lower limit of fusion (HR 5.9, p < 0.001) remained independent predictors of revision surgery on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

This series evaluated the risk of revision surgery following spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Our results show that the risk seemed to increase linearly with a rate of nearly 20 % after 10 years. The length and lower limit of fusion are the main risk factors for revision surgery. Level IV (e.g. case series).
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho W, Zebala LP, Pahys JM et al (2012) Comparative analysis of clinical outcome and complications in primary versus revision adult scoliosis surgery. Spine Mars 37(5):393–401CrossRef Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho W, Zebala LP, Pahys JM et al (2012) Comparative analysis of clinical outcome and complications in primary versus revision adult scoliosis surgery. Spine Mars 37(5):393–401CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Carreon LY, Puno RM, Lenke LG, Richards BS, Sucato DJ, Emans JB et al (2007) Non-neurologic complications following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone 89:2427–2432CrossRef Carreon LY, Puno RM, Lenke LG, Richards BS, Sucato DJ, Emans JB et al (2007) Non-neurologic complications following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone 89:2427–2432CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Johnson JR (2003) Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(11):20892092 Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Johnson JR (2003) Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(11):20892092
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bago J, Ramirez M, Pellise F, Villanueva C (2003) Survivorship analysis of Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 12(4):435–439CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bago J, Ramirez M, Pellise F, Villanueva C (2003) Survivorship analysis of Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 12(4):435–439CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Guigui P, Blamoutier A, Groupe d’Etude de la Scoliose (2005) Complications of surgical treatment of spinal deformities: a prospective multicentric study of 3311 patients. Rev Chir Orthopédique Réparatrice Appar Mot juin 91(4):314–327CrossRef Guigui P, Blamoutier A, Groupe d’Etude de la Scoliose (2005) Complications of surgical treatment of spinal deformities: a prospective multicentric study of 3311 patients. Rev Chir Orthopédique Réparatrice Appar Mot juin 91(4):314–327CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramo BA, Richards BS (2012) Repeat surgical interventions following « definitive » instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: five-year update on a previously published cohort. Spine 37(14):1211–1217CrossRefPubMed Ramo BA, Richards BS (2012) Repeat surgical interventions following « definitive » instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: five-year update on a previously published cohort. Spine 37(14):1211–1217CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Richards BS, Hasley BP, Casey VF (2006) Repeat surgical interventions following « definitive » instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31(26):3018–3026CrossRefPubMed Richards BS, Hasley BP, Casey VF (2006) Repeat surgical interventions following « definitive » instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31(26):3018–3026CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mok JM, Cloyd JM, Bradford DS, Hu SS, Deviren V, Smith JA et al (2009) Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing. [miscellaneous article]. Spine 34(8):832–839CrossRefPubMed Mok JM, Cloyd JM, Bradford DS, Hu SS, Deviren V, Smith JA et al (2009) Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing. [miscellaneous article]. Spine 34(8):832–839CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Schootman M (2009) Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 34(20):2191–2197CrossRefPubMed Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Schootman M (2009) Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 34(20):2191–2197CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC (2010) Analysis of instrumentation/fusion survivorship without reoperation after primary posterior multiple anchor instrumentation and arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J Janv 10(1):5–15CrossRef Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC (2010) Analysis of instrumentation/fusion survivorship without reoperation after primary posterior multiple anchor instrumentation and arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J Janv 10(1):5–15CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Campos M, Dolan L, Weinstein S (2012) Unanticipated revision surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 37(12):1048–1053CrossRefPubMed Campos M, Dolan L, Weinstein S (2012) Unanticipated revision surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 37(12):1048–1053CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Charosky S, Guigui P, Blamoutier A, Roussouly P, Chopin DM, BULLET, Study Group on Scoliosis (2012) Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of 306 patients [miscellaneous article]. Spine 37(8):693–700CrossRefPubMed Charosky S, Guigui P, Blamoutier A, Roussouly P, Chopin DM, BULLET, Study Group on Scoliosis (2012) Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of 306 patients [miscellaneous article]. Spine 37(8):693–700CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Biau DJ, Hamadouche M (2011) Estimating implant survival in the presence of competing risks. Int Orthop 35(2):151–155CrossRefPubMed Biau DJ, Hamadouche M (2011) Estimating implant survival in the presence of competing risks. Int Orthop 35(2):151–155CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP et al (2008) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61(4):344–349CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP et al (2008) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61(4):344–349CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sansur CA, Smith JS, Coe JD, Glassman SD, Berven SH, Polly DW et al (2011) Scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality of adult scoliosis surgery. Spine 36(9):E593–E597CrossRefPubMed Sansur CA, Smith JS, Coe JD, Glassman SD, Berven SH, Polly DW et al (2011) Scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality of adult scoliosis surgery. Spine 36(9):E593–E597CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Lenke LG, Polly DWJ, Sides B, Bridwell KH (2007) Surgical revision rates of hooks versus hybrid versus screws versus combined anteroposterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 32(20):2258–2264CrossRefPubMed Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Lenke LG, Polly DWJ, Sides B, Bridwell KH (2007) Surgical revision rates of hooks versus hybrid versus screws versus combined anteroposterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 32(20):2258–2264CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pichelmann MA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Good CR, O’Leary PT, Sides BA (2010) Revision rates following primary adult spinal deformity surgery: six hundred forty-three consecutive patients followed-up to twenty-two years postoperative. Spine 35(2):219–226CrossRefPubMed Pichelmann MA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Good CR, O’Leary PT, Sides BA (2010) Revision rates following primary adult spinal deformity surgery: six hundred forty-three consecutive patients followed-up to twenty-two years postoperative. Spine 35(2):219–226CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, Smith JA, Hu SS, Bradford DS (2002) Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine 27(7):776–786CrossRefPubMed Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, Smith JA, Hu SS, Bradford DS (2002) Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine 27(7):776–786CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Berra A, Lenke LG (2004) Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum a matched cohort analysis. Spine 29(18):1996–2005CrossRefPubMed Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Berra A, Lenke LG (2004) Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum a matched cohort analysis. Spine 29(18):1996–2005CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Kim YW (2007) Is the T9, T11, or L1 the more reliable proximal level after adult lumbar or lumbosacral instrumented fusion to L5 or S1? Spine 32(24):2653–2661CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Kim YW (2007) Is the T9, T11, or L1 the more reliable proximal level after adult lumbar or lumbosacral instrumented fusion to L5 or S1? Spine 32(24):2653–2661CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, Kim JH, Kim SS, Lee TJ et al (2008) Short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 17(5):650–656CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, Kim JH, Kim SS, Lee TJ et al (2008) Short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 17(5):650–656CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat OʼShaughnessy BA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho W, Baldus C, Chang MS et al (2012) Does a long-fusion « T3-sacrum » portend a worse outcome than a short-fusion « T10-sacrum » in primary surgery for adult scoliosis? Spine 37(10):884–890CrossRefPubMed OʼShaughnessy BA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho W, Baldus C, Chang MS et al (2012) Does a long-fusion « T3-sacrum » portend a worse outcome than a short-fusion « T10-sacrum » in primary surgery for adult scoliosis? Spine 37(10):884–890CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartin NL, Mehbod AA, Joglekar SB, Transfeldt EE (2013) The fusion risk score: evaluating baseline risk in thoracic and lumbar fusion surgery. Spine 38(25):E1616–E1623CrossRefPubMed Hartin NL, Mehbod AA, Joglekar SB, Transfeldt EE (2013) The fusion risk score: evaluating baseline risk in thoracic and lumbar fusion surgery. Spine 38(25):E1616–E1623CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearcy M, Portek I, Shepherd J (1984) Three-dimensional x-ray analysis of normal movement in the lumbar spine. Spine 9(3):294–297CrossRefPubMed Pearcy M, Portek I, Shepherd J (1984) Three-dimensional x-ray analysis of normal movement in the lumbar spine. Spine 9(3):294–297CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Chang D, Theiler R, Grob D (1991) Functional radiographic diagnosis of the lumbar spine flexion-extension and lateral bending. Spine 16(5):562–571CrossRefPubMed Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Chang D, Theiler R, Grob D (1991) Functional radiographic diagnosis of the lumbar spine flexion-extension and lateral bending. Spine 16(5):562–571CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Edmondston SJ, Christensen MM, Keller S, Steigen LB, Barclay L (2012) Functional radiographic analysis of thoracic spine extension motion in asymptomatic men. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 35(3):203–208CrossRefPubMed Edmondston SJ, Christensen MM, Keller S, Steigen LB, Barclay L (2012) Functional radiographic analysis of thoracic spine extension motion in asymptomatic men. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 35(3):203–208CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Marks M, Newton PO, Petcharaporn M, Bastrom TP, Shah S, Betz R et al (2012) Postoperative segmental motion of the unfused spine distal to the fusion in 100 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 37(10):826–832CrossRefPubMed Marks M, Newton PO, Petcharaporn M, Bastrom TP, Shah S, Betz R et al (2012) Postoperative segmental motion of the unfused spine distal to the fusion in 100 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 37(10):826–832CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MC, Ounpuu S, Solomito M, Smith BG, Thomson JD (2013) Loss in spinal motion from inclusion of a single mid-lumbar level in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 10:118 Lee MC, Ounpuu S, Solomito M, Smith BG, Thomson JD (2013) Loss in spinal motion from inclusion of a single mid-lumbar level in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 10:118
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Li G, Patil CG, Lad SP, Ho C, Tian W, Boakye M (2008) Effects of age and comorbidities on complication rates and adverse outcomes after lumbar laminectomy in elderly patients. Spine 33(11):1250–1255CrossRefPubMed Li G, Patil CG, Lad SP, Ho C, Tian W, Boakye M (2008) Effects of age and comorbidities on complication rates and adverse outcomes after lumbar laminectomy in elderly patients. Spine 33(11):1250–1255CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Patil CG, Santarelli J, Lad SP, Ho C, Tian W, Boakye M (2008) Inpatient complications, mortality, and discharge disposition after surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis: a national perspective. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 8(6):904–910CrossRef Patil CG, Santarelli J, Lad SP, Ho C, Tian W, Boakye M (2008) Inpatient complications, mortality, and discharge disposition after surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis: a national perspective. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 8(6):904–910CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MJ, Konodi MA, Cizik AM, Bransford RJ, Bellabarba C, Chapman J (2012) Risk Factors for Medical Complication after Spine Surgery: a multivariate analysis of 1591 patients. Spine J Mars 12(3):197–206CrossRef Lee MJ, Konodi MA, Cizik AM, Bransford RJ, Bellabarba C, Chapman J (2012) Risk Factors for Medical Complication after Spine Surgery: a multivariate analysis of 1591 patients. Spine J Mars 12(3):197–206CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Bess S, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, Cunningham M, Shaffrey C, Shelokov A et al (2009) Pain and disability determine treatment modality for older patients with adult scoliosis, while deformity guides treatment for younger patients. Spine 34(20):2186–2190CrossRefPubMed Bess S, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, Cunningham M, Shaffrey C, Shelokov A et al (2009) Pain and disability determine treatment modality for older patients with adult scoliosis, while deformity guides treatment for younger patients. Spine 34(20):2186–2190CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Glassman SD, Schwab FJ, Bridwell KH, Ondra SL, Berven S, Lenke LG (2007) The selection of operative versus nonoperative treatment in patients with adult scoliosis [Miscellaneous Article]. Spine 32(1):93–97CrossRefPubMed Glassman SD, Schwab FJ, Bridwell KH, Ondra SL, Berven S, Lenke LG (2007) The selection of operative versus nonoperative treatment in patients with adult scoliosis [Miscellaneous Article]. Spine 32(1):93–97CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjönen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Helenius M et al (2005) Does gender affect outcome of surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 30(4):462–467CrossRefPubMed Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjönen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Helenius M et al (2005) Does gender affect outcome of surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 30(4):462–467CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O (2012) Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis minimum 5 years of follow-up. Spine 37(17):1479–1489CrossRefPubMed Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O (2012) Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis minimum 5 years of follow-up. Spine 37(17):1479–1489CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun Z, Qiu G, Zhao Y, Guo S, Wang Y, Zhang J et al (2015) Risk factors of proximal junctional angle increase after selective posterior thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc févr 24(2):290–297CrossRef Sun Z, Qiu G, Zhao Y, Guo S, Wang Y, Zhang J et al (2015) Risk factors of proximal junctional angle increase after selective posterior thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc févr 24(2):290–297CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Koller H, Pfanz C, Meier O, Hitzl W, Mayer M, Bullmann V, et al (2015) Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 1–17 Koller H, Pfanz C, Meier O, Hitzl W, Mayer M, Bullmann V, et al (2015) Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 1–17
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazennec JY, Ramaré S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B et al (2009) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc févr 9(1):47–55CrossRef Lazennec JY, Ramaré S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B et al (2009) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc févr 9(1):47–55CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G (2006) Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine 31(20):2329–2336CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G (2006) Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine 31(20):2329–2336CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Yagi M, King AB, BoachieAdjei O (2012) Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis minimum 5 years of follow-up. Spine 37(17):147914–147989CrossRef Yagi M, King AB, BoachieAdjei O (2012) Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis minimum 5 years of follow-up. Spine 37(17):147914–147989CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years
verfasst von
Guillaume Riouallon
Benjamin Bouyer
Stéphane Wolff
Publikationsdatum
10.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4505-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

European Spine Journal 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

TEP mit Roboterhilfe führt nicht zu größerer Zufriedenheit

15.05.2024 Knie-TEP Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Operationsrobotern für den Einbau von Totalendoprothesen des Kniegelenks hat die Präzision der Eingriffe erhöht. Für die postoperative Zufriedenheit der Patienten scheint das aber unerheblich zu sein, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.