Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Epidemiology 10/2021

18.10.2021 | ESSAY

The limits of small-for-gestational-age as a high-risk category

verfasst von: Allen J. Wilcox, Marianna Cortese, D. Robert McConnaughey, Dag Moster, Olga Basso

Erschienen in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Ausgabe 10/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

SGA (small for gestational age) is widely used to identify high-risk infants, although with inconsistent definitions. Cut points range from 2.5th to 10th percentile of birthweight-for-gestational age. We used receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC) to identify the cut point with maximum sensitivity and specificity (Youden Index), and the area under the curve (AUC), which assesses overall discriminating power. Analysis was conducted on 3,836,034 US births (2015) and 292,279 Norwegian births (2010–14). Birthweight percentiles were calculated using exact birthweights at each week of gestational age, and then summarized across gestational ages. We also conducted a companion analysis of gestational age itself to consider the predictive power of gestational week of birth. Outcomes were neonatal mortality and cerebral palsy, both strongly associated with birthweight. Birthweight percentiles performed poorly in all analyses. The AUC for birthweight percentiles as a discriminator of neonatal mortality was 60% (where 50% is no better than a coin-toss). At such low discrimination, the Youden Index provides no useful SGA cut point. Results in Norway were virtually identical, with an AUC of 58%. The AUC with cerebral palsy as the outcome was even lower, at 54%. In contrast, gestational age had an AUC of 85% as a predictor of neonatal mortality, with < 37 weeks as the optimum cut point. SGA provides surprisingly poor identification of at-risk infants, while gestational age performs well. Similar results in two countries that differ in mean birthweight, percent preterm, and neonatal mortality suggest robustness across populations.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Web of. Science, accessed 31 March 2021. Web of. Science, accessed 31 March 2021.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeve D, Regelmann MO, Holzman IR, Rapaport R. Small at birth, but how small? The definition of SGA revisited. Horm Res Paediatr. 2016;86:357–60.CrossRef Zeve D, Regelmann MO, Holzman IR, Rapaport R. Small at birth, but how small? The definition of SGA revisited. Horm Res Paediatr. 2016;86:357–60.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Basso O, Wilcox AJ. Mortality risk among preterm babies: immaturity vs. underlying pathology. Epidemiology. 2010;21(4):521–7.CrossRef Basso O, Wilcox AJ. Mortality risk among preterm babies: immaturity vs. underlying pathology. Epidemiology. 2010;21(4):521–7.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Talge NM, Mudd LM, Sikorskii A, Basso O. United States birth weight reference corrected for implausible gestational age estimates. Pediatrics. 2014;133(5):844–53.CrossRef Talge NM, Mudd LM, Sikorskii A, Basso O. United States birth weight reference corrected for implausible gestational age estimates. Pediatrics. 2014;133(5):844–53.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cortese M, Moster D, Wilcox AJ. Term birth weight and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Epidemiology. 2021;32(4):583–90.CrossRef Cortese M, Moster D, Wilcox AJ. Term birth weight and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Epidemiology. 2021;32(4):583–90.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Moster D, Lie RT, Irgens LM, Bjerkedal T, Markestad T. The association of Apgar score with subsequent death and cerebral palsy: a population-based study in term infants. J Pediatr. 2001;138(6):798–803l.CrossRef Moster D, Lie RT, Irgens LM, Bjerkedal T, Markestad T. The association of Apgar score with subsequent death and cerebral palsy: a population-based study in term infants. J Pediatr. 2001;138(6):798–803l.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldenberg RL, Hoffman HJ, Foster JM, et al. Intrauterine growth retardation: standards for diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:271–7.CrossRef Goldenberg RL, Hoffman HJ, Foster JM, et al. Intrauterine growth retardation: standards for diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:271–7.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Kimeyer SE, Gregory ECW. Measuring gestational age in vital statistics data: transitioning to the obstetric estimate. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(5):1–20.PubMed Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Kimeyer SE, Gregory ECW. Measuring gestational age in vital statistics data: transitioning to the obstetric estimate. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(5):1–20.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilcox AJ. On the importance, and unimportance, of birth weight. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30(6):1233–41.CrossRef Wilcox AJ. On the importance, and unimportance, of birth weight. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30(6):1233–41.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Divon MY. Fetal growth restriction: screening and diagnosis. UpToDate. Accessed 3 May 2021. Divon MY. Fetal growth restriction: screening and diagnosis. UpToDate. Accessed 3 May 2021.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat WHO Expert Committee. Physical Status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry: Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva. World Health Organization; 1995. WHO Expert Committee. Physical Status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry: Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva. World Health Organization; 1995.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Clayton PE, Cianfarani S, Czernichow P, Johannsson G, Rapaport R, Rogol A. A consensus statement of the International Societies of Pediatric endocrinology and the Growth Hormone Research Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(3):804–10.CrossRef Clayton PE, Cianfarani S, Czernichow P, Johannsson G, Rapaport R, Rogol A. A consensus statement of the International Societies of Pediatric endocrinology and the Growth Hormone Research Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(3):804–10.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Anctil AO, Joshi GB, Lucas WE, Little WA, Callagan DA. Prematurity: a more precise approach to identification. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;24(5):716–21.PubMed Anctil AO, Joshi GB, Lucas WE, Little WA, Callagan DA. Prematurity: a more precise approach to identification. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;24(5):716–21.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Budin P. Sickly infants. La Presse Med. 1902;97:1155–57. Budin P. Sickly infants. La Presse Med. 1902;97:1155–57.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Basso O, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR. Birth weight and mortality: causality or confounding? Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(4):303–11.CrossRef Basso O, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR. Birth weight and mortality: causality or confounding? Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(4):303–11.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kabiri D, et al. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55:177–88.CrossRef Kabiri D, et al. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55:177–88.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkinson D, Verhagen E, Johansson S. Thresholds for resuscitation of extremely preterm infants in the UK, Sweden, and Netherlands. Pediatrics. 2018;1142(s1):S574–S584.CrossRef Wilkinson D, Verhagen E, Johansson S. Thresholds for resuscitation of extremely preterm infants in the UK, Sweden, and Netherlands. Pediatrics. 2018;1142(s1):S574–S584.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandy GT. Infants with fetal (intrauterine) growth restriction. UpToDate. Accessed 10 Dec 2020. Mandy GT. Infants with fetal (intrauterine) growth restriction. UpToDate. Accessed 10 Dec 2020.
Metadaten
Titel
The limits of small-for-gestational-age as a high-risk category
verfasst von
Allen J. Wilcox
Marianna Cortese
D. Robert McConnaughey
Dag Moster
Olga Basso
Publikationsdatum
18.10.2021
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Ausgabe 10/2021
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00810-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2021

European Journal of Epidemiology 10/2021 Zur Ausgabe