Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2006

01.08.2006 | Professional Issues

Games in Clinical Genetic Counseling Supervision

verfasst von: Nathalie McIntosh, Anita Dircks, Jennifer Fitzpatrick, Cheryl Shuman

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 4/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Games are defined as ongoing series of complementary ulterior transactions that are superficially plausible but have a concealed motivation to maximize pay-offs and minimize penalties for the initiator. While some games are harmless and part of socialization, others are destructive. Destructive game-playing in clinical supervision, in which game-playing (initiated by either supervisors or students) interferes with a student's realization of internship goals, has been documented in some allied healthcare professions but has not yet been studied in genetic counseling. Genetic counselors and clinical supervisors of genetic counseling students were anonymously surveyed regarding their experiences with destructive game-playing. Results show that such games do occur in genetic counseling clinical supervision. Some games are the same or similar to ones previously described in other health-care professions; others may be unique to genetic counseling. The purpose of this paper is to document these games as a first step to facilitating dialogue, understanding and awareness of them.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey, J., & Baillie, L. (1996). Transactional analysis: How to improve communication skills. Nurs Stand, 10, 39–42.PubMed Bailey, J., & Baillie, L. (1996). Transactional analysis: How to improve communication skills. Nurs Stand, 10, 39–42.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Bauman, W. F. (1972). Games counselor trainees play: Dealing with trainee resistance. Couns Edu Superv, 44, 251–256. Bauman, W. F. (1972). Games counselor trainees play: Dealing with trainee resistance. Couns Edu Superv, 44, 251–256.
Zurück zum Zitat Berne, E. (1964a). Principles of transactional analysis. Curr Psychiatr Therapies, 25, 35–45. Berne, E. (1964a). Principles of transactional analysis. Curr Psychiatr Therapies, 25, 35–45.
Zurück zum Zitat Berne, E. (1964b). Games people play. New York: Grove Press. Berne, E. (1964b). Games people play. New York: Grove Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummings, P. H., & Groves, D. P. (1982). Communications breakdown: Games EMTs and nurses play. JEMS, 7, 52–57.PubMed Cummings, P. H., & Groves, D. P. (1982). Communications breakdown: Games EMTs and nurses play. JEMS, 7, 52–57.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Deering, C. G. (1993). Giving and taking criticism. Am J Nurs, 12, 56–62.CrossRef Deering, C. G. (1993). Giving and taking criticism. Am J Nurs, 12, 56–62.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gizynski, M. (1978). Self awareness of the supervisor in supervision. Clin Soc Work J, 6, 202–210.CrossRef Gizynski, M. (1978). Self awareness of the supervisor in supervision. Clin Soc Work J, 6, 202–210.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hagler, P., & Casey, P. L. (1990). Games supervisors play in clinical supervision. ASHA, X, 53–56. Hagler, P., & Casey, P. L. (1990). Games supervisors play in clinical supervision. ASHA, X, 53–56.
Zurück zum Zitat Hawthorne, L. (1975). Games supervisors play. Soc Work, 20, 179–183. Hawthorne, L. (1975). Games supervisors play. Soc Work, 20, 179–183.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendrickson, S. M., McCarthy Veach , P., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). A qualitative investigation of student and supervisor perceptions of live supervision in genetic counseling. J Genet Couns, 11, 25–50.CrossRef Hendrickson, S. M., McCarthy Veach , P., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). A qualitative investigation of student and supervisor perceptions of live supervision in genetic counseling. J Genet Couns, 11, 25–50.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, A. (2001). Possible influences on clinical supervision. Nurs Stand, 16, 38–42.PubMed Jones, A. (2001). Possible influences on clinical supervision. Nurs Stand, 16, 38–42.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kadushin, A. (1968). Games people play in supervision. Soc Work, 13, 23–32. Kadushin, A. (1968). Games people play in supervision. Soc Work, 13, 23–32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy, A. L. (2000). Supervision for practicing genetic counselors: An overview of models. J Genet Couns, 9, 379–390.CrossRef Kennedy, A. L. (2000). Supervision for practicing genetic counselors: An overview of models. J Genet Couns, 9, 379–390.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lankford, T. M. (1982). On games people play in hospitals. Nurs Manage, 13, 73.PubMed Lankford, T. M. (1982). On games people play in hospitals. Nurs Manage, 13, 73.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lindh, H. L., McCarthy Veach P., Cikanek, K., & LeRoy, B. S. (2003). A survey of clinical supervision in genetic counseling. J Genet Couns, 12, 23–41.CrossRef Lindh, H. L., McCarthy Veach P., Cikanek, K., & LeRoy, B. S. (2003). A survey of clinical supervision in genetic counseling. J Genet Couns, 12, 23–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy, P., & LeRoy, B. S. (1998). Student supervision. In D. L. Baker, J. Schuette and W. Ulhmann (Eds.), A guide to genetic counseling (pp. 295–330). New York: Wiley-Liss. McCarthy, P., & LeRoy, B. S. (1998). Student supervision. In D. L. Baker, J. Schuette and W. Ulhmann (Eds.), A guide to genetic counseling (pp. 295–330). New York: Wiley-Liss.
Zurück zum Zitat McGee, A. D., & Martin, W. B. W. (1978). The games nurses play. The Can Nurs, 74, 49–52. McGee, A. D., & Martin, W. B. W. (1978). The games nurses play. The Can Nurs, 74, 49–52.
Zurück zum Zitat Middleman, R. R. (1970). Let there be games!. Soc Serv Rev, 44, 44–53.CrossRef Middleman, R. R. (1970). Let there be games!. Soc Serv Rev, 44, 44–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sleight, C. C. (1984). Games people play in clinical supervision. ASHA, 26, 27–29.PubMed Sleight, C. C. (1984). Games people play in clinical supervision. ASHA, 26, 27–29.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Supervision for practicing genetic counselors (Special issue). (2000). J Genet Couns, 9(5). Supervision for practicing genetic counselors (Special issue). (2000). J Genet Couns, 9(5).
Metadaten
Titel
Games in Clinical Genetic Counseling Supervision
verfasst von
Nathalie McIntosh
Anita Dircks
Jennifer Fitzpatrick
Cheryl Shuman
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2006
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 4/2006
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9029-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2006

Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

Blutdrucksenkung könnte Uterusmyome verhindern

Frauen mit unbehandelter oder neu auftretender Hypertonie haben ein deutlich erhöhtes Risiko für Uterusmyome. Eine Therapie mit Antihypertensiva geht hingegen mit einer verringerten Inzidenz der gutartigen Tumoren einher.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugat hält solide Tumoren in Schach

16.05.2024 Zielgerichtete Therapie Nachrichten

Trastuzumab deruxtecan scheint auch jenseits von Lungenkrebs gut gegen solide Tumoren mit HER2-Mutationen zu wirken. Dafür sprechen die Daten einer offenen Pan-Tumor-Studie.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.