Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Im April diskutierten die Herz-Kreislauf-Spezialisten aus der ganzen Welt auf dem  Kongress des American College of Cardiology (ACC) u.a. neue Therapieansätze bei akutem Myokardinfarkt, koronarer Herzerkrankung, kardiogenem Schock oder Aortenklappenstenose. In unserem Kongress-Dossier haben wir für Sie Berichte über die „Late-Breaking Trials“ und andere wichtige Studien zusammengestellt. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 5/2007

01.10.2007 | Original Research

Distress and Family Functioning in Oncogenetic Counselling for Hereditary and Familial Breast and/or Ovarian Cancers

verfasst von: C. Condello, R. Gesuita, M. Pensabene, I. Spagnoletti, I. Capuano, C. Baldi, F. Carle, A. Contegiacomo

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 5/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

We conducted a psychological assessment during oncogenetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Anxiety and depression were assessed with the HAD scale, and family functioning and satisfaction with FACES III. HAD was administered at baseline (t 1), at risk communication (t 2), at genetic test result communication, or at first surveillance in not tested subjects (t 3); FACES III was administered at baseline only. We analysed a total of 185 questionnaires administered to the 37 subjects studied. Although not pathological, distress was significantly higher at t 2 and t 3 (p = 0.027 and p = 0.039, respectively). Health and marital status were significantly associated with distress. In a disease-free condition, anxiety was higher (p = 0.027) at t 2, and for single status, depression increased from t 1 to t 2 (p = 0.026). Families were perceived to be well functioning, and subjects were satisfied with their families. The data collected in this analysis could help to improve the quality of oncogenetic counselling in clinical practice.
Literatur
Andersen, B. L., & Tewfik, H. H. (1985). Psychological reactions to radiation therapy: Reconsideration of the adaptive aspects of anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1024–1032.PubMedCrossRef
Andrews, L., Meiser, B., Apicella, C., & Tucker, K. (2004). Psychological impact of genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in women of Ashkenazi Jewish background: A prospective study. Genet Test, 8, 240–247.PubMedCrossRef
Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P. D., Narod, S., Risch, H. A., Eyfjord, J. E., Hopper, J. L., et al. (2003). Average risks of breast cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: A combined analysis of 22 studies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 72, 1117–1130.PubMedCrossRef
Bleiker, E. M. A., Hahn, D. E. E., & Aaronson, N. K. (2003). Psychological issues in cancer genetics. Acta Oncologica, 42(4), 276–286.PubMedCrossRef
Bloom, J. R., Stewart, S. L., Johnston, M., Banks, P., & Fobair, P. (2001). Sources of support and the physical and mental well-being of young women with breast cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1513–1524.CrossRef
Bowles Biesecker, B., Ishibe, N., Hadley, D. W., Giambarresi, T. R., Kase, R. G., Lerman, C., et al. (2000). Psychosocial factors predicting BRCA1/2 testing decisions in members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. American Journal of Human Genetics, 93, 257–263.
Brain, K., Norman, P., Gray, J., & Mansel, R. (1999). Anxiety and adherence to breast self-examination in women with a family history of breast cancer. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 181–187.PubMed
Burke, W., Daly, M., Garber, J., Botkin, J., Kahn, M. J., Lynch P. et al. (1997). Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. JAMA, 277, 997–1003.PubMedCrossRef
Butow, P. N., Lobb, E. A., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., & Tucker, K. M. (2003). Psychological outcome and risk perception after genetic testing and counseling in breast cancer: A systematic review. Medical Journal of Australia, 178, 77–81.PubMed
Claes, E., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Denayer, L., Decruyenaere, M., Boogaerts, A., Philippe, K., et al. (2005). Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: psychological distress and illness representations 1 year following disclosure. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(5), 349–363.PubMedCrossRef
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.PubMedCrossRef
Contegiacomo, A., Pensabene, M., Capuano, I., Tauchmanova, L., Federico, M., Turchetti, D., et al. (2004). An oncologist-based model of cancer genetic counselling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Annals of Oncology, 15, 726–732.PubMedCrossRef
Contegiacomo, A., Pensabene, M., Capuano, I., Tauchmanova, L., Federico, M., Turchetti, D., et al. (2005). Comment on “Cancer genetic counseling” by P. Mandich et al. (Ann Oncol 2005; 16:171). Annals of Oncology, 16, 1208–1209.PubMedCrossRef
Costantini, M., Musso, M, Viterbori, P., Bonci, F., Del Mastro, L., Garrone, O., et al. (1999). Detecting psychological distress in cancer patients: Validity of the Italian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Supportive Care in Cancer, 7, 121–127.PubMedCrossRef
Drossaert, C. C., Boer, H., & Seydel, E. R. (1996). Perceived risk, anxiety, mammogram uptake, and breast self-examination of women with a family history of breast cancer: The role of knowing to be at increased risk. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 20, 76–85.PubMed
DiCastro, M., Frydman, M., Friedman, I., Shiri-Sverdlov, R., Papa, M. Z., Goldman, B., et al. (2002). Genetic counseling in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer in Israel: Psychosocial impact and retention of genetic information. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 111, 147–151.PubMedCrossRef
DudokdeWit, A. C., Tibben, A., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Niermeijer, M. F., Passchier, J., Trijsburg, R. W., and the Rotterdam/Leiden Genetics Workgroup (1998). Distress in individuals facing predictive DNA testing for autosomal dominant late-onset disorders: Comparing questionnaire results with in-depth interviews. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 75, 62–74.PubMedCrossRef
DudokdeWit, A. C., Tibben, A., Frets, P. G., Meijers-Heijboer, E. J., Devilee, P., Klijn, J. G., et al. (1997). BRCA1 in the Family: A case description of psychological implications. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 71, 63–71.PubMedCrossRef
Evans, D. G. R., Blair, V., Greenhalgh, R., Hopwood, P. & Howell, A. (1994). The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 70, 934–938.PubMed
Foster, C., Evans, D. G., Eeles, R., Eccles, D., Ashley, S., Brooks, L., et al. (2004). Non-uptake of predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 among relatives of known carriers: Attributes, cancer worry, and barriers to testing in a multicenter clinical cohort. Genet Test, 8, 23–29.PubMedCrossRef
Friedman, L. C, Kalidas, M, Elledge, R., Chang, J., Romero, C., Husain, I., et al. (2006). Optimism, Social Support and Psychosocial Functioning Among Women With Breast Cancer. Psychooncology, 15, 595–603.PubMedCrossRef
Geirdal, A. O., Reichelt, J. G., Dahl, A. A., Heimdal, K., Maehle, L., Stormorken, A., et al. (2005). Psychological distress in women at risk of hereditary breast/ovarian or HNPCC cancers in the absence of demonstrated mutations. Familial Cancer, 4, 121–126.PubMedCrossRef
Hopwood, P., Howell, A., & Maguire, P. (1991). Screening for psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced breast cancer: validation of two self-report questionnaires. British Journal of Cancer, 64, 353–356.PubMed
Kash, K. M., Holland, J. C., Halper, M. S., & Miller, D. G. (1992). Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 84, 24–30.PubMedCrossRef
Kash, K. M., Ortega-Verdejo, K., Dabney, M. K., Holland, J. C., Miller, D. G., & Osborne, M. P. (2000). Psychological aspects of cancer genetics: women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Seminars in Surgical Oncology, 18, 333–338.PubMedCrossRef
Kim, Y., Duhamel, K. N., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (2005). Psychological distress among healthy women with family histories of breast cancer: Effects of recent life events. Psychooncology, 14, 555–563.PubMedCrossRef
Koehly, L. M., Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Kempf, K. K. G., Vernon, S. W., & Gritz, E. R. (2003). A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12(4), 304–13.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
Lodder, L., Frets, P. G., Trijsburg, R. W., Meijers-Heijboer, E. J., Klijn, J. G., Duivenvoorden, H. J., et al. (2001). Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 98, 15–24.PubMedCrossRef
Lutgendorf, S. K., Sood, A. K., Anderson, B., McGinn, S., Maiseri, H., Dao, M., et al. (2005). Social support, psychological distress, and natural killer cell activity in ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 7105–7113.PubMedCrossRef
Marteau, T. M., & Croyle, R. T. (1998). The new genetics psychological responses to genetic testing. BMJ, 316(7132): 693–696.PubMed
McInerney-Leo, A., Hadley, D., Kase, R. G., Giambarresi, T. R., Struewing, J. P., & Bowle Biesecker, B. (2006). BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families III: Risk perception and screening. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 140A, 2198–2206.CrossRef
Meiser, B. (2005). Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: An update of the literature. Psychooncology, 14, 1060–1074.PubMedCrossRef
Minuchin, S. (1976). Famiglia e Terapia della Famiglia. Roma: Astrolabio.
Mouchawar, J., Byers, T., Cutter, G., Dignan, M., & Michael, S. (1999). A study of the relationship between family history of breast cancer and knowledge of breast cancer genetic testing prerequisites. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 23, 22–30.PubMedCrossRef
Olson, D. H. (1985). FACES III (Family Adaptation and Cohesion Scales). St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.
Olson, D. H. (2000). Empirical approach to family Assessment. Circumplex model of marital and family system. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144–167.CrossRef
Olson D. H. & Gorall D. M. (2003) Circumplex model of marital and family systems. In: F. Walsh (Ed), Normal Family Processes, 3rd edn. New York: Guilford, pp. 514–547.
Payne, D. K., Hoffman, R. G., Theodoulou, M., Dosik, M., & Massie, M. J. (1999). Screening for anxiety and depression in women with breast cancer. Psychiatry and medical grear up for managed care. Psychosomatics, 40, 64–69.PubMed
Söllner, W., Maislinger, S., König, A., Devries, A., & Lukas, P. (2004). Providing psychosocial support for breast cancer patients based on screening for distress within a consultation-liaison service. Psychooncology, 13, 893–897.PubMedCrossRef
Stark, D., Kiely, M., Smith, A., Velikova, G., House, A., & Selby, P. (2002). Anxiety disorders in cancer patients: Their nature, association, and relation to quality of life. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(14), 3137–3148.PubMedCrossRef
Vasen, H. F., Haites, N. E., Evans, D. G., Steel, C. M., Moller, P., Hodgson, S., et al. (1998). Current policies for surveillance and management in women at risk of breast and ovarian cancer: A survey among 16 European family cancer clinics. European Familial Breast Cancer Collaborative Group. European Journal of Cancer, 34, 1922–1926.PubMedCrossRef
Watson, M., Foster, C., Eeles, R., Eccles, D., Ashley, S., Davidson, R., et al. (2004). Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre cohort. British Journal of Cancer, 91, 1787–1794.PubMedCrossRef
WHOQOL Group. (1994). The development of life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In: J. Orley, & W. Kuyken (Eds), Quality of life assessment: International perspective. Heidelberg: Springer.
Wong-Kim, E. C., & Bloom, J. R. (2005). Depression experienced by young women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psychooncology, 14, 564–573.PubMedCrossRef
Zigmond, A. S.,& Snaith, R. P. (1983). Hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Distress and Family Functioning in Oncogenetic Counselling for Hereditary and Familial Breast and/or Ovarian Cancers
verfasst von
C. Condello
R. Gesuita
M. Pensabene
I. Spagnoletti
I. Capuano
C. Baldi
F. Carle
A. Contegiacomo
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2007
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 5/2007
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9102-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2007

Journal of Genetic Counseling 5/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Professional Issues

Stigmatization, Culture and Counseling A Commentary on Growing Up and Living with NF1: a UK–Bangladeshi Case Study—by Santi Rozario

Original Research

Awareness and Attitudes Regarding Prenatal Testing among Texas Women of Childbearing Age

Original Research

The Impact of Breast Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment on Intentions to Perform Cancer Surveillance Behaviors

Original Research

The Influence of Cancer-related Distress and Sense of Coherence on Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Hereditary Cancer

Professional Issues

Providing a Transcultural Genetic Counseling Service in the UK

Book Review

Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians (2nd ed)

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

Blutdrucksenkung könnte Uterusmyome verhindern

21.05.2024 Krebsvorsorge in der Gynäkologie Nachrichten

Frauen mit unbehandelter oder neu auftretender Hypertonie haben ein deutlich erhöhtes Risiko für Uterusmyome. Eine Therapie mit Antihypertensiva geht hingegen mit einer verringerten Inzidenz der gutartigen Tumoren einher.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugat hält solide Tumoren in Schach

16.05.2024 Zielgerichtete Therapie Nachrichten

Trastuzumab deruxtecan scheint auch jenseits von Lungenkrebs gut gegen solide Tumoren mit HER2-Mutationen zu wirken. Dafür sprechen die Daten einer offenen Pan-Tumor-Studie.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise