Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2008

01.12.2008 | Perspectives

Publication Guidelines for Quality Improvement Studies in Health Care: Evolution of the SQUIRE Project

verfasst von: Frank Davidoff, MD, Paul Batalden, MD, David Stevens, MD, Greg Ogrinc, MD, MS, Susan Mooney, MD, MS, for the SQUIRE development group

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 12/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In 2005 we published draft guidelines for reporting studies of quality improvement interventions as the initial step in a consensus process for development of a more definitive version. The current article contains the revised version, which we refer to as SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence). We describe the consensus process, which included informal feedback, formal written commentaries, input from publication guideline developers, review of the literature on the epistemology of improvement and on methods for evaluating complex social programs, and a meeting of stakeholders for critical review of the guidelines’ content and wording, followed by commentary on sequential versions from an expert consultant group. Finally, we examine major differences between SQUIRE and the initial draft, and consider limitations of and unresolved questions about SQUIRE; we also describe ancillary supporting documents and alternative versions under development, and plans for dissemination, testing, and further development of SQUIRE.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:319–25.PubMedCrossRef Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:319–25.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Janisse T. A next step: reviewer feedback on quality improvement publication guidelines. Permanente Journal. 2007;11:1. Janisse T. A next step: reviewer feedback on quality improvement publication guidelines. Permanente Journal. 2007;11:1.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Berwick D. Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:315–6.PubMedCrossRef Berwick D. Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:315–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomson RG. Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement? Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:317–8.PubMedCrossRef Thomson RG. Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement? Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:317–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chin MH, Chien AT. Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in health care: an integral part of quality improvement scholarship. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:79–80.PubMedCrossRef Chin MH, Chien AT. Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in health care: an integral part of quality improvement scholarship. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:79–80.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker GR. Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:150–1.PubMedCrossRef Baker GR. Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:150–1.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pronovost P, Wachter R. Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:152–3.PubMedCrossRef Pronovost P, Wachter R. Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:152–3.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gawande A. The checklist. The New Yorker. December 10, 2007, pp. 86–95. Gawande A. The checklist. The New Yorker. December 10, 2007, pp. 86–95.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rennie D. Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readers. JAMA. 1995;273:1054–5.PubMedCrossRef Rennie D. Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readers. JAMA. 1995;273:1054–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams JW, Holleman JR, Samsa GP, Simel DL. Randomized controlled trial of 3 vs 10 days of timethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for acute maxillary sinusitis. JAMA. 1995;273:1015–21.PubMedCrossRef Williams JW, Holleman JR, Samsa GP, Simel DL. Randomized controlled trial of 3 vs 10 days of timethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for acute maxillary sinusitis. JAMA. 1995;273:1015–21.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2002. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2002.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Day RA. The origins of the scientific paper: the IMRaD format. J Am Med Writ Assoc. 1989;4:16–8. Day RA. The origins of the scientific paper: the IMRaD format. J Am Med Writ Assoc. 1989;4:16–8.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Huth EJ. The research paper: general principles for structure and content. In Writing and Publishing in Medicine, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1999, pp. 63–73. Huth EJ. The research paper: general principles for structure and content. In Writing and Publishing in Medicine, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1999, pp. 63–73.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jadad AR, Enkin MW. Randomized Controlled Trials. Questions, Answers, and Musings. 2London: Blackwell Publishing/BMJ Books; 2007. Jadad AR, Enkin MW. Randomized Controlled Trials. Questions, Answers, and Musings. 2London: Blackwell Publishing/BMJ Books; 2007.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Batalden P, Davidoff F. Teaching quality improvement. The devil is in the details. JAMA. 2007;298:1059–61.PubMedCrossRef Batalden P, Davidoff F. Teaching quality improvement. The devil is in the details. JAMA. 2007;298:1059–61.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolb DA. Experiential Learning. Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning. Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10Suppl 121–34.PubMedCrossRef Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10Suppl 121–34.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Evaluation for the 21st Century. In: E Chelimsky, William Shadish, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997. Evaluation for the 21st Century. In: E Chelimsky, William Shadish, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Health Care Quality Improvement: Ethical and Regulatory Issues. In: Jennings B, Baily MA, Bottrell M, Lynn J, eds. Garrison, NY: The Hastings Center; 2007. Health Care Quality Improvement: Ethical and Regulatory Issues. In: Jennings B, Baily MA, Bottrell M, Lynn J, eds. Garrison, NY: The Hastings Center; 2007.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Glouberman S, Zimmerman B. Complicated and complex systems: What would succesful reform of medicine look like? In: Forest PG, McKintosh K, Marchilden G, eds. Health Care Services and the Process of Change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2004. Glouberman S, Zimmerman B. Complicated and complex systems: What would succesful reform of medicine look like? In: Forest PG, McKintosh K, Marchilden G, eds. Health Care Services and the Process of Change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2004.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, for the STROBE initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, for the STROBE initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogrinc G, Mooney SE, Estrada C, et al. The SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; Supplement, in press. Ogrinc G, Mooney SE, Estrada C, et al. The SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; Supplement, in press.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Goetzsche PC, Lang T, CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–94.PubMed Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Goetzsche PC, Lang T, CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–94.PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gastonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HCW, Lijmer JG. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003;49:7–18.PubMedCrossRef Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gastonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HCW, Lijmer JG. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003;49:7–18.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche P, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, for the STROBE initiative, et al.. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:W–164. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche P, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, for the STROBE initiative, et al.. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:W–164.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Keech A, Gebski V, Pike R. Interpreting and Reporting Clinical Trials. A Guide to the CONSORT Statement and the Principles of Randomized Trials. Sydney: Australian Medical Publishing Company; 2007. Keech A, Gebski V, Pike R. Interpreting and Reporting Clinical Trials. A Guide to the CONSORT Statement and the Principles of Randomized Trials. Sydney: Australian Medical Publishing Company; 2007.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, Hill C, et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2006;185:263–7.PubMed Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, Hill C, et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2006;185:263–7.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C. Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2001;285:1996–9.PubMedCrossRef Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C. Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2001;285:1996–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Publication Guidelines for Quality Improvement Studies in Health Care: Evolution of the SQUIRE Project
verfasst von
Frank Davidoff, MD
Paul Batalden, MD
David Stevens, MD
Greg Ogrinc, MD, MS
Susan Mooney, MD, MS
for the SQUIRE development group
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0797-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

„Überwältigende“ Evidenz für Tripeltherapie beim metastasierten Prostata-Ca.

22.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Patienten mit metastasiertem hormonsensitivem Prostatakarzinom sollten nicht mehr mit einer alleinigen Androgendeprivationstherapie (ADT) behandelt werden, mahnt ein US-Team nach Sichtung der aktuellen Datenlage. Mit einer Tripeltherapie haben die Betroffenen offenbar die besten Überlebenschancen.

So sicher sind Tattoos: Neue Daten zur Risikobewertung

22.05.2024 Melanom Nachrichten

Das größte medizinische Problem bei Tattoos bleiben allergische Reaktionen. Melanome werden dadurch offensichtlich nicht gefördert, die Farbpigmente könnten aber andere Tumoren begünstigen.

CAR-M-Zellen: Warten auf das große Fressen

22.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

Auch myeloide Immunzellen lassen sich mit chimären Antigenrezeptoren gegen Tumoren ausstatten. Solche CAR-Fresszell-Therapien werden jetzt für solide Tumoren entwickelt. Künftig soll dieser Prozess nicht mehr ex vivo, sondern per mRNA im Körper der Betroffenen erfolgen.

Frühzeitige HbA1c-Kontrolle macht sich lebenslang bemerkbar

22.05.2024 Typ-2-Diabetes Nachrichten

Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes von Anfang an intensiv BZ-senkend zu behandeln, wirkt sich positiv auf Komplikationen und Mortalität aus – und das offenbar lebenslang, wie eine weitere Nachfolgeuntersuchung der UKPD-Studie nahelegt.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.