Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2015

01.08.2015 | Original Research

The Results Are Only as Good as the Sample: Assessing Three National Physician Sampling Frames

verfasst von: Catherine M. DesRoches, Dr.P.H., Kirsten A. Barrett, Dr.P.H., Bonnie E. Harvey, B.A., Rachel Kogan, M.P.H., James D. Reschovsky, Ph.D., Bruce E. Landon, M.D., M.B.A., M.Sc., Lawrence P. Casalino, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D., Stephen M. Shortell, PhD, MPH, MBA, Eugene C. Rich, MD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Sonderheft 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Databases of practicing physicians are important for studies that require sampling physicians or counting the physician population in a given area. However, little is known about how the three main sampling frames differ from each other.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare the National Provider and Plan Enumeration System (NPPES), the American Medical Association Masterfile and the SK&A physician file.

METHODS

We randomly sampled 3000 physicians from the NPPES (500 in six specialties). We conducted two- and three-way comparisons across three databases to determine the extent to which they matched on address and specialty. In addition, we randomly selected 1200 physicians (200 per specialty) for telephone verification.

KEY RESULTS

One thousand, six hundred and fifty-five physicians (55 %) were found in all three data files. The SK&A data file had the highest rate of missing physicians when compared to the NPPES, and varied by specialty (50 % in radiology vs. 28 % in cardiology). NPPES and SK&A had the highest rates of matching mailing address information, while the AMA Masterfile had low rates compared with the NPPES. We were able to confirm 65 % of physicians’ address information by phone. The NPPES and SK&A had similar rates of correct address information in phone verification (72–94 % and 79–92 %, respectively, across specialties), while the AMA Masterfile had significantly lower rates of correct address information across all specialties (32–54 % across specialties).

CONCLUSIONS

None of the data files in this study were perfect; the fact that we were unable to reach one-third of our telephone verification sample is troubling. However, the study offers some encouragement for researchers conducting physician surveys. The NPPES and to a lesser extent, the SK&A file, appear to provide reasonably accurate, up-to-date address information for physicians billing public and provider insurers.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Berenson RA, Kaye DR. Grading a physician’s value—the misapplication of performance measurement. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2079–2081.PubMedCrossRef Berenson RA, Kaye DR. Grading a physician’s value—the misapplication of performance measurement. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2079–2081.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Aday LA. Designing and conducting health surveys. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1991. Aday LA. Designing and conducting health surveys. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1991.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kish L. Survey sampling. New York: Willey; 1995. Kish L. Survey sampling. New York: Willey; 1995.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat DiGaetano R. Sample frame and related sample design issues for surveys of physicians and physician practices. Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(3):296–329.PubMedCrossRef DiGaetano R. Sample frame and related sample design issues for surveys of physicians and physician practices. Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(3):296–329.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunn A, Shapiro AH. Do physicians possess market power? J Law Econ. 2014;57(1):159–193.CrossRef Dunn A, Shapiro AH. Do physicians possess market power? J Law Econ. 2014;57(1):159–193.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark J, Digaetano R. Using the national provider identification file as the sampling frame for a physician survey. Joint Statistical Meeting; August 2014; Boston. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Society; 2014. Clark J, Digaetano R. Using the national provider identification file as the sampling frame for a physician survey. Joint Statistical Meeting; August 2014; Boston. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Society; 2014.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Klabunde CN, Willis GB, McLeod CC, et al. Improving the quality of surveys of physicians and medical groups: a research agenda. Eval Health Prof. 2012;35(4):477–506.PubMedCrossRef Klabunde CN, Willis GB, McLeod CC, et al. Improving the quality of surveys of physicians and medical groups: a research agenda. Eval Health Prof. 2012;35(4):477–506.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat McLeod CC, Klanbunde CN, Willis GB, Stark DB. Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000–2010: a review. Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(1):106–126.PubMedCrossRef McLeod CC, Klanbunde CN, Willis GB, Stark DB. Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000–2010: a review. Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(1):106–126.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Strouse R, Potter F, Davis T, et al. HSC 2008 Health Tracking Physician Survey Methodology Report, Technical Publication, vol. 77. Washington, D.C: Center for Studying Health System Change; 2009. Strouse R, Potter F, Davis T, et al. HSC 2008 Health Tracking Physician Survey Methodology Report, Technical Publication, vol. 77. Washington, D.C: Center for Studying Health System Change; 2009.
Metadaten
Titel
The Results Are Only as Good as the Sample: Assessing Three National Physician Sampling Frames
verfasst von
Catherine M. DesRoches, Dr.P.H.
Kirsten A. Barrett, Dr.P.H.
Bonnie E. Harvey, B.A.
Rachel Kogan, M.P.H.
James D. Reschovsky, Ph.D.
Bruce E. Landon, M.D., M.B.A., M.Sc.
Lawrence P. Casalino, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D.
Stephen M. Shortell, PhD, MPH, MBA
Eugene C. Rich, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe Sonderheft 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3380-9

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 3/2015

Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

„Überwältigende“ Evidenz für Tripeltherapie beim metastasierten Prostata-Ca.

22.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Patienten mit metastasiertem hormonsensitivem Prostatakarzinom sollten nicht mehr mit einer alleinigen Androgendeprivationstherapie (ADT) behandelt werden, mahnt ein US-Team nach Sichtung der aktuellen Datenlage. Mit einer Tripeltherapie haben die Betroffenen offenbar die besten Überlebenschancen.

So sicher sind Tattoos: Neue Daten zur Risikobewertung

22.05.2024 Melanom Nachrichten

Das größte medizinische Problem bei Tattoos bleiben allergische Reaktionen. Melanome werden dadurch offensichtlich nicht gefördert, die Farbpigmente könnten aber andere Tumoren begünstigen.

CAR-M-Zellen: Warten auf das große Fressen

22.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

Auch myeloide Immunzellen lassen sich mit chimären Antigenrezeptoren gegen Tumoren ausstatten. Solche CAR-Fresszell-Therapien werden jetzt für solide Tumoren entwickelt. Künftig soll dieser Prozess nicht mehr ex vivo, sondern per mRNA im Körper der Betroffenen erfolgen.

Frühzeitige HbA1c-Kontrolle macht sich lebenslang bemerkbar

22.05.2024 Typ-2-Diabetes Nachrichten

Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes von Anfang an intensiv BZ-senkend zu behandeln, wirkt sich positiv auf Komplikationen und Mortalität aus – und das offenbar lebenslang, wie eine weitere Nachfolgeuntersuchung der UKPD-Studie nahelegt.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.