Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 4/2022

01.04.2022 | Practical Application

Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice

verfasst von: Manuel Gomes, Elizabeth Murray, James Raftery

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Health care interventions are increasingly being delivered through digital technologies, offering major opportunities for delivering more health gains from scarce health care resources. Digital health interventions (DHIs) raise distinct challenges for economic evaluations compared with drugs and medical devices, not least due to their interacting, evolving features. The implications of the distinctive nature of DHIs for the methodological choices underpinning their economic evaluation is not well understood. This paper provides an in-depth discussion of distinct features of DHIs and how they might impact the design, measurement, analysis and reporting of cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside both randomised and non-randomised studies. These include aspects related to choice of comparator, costs and benefits assessment, study perspective and type of economic analysis. We argue that typical methodological standpoints, such as taking a health service perspective, focusing on health-related benefits and adopting cost-utility analyses, as typically adopted in the economic evaluation of non-digital technologies (pharmaceutical drugs and medical devices), are unlikely to be appropriate for DHIs. We illustrate how these methodological aspects can be appropriately addressed in an evaluation of a digitally supported, remote rehabilitation programme for patients with Long Covid in England. We highlight several methodological considerations for improving practice and areas where further methodological work is required.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat McCombie A, et al. Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for psychological distress in patients with physical illnesses: a systematic review. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2015;22(1):20–44.CrossRefPubMed McCombie A, et al. Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for psychological distress in patients with physical illnesses: a systematic review. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2015;22(1):20–44.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Olthuis JV, et al. Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD011565. Olthuis JV, et al. Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD011565.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Torok M, et al. Suicide prevention using self-guided digital interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(1):e25–36.CrossRefPubMed Torok M, et al. Suicide prevention using self-guided digital interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(1):e25–36.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McLean G, et al. Digital interventions to promote self-management in adults with hypertension systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2016;34(4):600–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McLean G, et al. Digital interventions to promote self-management in adults with hypertension systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2016;34(4):600–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat van Beugen S, et al. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with chronic somatic conditions: a meta-analytic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Beugen S, et al. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with chronic somatic conditions: a meta-analytic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris J, et al. Adaptive e-learning to improve dietary behaviour: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(37):1–160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harris J, et al. Adaptive e-learning to improve dietary behaviour: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(37):1–160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandelanotte C, et al. Website-delivered physical activity interventions a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(1):54–64.CrossRefPubMed Vandelanotte C, et al. Website-delivered physical activity interventions a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(1):54–64.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jankovic D, et al. Systematic review and critique of methods for economic evaluation of digital mental health interventions. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021;19(1):17–27.CrossRefPubMed Jankovic D, et al. Systematic review and critique of methods for economic evaluation of digital mental health interventions. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021;19(1):17–27.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat McNamee P, et al. Designing and undertaking a health economics study of digital health interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):852–60.CrossRefPubMed McNamee P, et al. Designing and undertaking a health economics study of digital health interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):852–60.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mistry H. Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare. Changes in the economic evidence over twenty years. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(1):1–6.CrossRefPubMed Mistry H. Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare. Changes in the economic evidence over twenty years. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(1):1–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Iribarren SJ, et al. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0170581.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Iribarren SJ, et al. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0170581.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolasa K, Kozinski G. How to Value Digital Health Interventions? A Systematic Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):2119.CrossRefPubMedCentral Kolasa K, Kozinski G. How to Value Digital Health Interventions? A Systematic Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):2119.CrossRefPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang X, Ming WK, You JH. The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions on the management of cardiovascular diseases: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(6):e13166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jiang X, Ming WK, You JH. The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions on the management of cardiovascular diseases: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(6):e13166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergmo TS. How to measure costs and benefits of eHealth interventions: an overview of methods and frameworks. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(11):254.CrossRef Bergmo TS. How to measure costs and benefits of eHealth interventions: an overview of methods and frameworks. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(11):254.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yardley L, et al. Understanding and promoting effective engagement with digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):833–42.CrossRefPubMed Yardley L, et al. Understanding and promoting effective engagement with digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):833–42.CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Klersy C, et al. Effect of telemonitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices on healthcare utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(2):195–204.CrossRefPubMed Klersy C, et al. Effect of telemonitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices on healthcare utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(2):195–204.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Budd J, et al. Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020;26(8):1183–92.CrossRefPubMed Budd J, et al. Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020;26(8):1183–92.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarricone R, et al. Improving the methods for the economic evaluation of medical devices. Health Econ. 2017;26(Suppl 1):70–92.CrossRefPubMed Tarricone R, et al. Improving the methods for the economic evaluation of medical devices. Health Econ. 2017;26(Suppl 1):70–92.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarricone R, Torbica A, Drummond M. Challenges in the assessment of medical devices: the MedtecHTA project. Health Econ. 2017;26(Suppl 1):5–12.CrossRefPubMed Tarricone R, Torbica A, Drummond M. Challenges in the assessment of medical devices: the MedtecHTA project. Health Econ. 2017;26(Suppl 1):5–12.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ainsworth B, et al. Feasibility trial of a digital self-management intervention “My Breathing Matters” to improve asthma-related quality of life for UK primary care patients with asthma. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e032465.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ainsworth B, et al. Feasibility trial of a digital self-management intervention “My Breathing Matters” to improve asthma-related quality of life for UK primary care patients with asthma. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e032465.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of facilitated access to a self-management website, compared to usual care, for patients with type 2 diabetes (HeLP-Diabetes): randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of facilitated access to a self-management website, compared to usual care, for patients with type 2 diabetes (HeLP-Diabetes): randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Little P, et al. An internet-delivered handwashing intervention to modify influenza-like illness and respiratory infection transmission (PRIMIT): a primary care randomised trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10004):1631–9.CrossRefPubMed Little P, et al. An internet-delivered handwashing intervention to modify influenza-like illness and respiratory infection transmission (PRIMIT): a primary care randomised trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10004):1631–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Little P, et al. An internet-based intervention with brief nurse support to manage obesity in primary care (POWeR+): a pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(10):821–8.CrossRefPubMed Little P, et al. An internet-based intervention with brief nurse support to manage obesity in primary care (POWeR+): a pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(10):821–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat McManus RJ, et al. Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) using a digital intervention in poorly controlled hypertension: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021;372:m4858.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McManus RJ, et al. Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) using a digital intervention in poorly controlled hypertension: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021;372:m4858.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallace P, et al. On-line randomized controlled trial of an internet based psychologically enhanced intervention for people with hazardous alcohol consumption. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(3):e14740.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wallace P, et al. On-line randomized controlled trial of an internet based psychologically enhanced intervention for people with hazardous alcohol consumption. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(3):e14740.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomes M, et al. Evaluating digital health products: health economic studies. Public Health England; 2021. Gomes M, et al. Evaluating digital health products: health economic studies. Public Health England; 2021.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Elbert NJ, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ehealth interventions in somatic diseases: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elbert NJ, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ehealth interventions in somatic diseases: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat von Huben A, et al. Health technology assessment for digital technologies that manage chronic disease: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021;37(1):e66.CrossRef von Huben A, et al. Health technology assessment for digital technologies that manage chronic disease: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021;37(1):e66.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Faujdar DS, et al. Field testing of a digital health information system for primary health care: A quasi-experimental study from India. Int J Med Inform. 2020;141:104235.CrossRefPubMed Faujdar DS, et al. Field testing of a digital health information system for primary health care: A quasi-experimental study from India. Int J Med Inform. 2020;141:104235.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat England PH. Choose evaluation methods. PHE guiding principles for evaluating digital health products. 2020. England PH. Choose evaluation methods. PHE guiding principles for evaluating digital health products. 2020.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanders GD, et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1093–103.CrossRefPubMed Sanders GD, et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1093–103.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker S, et al. Striving for a societal perspective: a framework for economic evaluations when costs and effects fall on multiple sectors and decision makers. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019;17(5):577–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walker S, et al. Striving for a societal perspective: a framework for economic evaluations when costs and effects fall on multiple sectors and decision makers. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019;17(5):577–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Brynjolfsson E, Collis A, Eggers F. Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(15):7250–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brynjolfsson E, Collis A, Eggers F. Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(15):7250–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan SD, et al. Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force. Value Health. 2014;17(1):5–14.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan SD, et al. Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force. Value Health. 2014;17(1):5–14.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray E, Goodfellow H, et al. Development, deployment and evaluation of digitally enabled, remote, supported rehabilitation for people with Long Covid (Living With Covid Recovery). Protocol for a mixed methods study. BMJ Open, 2021. (in press). Murray E, Goodfellow H, et al. Development, deployment and evaluation of digitally enabled, remote, supported rehabilitation for people with Long Covid (Living With Covid Recovery). Protocol for a mixed methods study. BMJ Open, 2021. (in press).
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Maxwell E. A dynamic review of the evidence around ongoing Covid19 symptoms (often called Long Covid). NIHR Centre for Engagement and Dissemination; 2020. Maxwell E. A dynamic review of the evidence around ongoing Covid19 symptoms (often called Long Covid). NIHR Centre for Engagement and Dissemination; 2020.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Mundt JC, et al. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:461–4.CrossRefPubMed Mundt JC, et al. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:461–4.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Raftery J. The effects of a digital intervention on time spent managing blood pressure: the HOME BP randomized trial. Working paper-University of Southampton, 2021. Raftery J. The effects of a digital intervention on time spent managing blood pressure: the HOME BP randomized trial. Working paper-University of Southampton, 2021.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat McCambridge J, et al. How big is the elephant in the room? Estimated and actual IT costs in an online behaviour change trial. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:172.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McCambridge J, et al. How big is the elephant in the room? Estimated and actual IT costs in an online behaviour change trial. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:172.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Smit ES, et al. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of Internet-based computer tailoring for smoking cessation. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(3):w57.CrossRef Smit ES, et al. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of Internet-based computer tailoring for smoking cessation. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(3):w57.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Le LK, et al. The cost-effectiveness of an internet intervention to facilitate mental health help-seeking by young adults: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(7):e13065.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Le LK, et al. The cost-effectiveness of an internet intervention to facilitate mental health help-seeking by young adults: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(7):e13065.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell JL, et al. Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9957):1859–68.CrossRefPubMed Campbell JL, et al. Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9957):1859–68.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouwsma EVA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of an internet-based perioperative care programme to enhance postoperative recovery in gynaecological patients: economic evaluation alongside a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e017782.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bouwsma EVA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of an internet-based perioperative care programme to enhance postoperative recovery in gynaecological patients: economic evaluation alongside a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e017782.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice
verfasst von
Manuel Gomes
Elizabeth Murray
James Raftery
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2022
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01130-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

PharmacoEconomics 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Original Research Article

The EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study in Egypt