Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 11/2013

01.11.2013 | Original article

A novel surface imaging system for patient positioning and surveillance during radiotherapy

A phantom study and clinical evaluation

verfasst von: F. Stieler, Ph.D., F. Wenz, M. Shi, F. Lohr

Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Ausgabe 11/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The use of optical surface positioning to support or replace X-ray-based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) may reduce patient exposure to extra dose. In specifically designed phantom tests, we analyzed the potential of a new scanning device preclinically. The system’s clinical performance was evaluated in comparison to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a prospective study.

Materials and methods

We first evaluated the scanning performance in terms of accuracy and reproducibility using phantom tests. An institutional review board (IRB)-approved clinical evaluation encompassing 224 fractions in 13 patients treated in three different regions (head and neck, thorax, pelvis) was then performed. Patients were first positioned using CBCT and then scanned with the CatalystTM (C-RAD, Uppsala, Sweden) optical system to define the resulting difference vector.

Results

Individual system settings are necessary for different scanning conditions. Reproducibility tests with phantoms showed a mean difference of 0.25 ± 0.21 cm. Accuracy tests showed a mean difference of less than 0.52 ± 0.41 cm. Considering all patients, clinical data showed residual target position differences between CatalystTM (surface-driven) and CBCT (target-driven) systems within 0.07 ± 0.28 cm/− 0.13 ± 0.40 cm/0.15 ± 0.36 cm/0.11 ± 1.57°/− 0.43 ± 1.68/− 0.10 ± 1.67° (lateral/longitudinal/vertical/rotation/roll/pitch).

Conclusion

Scanning quality depends on the color and shape of the scanned surface. Upon prospective clinical evaluation, excellent agreement between target- and contour driven positioning was observed. CatalystTM may reduce CBCT scan frequency in patients where tumor location is fixed relative to the surface.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Walter C et al (2007) Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT. Radiother Oncol 85(3):418–423PubMedCrossRef Walter C et al (2007) Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT. Radiother Oncol 85(3):418–423PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Amer A et al (2007) Imaging doses from the Elekta Synergy X-ray cone beam CT system. Br J Radiol 80(954):476–482PubMedCrossRef Amer A et al (2007) Imaging doses from the Elekta Synergy X-ray cone beam CT system. Br J Radiol 80(954):476–482PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Guckenberger M et al (2012) Motion compensation in radiotherapy. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40(3):187–197PubMedCrossRef Guckenberger M et al (2012) Motion compensation in radiotherapy. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40(3):187–197PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pallotta S et al (2012) A phantom evaluation of Sentinel(™), a commercial laser/camera surface imaging system for patient setup verification in radiotherapy. Med Phys 39(2):706–712PubMedCrossRef Pallotta S et al (2012) A phantom evaluation of Sentinel(™), a commercial laser/camera surface imaging system for patient setup verification in radiotherapy. Med Phys 39(2):706–712PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stieler F et al (2012) Clinical evaluation of a commercial surface-imaging system for patient positioning in radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 188(12):1080–1084PubMedCrossRef Stieler F et al (2012) Clinical evaluation of a commercial surface-imaging system for patient positioning in radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 188(12):1080–1084PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gopan O, Wu Q (2012) Evaluation of the accuracy of a 3D surface imaging system for patient setup in head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84(2):547–552PubMedCrossRef Gopan O, Wu Q (2012) Evaluation of the accuracy of a 3D surface imaging system for patient setup in head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84(2):547–552PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Moser T et al (2012) Clinical evaluation of a laser surface scanning system in 120 patients for improving daily setup accuracy in fractionated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85(3):846–853PubMedCrossRef Moser T et al (2012) Clinical evaluation of a laser surface scanning system in 120 patients for improving daily setup accuracy in fractionated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85(3):846–853PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pallotta S et al (2013) Accuracy of a 3D lasercamera surface imaging system for setup verification of the pelvic and thoracic regions in radiotherapy treatments. Med Phys 40(1):011710PubMedCrossRef Pallotta S et al (2013) Accuracy of a 3D lasercamera surface imaging system for setup verification of the pelvic and thoracic regions in radiotherapy treatments. Med Phys 40(1):011710PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kauweloa KI et al (2012) GateCT surface tracking system for respiratory signal reconstruction in 4DCT imaging. Med Phys 39(1):492–502PubMedCrossRef Kauweloa KI et al (2012) GateCT surface tracking system for respiratory signal reconstruction in 4DCT imaging. Med Phys 39(1):492–502PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff D et al (2009) Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. serial tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D-conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 93(2):226–233PubMedCrossRef Wolff D et al (2009) Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. serial tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D-conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 93(2):226–233PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Stieler F et al (2011) A comparison of several modulated radiotherapy techniques for head and neck cancer and dosimetric validation of VMAT. Radiother Oncol 101(3):388–393PubMedCrossRef Stieler F et al (2011) A comparison of several modulated radiotherapy techniques for head and neck cancer and dosimetric validation of VMAT. Radiother Oncol 101(3):388–393PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen EK et al (2006) Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64(2):355–362PubMedCrossRef Hansen EK et al (2006) Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64(2):355–362PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho KF et al (2012) Monitoring dosimetric impact of weight loss with kilovoltage (kV) cone beam CT (CBCT) during parotid-sparing IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(3):e375–e382PubMedCrossRef Ho KF et al (2012) Monitoring dosimetric impact of weight loss with kilovoltage (kV) cone beam CT (CBCT) during parotid-sparing IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(3):e375–e382PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Giraud P et al (2003) Respiration-gated radiotherapy: current techniques and potential benefits. Cancer Radiother 7(Suppl 1):15s–25sPubMed Giraud P et al (2003) Respiration-gated radiotherapy: current techniques and potential benefits. Cancer Radiother 7(Suppl 1):15s–25sPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Herk M van et al (2000) The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47(4):1121–1135PubMedCrossRef Herk M van et al (2000) The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47(4):1121–1135PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A novel surface imaging system for patient positioning and surveillance during radiotherapy
A phantom study and clinical evaluation
verfasst von
F. Stieler, Ph.D.
F. Wenz
M. Shi
F. Lohr
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Ausgabe 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-013-0441-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2013

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 11/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen der Fachgesellschaften

Mitteilungen der Fachgesellschaften

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.