Erschienen in:
01.11.2014 | Knee
Introduction of a classification system for patients with patellofemoral instability (WARPS and STAID)
verfasst von:
Laurie A. Hiemstra, Sarah Kerslake, Mark Lafave, S. Mark Heard, Gregory M. L. Buchko
Erschienen in:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
|
Ausgabe 11/2014
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
The primary purpose of this paper is to introduce the WARPS/STAID classification system for patellofemoral instability. The secondary purpose is to establish the validity and reliability of the WARPS/STAID classification system.
Methods
Patients (n = 31) with a confirmed diagnosis of patellofemoral instability underwent a thorough knee history and physical examination with 3 raters. The raters graded each component of the WARPS/STAID classification system on a visual analogue scale (VAS). A single Global VAS WARPS/STAID score was graded after all other components of the classification system were completed. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2, 3) was calculated for each metric of the classification scale and for the Global score. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating the WARPS/STAID score with the Kujala score. Subjects were assigned to one of three categories (WARPS, STAID, or mixed characteristics) according to the Total WARPS/STAID score to determine the level of agreement between the three raters.
Results
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2, 3) of the WARPS/STAID classification continuum ranged between 0.73 and 0.91 for the individual metrics of the classification. The ICC (2, 3) for the Global WARPS/STAID score was 0.75. The mean Kujala score (m = 61, SD 18) was significantly correlated with the total WARPS/STAID score (r = 0.387, p < 0.05). The majority of subjects were assigned to either the WARPS or STAID categories.
Conclusion
This study introduced the WARPS/STAID classification system and established both validity and reliability in subjects with patellofemoral instability.