Recurrent patellofemoral instability rates after MPFL reconstruction techniques are in the range of instability rates after other soft tissue realignment techniques

Patellofemoral dislocation or subluxation is a common knee injury in children and young adolescents. The overall annual incidence of patellar dislocation has been estimated to be 23.2 per 100,000, with a highest annual incidence among adolescents aged 14 to 18 years of 147.7 per 100,000 [33]. However, as most epidemiological studies focus on the adult population, the exact numbers for skeletally immature patients with patellofemoral instability are still unknown [36]. The risk of recurrent instability reported in literature varies widely, ranging from 11 to 60% after primary dislocation [17, 21, 26, 32].

The pathomechanism of patellofemoral instability is complex and often multifactorial. The osseous anatomy of the entire femur, in both torsion and trochlea shape, is often abnormal and the rotation of the tibia and the ligamentous stability (i.e. laxity) of the knee have been reported to be important predisposing factors to develop patellofemoral instability or pain [26, 31, 37, 39].

After first time dislocation, conservative treatment is indicated, whereas surgery is the treatment of first choice in case of recurrence [29].

In adults, the main surgical goal is to restore the bony mismatch in the knee, for instance, by performing a tibial tubercle transfer or trochleoplasty. There is still much controversy in the current literature as to what extend and degree of bone pathology requires correction in addition to a MPFL reconstruction [29].

However, these bony surgical procedures are generally not indicated in skeletally immature patients due to the risk to damage an open growth plate, and the subsequent development of bony deformities. Nelitz et al. [23] recently showed that for selected adolescent patients with high-grade trochlear dysplasia, trochleoplasty can be safely performed up to 2 years before the projected end of growth. However, so far, soft tissue (balancing) or realignment techniques are the generally preferred operative options for skeletally immature patients [5, 34].

In the past century many realignment techniques, such as the (Roux-) Goldthwait, the Galeazzi semitendinosus tenodesis, the lateral retinaculum release, the medial retinaculum reefing/imbrication or any combined procedures have been described [2-4, 7, 11, 13, 16, 27, 31, 36]. The success rates of these techniques vary widely, and none of these techniques has been shown to be superior to the other. In the last decade, several studies have shown the importance of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) as a medial restraint against lateral patellar displacement in early knee flexion, and several promising MPFL reconstruction techniques, with different grafts and/or fixation points, have been described in skeletally immature patients [1, 8, 15, 17, 21, 22, 27, 42].

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify all available evidence on recurrent patellofemoral instability rates after MPFL reconstruction techniques and other soft tissue realignment techniques in skeletally immature patients. The results of this study will provide clinicians with the best currently available evidence on recurrent patellofemoral instability rates after surgical treatment for patellofemoral instability in skeletally immature patients, can be helpful in the process of deciding whether or not to perform such a procedure, and can be used to better inform patients about the advantages and disadvantages of different procedures.

This systematic review investigates recurrent patellofemoral instability rates after MPFL reconstruction techniques and other soft tissue realignment techniques in skeletally immature patients. The inclusion criteria and method of analysis were specified in advance and documented in a protocol (PROSPERO CRD42017069706) and the study is reported according to PRISMA guidelines [20].

The search strategy retrieved 1433 records. The subsequent selection procedure resulted in 21 eligible articles. A flow chart of the study selection process is presented in Fig. 1.

Of the 21 eligible articles (448 knees in 389 patients), 10 studies reported on MPFL reconstruction techniques using different grafts and fixation techniques and 11 reported on other soft tissue realignment procedures. In total, 62 of the 448 (13.8%) treated knees showed recurrent patellofemoral instability during follow-up. All 21 studies reported on different surgical techniques or combinations of surgical techniques. There was a large variation in reported recurrent instability rates, varying between 0 and 38% for MPFL reconstruction techniques and between 0 and 82% for other soft tissue realignment techniques. The characteristics of all included studies are summarized in Table 1. Mean follow-up ranged between 17.7 months and 7.4 years and between 12 months and 13.5 years for MPFL reconstruction techniques and other soft tissue realignment techniques, respectively.

The most important finding of this systematic review and meta-analysis was that recurrent patellofemoral instability rates using MPFL reconstruction techniques were in the range of instability rates after other soft tissue realignment techniques. There was a large variation in both surgical techniques and reported recurrent instability rates, varying between 0 and 38% for MPFL reconstruction techniques and between 0 and 82% for other soft tissue realignment techniques.

In the MPFL reconstruction techniques, 9 out of 10 studies reported low post-operative recurrent patellofemoral instability rates. Only Lind et al. [17] reported a 38% (9/24 knees) recurrent patellofemoral instability rate at final follow-up. They reported on patients with various degrees of patellofemoral dysplasia, which may explain the high recurrent patellofemoral instability rate. However, they could not find an association between the high degree of trochlea dysplasia (grade C and D) and the redislocation rates [17]. Abouelsoud et al. [1] reported no recurrent patellofemoral instability after MPFL reconstruction, but five cases could be described as infrequent subluxation episodes. Patients with severe trochlear dysplasia were excluded in their study.

In the other soft tissue realignment techniques, 8 out of 11 studies reported post-operative recurrent instability rates less than or equal to 10%. Two studies reported rates higher than 20%. Cootjans et al. [7] reported a recurrent instability rate of 29%, while Grannatt et al. [11], reported an 82% rate at final follow-up. An explanation for the poor results in Grannatt et al. [11] could be the long duration of follow-up. Patients had a minimum follow-up of 2-year with a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (range 27–217 months). They concluded that the Galeazzi procedure may be associated with higher rates of recurrent instability and more debilitated knee function than previously appreciated. Cootjans et al. [7] reported a very low response rate on the questionnaire and analyzed and reported the data based on the available questionnaires.

Despite the more anatomical nature of a MPFL reconstruction, in the present study no clear advantage of MPFL reconstruction techniques over other soft tissue realignment techniques was found as the confidence intervals were overlapping. One of the most important reasons for MPFL reconstruction failure in young patients is severe trochlear dysplasia [24]. Generally, this is not addressed until patients have closed physes. Since younger patients have often more severe dysplasia or rotational deformities, this might explain the similar recurrence rates in both groups. Despite severe trochlear dysplasia or increased femoral anteversion, technical errors (e.g. non-anatomic bone tunnels or overtensioning of the graft) are also a common cause for MPFL reconstruction failure [25]. An MPFL reconstruction remains a challenging procedure in young patients, particularly in those with additional bony deformities with attribute to patellar instability, and should, therefore, be performed by experienced surgeons.

Some limitations of this study have to be discussed. First, the definition of recurrent patellofemoral instability, that is redislocation or subluxation, is arguable and might differ between clinicians and/or patients. In addition, relying on patient reported recurrent patellofemoral instability may result in not all occurrences being reported. Second, there is no clear consensus on indication for the use an MPFL reconstruction techniques or other soft tissue realignment techniques, which hampers a comparison between studies and/or techniques. The presented recurrent patellofemoral instability rates for different techniques should be interpreted in the context of the individual studies that have been published, including exact indication for surgery, duration and severity of symptoms, and patient factors. Predisposing factors, such as increased Q-angle and TT-TG in combination with all the limitations of soft tissue procedures could also explain a high recurrent patellofemoral instability rate, but these are unknown for all individual patients included in the studies. Third, almost all studies were retrospective or prospective case series and publication bias may be present since “negative” results of case series of surgical procedures are less likely to be submitted for publication. None of the studies were randomized nor blinded and there was a considerable risk of bias in most of the included studies.

Skeletally immature patients have the unique advantage that their bones are capable of remodeling after injury or a surgical intervention. Sugimoto et al. [36] described a decrease in sulcus angle after surgery, suggesting the femoral trochlea was deepened and remodelled due to a more centralized patella. Joo et al. [13] concluded an improvement in development of the femoral trochlea after surgery. In contrast, Rajdev et al. [30] showed no remodeling of the femoral trochlea after patellar stabilization. However, in that study the mean age was 14.7 years and therefore most of the patients were after their growth spurt. In the same study, the age of 10 years is indicated as an important age after which trochlear remodeling is limited. It can be assumed that with a skeletal age of 12 years for girls and 14 years for boys, the main growth spurt is over and there is only residual growth after that and no clear remodeling is to be expected [23]. This conclusion is also supported by Fu et al. [9], who showed trochlear remodeling in a patient population ranging from 7–11 years of age. Therefore, the relation between soft tissue realignment and remodeling seems to be clearly related to the start of the growth spurt of a patient. Evidence is still very limited due to lack of information in most studies. Nevertheless, trochlear remodeling due to patella realignment surgery is a topic which needs to be addressed more in detail, since it has not been well described in the pediatric orthopedic literature yet.

Many different surgical techniques on skeletally mature patients have been reported. These surgical techniques may be used on skeletally immature patients, however, should be possibly modified and further studied before use in this young patient population [6, 10, 14, 41].

The clinical relevance of this study is that it provides clinicians with the best currently available evidence on recurrent patellofemoral instability rates after surgical treatment for patellofemoral instability in skeletally immature patients. This can be helpful in the process of deciding whether or not to perform such a procedure, and can be used to better inform patients about the advantages and disadvantages of different procedures.

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that recurrent patellofemoral instability rates after MPFL reconstruction techniques are in the range of instability rates after other soft tissue realignment techniques.