Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 12/2015

01.12.2015 | Original Article

Perineorrhaphy: commonly performed yet poorly understood. A survey of surgeons

verfasst von: Gregory Kanter, Peter C. Jeppson, Brenna Lynn McGuire, Rebecca G. Rogers

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 12/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Perineorrhaphy is performed for the prevention of recurrent prolapse, improved sexual function, treatment of pain, and cosmesis. Its use is based on expert opinion with few objective data. We aimed to describe factors that are important to surgeons when deciding to perform perineorrhaphy and variations in surgical technique.

Methods

We administered an anonymous survey to surgeon attendees at the 2014 SGS annual scientific meeting regarding which factors are important when deciding to perform a perineorrhaphy and details of their surgical technique. Surgeons rated the importance of factors; one-way ANOVA was used to rank the decision factors and post hoc pairwise comparisons with Fisher’s least significant difference method were used to evaluate the importance between factors.

Results

A total of 183 out of 360 surgeon attendees responded. Most were between ages 36 and 60 (79 %), 56 % were female, 64 % practiced in an academic environment, and 64 % had undergone subspecialty training. An enlarged genital hiatus (GH) ranked as the most important factor influencing the decision to perform a perineorrhaphy, followed by a concomitant prolapse procedure (p < 0.001). Sexual function and cosmesis were rated as being less important. The decision to perform perineorrhaphy was made with the patient in 65 % of cases, and otherwise in the operating room. Significant heterogeneity exists regarding surgeon suture preference and how muscles were re-approximated. Most (81 %) reported incorporating structures both proximal and distal to the hymen in their repairs.

Conclusion

Genital hiatus size and concomitant prolapse procedures ranked highest in surgeons’ decision to perform a perineorrhaphy. Significant heterogeneity exists in the indications for and technique used to perform perineorrhaphy.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers RG, Sung VW, Thankar R, Igelesia B (2013) Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery: clinical practice and surgical atlas. McGraw-Hill, China Rogers RG, Sung VW, Thankar R, Igelesia B (2013) Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery: clinical practice and surgical atlas. McGraw-Hill, China
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Walters MK, Karram MM (2006) Urogynecology and reconstructive surgery, 3rd edn. Elsevier/Saunders, Philadelphia Walters MK, Karram MM (2006) Urogynecology and reconstructive surgery, 3rd edn. Elsevier/Saunders, Philadelphia
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Baggish M, Karram MM (2010) Atlas of pelvic anatomy and gynecologic surgery, 3rd edn. Elsevier/Saunders, St. Louis Baggish M, Karram MM (2010) Atlas of pelvic anatomy and gynecologic surgery, 3rd edn. Elsevier/Saunders, St. Louis
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouzier R, Haddad B, Deyrolle C, Pelisse M, Moyal-Barracco M, Paniel BJ (2002) Perineoplasty for the treatment of introital stenosis related to vulvar lichen sclerosus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(1):49–52CrossRefPubMed Rouzier R, Haddad B, Deyrolle C, Pelisse M, Moyal-Barracco M, Paniel BJ (2002) Perineoplasty for the treatment of introital stenosis related to vulvar lichen sclerosus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(1):49–52CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nichols DH (1991) Posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy: separate and distinct operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164(3):714–721CrossRefPubMed Nichols DH (1991) Posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy: separate and distinct operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164(3):714–721CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(6 Pt 1):1717–1724, discussion 1724–1728CrossRefPubMed DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(6 Pt 1):1717–1724, discussion 1724–1728CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rock JJ, Jones HW III (2011) TeLinde’s operative gynecology, 10th edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins/Wolters-Kluwer, Philadelphia Rock JJ, Jones HW III (2011) TeLinde’s operative gynecology, 10th edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins/Wolters-Kluwer, Philadelphia
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghetti C, Gregory WT, Edwards SR, Otto LN, Clark A (2005) Severity of pelvic organ prolapse associated with measurements of pelvic floor function. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(6):432–436CrossRefPubMed Ghetti C, Gregory WT, Edwards SR, Otto LN, Clark A (2005) Severity of pelvic organ prolapse associated with measurements of pelvic floor function. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(6):432–436CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dallenbach P, Jungo Nancoz C, Eperon I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M (2012) Incidence and risk factors for reoperation of surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):35–41CrossRefPubMed Dallenbach P, Jungo Nancoz C, Eperon I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M (2012) Incidence and risk factors for reoperation of surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):35–41CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodward AP, Matthews CA (2010) Outcomes of revision perineoplasty for persistent postpartum dyspareunia. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 16(2):135–139CrossRefPubMed Woodward AP, Matthews CA (2010) Outcomes of revision perineoplasty for persistent postpartum dyspareunia. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 16(2):135–139CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Leeman LM, Rogers RG, Greulich B, Albers LL (2007) Do unsutured second-degree perineal lacerations affect postpartum functional outcomes? J Am Board Fam Med 20(5):451–457CrossRefPubMed Leeman LM, Rogers RG, Greulich B, Albers LL (2007) Do unsutured second-degree perineal lacerations affect postpartum functional outcomes? J Am Board Fam Med 20(5):451–457CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Perineorrhaphy: commonly performed yet poorly understood. A survey of surgeons
verfasst von
Gregory Kanter
Peter C. Jeppson
Brenna Lynn McGuire
Rebecca G. Rogers
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2015
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2762-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2015

International Urogynecology Journal 12/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.