Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 3/2020

26.06.2019 | Original Article

Patient attitude and acceptance towards episiotomy during pregnancy before and after information provision: a questionnaire

verfasst von: James W. Alexander, Emmanuel Karantanis, Robin M Turner, Kate Faasse, Chelsea Watt

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Evidence regarding how women feel about episiotomies is not recorded in the literature. As the most common surgical procedure, there is a need to understand how women feel about episiotomy.

Methods

The primary outcome was to identify the percentage of women who would accept an episiotomy if required. A literature review was compiled to provide nulliparous women in their third trimester with evidence-based information about episiotomies and perineal tears. Questions eliciting demographics, pre-information level of anxiety and acceptance of episiotomy were asked. After reading the information sheets, anxiety and knowledge were assessed again. Changes in anxiety levels from pre- to post-information were investigated using paired samples t tests. Because anxiety was measured on a scale, we assessed potential departures from normality by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Questions also assessed the value women placed on this form of education.

Results

There were 105 responses, with 88% accepting episiotomy, 2% declining and 10% seeking more information to decide. Eighty-one percent of women agreed that the information provided helped them to understand more about childbirth and 62% agreed that they felt more comfortable with the birthing process after reading the material. There was a reduction in anxiety levels regarding episiotomies after reading information (p = 0.002) and perineal tears (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Most women will accept an episiotomy if required. Antenatal education about episiotomies is important to women and helps them feel more comfortable with the birthing process. Written information increases acceptance and reduces anxiety levels regarding episiotomies.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Clesse C, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, De Lavergne S, Hamlin S, Scheffler M. Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: comparative systematic review of changing practices. Health Care Women Int. 2018;39(6):644–62.CrossRef Clesse C, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, De Lavergne S, Hamlin S, Scheffler M. Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: comparative systematic review of changing practices. Health Care Women Int. 2018;39(6):644–62.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD000081.PubMed Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD000081.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat De Leeuw J, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2008;115(1):104–8. De Leeuw J, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2008;115(1):104–8.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Bavel J, Hukkelhoven CWPM, de Vries C, Papatsonis DNM, de Vogel J, Roovers JWR, et al. The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(3):407–13. Van Bavel J, Hukkelhoven CWPM, de Vries C, Papatsonis DNM, de Vogel J, Roovers JWR, et al. The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(3):407–13.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25.CrossRef Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowe NK. Self-efficacy for labor and childbirth fears in nulliparous pregnant women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;21(4):219–24.CrossRef Lowe NK. Self-efficacy for labor and childbirth fears in nulliparous pregnant women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;21(4):219–24.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rondung E, Thomtén J, Sundin Ö. Psychological perspectives on fear of childbirth. J Anxiety Disord. 2016;44:80–91.CrossRef Rondung E, Thomtén J, Sundin Ö. Psychological perspectives on fear of childbirth. J Anxiety Disord. 2016;44:80–91.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Areskog B, Kjessler B, Uddenberg N. Identification of women with significant fear of childbirth during late pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1982;13(2):98–107.CrossRef Areskog B, Kjessler B, Uddenberg N. Identification of women with significant fear of childbirth during late pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1982;13(2):98–107.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Räisänen S, Selander T, Cartwright R, Gissler M, Kramer MR, Laine K, et al. The Association of Episiotomy with obstetric anal sphincter injury–a population based matched cohort study. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107053. Räisänen S, Selander T, Cartwright R, Gissler M, Kramer MR, Laine K, et al. The Association of Episiotomy with obstetric anal sphincter injury–a population based matched cohort study. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107053.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalis V, Landsmanova J, Bednarova B, Karbanova J, Laine K, Rokyta Z. Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112:220–4.CrossRef Kalis V, Landsmanova J, Bednarova B, Karbanova J, Laine K, Rokyta Z. Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112:220–4.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(513):305–12.PubMedPubMedCentral Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(513):305–12.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel D, Nasir S, Elati A, Vernon G, Weeks A. Historical trends in the timing of informed consent for research into intrapartum complications. BJOG. 2012;119(3):361–5.CrossRef Patel D, Nasir S, Elati A, Vernon G, Weeks A. Historical trends in the timing of informed consent for research into intrapartum complications. BJOG. 2012;119(3):361–5.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hibbard J, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(2):207–14CrossRef Hibbard J, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(2):207–14CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Patient attitude and acceptance towards episiotomy during pregnancy before and after information provision: a questionnaire
verfasst von
James W. Alexander
Emmanuel Karantanis
Robin M Turner
Kate Faasse
Chelsea Watt
Publikationsdatum
26.06.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04003-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.