Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Urolithiasis 3/2013

01.06.2013 | Original Paper

Treatment of upper urinary calculi with Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center experience with 12,482 consecutive patients over 20 years

verfasst von: Guohua Zeng, Zanlin Mai, Zhijian Zhao, Xun Li, Wen Zhong, Jian Yuan, Kaijun Wu, Wenqi Wu

Erschienen in: Urolithiasis | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) was a modified version of standard PCNL which utilizes smaller tract and sheaths. The aim of this study was to present our experience on its efficacy and safety, and to grade its complications according to the modified Clavien classification. Between 1992 and 2011, 12,482 patients who underwent 13,984 MPCNL procedures entered this study. Data on stone size, access number, operative time, hospital length of stay, stone-free rate (SFR), and complications according to the modified clavien system were evaluated prospectively. Their mean age of patients was 47.6 years (range 0.6–93). The mean stone size was 3.2 ± 0.8 (1.4–7.4) cm. The mean operative time was 83 ± 38 min. Mean hemoglobin drop was 13.5 ± 11.3 g/L. Mean hospital stay was 10.3 ± 6.4 days (2–22 days). The initial SFR after first procedure was 78.6 %. In 14.7 % of cases with a second look, the SFR increase to 89.9 %. At 3 months after auxiliary procedures (re-PCNL, ureterorenoscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy), the overall SFR was achieved to 94.8 %. A total of 3,624 complications (25.92 %) were observed in 2,591 (18.53 %) procedures. There were 2,355 grade I (16.84 %), 706 grade II (5.05 %), 553 grade III (3.95 %), 7 grade IV (0.05 %), and three death of grade V (0.02 %) complications. This large-scale, contemporary analysis confirms MPCNL is still a safe and efficacious treatment option of kidney stones with a high stone-free rate and uncommon rate of high grade complications.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA et al (1998) The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16(6):371–374PubMedCrossRef Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA et al (1998) The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16(6):371–374PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C et al (2011) Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int 108(6):896–899PubMed Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C et al (2011) Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int 108(6):896–899PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G (2010) Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? a comparative prospective study. J Endourol 24(7):1075–1079PubMedCrossRef Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G (2010) Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? a comparative prospective study. J Endourol 24(7):1075–1079PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng F, Yu W, Zhang X et al (2010) Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones. J Endourol 24(10):1579–1582PubMedCrossRef Cheng F, Yu W, Zhang X et al (2010) Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones. J Endourol 24(10):1579–1582PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Li X, He Z, Wu K, Li SK et al (2009) Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the Guangzhou experience. J Endourol 23(10):1693–1697PubMedCrossRef Li X, He Z, Wu K, Li SK et al (2009) Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the Guangzhou experience. J Endourol 23(10):1693–1697PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study—indications, complications, and outcomes in 5,803 patients. J Endourol 25(1):11–17CrossRef de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study—indications, complications, and outcomes in 5,803 patients. J Endourol 25(1):11–17CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B et al (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol 25(8):1263–1268PubMedCrossRef Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B et al (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol 25(8):1263–1268PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Michel MS, Trojan L et al (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51(4):899–906PubMedCrossRef Michel MS, Trojan L et al (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51(4):899–906PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A et al (2012) Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol 61(1):146–158PubMedCrossRef Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A et al (2012) Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol 61(1):146–158PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53(1):184–190PubMedCrossRef Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53(1):184–190PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Falahatkar S, Moghaddam KG, Kazemnezhad E (2011) Factors affecting operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: our experience with the complete supine position. J Endourol 25(12):1831–1836PubMedCrossRef Falahatkar S, Moghaddam KG, Kazemnezhad E (2011) Factors affecting operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: our experience with the complete supine position. J Endourol 25(12):1831–1836PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR et al (2008) Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 179(4):1379–1390PubMedCrossRef Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR et al (2008) Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 179(4):1379–1390PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Marberger M (1994) Percutaneous renal surgery: its role in stone management. In: Krane RJ, Sirolky MB, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Clinical Urology. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 254–256 Marberger M (1994) Percutaneous renal surgery: its role in stone management. In: Krane RJ, Sirolky MB, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Clinical Urology. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 254–256
14.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP et al (2012) Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 62(2):246–255CrossRef de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP et al (2012) Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 62(2):246–255CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Treatment of upper urinary calculi with Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center experience with 12,482 consecutive patients over 20 years
verfasst von
Guohua Zeng
Zanlin Mai
Zhijian Zhao
Xun Li
Wen Zhong
Jian Yuan
Kaijun Wu
Wenqi Wu
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Urolithiasis / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Elektronische ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0561-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Urolithiasis 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.