Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 6/2011

01.06.2011 | Editorial

Whole-body hybrid PET/MRI: ready for clinical use?

verfasst von: Osman Ratib, Thomas Beyer

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 6/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Since its introduction in 1998 [1], combined PET/CT has gained clinical acceptance as an oncology imaging modality providing superior accuracy in tumour staging and assessment of oncology therapy response compared to PET or CT alone [2, 3] and to both imaging modalities viewed side-by-side [4, 5]. The PET technology available in combined PET/CT has advanced significantly over the years and now supports emission imaging of the torso from head to mid-thigh with isotropic sub-centimetre resolution in 10 min, or less. The integration of high-end multidetector CT in dual modality tomographs marks a trend towards performing contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT studies, which has progressively increased the clinical relevance of integrated PET/CT imaging protocols. Undisputedly, these changes in diagnostic pathways require the close collaboration and even cross-specialist training of nuclear medicine specialists and radiologists. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Townsend DW, Beyer T, Kinahan PE, Meltzer CC, Brun T, Nutt R, et al. The SMART Scanner: A combined PET/CT tomograph for clinical oncology. Radiology. 1998;209P:169–70. Townsend DW, Beyer T, Kinahan PE, Meltzer CC, Brun T, Nutt R, et al. The SMART Scanner: A combined PET/CT tomograph for clinical oncology. Radiology. 1998;209P:169–70.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins CD. PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard? Cancer Imaging. 2007;7 Spec No A:S77–87.PubMedCrossRef Collins CD. PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard? Cancer Imaging. 2007;7 Spec No A:S77–87.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lonsdale MN, Beyer T. Dual-modality PET/CT instrumentation – today and tomorrow. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73:452–60.PubMedCrossRef Lonsdale MN, Beyer T. Dual-modality PET/CT instrumentation – today and tomorrow. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73:452–60.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, Dahmen G, Mueller SP, Beyer T, et al. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4357–68.PubMedCrossRef Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, Dahmen G, Mueller SP, Beyer T, et al. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4357–68.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1200–9.PubMed Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1200–9.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoch G, Bockisch A. Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36 Suppl 1:S113–20.PubMedCrossRef Antoch G, Bockisch A. Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36 Suppl 1:S113–20.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang X, Congxin W, Yi Z, Jinwen H, Chuanfu L. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging with fat suppression by using STIR: Clinical utility for detection of primary malignancies in patients initially presented with metastasis. Eur J Radiol. 2010. Epub 2010 Mar 22. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.02.013 Liang X, Congxin W, Yi Z, Jinwen H, Chuanfu L. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging with fat suppression by using STIR: Clinical utility for detection of primary malignancies in patients initially presented with metastasis. Eur J Radiol. 2010. Epub 2010 Mar 22. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2010.​02.​013
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pichler BJ, Kolb A, Nagele T, Schlemmer HP. PET/MRI: paving the way for the next generation of clinical multimodality imaging applications. J Nucl Med. 2009;51:333–6.CrossRef Pichler BJ, Kolb A, Nagele T, Schlemmer HP. PET/MRI: paving the way for the next generation of clinical multimodality imaging applications. J Nucl Med. 2009;51:333–6.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Shao Y, Cherry SR, Farahani K, Meadors K, Siegel S, Silverman RW, et al. Simultaneous PET and MR imaging. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42:1965–70.PubMedCrossRef Shao Y, Cherry SR, Farahani K, Meadors K, Siegel S, Silverman RW, et al. Simultaneous PET and MR imaging. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42:1965–70.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlemmer HP, Pichler BJ, Schmand M, Burbar Z, Michel C, Ladebeck R, et al. Simultaneous MR/PET imaging of the human brain: feasibility study. Radiology. 2008;248:1028–35.PubMedCrossRef Schlemmer HP, Pichler BJ, Schmand M, Burbar Z, Michel C, Ladebeck R, et al. Simultaneous MR/PET imaging of the human brain: feasibility study. Radiology. 2008;248:1028–35.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Slates RB, Farahani K, Shao Y, Marsden PK, Taylor J, Summers PE, et al. A study of artefacts in simultaneous PET and MR imaging using a prototype MR compatible PET scanner. Phys Med Biol. 1999;44:2015–27.PubMedCrossRef Slates RB, Farahani K, Shao Y, Marsden PK, Taylor J, Summers PE, et al. A study of artefacts in simultaneous PET and MR imaging using a prototype MR compatible PET scanner. Phys Med Biol. 1999;44:2015–27.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wehrl HF, Judenhofer MS, Wiehr S, Pichler BJ. Pre-clinical PET/MR: technological advances and new perspectives in biomedical research. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36 Suppl 1:S56–68.PubMedCrossRef Wehrl HF, Judenhofer MS, Wiehr S, Pichler BJ. Pre-clinical PET/MR: technological advances and new perspectives in biomedical research. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36 Suppl 1:S56–68.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher JW, Kymes SM, Gould M, Alazraki N, Coleman RE, Lowe VJ, et al. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and CT in the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:179–85.PubMedCrossRef Fletcher JW, Kymes SM, Gould M, Alazraki N, Coleman RE, Lowe VJ, et al. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and CT in the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:179–85.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang W, Fu Z, Yu J, Yuan S, Zhang B, Li D, et al. Value of PET/CT versus enhanced CT for locoregional lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2008;61:35–43.PubMedCrossRef Yang W, Fu Z, Yu J, Yuan S, Zhang B, Li D, et al. Value of PET/CT versus enhanced CT for locoregional lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2008;61:35–43.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med. 2007;48 Suppl 1:78S–88.PubMed Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med. 2007;48 Suppl 1:78S–88.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, Jian W, Li HT, Li C, Zhang YK, Xie B, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging vs. FDG-PET for the detection of non-small-cell lung cancer. How do they measure up? Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;28:613–20.PubMedCrossRef Chen W, Jian W, Li HT, Li C, Zhang YK, Xie B, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging vs. FDG-PET for the detection of non-small-cell lung cancer. How do they measure up? Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;28:613–20.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Goethem M, Tjalma W, Schelfout K, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Parizel P. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:901–10.PubMedCrossRef Van Goethem M, Tjalma W, Schelfout K, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Parizel P. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:901–10.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Heusner TA, Kuemmel S, Koeninger A, Hamami ME, Hahn S, Quinsten A, et al. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1077–86.PubMedCrossRef Heusner TA, Kuemmel S, Koeninger A, Hamami ME, Hahn S, Quinsten A, et al. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1077–86.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Heusner TA, Kuemmel S, Umutlu L, Koeninger A, Freudenberg LS, Hauth EA, et al. Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1215–22.PubMedCrossRef Heusner TA, Kuemmel S, Umutlu L, Koeninger A, Freudenberg LS, Hauth EA, et al. Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1215–22.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hofmann M, Pichler B, Schölkopf and Beyer T. Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Ima. 2009;36 Suppl 1: S93–104. Hofmann M, Pichler B, Schölkopf and Beyer T. Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Ima. 2009;36 Suppl 1: S93–104.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pichler BJ, Wehrl HF, Judenhofer MS. Latest advances in molecular imaging instrumentation. J Nucl Med. 2008;49 Suppl 2:5S–23.PubMedCrossRef Pichler BJ, Wehrl HF, Judenhofer MS. Latest advances in molecular imaging instrumentation. J Nucl Med. 2008;49 Suppl 2:5S–23.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Whole-body hybrid PET/MRI: ready for clinical use?
verfasst von
Osman Ratib
Thomas Beyer
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 6/2011
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1790-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2011

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 6/2011 Zur Ausgabe