Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2019

29.07.2019 | Original Article

Clinical impact of PET/MR in treated colorectal cancer patients

verfasst von: Barbara J. Amorim, Theodore S. Hong, Lawrence S. Blaszkowsky, Cristina R. Ferrone, David L. Berger, Liliana G. Bordeianou, Rocco Ricciardi, Jeffrey W. Clark, David P. Ryan, Jennifer Y. Wo, Motaz Qadan, Mark Vangel, Lale Umutlu, David Groshar, Lina G. Cañamaques, Debra A. Gervais, Umar Mahmood, Bruce R. Rosen, Onofrio A. Catalano

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 11/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate if PET/MR induced management changes versus standard of care imaging (SCI) in treated colorectal cancer patients. The secondary aim was to assess the staging performance of PET/MR and of SCI versus the final oncologic stage.

Methods

Treated CRC patients who underwent PET/MR with 18F-FDG and SCI between January 2016 and October 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Their medical records were evaluated to ascertain if PET/MR had impacted on their clinical management versus SCI. The final oncologic stage, as reported in the electronic medical record, was considered the true stage of disease.

Results

A total of 39 patients who underwent 42 PET/MR studies were included, mean age 56.7 years (range 39–75 years), 26 males, and 13 females. PET/MR changed clinical management 15/42 times (35.7%, standard error ± 7.4%); these 15 changes in management were due to upstaging in 9/42 (21.5%) and downstaging in 6/42 (14.2%). The differences in management prompted by SCI versus PET/MR were statistically significant, and PET/MR outperformed SCI (P value < 0.001; odds ratio = 2.8). In relation to the secondary outcome, PET/MR outperformed the SCI in accuracy of oncologic staging (P value = 0.016; odds ratio = 4.6).

Conclusions

PET/MR is a promising imaging tool in the evaluation of treated CRC and might change the management in these patients. However, multicenter prospective studies with larger patient samples are required in order to confirm these preliminary results.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2018. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2018.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu P-H, Wu K, Ng K, Zauber AG, Nguyen LH, Song M, et al. Association of obesity with risk of early-onset colorectal cancer among women. JAMA Oncol. 2018. Liu P-H, Wu K, Ng K, Zauber AG, Nguyen LH, Song M, et al. Association of obesity with risk of early-onset colorectal cancer among women. JAMA Oncol. 2018.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Aklilu M, Eng C. The current landscape of locally advanced rectal cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:649–59.CrossRefPubMed Aklilu M, Eng C. The current landscape of locally advanced rectal cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:649–59.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilhelmsen M, Kring T, Jorgensen LN, Madsen MR, Jess P, Bulut O, et al. Determinants of recurrence after intended curative resection for colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:1399–408.CrossRefPubMed Wilhelmsen M, Kring T, Jorgensen LN, Madsen MR, Jess P, Bulut O, et al. Determinants of recurrence after intended curative resection for colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:1399–408.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsikitis VL, Larson DW, Huebner M, Lohse CM, Thompson PA. Predictors of recurrence free survival for patients with stage II and III colon cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:336.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tsikitis VL, Larson DW, Huebner M, Lohse CM, Thompson PA. Predictors of recurrence free survival for patients with stage II and III colon cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:336.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Maas M, Rutten IJG, Nelemans PJ, Lambregts DMJ, Cappendijk VC, Beets GL, et al. What is the most accurate whole-body imaging modality for assessment of local and distant recurrent disease in colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis: imaging for recurrent colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1560–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maas M, Rutten IJG, Nelemans PJ, Lambregts DMJ, Cappendijk VC, Beets GL, et al. What is the most accurate whole-body imaging modality for assessment of local and distant recurrent disease in colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis: imaging for recurrent colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1560–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Colosio A, Soyer P, Rousset P, Barbe C, Nguyen F, Bouché O, et al. Value of diffusion-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of pelvic recurrence from colorectal cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40:306–13.CrossRefPubMed Colosio A, Soyer P, Rousset P, Barbe C, Nguyen F, Bouché O, et al. Value of diffusion-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of pelvic recurrence from colorectal cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40:306–13.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wetter A, Grueneisen J, Umutlu L. PET/MR imaging of pelvic malignancies. Eur J Radiol. 2017;94:A44–51.CrossRefPubMed Wetter A, Grueneisen J, Umutlu L. PET/MR imaging of pelvic malignancies. Eur J Radiol. 2017;94:A44–51.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Catalano OA, Rosen BR, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, Guimaraes AR, Vangel MG, et al. Clinical impact of PET/MR imaging in patients with cancer undergoing same-day PET/CT: initial experience in 134 patients--a hypothesis-generating exploratory study. Radiology. 2013;269:857–69.CrossRefPubMed Catalano OA, Rosen BR, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, Guimaraes AR, Vangel MG, et al. Clinical impact of PET/MR imaging in patients with cancer undergoing same-day PET/CT: initial experience in 134 patients--a hypothesis-generating exploratory study. Radiology. 2013;269:857–69.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Catalano OA, Coutinho AM, Sahani DV, Vangel MG, Gee MS, Hahn PF, et al. Colorectal cancer staging: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MR. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42:1141–51.CrossRef Catalano OA, Coutinho AM, Sahani DV, Vangel MG, Gee MS, Hahn PF, et al. Colorectal cancer staging: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MR. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42:1141–51.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang B, Lee JM, Song YS, Woo S, Hur BY, Jeon JH, et al. Added value of integrated whole-body PET/MRI for evaluation of colorectal cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:W10–20.CrossRefPubMed Kang B, Lee JM, Song YS, Woo S, Hur BY, Jeon JH, et al. Added value of integrated whole-body PET/MRI for evaluation of colorectal cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:W10–20.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Westberg K, Palmer G, Hjern F, Johansson H, Holm T, Martling A. Management and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer - a national population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:100–7.CrossRefPubMed Westberg K, Palmer G, Hjern F, Johansson H, Holm T, Martling A. Management and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer - a national population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:100–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, Grothey A, Pawlik TM, Choti MA. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1261–8.CrossRefPubMed Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, Grothey A, Pawlik TM, Choti MA. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1261–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Glehen O, Kwiatkowski F, Sugarbaker PH, Elias D, Levine EA, De Simone M, et al. Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3284–92.CrossRef Glehen O, Kwiatkowski F, Sugarbaker PH, Elias D, Levine EA, De Simone M, et al. Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3284–92.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Odalovic S, Stojiljkovic M, Sobic-Saranovic D, Pandurevic S, Brajkovic L, Milosevic I, et al. Prospective study on diagnostic and prognostic significance of postoperative FDG PET/CT in recurrent colorectal carcinoma patients: comparison with MRI and tumor markers. Neoplasma. 2017;64:954–61.CrossRefPubMed Odalovic S, Stojiljkovic M, Sobic-Saranovic D, Pandurevic S, Brajkovic L, Milosevic I, et al. Prospective study on diagnostic and prognostic significance of postoperative FDG PET/CT in recurrent colorectal carcinoma patients: comparison with MRI and tumor markers. Neoplasma. 2017;64:954–61.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu Y-Y, Chen J-H, Chien C-R, Chen WT-L, Tsai S-C, Lin W-Y, et al. Use of FDG-PET or PET/CT to detect recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis. 2013;28:1039–47.CrossRef Lu Y-Y, Chen J-H, Chien C-R, Chen WT-L, Tsai S-C, Lin W-Y, et al. Use of FDG-PET or PET/CT to detect recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis. 2013;28:1039–47.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Delbeke D, Martin WH. PET and PET-CT for evaluation of colorectal carcinoma. Semin Nucl Med. 2004;34:209–23.CrossRefPubMed Delbeke D, Martin WH. PET and PET-CT for evaluation of colorectal carcinoma. Semin Nucl Med. 2004;34:209–23.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Plodeck V, Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Radosa CG, Laniado M, Hoffmann R-T, et al. FDG-PET/MRI in patients with pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer: first clinical experiences. Eur Radiol. 2018. Plodeck V, Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Radosa CG, Laniado M, Hoffmann R-T, et al. FDG-PET/MRI in patients with pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer: first clinical experiences. Eur Radiol. 2018.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Brendle C, Schwenzer NF, Rempp H, Schmidt H, Pfannenberg C, la Fougère C, et al. Assessment of metastatic colorectal cancer with hybrid imaging: comparison of reading performance using different combinations of anatomical and functional imaging techniques in PET/MRI and PET/CT in a short case series. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:123–32.CrossRefPubMed Brendle C, Schwenzer NF, Rempp H, Schmidt H, Pfannenberg C, la Fougère C, et al. Assessment of metastatic colorectal cancer with hybrid imaging: comparison of reading performance using different combinations of anatomical and functional imaging techniques in PET/MRI and PET/CT in a short case series. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:123–32.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical impact of PET/MR in treated colorectal cancer patients
verfasst von
Barbara J. Amorim
Theodore S. Hong
Lawrence S. Blaszkowsky
Cristina R. Ferrone
David L. Berger
Liliana G. Bordeianou
Rocco Ricciardi
Jeffrey W. Clark
David P. Ryan
Jennifer Y. Wo
Motaz Qadan
Mark Vangel
Lale Umutlu
David Groshar
Lina G. Cañamaques
Debra A. Gervais
Umar Mahmood
Bruce R. Rosen
Onofrio A. Catalano
Publikationsdatum
29.07.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 11/2019
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04449-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2019

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2019 Zur Ausgabe