Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Abdominal Radiology
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2007

01.06.2007

Renal MR and CT angiography: current concepts

verfasst von: James F. Glockner, Terri J. Vrtiska

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

During the past decade, noninvasive CTA and MRA imaging techniques have replaced catheter angiography for evaluation of the renal arteries. This article reviews techniques for optimizing renal MRA and CTA, assesses the advantages and limitations of MRA and CTA, and provides the current indications for renal vascular imaging including renal artery stenosis screening. New and future developments in these rapidly evolving techniques are also discussed.
Literatur
1.
Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, et al. (1994) Accuracy of CT angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Rofo 161(6):519–525PubMed
2.
Fleischmann D (2003) Multiple detector-row CT angiography of the renal and mesenteric vessels. Eur J Radiol 45(suppl 1):S79–S87PubMedCrossRef
3.
Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, et al. (1993) Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:877–881PubMedCrossRef
4.
Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. (1995) Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 197:785–892PubMed
5.
Maki JH, Prince MR, Chenevert TC (1998) Optimizing three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 33(9):528–537PubMedCrossRef
6.
Mittal TK, Evans C, Perkins T, et al. (2001) Renal arteriography using gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography—clinical experience with the technique, its limitations and pitfalls. Br J Radiol 74:495–502PubMed
7.
Shetty AN, Bis KG, Kirsch M, et al. (2000) Contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of renal arteries: optimization of technique and pitfalls. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:912–923PubMedCrossRef
8.
Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF, et al. (2001) High spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 218:481–490PubMed
9.
Qanadli SD, Soulez G, Therasse E, et al. (2001) Detection of renal artery stenosis: prospective comparison of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced scintigraphy, and MR angiography. AJR 177:1123–1129PubMed
10.
Thornton J, O’Callaghan J, Walshe J, et al. (1999) Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 9:930–934PubMedCrossRef
11.
Leung DA, Hagspiel KD, Angle F, et al. (2002) MR angiography of the renal arteries. Radiol Clin N Am 40:847–865PubMedCrossRef
12.
Olin JW, Melia M, Young JR, et al. (1990) Prevalence of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis in patients with atherosclerosis elsewhere. Am J Med 88:46N–51NPubMedCrossRef
13.
Jean WJ, al Bitar I, Zwicke DL, et al. (1994) High incidence of renal artery stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 32:8–10PubMedCrossRef
14.
Scoble JE, Maher ER, Hamilton G, et al. (1989) Atherosclerotic renovascular disease causing renal impairment: a case for treatment. Clin Nephrol 31:119–122PubMed
15.
van Jaarsveld BC, Krijnen P, Pieterman H, et al. (2000) The effect of balloon angioplasty on hypertension in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: Dutch renal artery stenosis intervention cooperative study group. N Engl J Med 342:1007–1014PubMedCrossRef
16.
Webster J, Marshall F, Abdalla M, et al. (1998) Randomised comparison of percutaneous angioplasty vs. continued medical therapy for hypertensive patients with atheromatous renal artery stenosis. Scottish and Newcastle renal artery stenosis collaborative group. J Hum Hypertens 12:329–335PubMedCrossRef
17.
Dorros G, Jaff M, Mathiak L, et al. (2002) Multicenter Palmaz stent renal artery stenosis revascularization registry report: four-year follow-up of 1,058 successful patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2:182–188CrossRef
18.
Isles CG, Robertson S, Hill D (1999) Management of renovascular disease: a review of renal artery stenting in ten studies. QJM 92:159–167PubMedCrossRef
19.
Beutler JJ, van Ampting JMA, van de Ven PJG, et al. (2001) Long-term effects of arterial stenting on kidney function for patients with ostial atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and renal insufficiency. J Am Soc Nephrol 12:1475–1481PubMed
20.
Uder M, Humke U (2005) Endovascular therapy of renal artery stenosis: where do we stand today? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28:139–147PubMedCrossRef
21.
Bettmann MA, Dake MD, Hopkins N, et al. (2004) Atherosclerotic vascular disease conference writing group VI: revascularization. Circulation 109:2643–2650PubMedCrossRef
22.
Haller C (2002) Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: conservative versus interventional management. Heart 88:193–197PubMedCrossRef
23.
Tan KT, Van Beek EJR, Brown PWG, et al. (2002) Magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 57:617–624PubMedCrossRef
24.
Boudewijn G, Vasbinder C, Nelemans PJ, et al. (2001) Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 135:401–411
25.
Boudewijn G, Vasbinder C, Nelemans PJ, et al. (2004) Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 141:674–682
26.
Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH, et al. (2005) High spatial resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Radiology 235:687–698PubMedCrossRef
27.
Kramer U, Kambiz N, Laub G, et al. (2006) High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries using parallel imaging acquisition techniques at 3.0 T. Invest Radiol 41:125–132PubMedCrossRef
28.
Draney MT, Zarins CK, Taylor CA (2005) Three-dimensional analysis of renal artery bending motion during respiration. J Endovasc Ther 12:380–386PubMedCrossRef
29.
Boudewijn G, Vasbinder C, Maki JH, et al. (2002) Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:685–696CrossRef
30.
Masunaga H, Takehara Y, Isoda H, et al. (2001) Assessment of gadolinium-enhanced time-resolved three-dimensional MR angiography for evaluating renal artery stenosis. AJR 176:1213–1219PubMed
31.
Volk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, et al. (2000) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability. AJR 174:1583–1588PubMed
32.
Buecker A, Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, et al. (2002) Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent. Circulation 105(15):1772–1775PubMedCrossRef
33.
van Holten J, Wielopolski P, Bruck E, et al. (2003) High flip angle imaging of metallic stents: implications for MR angiography and intraluminal signal interruption. Magn Reson Med 50(4):879–883PubMedCrossRef
34.
Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, Stuber M, et al. (2003) Metallic renal artery MR imaging stent: artifact-free lumen visualization with projection and standard renal MR angiography. Radiology 227(3):897–902PubMedCrossRef
35.
Kearney GP, Waters WB, Klein LA, et al. (1981) Results of inferior vena cava resection for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 125:769PubMed
36.
Hallscheidt PJ, Fink C, Haferkamp A, et al. (2005) Preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus using multidetector CT and MRI: prospective study with histopathological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:64–68PubMedCrossRef
37.
Kallmann DA, King BF, Hattery RR, et al. (1992) Renal vein and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus in renal cell carcinoma: CT, US, MRI, and vena cavography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:240–247CrossRef
38.
Choyke PL, Wather MCM, Wagner JR, et al. (1997) Renal cancer: preoperative evaluation with dual phase three dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 205:767–771PubMed
39.
Oto A, Herts BR, Remer EM, et al. (1998) Inferior vena cava tumor thrombus in renal cell carcionoma: staging by MR imaging and impact on surgical treatment. AJR 171:1619–1624PubMed
40.
Schaffer D, Sahyoun AI, Madras PN, et al. (1998) Two hundred and one consecutive living-donor nephrectomies. Arch Surg 133:426–431CrossRef
41.
Lind MY, Ijzermans JNM, Bonjer HJ (2002) Open vs. laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation. BJU Int 89:162–168PubMedCrossRef
42.
Hussain SM, Kock MCJM, Ijzermans JNM, et al. (2003) MR imaging: a one stop shop modality for preoperative evaluation of potential living kidney donors. Radiographics 23:505–520PubMedCrossRef
43.
Fink C, Hallscheidt PJ, Hosch WP, et al. (2003) Preoperative evaluation of living renal donors: value of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography and comparison of three rendering algorithms. Eur Radiol 13:794–801PubMed
44.
Subramaniam M, Mizzi A, Roditi G (2004) Magnetic resonance angiography in potential live renal donors: a joint radiological and surgical evaluation. Clin Radiol 59:335–341PubMedCrossRef
45.
Rajab A, Khabiri H, Pelletier RP, et al. (2004) Magnetic resonance angiography for preoperative evaluation of potential kidney donors. J Surg Res 120:195–200PubMedCrossRef
46.
Tan SP, Bux SI, Kumar G, et al. (2004) Evaluation of live renal donors with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to catheter angiography. Transplant Proc 36:1914–1916PubMedCrossRef
47.
Al-Saeed O, Ismail M, Sheikh M, et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries for potential living renal transplant donors: a comparative study with digital subtraction angiography. Australas Radiol 49:214–217PubMedCrossRef
48.
Bhatti AA, Chugtai A, Haslam P, et al. (2005) Prospective study comparing three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors. BJU Int 96:1105–1108PubMedCrossRef
49.
Wang DS, Stolpen AH, Bird VG, et al. (2005) Correlation of preoperative three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with intraoperative findings in laparoscopic renal surgery. J Endocr 19:193–199
50.
Di Felice A, Inguaggiato P, Rubbiani E, et al. (2002) Magnetic resonance in renal transplantation: evaluation of post-surgery complications. Transplant Proc 34:3193–3195PubMedCrossRef
51.
Browne RFJ, Riordan EO, Roberts JA, et al. (2004) Renal artery aneurysms: diagnosis and surveillance with 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol 14:1807–1812PubMedCrossRef
52.
Svensson J, Petersson JS, Stahlberg F, et al. (1999) Image artifacts due to a time-varying contrast medium concentration in 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 10(6):919–928PubMedCrossRef
53.
Lee VS, Martin DJ, Krinsky GA, et al. (2000) Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: artifacts and pitfalls. AJR 175:197–205PubMed
54.
Zhang HL, Schoenberg SO, Resnick LM, et al. (2003) Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: combining gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with functional magnetic resonance pulse sequences. AJH 16:1079–1082PubMed
55.
Hood MN, Ho VB, Corse WR (2002) Three-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography: a useful clinical adjunct to gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional renal magnetic resonance angiography? Mil Med 167:343–349PubMed
56.
Miller S, Schick F, Duda SH, et al. (1998) Gd-enhanced 3D phase-contrast MR angiography and dynamic perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Magn Reson Imaging 16:1005–1012PubMedCrossRef
57.
Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Londy F, et al. (2002) Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:158–169PubMed
58.
Yim PJ, Cebral JR, Weaver A, et al. (2004) Estimation of the differential pressure at renal artery stenoses. Magn Reson Med 51:969–977PubMedCrossRef
59.
Grenier N, Basseau F, Ries M, et al. (2004) Functional MRI of the kidney. Abdom Imaging 28:164–175CrossRef
60.
Michaely HJ, Schoenberg SO, Ittrich C, et al. (2004) Renal disease: value of functional magnetic resonance imaging with flow and perfusion measurements. Invest Radiol 39:698–705PubMedCrossRef
61.
Huang AJ, Lee VS, Rusinek H (2004) Functional renal MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 12:469–486PubMedCrossRef
62.
Gandy SJ, Sudarshan TAP, Sheppard DG, et al. (2003) Dynamic MRI contrast enhancement of renal cortex: a functional assessment of renovascular disease in patients with renal artery stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:461–466PubMedCrossRef
63.
Juillard L, Lerman LO, Kruger DG, et al. (2004) Blood oxygen-level dependent measurement of acute intra-renal ischemia. Kidney Int 65:944–950PubMedCrossRef
64.
Van den Brink JS, Watanabe Y, Kuhl CK, et al. (2003) Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 46:3–27PubMedCrossRef
65.
Glockner JF, Hu HH, Stanley DW, et al. (2005) Parallel imaging: a user’s guide. Radiographics 25:1279–1297PubMedCrossRef
66.
Katoh M, Spuentrup E, Stuber M, et al. (2005) Free-breathing renal magnetic resonance angiography with steady-state free-precession and slab-selective spin inversion combined with radial k-space sampling and water-selective excitation. Magn Reson Med 53:1228–1233PubMedCrossRef
67.
Coenegrachts KL, Hoogeveen R, Vaninbroukx JA, et al. (2004) High spatial resolution 3D balanced turbo field echo technique for MR angiography of the renal arteries: initial experience. Radiology 231:237–242PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Renal MR and CT angiography: current concepts
verfasst von
James F. Glockner
Terri J. Vrtiska
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2007
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9066-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2007

Abdominal Radiology 3/2007 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Aortoenteric fistula: a diagnostic dilemma

OriginalPaper

Pediatric Burkitt’s lymphoma: CT findings

OriginalPaper

Staging rectal cancer: MRI compared to MDCT

OriginalPaper

CT of internal hernia through a defect of the perirectal fossa

OriginalPaper

Sonographic subcutaneous and visceral fat indices represent the distribution of body fat volume

OriginalPaper

Gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma: CT findings

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise