nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.05.2013 | Original Paper

Oxford phase 3 unicondylar knee arthroplasty through a minimally invasive approach: long-term results

verfasst von: Omar Faour-Martín, Jose Antonio Valverde-García, Miguel Ángel Martín-Ferrero, Aurelio Vega-Castrillo, María Angeles de la Red Gallego, Cesar C. Suárez de Puga, Luis Amigo-Liñares

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Surgical treatment options for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee include high tibial osteotomy, total knee arthroplasty or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), depending on the patient’s age, level of physical activity and the degree of deformity.

Methods

In this study, we evaluated the long-term results of patients who underwent the Oxford cemented meniscal-bearing unicondylar knee prosthesis through a minimally invasive approach including a clinical, functional and radiographic assessment.

Results

Favourable clinical and radiological outcomes were registered overall at ten years after surgery. Overall results of UKA according to the American Knee Society (AKS) using Insall’s criteria showed an excellent or good outcome for 492 knees (96.28 %), fair for 11 (2.15 %) and poor for eight (1.57 %) in the post-operative long term.

Conclusions

We believe that with appropriate surgical technique, patient selection, prosthetic design and specific training, surgeons should achieve good outcomes with the added advantages of a minimally invasive approach. High volume for this technique is important in our opinion.

Çullu E, Aydoğdu S, Alparslan B, Sur H (2005) Tibial slope changes following dome-type high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:38–43PubMedCrossRef

Kesmezacar H, Erginer R, Ögüt T, Seyahi A, Babacan M, Tenekecioğlu Y (2005) Evaluation of patellar height and measurement methods after valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:539–544PubMedCrossRef

Aslan H, Ersan O, Baz AB, Duman E, Aydın E, Ateş Y (2007) Midterm results of Oxford phase 3 unicondylar knee arthroplasty for medial osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 41:367–372PubMed

Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC (1991) Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:151–156PubMed

Emerson RH Jr, Higgins LL (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:118–122PubMedCrossRef

Pandit H, Jenkins C, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2006) The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:54–60PubMedCrossRef

Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–989PubMedCrossRef

Repicci JA, Eberle RW (1999) Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 8:20–27PubMed

Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J, Murray DW (2002) The Oxford meniscal unicompartmental knee. J Knee Surg 15:240–246PubMed

10.

Rajasekhar C, Das S, Smith A (2004) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. 2- to 12-year results in a community hospital. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:983–985PubMedCrossRef

11.

Svärd U (2009) Long-term results after partial knee arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee. Dissertation, University of Gothenburg

12.

Svärd UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:191–194PubMedCrossRef

13.

Skowroński J, Jatskewych J, Długosz J, Skowroński R, Bielecki M (2005) The Oxford II medial unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 10-year follow-up study. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 7:620–625PubMed

14.

Argenson JN, Parratte S, Bertani A, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM (2008) Long-term results with a lateral unicondylar replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2686–2693PubMedCrossRef

15.

Kendrick BJ, Longino D, Pandit H, Svard U, Gill HS, Dodd CA, Murray DW, Price AJ (2010) Polyethylene wear in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval study of 47 bearings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:367–373PubMedCrossRef

16.

Psychoyios V, Crawford RW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW (1998) Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrieval study of 16 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:976–982PubMedCrossRef

17.

Kim KT, Lee S, Park HS, Cho KH, Kim KS (2007) A prospective analysis of Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 30(Suppl):15–18PubMed

18.

Carr A, Keyes G, Miller R, O’Connor J, Goodfellow J (1993) Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 295:205–213PubMed

19.

Kozinn SC, Scott R (1989) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:145–150PubMed

20.

Langdown AJ, Pandit H, Price AJ et al (2005) Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty for focal spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Acta Orthop 76:688–692PubMedCrossRef

21.

Lisowski LA, van den Bekerom MP, Pilot P, van Dijk CN, Lisowski AE (2011) Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:277–284PubMedCrossRef

22.

Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ, Dodd CA (1999) Oxford unicompartmental knee: manual of the surgical technique. Biomet, Bridgend, pp 1–40

23.

Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed

24.

Goodfellow JW, Kershaw CJ, Benson MK, O’Connor JJ (1988) The Oxford Knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:692–701PubMed

25.

Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:198–204PubMedCrossRef

26.

Pietschmann MF, Wohlleb L, Weber P et al (2013) Sports activities after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Oxford III-what can we expect? Int Orthop 37:31–37PubMedCrossRef

27.

Vardi G, Strover AE (2004) Early complications of unicompartmental knee replacement; the Droitwich experience. Knee 11:389–394PubMedCrossRef

28.

Kim KT, Lee S, Bae EH et al (2005) Short-term results and early complications of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Korean Knee Soc 17:119–126

29.

Lewold S, Goodman S, Knutson K, Robertsson O, Lidgren L (1995) Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. A Swedish multicenter survival study. J Arthroplasty 10:722–731PubMedCrossRef

30.

Saragaglia D, Picard F, Refaie R (2012) Navigation of the tibial plateau alone appears to be sufficient in computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36:2479–2483PubMedCrossRef

31.

Järvenpää J, Kettunen J, Miettinen H, Kröger H (2010) The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8–17 years follow-up study of 49 patients. Int Orthop 34:649–653PubMedCrossRef

32.

Clarius M, Hauck C, Seeger JB, James A, Murray DW, Aldinger PR (2009) Pulsed lavage reduces the incidence of radiolucent lines under the tibial tray of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: pulsed lavage versus syringe lavage. Int Orthop 33:1585–1590PubMedCrossRef

33.

Mercier N, Wimsey S, Saragaglia D (2010) Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 34:1137–1143PubMedCrossRef

34.

Luscombe KL, Lim J, Jones PW, White SH (2007) Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A note of caution! Int Orthop 31:321–324PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Oxford phase 3 unicondylar knee arthroplasty through a minimally invasive approach: long-term results
verfasst von: Omar Faour-Martín
Jose Antonio Valverde-García
Miguel Ángel Martín-Ferrero
Aurelio Vega-Castrillo
María Angeles de la Red Gallego
Cesar C. Suárez de Puga
Luis Amigo-Liñares
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2013
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1830-8

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

Complications with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and recent evolutions

Morphological characteristics of split-depression fractures of the lateral tibial plateau (Schatzker type II): a computer-tomography–based study

Reply to comment on Kritsaneephaiboon et al. “Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal tibial fracture using a posterolateral approach: a cadaveric study and preliminary report”

Comment on Xu et al.: A retrospective study of posterior malleolus fractures

Balloon reduction and cement fixation in calcaneal articular fractures: a five-year experience