Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 7/2013

01.07.2013 | Original Paper

Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty

verfasst von: Michele Vasso, Philippe Beaufils, Alfredo Schiavone Panni

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 7/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Along with the increase in primary total knee arthroplasty, there has been an increase in the number of revisions. The aim of this study was to propose a selection algorithm for the knee revision constraint according to the state of ligaments and to the bone defects Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute Classification [AORI] classification. The hypothesis was that this algorithm would facilitate the appropriate choice of prosthesis constraint, thus providing stable components and a good long-term survivorship of the knee revisions.

Methods

Sixty consecutive revision knee arthroplasties in 57 patients were prospectively evaluated. Prostheses implanted at revision included postero-stabilised, condylar constrained and rotating hinged, relative to the state of the ligaments and of the bone loss around the knee. The median follow-up was nine years (range, 4–12).

Results

The median IKS knee and function scores and HSS score were 41 (15–62), 21.5 (12–43) and 34 (23–65) points, respectively, before the operation, and 81 (48–97), 79 (56–92) and 83.5 (62–98) points (p < 0.001) at the latest follow-up evaluation. The median ROM increased from 74° (29–110°) preoperatively to 121° (98–132°) (p < 0.01) at the final follow-up. Re-revision was necessary in five (8.3 %) patients.

Conclusions

A selection algorithm for the revision implant constraint based on the state of ligaments and the bone loss AORI classification could provide stable knee reconstructions and long-term success of knee revisions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahomed NN, Barrett J, Katz JN, Baron JA, Wright J, Losina E (2005) Epidemiology of total knee replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1222–1228PubMedCrossRef Mahomed NN, Barrett J, Katz JN, Baron JA, Wright J, Losina E (2005) Epidemiology of total knee replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1222–1228PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson AJ, Sayeed SA, Naziri Q, Khanuja HS, Mont MA (2012) Minimizing dynamic knee spacer complications in infected revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:220–227PubMedCrossRef Johnson AJ, Sayeed SA, Naziri Q, Khanuja HS, Mont MA (2012) Minimizing dynamic knee spacer complications in infected revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:220–227PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Whittaker JP, Dharmarajan R, Toms AD (2008) The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:981–987PubMed Whittaker JP, Dharmarajan R, Toms AD (2008) The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:981–987PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman MG, Fehring TK, Odum SM, Fehring K, Griffin WL, Mason JB (2007) Functional advantage of articulating versus static spacers in 2-stage revision for total knee arthroplasty infection. J Arthroplasty 22:1116–1121PubMedCrossRef Freeman MG, Fehring TK, Odum SM, Fehring K, Griffin WL, Mason JB (2007) Functional advantage of articulating versus static spacers in 2-stage revision for total knee arthroplasty infection. J Arthroplasty 22:1116–1121PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang SC, Kong JY, Nam DC, Kim DH, Park HB, Jeong ST, Cho SH (2010) Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis. Clin Orthop Surg 2:112–120PubMedCrossRef Hwang SC, Kong JY, Nam DC, Kim DH, Park HB, Jeong ST, Cho SH (2010) Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis. Clin Orthop Surg 2:112–120PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mortazavi SM, Molligan J, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2011) Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause. Int Orthop 35:1157–1164PubMedCrossRef Mortazavi SM, Molligan J, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2011) Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause. Int Orthop 35:1157–1164PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanna SA, Aston WJ, de Roeck NJ, Gough-Palmer A, Powles DP (2011) Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3164–3171PubMedCrossRef Hanna SA, Aston WJ, de Roeck NJ, Gough-Palmer A, Powles DP (2011) Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3164–3171PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters CL, Erickson JA, Gililland JM (2009) Clinical and radiographic results of 184 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties placed with modular cementless stems. J Arthroplasty 24(6 Suppl):48–53PubMedCrossRef Peters CL, Erickson JA, Gililland JM (2009) Clinical and radiographic results of 184 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties placed with modular cementless stems. J Arthroplasty 24(6 Suppl):48–53PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sternheim A, Lochab J, Drexler M, Kuzyk P, Safir O, Gross A, Backstein D (2012) The benefit of revision knee arthroplasty for component malrotation after primary total knee replacement. Int Orthop 36:2473–2478PubMedCrossRef Sternheim A, Lochab J, Drexler M, Kuzyk P, Safir O, Gross A, Backstein D (2012) The benefit of revision knee arthroplasty for component malrotation after primary total knee replacement. Int Orthop 36:2473–2478PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gudnason A, Milbrink J, Hailer NP (2011) Implant survival and outcome after rotating-hinge total knee revision arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1601–1607PubMedCrossRef Gudnason A, Milbrink J, Hailer NP (2011) Implant survival and outcome after rotating-hinge total knee revision arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1601–1607PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YH, Kim JS (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1440–1447PubMedCrossRef Kim YH, Kim JS (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1440–1447PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Meijer MF, Reininga IH, Boerboom AL, Stevens M, Bulstra SK (2013) Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37:415–419PubMedCrossRef Meijer MF, Reininga IH, Boerboom AL, Stevens M, Bulstra SK (2013) Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37:415–419PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nett M, Long WJ, Scuderi GR (2009) Principles of revision total knee arthroplasty. Tech Knee Surg 8:144–153CrossRef Nett M, Long WJ, Scuderi GR (2009) Principles of revision total knee arthroplasty. Tech Knee Surg 8:144–153CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Radnay CS, Scuderi GR (2006) Management of bone loss. Augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:83–92PubMedCrossRef Radnay CS, Scuderi GR (2006) Management of bone loss. Augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:83–92PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang JH, Yoon JR, Oh CH, Kim TS (2012) Primary total knee arthroplasty using rotating-hinge prosthesis in severely affected knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:517–523PubMedCrossRef Yang JH, Yoon JR, Oh CH, Kim TS (2012) Primary total knee arthroplasty using rotating-hinge prosthesis in severely affected knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:517–523PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JA, Baldini A, MacDonald JH, Tomek I, Pellicci PM, Sculco TP (2007) Constrained condylar knee without stem extensions for difficult primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 20:195–198PubMed Anderson JA, Baldini A, MacDonald JH, Tomek I, Pellicci PM, Sculco TP (2007) Constrained condylar knee without stem extensions for difficult primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 20:195–198PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Girard J, Amzallag M, Pasquier G, Mulliez A, Brosset T, Gougeon F, Duhamel A, Migaud H (2009) Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees: predictive preoperative parameters influencing a constrained design selection. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:260–266PubMedCrossRef Girard J, Amzallag M, Pasquier G, Mulliez A, Brosset T, Gougeon F, Duhamel A, Migaud H (2009) Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees: predictive preoperative parameters influencing a constrained design selection. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:260–266PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES (2011) Results of a second-generation constrained condylar prosthesis in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:1228–1231PubMedCrossRef Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES (2011) Results of a second-generation constrained condylar prosthesis in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:1228–1231PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Engh GA (1997) Bone loss classification. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 63–120 Engh GA (1997) Bone loss classification. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 63–120
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray PB, Rand JA, Hanssen AD (1994) Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:116–123PubMed Murray PB, Rand JA, Hanssen AD (1994) Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:116–123PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuchs S, Sandmann C, Gerdemann G, Skwara A, Tibesku CO, Bottner F (2004) Quality of life and clinical outcome in salvage revision total knee replacement: hinged vs total condylar design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:140–143PubMedCrossRef Fuchs S, Sandmann C, Gerdemann G, Skwara A, Tibesku CO, Bottner F (2004) Quality of life and clinical outcome in salvage revision total knee replacement: hinged vs total condylar design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:140–143PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Burnett RS, Butler RA, Barrack RL (2006) Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction in TKA al a mean of 56 months. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:159–165PubMedCrossRef Burnett RS, Butler RA, Barrack RL (2006) Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction in TKA al a mean of 56 months. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:159–165PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hossain F, Patel S, Haddad FS (2010) Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1221–1228PubMedCrossRef Hossain F, Patel S, Haddad FS (2010) Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1221–1228PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones RE (2006) Total knee arthroplasty with modular rotating platform hinge. Orthopedics 29(9 Suppl):S80–S82PubMed Jones RE (2006) Total knee arthroplasty with modular rotating platform hinge. Orthopedics 29(9 Suppl):S80–S82PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Utting MR, Newman JH (2004) Customised hinged knee replacements as a salvage procedure for failed total knee arthroplasty. Knee 11:475–479PubMedCrossRef Utting MR, Newman JH (2004) Customised hinged knee replacements as a salvage procedure for failed total knee arthroplasty. Knee 11:475–479PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardeman F, Londers J, Favril A, Witvrouw E, Bellemans J, Victor J (2012) Predisposing factors which are relevant for the clinical outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 206:1049–1056CrossRef Hardeman F, Londers J, Favril A, Witvrouw E, Bellemans J, Victor J (2012) Predisposing factors which are relevant for the clinical outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 206:1049–1056CrossRef
27.
Metadaten
Titel
Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty
verfasst von
Michele Vasso
Philippe Beaufils
Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1929-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2013

International Orthopaedics 7/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.