Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2006

01.09.2006

Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography in the Diagnosis of Bile Duct Lithiasis

verfasst von: Damir Miletic, Miljenko Uravic, Marzena Mazur-Brbac, Davor Stimac, Davor Petranovic, Branko Sestan

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim:

The aim of our study was to assess diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in patients with suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones focusing on the capability of this noninvasive method to replace invasive diagnostic procedures in these patients and to limit the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) to the patients who need simultaneous therapeutic intervention.

Materials and methods:

Single-shot fast-spin-echo rapid-acquisition thick-section MRC images were obtained in 310 patients recruited into this prospective study. There were 136 male and 174 female patients aged 21–95 years [mean ± standard deviation (SD) 64.9 ± 13.6 years]. Patients were subsequently classified into different risk groups (high, moderate, low) according to biochemical abnormalities or morphological features on abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography. Direct cholangiography was the reference method of CBD evaluation.

Results:

CBD stones were diagnosed in 115 (37%) patients; 86 of 175 patients in the high-risk group, 24 of 83 patients in the moderate-risk group, and 5 of 50 patients in the low-risk group. In dependent risk groups, the mean CBD caliber was 9.7 ± 4.5, 7.1 ± 2.0, and 4.8 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. The difference was significant between all three groups (P < 0.05). The median size of CBD stones was 7 mm (range 3–21 mm). MRC achieved accuracy and positive and negative predictive values of 97%, 94%, and 98%, respectively.

Conclusions:

MRC has a potential to substitute diagnostic ERC in all patients with suspected choledocholithiasis due to its high accuracy, reducing invasive direct cholangiography to patients who require therapeutic intervention.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976;70:314–320PubMed Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976;70:314–320PubMed
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909–918PubMedCrossRef Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909–918PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Assouline Y, Liguory C, Ink O, et al. Current results of endoscopic sphincterotomy for lithiasis of the common bile duct. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1993;17:251–258 (in French)PubMed Assouline Y, Liguory C, Ink O, et al. Current results of endoscopic sphincterotomy for lithiasis of the common bile duct. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1993;17:251–258 (in French)PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Stuart SA, Timothy IGS, Alvord LA, et al. Routine intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography. Am J Surg 1998;176:632–637PubMedCrossRef Stuart SA, Timothy IGS, Alvord LA, et al. Routine intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography. Am J Surg 1998;176:632–637PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 2003;289:1639–1644PubMedCrossRef Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 2003;289:1639–1644PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Vazakis A, Davides D, Ammori BJ, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1118–1122CrossRef Vazakis A, Davides D, Ammori BJ, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1118–1122CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Montariol T, Msika S, Charlier A, et al. Diagnosis of asymptomatic common bile duct stones: preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography—multicenter, prospective controlled study: French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery 1988;124:6–13 Montariol T, Msika S, Charlier A, et al. Diagnosis of asymptomatic common bile duct stones: preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography—multicenter, prospective controlled study: French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery 1988;124:6–13
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Kim MJ, Park SI, et al. MR cholangiography in symptomatic gallstones: diagnostic accuracy according to clinical risk group. Radiology 2002;224:410–416PubMed Kim JH, Kim MJ, Park SI, et al. MR cholangiography in symptomatic gallstones: diagnostic accuracy according to clinical risk group. Radiology 2002;224:410–416PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, et al. Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Arch Surg 2000;135:148–152PubMedCrossRef Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, et al. Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Arch Surg 2000;135:148–152PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Houdart R, Perniceni T, Darne B, et al. Predicting common bile duct lithiasis: determination and prospective validation of a model predicting low risk. Am J Surg 1995;170:38–43PubMedCrossRef Houdart R, Perniceni T, Darne B, et al. Predicting common bile duct lithiasis: determination and prospective validation of a model predicting low risk. Am J Surg 1995;170:38–43PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, et al. Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function. Arch Surg 1998;133:162–166PubMedCrossRef Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, et al. Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function. Arch Surg 1998;133:162–166PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Menezes N, Marson LP, DeBeaux AC, et al. Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1176–1181PubMedCrossRef Menezes N, Marson LP, DeBeaux AC, et al. Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1176–1181PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zidi SH, Prat F, Guen OL, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 1999;44:118–122PubMedCrossRef Zidi SH, Prat F, Guen OL, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 1999;44:118–122PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 2000;55:25–35PubMedCrossRef Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 2000;55:25–35PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Laing FC, Jeffrey RB Jr, Wing VW, et al. Biliary dilatation: defining the level and cause by real-time US. Radiology 1986;160:39–42PubMed Laing FC, Jeffrey RB Jr, Wing VW, et al. Biliary dilatation: defining the level and cause by real-time US. Radiology 1986;160:39–42PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P, et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 1996;347:75–79PubMedCrossRef Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P, et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 1996;347:75–79PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:225–231PubMedCrossRef Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:225–231PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Barish MA, Yucel EK, Ferrucci JT. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. N Engl J Med 1999;341:258–264PubMedCrossRef Barish MA, Yucel EK, Ferrucci JT. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. N Engl J Med 1999;341:258–264PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Craney B, Logan H. Exploration of the common bile duct—the relevance of clinical picture and importance of preoperative cholangiography. Br J Surg 1989;67:869–872 Craney B, Logan H. Exploration of the common bile duct—the relevance of clinical picture and importance of preoperative cholangiography. Br J Surg 1989;67:869–872
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips EH. Controversies in the management of common duct calculi. Surg Clin North Am 1994;74:931–948PubMed Phillips EH. Controversies in the management of common duct calculi. Surg Clin North Am 1994;74:931–948PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rieger R, Wayand W. Yield of prospective, noninvasive evaluation of the common bile duct combined with selective ERCP/sphincterotomy in 1390 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:6–12PubMedCrossRef Rieger R, Wayand W. Yield of prospective, noninvasive evaluation of the common bile duct combined with selective ERCP/sphincterotomy in 1390 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:6–12PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Metcalfe MS, Ong T, Bruening MH, et al. Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine? Am J Surg 2004;187:475–481PubMedCrossRef Metcalfe MS, Ong T, Bruening MH, et al. Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine? Am J Surg 2004;187:475–481PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pace BW, Cosgrove J, Breuer B, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography revisited. Arch Surg 1992;127:448–450PubMed Pace BW, Cosgrove J, Breuer B, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography revisited. Arch Surg 1992;127:448–450PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Griniatsos J, Karvounis E, Isla AM. Limitations of fluoroscopic intraoperative cholangiography in cases suggestive of choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005;15:312–317PubMedCrossRef Griniatsos J, Karvounis E, Isla AM. Limitations of fluoroscopic intraoperative cholangiography in cases suggestive of choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005;15:312–317PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Barkun JS, Fried GM, Barkun AN, et al. Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 1993;218:371–379PubMed Barkun JS, Fried GM, Barkun AN, et al. Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 1993;218:371–379PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Livingston EH, Miller JA, Coan B, et al. Indications for selective intraoperative cholangiography. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:1371–1377PubMedCrossRef Livingston EH, Miller JA, Coan B, et al. Indications for selective intraoperative cholangiography. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:1371–1377PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:547–557PubMed Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:547–557PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dwerryhouse SJ, Brown E, Vipond MN. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1998;85:1364–1366PubMedCrossRef Dwerryhouse SJ, Brown E, Vipond MN. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1998;85:1364–1366PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, et al. The efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1999;178:480–484PubMedCrossRef Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, et al. The efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1999;178:480–484PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Park AE, Mastrangelo MJ Jr. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2000;14:219–226PubMedCrossRef Park AE, Mastrangelo MJ Jr. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2000;14:219–226PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Duensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, et al. Managing choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 1995;170:619–623PubMedCrossRef Duensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, et al. Managing choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 1995;170:619–623PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Aube C, Delorme B, Yzet T, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:55–62PubMed Aube C, Delorme B, Yzet T, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:55–62PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat de Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? – a prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:26–31PubMedCrossRef de Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? – a prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:26–31PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JF, et al. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2000;32:3–9PubMedCrossRef Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JF, et al. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2000;32:3–9PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Irie H, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, et al. Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatographic interpretation. Radiographics 2001;21:23–37PubMed Irie H, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, et al. Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatographic interpretation. Radiographics 2001;21:23–37PubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat David V, Reinhold C, Hochman M, et al. Pitfalls in the interpretation of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1055–1059PubMed David V, Reinhold C, Hochman M, et al. Pitfalls in the interpretation of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1055–1059PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Vanbeckevoort D, et al. Normal Vaterian sphincter complex: evaluation of morphology and contractility with dynamic single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1497–1500PubMed van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Vanbeckevoort D, et al. Normal Vaterian sphincter complex: evaluation of morphology and contractility with dynamic single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1497–1500PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim TK, Kim BS, Kim JH, et al. Diagnosis of intrahepatic stones: superiority of MR cholangiopancreatography over endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:429–434PubMed Kim TK, Kim BS, Kim JH, et al. Diagnosis of intrahepatic stones: superiority of MR cholangiopancreatography over endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:429–434PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Topal B, van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, et al. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg 2003;90:42–47PubMedCrossRef Topal B, van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, et al. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg 2003;90:42–47PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott TR, Zucker KA, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992;2:191–198PubMed Scott TR, Zucker KA, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992;2:191–198PubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, et al. Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications. Ann Surg 1992;215:209–216 Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, et al. Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications. Ann Surg 1992;215:209–216
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Madden JL. Common duct stones: their origin and surgical management. Surg Clin North Am 1973;53:1095–1113PubMed Madden JL. Common duct stones: their origin and surgical management. Surg Clin North Am 1973;53:1095–1113PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography in the Diagnosis of Bile Duct Lithiasis
verfasst von
Damir Miletic
Miljenko Uravic
Marzena Mazur-Brbac
Davor Stimac
Davor Petranovic
Branko Sestan
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2006
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2006
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0459-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2006

World Journal of Surgery 9/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.