Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2007

01.12.2007 | Erratum

Predictors and Outcome of Readmission after Laparoscopic Intestinal Surgery

verfasst von: David Patrick O’Brien, Anthony Senagore, James Merlino, Karen Brady, Conor Delaney

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Erratum to: World J Surg DOI 10.1007/s00268-007-9236-7

The original version of this article, published online on September 25, 2007 and in print in the November 2007 issue (vol 31/no 11, pp 2138–2143), did not include the full list of authors’ names. The correct list of authors and their affiliations are shown below.
The article is reprinted in its entirety.

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have failed to identify predictors of early readmission after major intestinal operations. The objectives of this study were to determine readmission rates, outcomes, and predictors of readmission for patients undergoing laparoscopic colon and rectal operations.

Methods

Patients readmitted (PR) to the hospital within 30 days of discharge after laparoscopic colon and rectal operations were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The PR group was compared with patients that were not readmitted (NR). Outcomes and variables related to readmission were evaluated.

Results

There were 820 consecutive elective laparoscopic colon and rectal operations performed over a 5-year period, with adequate follow-up data for 787 cases. Seventy-nine (10%) patients were readmitted. There was no difference in the age, sex, surgeon, or type of operation between the PR and NR groups. The most common causes for readmission were bowel obstruction (19%), ileus (18%), intra-abdominal abscess (14%), and anastomotic leak (9%). Overall mean (median) length of stay (LOS) for the index admission was 3.7 ± 4.3 (3.0) days. Patients in the PR group had a trend toward a longer index admission LOS than the NR group (5.4 ± 8.8 [3.0] versus 3.5 ± 3.3 [3.0], p = 0.068). Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with inflammatory bowel disease, pulmonary comorbidities, and steroid use were more likely to be readmitted. Multivariate analysis confirmed that inflammatory bowel disease and pulmonary comorbidity are independent risk factors for readmission.

Conclusions

Early readmission after laparoscopic colon and rectal operations is not associated with early discharge. Identification of specific patient characteristics indicating risk for early readmission may allow for selective changes in perioperative care or discharge criteria to avoid unexpected readmission.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Basse L, Thorbol JE, Lossl K, et al. (2004) Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 47(3):271–277; discussion 277–278PubMedCrossRef Basse L, Thorbol JE, Lossl K, et al. (2004) Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 47(3):271–277; discussion 277–278PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff BG, Michelassi F, Gerkin TM, et al. (2004) Alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting μ opioid antagonist: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of major abdominal surgery and postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 240(4):728–734; discussion 734–735PubMed Wolff BG, Michelassi F, Gerkin TM, et al. (2004) Alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting μ opioid antagonist: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of major abdominal surgery and postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 240(4):728–734; discussion 734–735PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, et al. (2004) Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 198(6):877–883PubMedCrossRef Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, et al. (2004) Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 198(6):877–883PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Azimuddin K, Rosen L, Reed JF 3rd, et al. (2001) Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted. Dis Colon Rectum 44(7):942–946PubMedCrossRef Azimuddin K, Rosen L, Reed JF 3rd, et al. (2001) Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted. Dis Colon Rectum 44(7):942–946PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91(9):1111–1124PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91(9):1111–1124PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Vignali A, Braga M, Zuliani W, et al. (2004) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery modifies risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum 47(10):1686–1693PubMedCrossRef Vignali A, Braga M, Zuliani W, et al. (2004) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery modifies risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum 47(10):1686–1693PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, et al. (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 2005(3):CD003145 Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, et al. (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 2005(3):CD003145
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, et al. (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238(1):67–72PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, et al. (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238(1):67–72PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ, et al. (1992) Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 216(6):703–707PubMedCrossRef Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ, et al. (1992) Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 216(6):703–707PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, et al. (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187(1):46–54; discussion 55PubMedCrossRef Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, et al. (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187(1):46–54; discussion 55PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236(6):759–766; discussion 767PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236(6):759–766; discussion 767PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, et al. (2003) Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 138(3):252–256PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, et al. (2003) Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 138(3):252–256PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2006) A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: lessons learned after 1000 cases. Am J Surg 191(3):377–380PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2006) A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: lessons learned after 1000 cases. Am J Surg 191(3):377–380PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorski TF, Rosen L, Lawrence S, et al. (1999) Usefulness of a state-legislated, comparative database to evaluate quality in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 42(11):1381–1387PubMedCrossRef Gorski TF, Rosen L, Lawrence S, et al. (1999) Usefulness of a state-legislated, comparative database to evaluate quality in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 42(11):1381–1387PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kariv Y, Wang W, Senagore AJ, et al. (2006) Multivariable analysis of factors associated with hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. Am J Surg 191(3):364–371PubMedCrossRef Kariv Y, Wang W, Senagore AJ, et al. (2006) Multivariable analysis of factors associated with hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. Am J Surg 191(3):364–371PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Viscusi ER, et al. (2006) Postoperative upper and lower gastrointestinal recovery and gastrointestinal morbidity in patients undergoing bowel resection: pooled analysis of placebo data from 3 randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg 191(3):315–319PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Viscusi ER, et al. (2006) Postoperative upper and lower gastrointestinal recovery and gastrointestinal morbidity in patients undergoing bowel resection: pooled analysis of placebo data from 3 randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg 191(3):315–319PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney CP, Weese JL, Hyman NH, et al. (2005) Phase III trial of alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting, mu opioid antagonist, for postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48(6):1114–1125; discussion 1125–1126; author reply 1127–1129PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Weese JL, Hyman NH, et al. (2005) Phase III trial of alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting, mu opioid antagonist, for postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48(6):1114–1125; discussion 1125–1126; author reply 1127–1129PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Viscusi ER, Goldstein S, Witkowski T, et al. (2006) Alvimopan, a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, compared with placebo in postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery: results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Surg Endosc 20(1):64–70PubMedCrossRef Viscusi ER, Goldstein S, Witkowski T, et al. (2006) Alvimopan, a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, compared with placebo in postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery: results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Surg Endosc 20(1):64–70PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Davenport DL, Bowe EA, Henderson WG, et al. (2006) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk factors can be used to validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA PS) levels. Ann Surg 243(5):636–641; discussion 641–644PubMedCrossRef Davenport DL, Bowe EA, Henderson WG, et al. (2006) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk factors can be used to validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA PS) levels. Ann Surg 243(5):636–641; discussion 641–644PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors and Outcome of Readmission after Laparoscopic Intestinal Surgery
verfasst von
David Patrick O’Brien
Anthony Senagore
James Merlino
Karen Brady
Conor Delaney
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9345-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2007

World Journal of Surgery 12/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Invited Commentary

Invited Commentary

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.