Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 3/2010

01.03.2010

Surgical Outcomes Auditing Systems in Humanitarian Organizations

verfasst von: Luis Bermudez, Victoria Carter, William Magee Jr., Randy Sherman, Ruben Ayala

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Operation Smile is a humanitarian volunteer-based organization that provides cleft care around the world. Successful primary surgery is the key to improving the quality of life of patients with oral clefts. A cleft surgery outcomes database and evaluation system has been developed and implemented.

Methods

During Operation Smile’s “World Journey of Smiles” in November 2007, a total of 4100 patients were operated on during a 10-day period at 40 simultaneous missions in 25 countries. Photographs taken before surgery, right after surgery, and at the follow-up consultations were entered in a database and used as media to evaluate surgical outcomes objectively by independent unbiased evaluators. Data about complications collected during the postoperative consultations were also entered.

Results

A postoperative consultation, 6 months to 1 year after surgery was conducted at 24 sites, 19 of which sent back postoperative images; and most returned postoperative examination forms. At those 19 sites, 703 of 1917 patients returned for a 6- to 9-month postoperative visit, for a 36.67% return rate. After matching before and after pictures, 562 patients were able to be entered into the database, allowing 580 procedures to be evaluated. Feedback reports have been sent to 134 volunteer surgeons around the world. Results were compared among sites and locations; and the places where future actions were needed to improve the quality of surgery were identified.

Conclusions

The current outcomes evaluation system has proven beneficial in tracking patient outcomes, auditing surgical performance, and providing feedback to surgeons and other team members. Challenges are discussed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanderas AP (1987) Incidence of cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate among races: a review. Cleft Palate J 24:216–225PubMed Vanderas AP (1987) Incidence of cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate among races: a review. Cleft Palate J 24:216–225PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee ST (2002) International surgical missions. In: Wyszynski DF (ed) Cleft lip & palate: from origin to treatment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 424–427 Lee ST (2002) International surgical missions. In: Wyszynski DF (ed) Cleft lip & palate: from origin to treatment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 424–427
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bermudez L (2004) Humanitarian missions in the Third World [letter]. Plast Reconstr Surg J 114:1687–1689 Bermudez L (2004) Humanitarian missions in the Third World [letter]. Plast Reconstr Surg J 114:1687–1689
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw WC, Williams AC, Sandy JR et al (1996) Minimum standards for the management of cleft lip and palate: efforts to close the audit loop. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78:110–114PubMed Shaw WC, Williams AC, Sandy JR et al (1996) Minimum standards for the management of cleft lip and palate: efforts to close the audit loop. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78:110–114PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hathorn IS, Atack NE, Butcher G et al (2006) Centralization of services: standard setting and outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:401–405PubMed Hathorn IS, Atack NE, Butcher G et al (2006) Centralization of services: standard setting and outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:401–405PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw WC, Semb G, Nelson PA et al (2000) The eurocleft project 1996–2000. IOS Press, Amsterdam Shaw WC, Semb G, Nelson PA et al (2000) The eurocleft project 1996–2000. IOS Press, Amsterdam
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw WC, Asher-McDade C, Brattström V et al (1992) A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:413–418CrossRefPubMed Shaw WC, Asher-McDade C, Brattström V et al (1992) A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:413–418CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw WC, Dahl E, Asher-McDade C et al (1992) A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Part 1. Principles and study design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:393–397CrossRefPubMed Shaw WC, Dahl E, Asher-McDade C et al (1992) A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Part 1. Principles and study design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:393–397CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Flinn W, Long R, Garattini G et al (2006) A multicenter outcomes assessment of five-year-old patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:253–258PubMed Flinn W, Long R, Garattini G et al (2006) A multicenter outcomes assessment of five-year-old patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:253–258PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Atack N, Hathorn I, Mars M et al (1997) Study models of 5-year-old children as predictors of surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod 19:165–170CrossRefPubMed Atack N, Hathorn I, Mars M et al (1997) Study models of 5-year-old children as predictors of surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod 19:165–170CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Atack NE, Hathorn I, Dowell T et al (1998) Early detection of differences in surgical outcome for cleft lip and palate. Br J Orthod 25:181–185CrossRefPubMed Atack NE, Hathorn I, Dowell T et al (1998) Early detection of differences in surgical outcome for cleft lip and palate. Br J Orthod 25:181–185CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw WC et al (1991) Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 28:385–390CrossRefPubMed Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw WC et al (1991) Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 28:385–390CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Brattstrom V, Molsted K, Phral-Andersen B et al (2005) The Euroclef study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2. Craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:69–77CrossRefPubMed Brattstrom V, Molsted K, Phral-Andersen B et al (2005) The Euroclef study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2. Craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:69–77CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Coghlan BA, Matthews B, Pigott RW (1987) A computer-based method of measuring facial asymmetry: results from an assessment of the repair of cleft lip deformities. Br J Plast Surg 40:371–376CrossRefPubMed Coghlan BA, Matthews B, Pigott RW (1987) A computer-based method of measuring facial asymmetry: results from an assessment of the repair of cleft lip deformities. Br J Plast Surg 40:371–376CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyrkanides S, Bellohusen R, Subtelny JD (1996) Asymmetries of the upper lip and nose in noncleft and postsurgical unilateral cleft lip and palate individuals. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 33:306–311CrossRefPubMed Kyrkanides S, Bellohusen R, Subtelny JD (1996) Asymmetries of the upper lip and nose in noncleft and postsurgical unilateral cleft lip and palate individuals. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 33:306–311CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Feragen KJ, Semb G, Magnussen S (1999) Asymmetry of left versus right unilateral cleft impairments: an experimental study of face perception. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 36:527–532CrossRefPubMed Feragen KJ, Semb G, Magnussen S (1999) Asymmetry of left versus right unilateral cleft impairments: an experimental study of face perception. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 36:527–532CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleves M, Arboleda C, Bermudez B, et al (2009) Reliability of the perceptual evaluation of MP# speech samples. In: Proceedings of the 63rd meeting of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, p 104 Cleves M, Arboleda C, Bermudez B, et al (2009) Reliability of the perceptual evaluation of MP# speech samples. In: Proceedings of the 63rd meeting of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, p 104
19.
Zurück zum Zitat English M, Lanata C F, Ngugi I, et al (2006) Priorities: disease control priorities in developing countries. DCPP publications, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press. New York, pp 1211–1228, www.dcp2.org English M, Lanata C F, Ngugi I, et al (2006) Priorities: disease control priorities in developing countries. DCPP publications, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press. New York, pp 1211–1228, www.​dcp2.​org
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Anastassov GE, Joos U, Zollner B (1998) Evaluation of the results of delayed rhinoplasty in cleft lip and palate patients: functional and aesthetic implications and factors that affect successful nasal repair. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:416–424CrossRefPubMed Anastassov GE, Joos U, Zollner B (1998) Evaluation of the results of delayed rhinoplasty in cleft lip and palate patients: functional and aesthetic implications and factors that affect successful nasal repair. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:416–424CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, Dahl E et al (1992) The RP: a six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:409–412CrossRefPubMed Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, Dahl E et al (1992) The RP: a six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:409–412CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Becker M, Svensson H, Jacobsson S (1998) Clinical examination compared with morphometry of digital photographs for evaluation of repaired cleft lips. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 32:301–306CrossRefPubMed Becker M, Svensson H, Jacobsson S (1998) Clinical examination compared with morphometry of digital photographs for evaluation of repaired cleft lips. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 32:301–306CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Glass L, Starr CD (1979) A study of relationships between judgments of speech and appearance of patients with orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate J 16:436–440PubMed Glass L, Starr CD (1979) A study of relationships between judgments of speech and appearance of patients with orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate J 16:436–440PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneiderman CR, Harding JB (1984) Social ratings of children with cleft lip by school peers. Cleft Palate J 21:219–223PubMed Schneiderman CR, Harding JB (1984) Social ratings of children with cleft lip by school peers. Cleft Palate J 21:219–223PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobiasen JM (1987) Social judgments of facial deformity. Cleft Palate J 24:323–327PubMed Tobiasen JM (1987) Social judgments of facial deformity. Cleft Palate J 24:323–327PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM (1993) Combined effects of severity of cleft impairment and facial attractiveness on social perception: an experimental study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 30:82–86CrossRefPubMed Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM (1993) Combined effects of severity of cleft impairment and facial attractiveness on social perception: an experimental study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 30:82–86CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM (1993) Clefting and psychosocial adjustment: influence of facial aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg 20:623–631PubMed Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM (1993) Clefting and psychosocial adjustment: influence of facial aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg 20:623–631PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Vegter F, Mulder JW, Hage JJ (1997) Major residual deformities in cleft patients: a new anthropometric approach. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 34:106CrossRefPubMed Vegter F, Mulder JW, Hage JJ (1997) Major residual deformities in cleft patients: a new anthropometric approach. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 34:106CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Omari I, Millett DT, Ayoub AF et al (2003) An appraisal of three methods of rating facial deformity in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 40:530–537CrossRefPubMed Al-Omari I, Millett DT, Ayoub AF et al (2003) An appraisal of three methods of rating facial deformity in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 40:530–537CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical Outcomes Auditing Systems in Humanitarian Organizations
verfasst von
Luis Bermudez
Victoria Carter
William Magee Jr.
Randy Sherman
Ruben Ayala
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0253-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

World Journal of Surgery 3/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.