Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2011

01.04.2011

Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Lymph Node Metastasis of Rectal Cancer

verfasst von: Yo Mizukami, Shugo Ueda, Akiyoshi Mizumoto, Tetsuro Sasada, Ryosuke Okumura, Shigene Kohno, Arimichi Takabayashi

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis is important in determining the optimal therapy for rectal cancer. It has been shown that diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is a useful tool for detecting malignant tumors.

Methods

One hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients with rectal cancer were examined with DWI + conventional (T1-weighted and T2-weighted) MRI and computed tomography (CT). All 129 patients underwent rectal resection with total mesorectal excision. Findings on DWI + conventional MRI and CT were compared with those from histopathologic examinations.

Results

Fifty-nine (46%) patients had metastatic lymph nodes on histopathologic examinations. Two hundred twenty (18%) of 1,250 lymph nodes were pathologically positive for tumor metastasis. The overall patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of DWI + conventional MRI were 93, 81, 81, 93, and 87%, respectively. Corresponding values of CT were 73, 79, 74, 77, and 76%, respectively. The overall node-based sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of DWI + conventional MRI were 97, 81, 52, 99, and 84%, respectively. Corresponding values of CT were 86, 80, 48, 96, and 81%, respectively.

Conclusion

DWI + conventional MRI is effective for the detection of lymph node metastasis and useful for selection of the optimal therapy for rectal cancer.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat LeBlanc JK (2007) Imaging and management of rectal cancer. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:665–676PubMedCrossRef LeBlanc JK (2007) Imaging and management of rectal cancer. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:665–676PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Beets-Tan R, Beets G, Vliegen R et al (2001) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 357:497–504PubMedCrossRef Beets-Tan R, Beets G, Vliegen R et al (2001) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 357:497–504PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dworak O (1989) Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinomas. Surg Endosc 3:96–99PubMedCrossRef Dworak O (1989) Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinomas. Surg Endosc 3:96–99PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F et al (1996) Manual dissection of adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum specimens for detection of lymph node metastases smaller than 5 mm. Cancer 77:607–612PubMedCrossRef Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F et al (1996) Manual dissection of adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum specimens for detection of lymph node metastases smaller than 5 mm. Cancer 77:607–612PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjelovic M, Kalezic V, Petrovic M et al (1998) Correlation of macroscopic and histological characteristics in the regional lymph nodes of patients with rectal and sigmoidal adenocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 45:433–438PubMed Bjelovic M, Kalezic V, Petrovic M et al (1998) Correlation of macroscopic and histological characteristics in the regional lymph nodes of patients with rectal and sigmoidal adenocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 45:433–438PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Monig SP, Baldus SE, Zirbes TK et al (1999) Lymph node size and metastatic infiltration in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 6:579–581PubMedCrossRef Monig SP, Baldus SE, Zirbes TK et al (1999) Lymph node size and metastatic infiltration in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 6:579–581PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner R, Le Bihan D, Maier J et al (1990) Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion. Radiology 177:407–414PubMed Turner R, Le Bihan D, Maier J et al (1990) Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion. Radiology 177:407–414PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rovira A, Rovira-Gols A, Pedraza S et al (2002) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the acute phase of transient ischemic attacks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:77–83PubMed Rovira A, Rovira-Gols A, Pedraza S et al (2002) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the acute phase of transient ischemic attacks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:77–83PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Basser PJ, Pajevic S, Pierpaoli C et al (2000) In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 44:625–632PubMedCrossRef Basser PJ, Pajevic S, Pierpaoli C et al (2000) In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 44:625–632PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosonuma T, Tozaki M, Ichiba N et al (2006) Clinical usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging using low and high b-values to detect rectal cancer. Magn Reson Med Sci 5(4):173–177PubMedCrossRef Hosonuma T, Tozaki M, Ichiba N et al (2006) Clinical usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging using low and high b-values to detect rectal cancer. Magn Reson Med Sci 5(4):173–177PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Kuroki S et al (2004) Diffusion-weighted single shot echo planar imaging of colorectal cancer using a sensitivity-encoding technique. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:620–626PubMedCrossRef Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Kuroki S et al (2004) Diffusion-weighted single shot echo planar imaging of colorectal cancer using a sensitivity-encoding technique. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:620–626PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sumi M, Sakihara N, Sumi T et al (2003) Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1627–1634PubMed Sumi M, Sakihara N, Sumi T et al (2003) Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1627–1634PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J et al (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer—implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45:857–866PubMedCrossRef Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J et al (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer—implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45:857–866PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE et al (2000) Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet 356:93–96PubMedCrossRef Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE et al (2000) Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet 356:93–96PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapiteijin E, Marijnen C, Nagtegaal I et al (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for respectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646CrossRef Kapiteijin E, Marijnen C, Nagtegaal I et al (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for respectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial (1997) Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 336:980–987CrossRef Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial (1997) Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 336:980–987CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRef Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2007) The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 246:693–701 PubMedCrossRef Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2007) The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 246:693–701 PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Castillo M, Smith JK, Kwock L et al (2001) Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation in high-grade cerebral glioma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:60–64PubMed Castillo M, Smith JK, Kwock L et al (2001) Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation in high-grade cerebral glioma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:60–64PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bipat S, Glas A, Slors F et al (2004) Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging—a meta-analysis. Radiology 232:773–783PubMedCrossRef Bipat S, Glas A, Slors F et al (2004) Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging—a meta-analysis. Radiology 232:773–783PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gearhart S, Frassica D, Rosen R et al (2006) Improved staging with pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in low rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 13:397–404PubMedCrossRef Gearhart S, Frassica D, Rosen R et al (2006) Improved staging with pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in low rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 13:397–404PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Lymph Node Metastasis of Rectal Cancer
verfasst von
Yo Mizukami
Shugo Ueda
Akiyoshi Mizumoto
Tetsuro Sasada
Ryosuke Okumura
Shigene Kohno
Arimichi Takabayashi
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-0986-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2011

World Journal of Surgery 4/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.