Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2012

01.09.2012

Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones in Sweden 1989–2006: An Observational Nationwide Study of a Paradigm Shift

verfasst von: Birger Sandzén, Markku M. Haapamäki, Erik Nilsson, Hans C. Stenlund, Mikael Öman

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The preferred strategies for treatment of common bile duct stones have changed from choledochotomy with cholecystectomy to sphincterotomy with or without cholecystectomy. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of these treatment strategies on a nationwide level in Sweden.

Methods

All patients with hospital care for benign biliary diagnoses 1988–2006 were identified in Swedish registers. Patients with common bile duct stones and a first admission with choledochotomy and or endoscopic sphincterotomy from 1989 through 2006 comprised the study group. These patients were analyzed with respect to readmission for biliary diagnoses and acute pancreatitis.

Results

Incidence of open and laparoscopic choledochotomy decreased from 19.4 to 5.2, whereas endoscopic sphincterotomy increased from 5.1 to 26.1 per 100,000 inhabitants per year, respectively. Among patients treated for common bile duct stones (n = 26,815), 60.0 % underwent cholecystectomy during the first hospital admission in 1989–1994, compared to 30.1 % in 2001–2006. The treatment strategy that included endoscopic sphincterotomy was associated with more readmissions for biliary diagnoses and increased risk for acute pancreatitis than the treatment strategy with choledochotomy. However, patients treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy and concurrent cholecystectomy at the index admission had the lowest risk of readmission.

Conclusions

Cholecystectomy has been increasingly separated from treatment of bile duct stones, and endoscopic sphincterotomy has superseded choledochotomy as a first alternative for bile duct clearance in Sweden. In patients fit for surgery, clearance of the common bile duct can be combined with cholecystectomy, as it probably reduces the need for biliary related readmissions.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Aerts R, Penninckx F (2003) The burden of gallstone disease in Europe. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18(Suppl 3):49–53PubMedCrossRef Aerts R, Penninckx F (2003) The burden of gallstone disease in Europe. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18(Suppl 3):49–53PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tazuma S (2006) Gallstone disease: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20:1075–1083PubMedCrossRef Tazuma S (2006) Gallstone disease: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20:1075–1083PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I et al (2008) Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 57:1004–1021PubMedCrossRef Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I et al (2008) Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 57:1004–1021PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Etzioni DA, Liu JH, Maggard MA et al (2003) The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce. Ann Surg 238:170–177PubMed Etzioni DA, Liu JH, Maggard MA et al (2003) The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce. Ann Surg 238:170–177PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hüttl TP, Hrdina C, Geiger TK et al (2002) Management of common bile duct stones—results of a nationwide survey with analysis of 8,433 common bile duct explorations in Germany. Zentralbl Chir 127:282–288PubMedCrossRef Hüttl TP, Hrdina C, Geiger TK et al (2002) Management of common bile duct stones—results of a nationwide survey with analysis of 8,433 common bile duct explorations in Germany. Zentralbl Chir 127:282–288PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Livingston EH, Rege RV (2005) Technical complications are rising as common duct exploration is becoming rare. J Am Coll Surg 201:426–433PubMedCrossRef Livingston EH, Rege RV (2005) Technical complications are rising as common duct exploration is becoming rare. J Am Coll Surg 201:426–433PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopt UT, Adam U (2006) Therapeutic splitting as standard treatment for cholelithiasis. Chirurg 77:307–314PubMedCrossRef Hopt UT, Adam U (2006) Therapeutic splitting as standard treatment for cholelithiasis. Chirurg 77:307–314PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M et al (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228:29–34PubMedCrossRef Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M et al (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228:29–34PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vecchio R, MacFadyen BV (2002) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:45–54PubMedCrossRef Vecchio R, MacFadyen BV (2002) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:45–54PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tokumura H, Umezawa A, Cao H et al (2002) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:206–212PubMedCrossRef Tokumura H, Umezawa A, Cao H et al (2002) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:206–212PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Waage A, Stromberg C, Leijonmarck CE et al (2003) Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17:1181–1185PubMedCrossRef Waage A, Stromberg C, Leijonmarck CE et al (2003) Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17:1181–1185PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tai CK, Tang CN, Ha JP et al (2004) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 18:910–914PubMedCrossRef Tai CK, Tang CN, Ha JP et al (2004) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 18:910–914PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat McMahon AJ, Fischbacher CM, Frame SH et al (2000) Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a population-based study. Lancet 356:1632–1637PubMedCrossRef McMahon AJ, Fischbacher CM, Frame SH et al (2000) Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a population-based study. Lancet 356:1632–1637PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang JY, Ellis C, Majeed A et al (2003) Gallstones–an increasing problem: a study of hospital admissions in England between 1989/1990 and 1999/2000. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:561–569PubMedCrossRef Kang JY, Ellis C, Majeed A et al (2003) Gallstones–an increasing problem: a study of hospital admissions in England between 1989/1990 and 1999/2000. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:561–569PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Keus F, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2010) Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD008318 Keus F, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2010) Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD008318
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Calland JF, Tanaka K, Foley E et al (2001) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 233:704–715PubMedCrossRef Calland JF, Tanaka K, Foley E et al (2001) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 233:704–715PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Leeder PC, Mattews T, Krzeminska K et al (2004) Routine day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 91:312–316PubMedCrossRef Leeder PC, Mattews T, Krzeminska K et al (2004) Routine day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 91:312–316PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD003327 Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD003327
23.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD005640 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD005640
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD005641 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD005641
26.
Zurück zum Zitat McAlister VC, Davenport E, Renouf E (2007) Cholecystectomy deferral in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD006233 McAlister VC, Davenport E, Renouf E (2007) Cholecystectomy deferral in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD006233
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Reinders JS, Goud A, Timmer R et al (2010) Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy improves outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledochocystolithiasis. Gastroenterology 138:2315–2320PubMedCrossRef Reinders JS, Goud A, Timmer R et al (2010) Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy improves outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledochocystolithiasis. Gastroenterology 138:2315–2320PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hüttl TP, Hrdina C, Geiger TK et al (2002) Management of common bile duct stones—results of a nationwide survey with analysis of 8 433 common bile duct explorations in Germany. Zentralbl Chir 127:282–288PubMedCrossRef Hüttl TP, Hrdina C, Geiger TK et al (2002) Management of common bile duct stones—results of a nationwide survey with analysis of 8 433 common bile duct explorations in Germany. Zentralbl Chir 127:282–288PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandzen B, Rosenmuller M, Haapamaki MM et al (2009) First attack of acute pancreatitis in Sweden 1988–2003: incidence, aetiological classification, procedures and mortality—register study. BMC Gastroenterol 9:18PubMedCrossRef Sandzen B, Rosenmuller M, Haapamaki MM et al (2009) First attack of acute pancreatitis in Sweden 1988–2003: incidence, aetiological classification, procedures and mortality—register study. BMC Gastroenterol 9:18PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulman CI, Levi J, Sleeman D et al (2007) Are we training our residents to perform open gall bladder and common bile duct operations? J Surg Res 142:246–249PubMedCrossRef Schulman CI, Levi J, Sleeman D et al (2007) Are we training our residents to perform open gall bladder and common bile duct operations? J Surg Res 142:246–249PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung RS, Wojtasik L, Pham Q et al (2002) The decline of training in open biliary surgery: effect on the residents’ attitude toward bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc 17:338–340 discussion 341PubMedCrossRef Chung RS, Wojtasik L, Pham Q et al (2002) The decline of training in open biliary surgery: effect on the residents’ attitude toward bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc 17:338–340 discussion 341PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung RS, Ahmed N (2010) The impact of minimally invasive surgery on residents’ open operative experience: analysis of two decades of national data. Ann Surg 251:205–212PubMedCrossRef Chung RS, Ahmed N (2010) The impact of minimally invasive surgery on residents’ open operative experience: analysis of two decades of national data. Ann Surg 251:205–212PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenmuller M, Haapamaki MM, Nordin P et al (2007) Cholecystectomy in Sweden 2000–2003: a nationwide study on procedures, patient characteristics, and mortality. BMC Gastroenterol 7:35PubMedCrossRef Rosenmuller M, Haapamaki MM, Nordin P et al (2007) Cholecystectomy in Sweden 2000–2003: a nationwide study on procedures, patient characteristics, and mortality. BMC Gastroenterol 7:35PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones in Sweden 1989–2006: An Observational Nationwide Study of a Paradigm Shift
verfasst von
Birger Sandzén
Markku M. Haapamäki
Erik Nilsson
Hans C. Stenlund
Mikael Öman
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1648-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2012

World Journal of Surgery 9/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.