Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2015

01.07.2015 | Original Scientific Report

Definition and Classification of Intraoperative Complications (CLASSIC): Delphi Study and Pilot Evaluation

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Standardized reporting of intraoperative adverse events is important to enhance transparency. To the best of our knowledge, there is no validated definition and classification of intraoperative complications.

Methods

We conducted a two-round Delphi study to develop a definition and classification of intraoperative complications. Experts were contacted by email and sent a link to the online questionnaire. In a pilot study, two independent raters applied the definition and classification in a sample of 60 surgical interventions of low, intermediate, and high complexity and evaluated practicability. Interrater agreement of the classification was determined (raw categorical agreement, weighted kappa, and intraclass correlation).

Results

In the Delphi study, 40 of 52 experts (77 % return rate) from 14 countries took part in each round. The Delphi study resulted in a comprehensive definition of intraoperative complications as any deviation from the ideal intraoperative course occurring between skin incision and skin closure. The classification foresees four grades depending on the need for treatment (no need, grade I; need for treatment, grade II) and the severity of the complication (life-threatening/permanent disability, grade III; death, grade IV). The pilot study showed good practicability (6 on a 7-point scale) and a high raw agreement of 87 %, a weighted kappa of 0.83 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.73–0.94] and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (95 % CI 0.73–0.90).

Conclusions

While the Delphi process enabled to develop definitions and classification of intraoperative complications by severity, further research including a multicentre international full-scale validation needs to be conducted with the ultimate goal to contribute to standardized reporting in surgical practice and research.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kram R (2008) Critical incident reporting system in emergency medicine. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 21:240–244PubMedCrossRef Kram R (2008) Critical incident reporting system in emergency medicine. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 21:240–244PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Manser T, Foster S, Flin R, Patey R (2013) Team communication during patient handover from the operating room: more than facts and figures. Hum Factors 55:138–156PubMedCrossRef Manser T, Foster S, Flin R, Patey R (2013) Team communication during patient handover from the operating room: more than facts and figures. Hum Factors 55:138–156PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagpal K, Abboudi M, Fischler L, Schmidt T, Vats A, Manchanda C, Sevdalis N, Scheidegger D, Vincent C, Moorthy K (2011) Evaluation of postoperative handover using a tool to assess information transfer and teamwork. Ann Surg 253:831–837PubMedCrossRef Nagpal K, Abboudi M, Fischler L, Schmidt T, Vats A, Manchanda C, Sevdalis N, Scheidegger D, Vincent C, Moorthy K (2011) Evaluation of postoperative handover using a tool to assess information transfer and teamwork. Ann Surg 253:831–837PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526PubMed Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de SE, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de SE, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pillai SB, van Rij AM, Williams S, Thomson IA, Putterill MJ, Greig S (1999) Complexity- and risk-adjusted model for measuring surgical outcome. Br J Surg 86:1567–1572PubMedCrossRef Pillai SB, van Rij AM, Williams S, Thomson IA, Putterill MJ, Greig S (1999) Complexity- and risk-adjusted model for measuring surgical outcome. Br J Surg 86:1567–1572PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pomposelli JJ, Gupta SK, Zacharoulis DC, Landa R, Miller A, Nanda R (1997) Surgical complication outcome (SCOUT) score: a new method to evaluate quality of care in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 25:1007–1014PubMedCrossRef Pomposelli JJ, Gupta SK, Zacharoulis DC, Landa R, Miller A, Nanda R (1997) Surgical complication outcome (SCOUT) score: a new method to evaluate quality of care in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 25:1007–1014PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2009) The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250:177–186PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2009) The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250:177–186PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenthal R, Hoffmann H, Dwan K, Clavien PA, Bucher HC (2015) Reporting of adverse events in surgical trials: critical appraisal of current practice. World J Surg 39:80–87PubMedCrossRef Rosenthal R, Hoffmann H, Dwan K, Clavien PA, Bucher HC (2015) Reporting of adverse events in surgical trials: critical appraisal of current practice. World J Surg 39:80–87PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu C-C, Sandford BA (2013) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(10):1–8 Hsu C-C, Sandford BA (2013) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(10):1–8
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Preston CC, Colman AM (2000) Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol 104:1–15CrossRef Preston CC, Colman AM (2000) Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol 104:1–15CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97PubMedCrossRef Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Klotz HP, Candinas D, Platz A, Horvath A, Dindo D, Schlumpf R, Largiader F (1996) Preoperative risk assessment in elective general surgery. Br J Surg 83:1788–1791PubMedCrossRef Klotz HP, Candinas D, Platz A, Horvath A, Dindo D, Schlumpf R, Largiader F (1996) Preoperative risk assessment in elective general surgery. Br J Surg 83:1788–1791PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Streiner DL (1995) Learning how to differ: agreement and reliability statistics in psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry 40:60–66PubMed Streiner DL (1995) Learning how to differ: agreement and reliability statistics in psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry 40:60–66PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1973) Equivalence of weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Measur 33:613–619CrossRef Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1973) Equivalence of weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Measur 33:613–619CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Warrens MJ (2011) Weighted kappa is higher than Cohen’s kappa for tridiagonal agreement tables. Stat Methodol 8:268–272CrossRef Warrens MJ (2011) Weighted kappa is higher than Cohen’s kappa for tridiagonal agreement tables. Stat Methodol 8:268–272CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428PubMedCrossRef Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP (2013) Defining technical errors in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:2678–2691PubMedCrossRef Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP (2013) Defining technical errors in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:2678–2691PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabri PJ, Zayas-Castro JL (2008) Human error, not communication and systems, underlies surgical complications. Surgery 144:557–563PubMedCrossRef Fabri PJ, Zayas-Castro JL (2008) Human error, not communication and systems, underlies surgical complications. Surgery 144:557–563PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagpal K, Vats A, Vincent C, Moorthy K (2009) A systems approach to errors. Surgery 145:689–690PubMedCrossRef Nagpal K, Vats A, Vincent C, Moorthy K (2009) A systems approach to errors. Surgery 145:689–690PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH (2001) The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess 5:1–194PubMedCrossRef Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH (2001) The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess 5:1–194PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Edlin R, Hall P, Wallner K, McCabe C (2014) Sharing risk between payer and provider by leasing health technologies: an affordable and effective reimbursement strategy for innovative technologies? Value Health 17:438–444PubMedCrossRef Edlin R, Hall P, Wallner K, McCabe C (2014) Sharing risk between payer and provider by leasing health technologies: an affordable and effective reimbursement strategy for innovative technologies? Value Health 17:438–444PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Long G, Mortimer R, Sanzenbacher G (2014) Evolving provider payment models and patient access to innovative medical technology. J Med Econ 17:1–11CrossRef Long G, Mortimer R, Sanzenbacher G (2014) Evolving provider payment models and patient access to innovative medical technology. J Med Econ 17:1–11CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Definition and Classification of Intraoperative Complications (CLASSIC): Delphi Study and Pilot Evaluation
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3003-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2015

World Journal of Surgery 7/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.