Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2016

14.01.2016 | Original Scientific Report

Advantages and Disadvantages of Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage in Distal Pancreatectomy

verfasst von: Suguru Yamashita, Takeaki Ishizawa, Akihiko Ichida, Junichi Kaneko, Taku Aoki, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Yasuhiko Sugawara, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Norihiro Kokudo

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A method to completely prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (PF) in distal pancreatectomy (DP) is lacking. Hence, prophylactic abdominal drains could be used to prevent PF from developing into life-threatening complications.

Methods

In 152 consecutive patients undergoing DP, three drains were placed routinely toward the pancreatic stump, supra-pancreatic space, and left subphrenic space. Abdominal drains were removed after surgery gradually based on amylase levels and positivity for bacterial infection in abdominal fluids.

Results

Postoperative symptomatic PF occurred in 57 of 152 patients (37.5 %). Prevalence of severe postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥IIIa) was 16 %, with surgery-associated mortality observed in one patient (0.7 %). Prevalence of infection in drained abdominal fluids increased gradually and was >10 % on postoperative day (POD)-7. Severe postoperative complications led to longer postoperative hospital stays and higher treatment costs. Multivariate analyses revealed that a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, serum albumin level ≤3.8 g/dL, and white blood cell count at POD-3 ≥15,000/μL were independent predictors for development of severe postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Use of prophylactic abdominal drains in DP seems to be effective for preventing PF from developing into fatal complications. However, definitive criteria should be established for enhancing safety and cost efficiency of DP through selective use and early removal of prophylactic drains.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mckay A, Mackenzie S, Sutherland FR et al (2006) Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93:929–936CrossRefPubMed Mckay A, Mackenzie S, Sutherland FR et al (2006) Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93:929–936CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E et al (2009) Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg 197:702–709CrossRefPubMed Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E et al (2009) Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg 197:702–709CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumel H, Huguier M, Manderscheid JC et al (1994) Results of resection for cancer of the exocrine pancreas: a study from the French Association of Surgery. Br J Surg 81:102–107CrossRefPubMed Baumel H, Huguier M, Manderscheid JC et al (1994) Results of resection for cancer of the exocrine pancreas: a study from the French Association of Surgery. Br J Surg 81:102–107CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabre JM, Houry S, Manderscheid JC et al (1996) Surgery for left-sided pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 83:1065–1070CrossRefPubMed Fabre JM, Houry S, Manderscheid JC et al (1996) Surgery for left-sided pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 83:1065–1070CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS et al (2002) Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 183:237–241CrossRefPubMed Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS et al (2002) Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 183:237–241CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM et al (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1315CrossRefPubMed Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM et al (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1315CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’graggen K et al (2007) Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 245:573–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’graggen K et al (2007) Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 245:573–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pannegeon V, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A et al (2006) Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment. Arch Surg 141:1071–1076CrossRefPubMed Pannegeon V, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A et al (2006) Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment. Arch Surg 141:1071–1076CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Paye F, Micelli Lupinacci R et al (2015) Distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic carcinoma in the era of multimodal treatment. Br J Surg 102:229–236CrossRefPubMed Paye F, Micelli Lupinacci R et al (2015) Distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic carcinoma in the era of multimodal treatment. Br J Surg 102:229–236CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Buren G 2nd, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ et al (2014) A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg 259:605–612CrossRefPubMed Van Buren G 2nd, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ et al (2014) A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg 259:605–612CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Abe N et al (2010) Secure placement of a peripancreatic drain after a distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 199:178–182CrossRefPubMed Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Abe N et al (2010) Secure placement of a peripancreatic drain after a distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 199:178–182CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshikawa K, Konishi M, Takahashi S et al (2011) Surgical management for the reduction of postoperative hospital stay following distal pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1389–1393CrossRefPubMed Yoshikawa K, Konishi M, Takahashi S et al (2011) Surgical management for the reduction of postoperative hospital stay following distal pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1389–1393CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D et al (2001) Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 234:487–494CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D et al (2001) Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 234:487–494CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Adham M, Chopin-Laly X, Lepilliez V et al (2013) Pancreatic resection: drain or no drain? Surgery 154:1069–1077CrossRefPubMed Adham M, Chopin-Laly X, Lepilliez V et al (2013) Pancreatic resection: drain or no drain? Surgery 154:1069–1077CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, Dʼangelica M et al (2013) Operative drainage following pancreatic resection: analysis of 1122 patients resected over 5 years at a single institution. Ann Surg 258:1051–1058CrossRefPubMed Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, Dʼangelica M et al (2013) Operative drainage following pancreatic resection: analysis of 1122 patients resected over 5 years at a single institution. Ann Surg 258:1051–1058CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher WE, Hodges SE, Silberfein EJ et al (2011) Pancreatic resection without routine intraperitoneal drainage. HPB (Oxf) 13:503–510CrossRef Fisher WE, Hodges SE, Silberfein EJ et al (2011) Pancreatic resection without routine intraperitoneal drainage. HPB (Oxf) 13:503–510CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener MK, Tadjalli-Mehr K, Wente MN et al (2011) Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:41–52CrossRefPubMed Diener MK, Tadjalli-Mehr K, Wente MN et al (2011) Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:41–52CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou Y, Zhang X, Wu L et al (2014) Evidence-based value of prophylactic intraperitoneal drainage following pancreatic resection: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology 14:302–307CrossRefPubMed Zhou Y, Zhang X, Wu L et al (2014) Evidence-based value of prophylactic intraperitoneal drainage following pancreatic resection: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology 14:302–307CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan Pancreas Society (2011) Classification of pancreatic carcinoma, 3rd edn. Kanehara, Tokyo Japan Pancreas Society (2011) Classification of pancreatic carcinoma, 3rd edn. Kanehara, Tokyo
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Konishi T, Hiraishi M, Kubota K et al (1995) Segmental occlusion of the pancreatic duct with prolamine to prevent fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 221:165–170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Konishi T, Hiraishi M, Kubota K et al (1995) Segmental occlusion of the pancreatic duct with prolamine to prevent fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 221:165–170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I et al (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1514–1522CrossRefPubMed Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I et al (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1514–1522CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawai M, Kondo S, Yamaue H et al (2011) Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:601–608CrossRefPubMed Kawai M, Kondo S, Yamaue H et al (2011) Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:601–608CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong X, Zhang B, Kang MX et al (2011) Analysis of pancreatic fistula according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula classification scheme for 294 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in a single center. Pancreas 40:222–228CrossRefPubMed Dong X, Zhang B, Kang MX et al (2011) Analysis of pancreatic fistula according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula classification scheme for 294 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in a single center. Pancreas 40:222–228CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sierzega M, Niekowal B, Kulig J et al (2007) Nutritional status affects the rate of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a multivariate analysis of 132 patients. J Am Coll Surg 205:52–59CrossRefPubMed Sierzega M, Niekowal B, Kulig J et al (2007) Nutritional status affects the rate of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a multivariate analysis of 132 patients. J Am Coll Surg 205:52–59CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sledzianowski JF, Duffas JP, Muscari F et al (2005) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 137:180–185CrossRefPubMed Sledzianowski JF, Duffas JP, Muscari F et al (2005) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 137:180–185CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh TS, Jan YY, Jeng LB et al (1997) Pancreaticojejunal anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomyemultivariate analysis of perioperative risk factors. J Surg Res 67:119–125CrossRefPubMed Yeh TS, Jan YY, Jeng LB et al (1997) Pancreaticojejunal anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomyemultivariate analysis of perioperative risk factors. J Surg Res 67:119–125CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Komagome M et al (2010) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the significance of the ratio of the main pancreatic duct to the pancreas body as a predictor of leakage. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:322–328CrossRefPubMed Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Komagome M et al (2010) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the significance of the ratio of the main pancreatic duct to the pancreas body as a predictor of leakage. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:322–328CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Bu X, Xu J, Dai X (2010) A novel technique for the management of pancreaticojejunal anastomosis dehiscence following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 27:265–271CrossRefPubMed Bu X, Xu J, Dai X (2010) A novel technique for the management of pancreaticojejunal anastomosis dehiscence following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 27:265–271CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Bu X, Xu Y, Xu J et al (2013) Continuous irrigation around pancreatic remnant decreases pancreatic fistula-related intraabdominal complications after distal pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:1083–1089CrossRefPubMed Bu X, Xu Y, Xu J et al (2013) Continuous irrigation around pancreatic remnant decreases pancreatic fistula-related intraabdominal complications after distal pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:1083–1089CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 204:244–249CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 204:244–249CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirano S, Kondo S, Hara T et al (2007) Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: long-term results. Ann Surg 246:46–51CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hirano S, Kondo S, Hara T et al (2007) Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: long-term results. Ann Surg 246:46–51CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo S, Katoh H, Hirano S et al (2003) Results of radical distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac artery for locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic body. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:101–106CrossRefPubMed Kondo S, Katoh H, Hirano S et al (2003) Results of radical distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac artery for locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic body. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:101–106CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H et al (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:1–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H et al (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:1–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Molinari E, Bassi C, Salvia R et al (2007) Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: results of a prospective study in 137 patients. Ann Surg 246:281–287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Molinari E, Bassi C, Salvia R et al (2007) Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: results of a prospective study in 137 patients. Ann Surg 246:281–287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Gebauer F, Kloth K, Tachezy M et al (2012) Options and limitations in applying the fistula classification by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula. Ann Surg 256:130–138CrossRefPubMed Gebauer F, Kloth K, Tachezy M et al (2012) Options and limitations in applying the fistula classification by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula. Ann Surg 256:130–138CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Shinchi H, Wada K, Traverso LW (2006) The usefulness of drain data to identify a clinically relevant pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 10:490–498CrossRefPubMed Shinchi H, Wada K, Traverso LW (2006) The usefulness of drain data to identify a clinically relevant pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 10:490–498CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Keller J, Layer P (2002) Circadian pancreatic enzyme pattern and relationship between secretory and motor activity in fasting humans. J Appl Physiol 93:592–600CrossRefPubMed Keller J, Layer P (2002) Circadian pancreatic enzyme pattern and relationship between secretory and motor activity in fasting humans. J Appl Physiol 93:592–600CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Dagorn JC, Sahel J, Sarles H (1977) Nonparallel secretion of enzymes in human duodenal juice and pure pancreatic juice collected by endoscopic retrograde catheterization of the papilla. Gastroenterology 73:42–45PubMed Dagorn JC, Sahel J, Sarles H (1977) Nonparallel secretion of enzymes in human duodenal juice and pure pancreatic juice collected by endoscopic retrograde catheterization of the papilla. Gastroenterology 73:42–45PubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Reseland JE, Holm H, Jenssen T et al (1995) Inhibitor-stimulated non-parallel pancreatic secretion in man: hormonal and neural regulation? Scand J Gastroenterol 30:72–80CrossRefPubMed Reseland JE, Holm H, Jenssen T et al (1995) Inhibitor-stimulated non-parallel pancreatic secretion in man: hormonal and neural regulation? Scand J Gastroenterol 30:72–80CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashita S, Sakabe M, Ishizawa T et al (2013) Visualization of the leakage of pancreatic juice using a chymotrypsin-activated fluorescent probe. Br J Surg 100:1220–1228CrossRefPubMed Yamashita S, Sakabe M, Ishizawa T et al (2013) Visualization of the leakage of pancreatic juice using a chymotrypsin-activated fluorescent probe. Br J Surg 100:1220–1228CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagai S, Fujii T, Kodera Y et al (2011) Recurrence pattern and prognosis of pancreatic cancer after pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2329–2337CrossRefPubMed Nagai S, Fujii T, Kodera Y et al (2011) Recurrence pattern and prognosis of pancreatic cancer after pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2329–2337CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Bellone G, Novarino A, Vizio B et al (2009) Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on cellular immunity in pancreatic carcinoma patients in view of an integration of standard cancer treatment with immunotherapy. Int J Oncol 34:1701–1715CrossRefPubMed Bellone G, Novarino A, Vizio B et al (2009) Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on cellular immunity in pancreatic carcinoma patients in view of an integration of standard cancer treatment with immunotherapy. Int J Oncol 34:1701–1715CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Advantages and Disadvantages of Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage in Distal Pancreatectomy
verfasst von
Suguru Yamashita
Takeaki Ishizawa
Akihiko Ichida
Junichi Kaneko
Taku Aoki
Yoshihiro Sakamoto
Yasuhiko Sugawara
Kiyoshi Hasegawa
Norihiro Kokudo
Publikationsdatum
14.01.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3399-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

World Journal of Surgery 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.