Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2018

30.07.2018 | Original Scientific Report

Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Minor Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Elderly

verfasst von: Brian K. P. Goh, Darren Chua, Nicholas Syn, Jin-Yao Teo, Chung-Yip Chan, Ser-Yee Lee, Prema Raj Jeyaraj, Peng-Chung Cheow, Pierce K. H. Chow, London L. P. J. Ooi, Alexander Y. F. Chung

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic minor hepatectomy (LMH) in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A total of 40 consecutive elderly (≥ 70 years) patients were compared with 94 young patients (< 70 years). The 40 patients were also compared with 85 consecutive elderly patients who underwent open minor hepatectomies (OMH). After 1:1 propensity-score matching (PSM), 32 LMHs were compared with 32 OMHs in elderly patients.

Results

Comparison between the baseline characteristics of elderly and young HCC patients showed that elderly patients were significantly more likely to have comorbidities, ASA score > 2, non-hepatitis B, previous liver resection and larger tumor size. Comparison between perioperative outcomes demonstrated that elderly patients were significantly more likely to have a longer operation time, increased blood loss, increased need for blood transfusion, longer Pringles duration and longer postoperative stay. Comparison between LMH and OMH in elderly patients demonstrated no significant difference in baseline characteristics except the LMH cohort were significantly more likely to have > 1 comorbidity, higher platelet count and lower median AFP level. Comparison between outcomes before and after PSM demonstrated that LMH was associated with longer operation time, increased blood loss, longer Pringles duration but decreased postoperative pulmonary complications and shorter postoperative stay compared to OMH.

Conclusion

LMH is safe and feasible in elderly patients with HCC. However, LMH in elderly patients is associated with poorer perioperative outcomes compared to LMH in young patients. Comparison between LMH and OMH in elderly patients demonstrated advantages in terms of decreased pulmonary complications and shorter length of stay at the expense of increased operation time and blood loss.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan AC, Poon RT, Cheung TT et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for elderly patients with malignant liver tumors: a single-center experience. J Gastro Hepatol 29:1279–1283CrossRef Chan AC, Poon RT, Cheung TT et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for elderly patients with malignant liver tumors: a single-center experience. J Gastro Hepatol 29:1279–1283CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y (2015) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in elderly patients: a single-center, case-matched study. Surg Endosc 29:1368–1375CrossRef Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y (2015) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in elderly patients: a single-center, case-matched study. Surg Endosc 29:1368–1375CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Statistics (2016) Monitoring health for the SDGs Annex B: tables of health statistics by country, WHO region and globally. World Health Organization, Geneva, p 2016 World Health Statistics (2016) Monitoring health for the SDGs Annex B: tables of health statistics by country, WHO region and globally. World Health Organization, Geneva, p 2016
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cucchetti A, Sposito C, Pinna AD et al (2016) Effect of age on survival in patients undergoing resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 103:e93–e99CrossRef Cucchetti A, Sposito C, Pinna AD et al (2016) Effect of age on survival in patients undergoing resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 103:e93–e99CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Faber W, Stockmann M, Schirmer C et al (2014) Significant impact of patient age on outcome after liver resection for HCC in cirrhosis. EJSO 40:208–213CrossRef Faber W, Stockmann M, Schirmer C et al (2014) Significant impact of patient age on outcome after liver resection for HCC in cirrhosis. EJSO 40:208–213CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang WL, Zhu Y, Cheng J et al (2014) Major hepatectomy is safe for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients with cirrhosis. Eur J Gas Hepatol 26:444–451CrossRef Wang WL, Zhu Y, Cheng J et al (2014) Major hepatectomy is safe for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients with cirrhosis. Eur J Gas Hepatol 26:444–451CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauschke A, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Mothes H et al (2016) Partial liver resection results in a significantly better long-term survival than locally ablative procedures even in elderly patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142:1099–1108CrossRef Bauschke A, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Mothes H et al (2016) Partial liver resection results in a significantly better long-term survival than locally ablative procedures even in elderly patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142:1099–1108CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777CrossRef Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sposito C, Battiston C, Facciorusso A et al (2016) Propensity score analysis of outcomes following laparoscopic or open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 103:871–880CrossRef Sposito C, Battiston C, Facciorusso A et al (2016) Propensity score analysis of outcomes following laparoscopic or open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 103:871–880CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T et al (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:721–727CrossRef Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T et al (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:721–727CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Han HS, Shehta A, Ahn S et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: case-matched study with propensity score matching. J Hepatol 63:643–650CrossRef Han HS, Shehta A, Ahn S et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: case-matched study with propensity score matching. J Hepatol 63:643–650CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Badawy A, Seo S, Toda R et al (2017) A propensity score-based analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for liver malignancies in elderly patients. J Invest Surg 17:1–8CrossRef Badawy A, Seo S, Toda R et al (2017) A propensity score-based analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for liver malignancies in elderly patients. J Invest Surg 17:1–8CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez-Cecilia D, Cipriani F, Vishal S et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases in elderly and octogenarian patients: a multicenter propensity score based analysis of short- and long-term outcomes. Ann Surg 265:1192–1200CrossRef Martinez-Cecilia D, Cipriani F, Vishal S et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases in elderly and octogenarian patients: a multicenter propensity score based analysis of short- and long-term outcomes. Ann Surg 265:1192–1200CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and result of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and result of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BK, Chan CY, Wong JS et al (2015) Factors associated with and outcomes of open conversion after laparoscopic minor hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 29:2636–2642CrossRef Goh BK, Chan CY, Wong JS et al (2015) Factors associated with and outcomes of open conversion after laparoscopic minor hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 29:2636–2642CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BK, Teo JY, Chan CY et al (2017) Evolution of laparoscopic liver resection at Singapore General Hospital: a nine-year experience of 195 consecutive resections. Singap Med J 58:708–713CrossRef Goh BK, Teo JY, Chan CY et al (2017) Evolution of laparoscopic liver resection at Singapore General Hospital: a nine-year experience of 195 consecutive resections. Singap Med J 58:708–713CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BK, Teo JY, Lee SY et al (2018) Critical appraisal of the impact of individual surgeon experience on the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in the modern era: collective experience of multiple surgeons at a single institution with 324 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 32(4):1802–1811CrossRef Goh BK, Teo JY, Lee SY et al (2018) Critical appraisal of the impact of individual surgeon experience on the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in the modern era: collective experience of multiple surgeons at a single institution with 324 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 32(4):1802–1811CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of Hepatic anatomy and resection: a review of Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12(5):351–355CrossRef Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of Hepatic anatomy and resection: a review of Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12(5):351–355CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Uchida H, Iwashita Y, Watanabe K, Takayama H et al (2015) Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in elderly patients: a comparative study from a single center. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:e109–e112CrossRef Uchida H, Iwashita Y, Watanabe K, Takayama H et al (2015) Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in elderly patients: a comparative study from a single center. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:e109–e112CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cauchy F, Fuks D, Nomi T et al (2016) Benefits of laparoscopy in elderly patients requiring major liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 222:174–184CrossRef Cauchy F, Fuks D, Nomi T et al (2016) Benefits of laparoscopy in elderly patients requiring major liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 222:174–184CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang XT, Wang HG, Duan WD et al (2015) Pure laparoscopic versus open liver resection for primary liver carcinoma in elderly patients. Medicine 94:e1854CrossRef Wang XT, Wang HG, Duan WD et al (2015) Pure laparoscopic versus open liver resection for primary liver carcinoma in elderly patients. Medicine 94:e1854CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Spampinato MG, Arvanitakis M, Puleo F et al (2013) Totally laparoscopic liver resections for primary and metastatic cancer in elderly: safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:1881–1886CrossRef Spampinato MG, Arvanitakis M, Puleo F et al (2013) Totally laparoscopic liver resections for primary and metastatic cancer in elderly: safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:1881–1886CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Minor Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Elderly
verfasst von
Brian K. P. Goh
Darren Chua
Nicholas Syn
Jin-Yao Teo
Chung-Yip Chan
Ser-Yee Lee
Prema Raj Jeyaraj
Peng-Chung Cheow
Pierce K. H. Chow
London L. P. J. Ooi
Alexander Y. F. Chung
Publikationsdatum
30.07.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4741-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2018

World Journal of Surgery 12/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.