Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2007

01.07.2007 | Clinical Trial Report

Erlotinib plus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer and other solid tumors: phase IB trial

verfasst von: Tomislav Dragovich, Mark Huberman, Daniel D. Von Hoff, Eric K. Rowinsky, Paul Nadler, Debra Wood, Marta Hamilton, George Hage, Julie Wolf, Amita Patnaik

Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Ausgabe 2/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this phase IB trial was to evaluate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity of erlotinib plus gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer and other solid tumors.

Patients and methods

Patients included those with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma or other malignancies potentially responsive to gemcitabine. In the escalating phase of the trial, patients were enrolled in sequential cohorts using 100 or 150 mg oral daily dosing of erlotinib. Gemcitabine dose was 1,000 mg/m2 weekly ×7 (first cycle), then weekly ×3, every 4 weeks.

Results

Twenty-six patients completed at least one course on study. In Cohort IA, at the 100 mg/day dose of erlotinib, three patients have developed grade 3 transaminase elevations. After stricter inclusion criteria were adopted (Cohort IB), no additional events of grade 3 transaminase elevations were observed and the dose of erlotinib was escalated to 150 mg/day (Cohorts IB and IIB) without reaching dose-limiting toxicities. The most common toxicities included diarrhea, skin rash, fatigue and neutropenia. The pharmacokinetic analyses did not reveal any significant interactions between erlotinib and gemcitabine. Objective responses were seen in two patients: cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. Patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer (n = 15) had a median progression-free survival of 289 days, the estimated overall survival of 389 days (12.5 months), and a 1-year survival rate of 51%.

Conclusion

The 150 mg/day dose of erlotinib can be safely administered in combination with standard dose gemcitabine in selected patients with pancreatic cancer and other advanced solid tumors. Promising antitumor activity has been observed in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2006) Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 56:106–130PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2006) Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 56:106–130PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413PubMed Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothenberg ML, Moore MJ, Cripps MC et al (1996) A phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with 5-FU-refractory pancreas cancer. Ann Oncol 7:347–353PubMed Rothenberg ML, Moore MJ, Cripps MC et al (1996) A phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with 5-FU-refractory pancreas cancer. Ann Oncol 7:347–353PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz Van Haperen V et al (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3402–3408PubMedCrossRef Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz Van Haperen V et al (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3402–3408PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Rielly E, Abou-Alfa GK, Letourneau R et al (2004) A randomized phase III trial of DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate; DX) and gemcitabine (GEM) vs gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. ASCO Annu Meet Proc 22:315s O’Rielly E, Abou-Alfa GK, Letourneau R et al (2004) A randomized phase III trial of DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate; DX) and gemcitabine (GEM) vs gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. ASCO Annu Meet Proc 22:315s
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Berlin JD, Catalano P, Thomas JP et al (2002) Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297. J Clin Oncol 20:3270–3275PubMedCrossRef Berlin JD, Catalano P, Thomas JP et al (2002) Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297. J Clin Oncol 20:3270–3275PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rocha Lima C, Rotche R, Jeffery M (2003) A randomized phase 3 study comparing efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) and irinotecan (I), to GEM alone in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who have not received prior systemic therapy. ASCO Annu Meet Proc 22:251 Rocha Lima C, Rotche R, Jeffery M (2003) A randomized phase 3 study comparing efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) and irinotecan (I), to GEM alone in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who have not received prior systemic therapy. ASCO Annu Meet Proc 22:251
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P (2004) GemOx (gemcitabine + oxaliplatin) versus Gem (gemcitabine) in non resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: final results of the GERCOR/GISCAD intergroup phase III. ASCO Annu Meet Proc 22:315s Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P (2004) GemOx (gemcitabine + oxaliplatin) versus Gem (gemcitabine) in non resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: final results of the GERCOR/GISCAD intergroup phase III. ASCO Annu Meet Proc 22:315s
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann V, Quietzsch D, Fieseler F et al (2003) A phase III trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Proc ASCO 22:250 Heinemann V, Quietzsch D, Fieseler F et al (2003) A phase III trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Proc ASCO 22:250
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kindler H, Friberg G, Stadler W (2004) Bevacizumab (B) plus gemcitabine (G) in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC): updated results of a multi-center phase II trial. ASCO Annu Meet Proc 22:315s Kindler H, Friberg G, Stadler W (2004) Bevacizumab (B) plus gemcitabine (G) in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC): updated results of a multi-center phase II trial. ASCO Annu Meet Proc 22:315s
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong HQ, Rosenberg A, LoBuglio A et al (2004) Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, in combination with gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 22:2610–2616PubMedCrossRef Xiong HQ, Rosenberg A, LoBuglio A et al (2004) Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, in combination with gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 22:2610–2616PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mendelsohn J (2002) Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor for cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol 20:1S–13SPubMed Mendelsohn J (2002) Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor for cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol 20:1S–13SPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Salomon DS, Brandt R, Ciardiello F et al (1995) Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 19:183–232PubMed Salomon DS, Brandt R, Ciardiello F et al (1995) Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 19:183–232PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong HQ, Abbruzzese JL (2002) Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy for pancreatic cancer. Semin Oncol 29:31–37PubMed Xiong HQ, Abbruzzese JL (2002) Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy for pancreatic cancer. Semin Oncol 29:31–37PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hidalgo M (2003) Erlotinib: preclinical investigations. Oncology (Huntingt) 17:11–16 Hidalgo M (2003) Erlotinib: preclinical investigations. Oncology (Huntingt) 17:11–16
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J et al (2005) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group [NCIC-CTG]. ASCO Annu Meet Proc 23:1s Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J et al (2005) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group [NCIC-CTG]. ASCO Annu Meet Proc 23:1s
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ling J, Johnson KA, Miao Z et al (2006) Metabolism and excretion of erlotinib, a small molecule inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in healthy male volunteers. Drug Metab Dispos 34:420–426PubMed Ling J, Johnson KA, Miao Z et al (2006) Metabolism and excretion of erlotinib, a small molecule inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in healthy male volunteers. Drug Metab Dispos 34:420–426PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pino MS, Shrader M, Baker CH et al (2006) Transforming growth factor alpha expression drives constitutive epidermal growth factor receptor pathway activation and sensitivity to gefitinib (Iressa) in human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 66:3802–3812PubMedCrossRef Pino MS, Shrader M, Baker CH et al (2006) Transforming growth factor alpha expression drives constitutive epidermal growth factor receptor pathway activation and sensitivity to gefitinib (Iressa) in human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 66:3802–3812PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Banerjee S, Wang Z et al (2006) Antitumor activity of epidermal growth factor receptor-related protein is mediated by inactivation of ErbB receptors and nuclear factor-kappaB in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 66:1025–1032PubMedCrossRef Zhang Y, Banerjee S, Wang Z et al (2006) Antitumor activity of epidermal growth factor receptor-related protein is mediated by inactivation of ErbB receptors and nuclear factor-kappaB in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 66:1025–1032PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Graeven U, Kremer B, Sudhoff T et al (2006) Phase I study of the humanised anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody matuzumab (EMD 72000) combined with gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 94:1293–1299PubMedCrossRef Graeven U, Kremer B, Sudhoff T et al (2006) Phase I study of the humanised anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody matuzumab (EMD 72000) combined with gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 94:1293–1299PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fossella FV, Lippman SM, Shin DM et al (1997) Maximum-tolerated dose defined for single-agent gemcitabine: a phase I dose-escalation study in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:310–316PubMed Fossella FV, Lippman SM, Shin DM et al (1997) Maximum-tolerated dose defined for single-agent gemcitabine: a phase I dose-escalation study in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:310–316PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Okamoto I, Fujii K, Matsumoto M et al (2003) Diffuse alveolar damage after ZD1839 therapy in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 40:339–342PubMed Okamoto I, Fujii K, Matsumoto M et al (2003) Diffuse alveolar damage after ZD1839 therapy in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 40:339–342PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah NT, Kris MG, Pao W et al (2005) Practical management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib. J Clin Oncol 23:165–174PubMedCrossRef Shah NT, Kris MG, Pao W et al (2005) Practical management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib. J Clin Oncol 23:165–174PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Roychowdhury DF, Cassidy CA, Peterson P et al (2002) A report on serious pulmonary toxicity associated with gemcitabine-based therapy. Invest New Drugs 20:311–315PubMedCrossRef Roychowdhury DF, Cassidy CA, Peterson P et al (2002) A report on serious pulmonary toxicity associated with gemcitabine-based therapy. Invest New Drugs 20:311–315PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hidalgo M, Siu LL, Nemunaitis J et al (2001) Phase I and pharmacologic study of OSI-774, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 19:3267–3279PubMed Hidalgo M, Siu LL, Nemunaitis J et al (2001) Phase I and pharmacologic study of OSI-774, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 19:3267–3279PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirsch FR, Varella-Garcia M, McCoy J et al (2005) Increased epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization associates with increased sensitivity to gefitinib in patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma subtypes: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 23:6838–6845PubMedCrossRef Hirsch FR, Varella-Garcia M, McCoy J et al (2005) Increased epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization associates with increased sensitivity to gefitinib in patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma subtypes: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 23:6838–6845PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell DW, Lynch TJ, Haserlat SM et al (2005) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and gene amplification in non-small-cell lung cancer: molecular analysis of the IDEAL/INTACT gefitinib trials. J Clin Oncol 23:8081–8092PubMedCrossRef Bell DW, Lynch TJ, Haserlat SM et al (2005) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and gene amplification in non-small-cell lung cancer: molecular analysis of the IDEAL/INTACT gefitinib trials. J Clin Oncol 23:8081–8092PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Erlotinib plus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer and other solid tumors: phase IB trial
verfasst von
Tomislav Dragovich
Mark Huberman
Daniel D. Von Hoff
Eric K. Rowinsky
Paul Nadler
Debra Wood
Marta Hamilton
George Hage
Julie Wolf
Amita Patnaik
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Ausgabe 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-006-0389-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2007

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

03.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Wenn bei Mammakarzinomen durch eine neoadjuvante Chemotherapie ein Downstaging von nodal-positiv zu nodal-negativ gelingt, scheint es auch ohne Axilladissektion nur selten zu axillären Rezidiven zu kommen.

Wo hapert es noch bei der Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie?

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Bestrahlung nach Prostatektomie: mehr Schaden als Nutzen?

02.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Eine adjuvante Radiotherapie nach radikaler Prostata-Op. bringt den Betroffenen wahrscheinlich keinen Vorteil. Im Gegenteil: Durch die Bestrahlung steigt offenbar das Risiko für Harn- und Stuhlinkontinenz.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.