Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2010

01.09.2010 | Cardiac

Coronary artery stent imaging with 128-slice dual-source CT using high-pitch spiral acquisition in a cardiac phantom: comparison with the sequential and low-pitch spiral mode

verfasst von: Florian Wolf, Sebastian Leschka, Christian Loewe, Peter Homolka, Christina Plank, Ruediger Schernthaner, Dominik Bercaczy, Robert Goetti, Johannes Lammer, Guy Friedrich, Borut Marincek, Hatem Alkadhi, Gudrun Feuchtner

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate coronary stents in vitro using 128-slice-dual-source computed tomography (CT).

Methods

Twelve different coronary stents placed in a non-moving cardiac/chest phantom were examined by 128-slice dual-source CT using three CT protocols [high-pitch spiral (HPS), sequential (SEQ) and conventional spiral (SPIR)]. Artificial in-stent lumen narrowing (ALN), visible inner stent area (VIA), artificial in-stent lumen attenuation (ALA) in percent, image noise inside/outside the stent and CTDIvol were measured.

Results

Mean ALN was 46% for HPS, 44% for SEQ and 47% for SPIR without significant difference. Mean VIA was similar with 31% for HPS, 30% for SEQ and 33% for SPIR. Mean ALA was, at 5% for HPS, significantly lower compared with −11% for SPIR (p = 0.024), but not different from SEQ with −1%. Mean image noise was significantly higher for HPS compared with SEQ and SPIR inside and outside the stent (p < 0.001). CTDIvol was lower for HPS (5.17 mGy), compared with SEQ (9.02 mGy) and SPIR (55.97 mGy), respectively.

Conclusion

The HPS mode of 128-slice dual-source CT yields fewer artefacts inside the stent lumen compared with SPIR and SEQ, but image noise is higher. ALN is still too high for routine stent evaluation in clinical practice. Radiation dose of the HPS mode is markedly (less than about tenfold) reduced.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Carbonaro S, Villines TC, Hausleiter J, Devine PJ, Gerber TC, Taylor AJ (2009) International, multidisciplinary update of the 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:224–232CrossRefPubMed Carbonaro S, Villines TC, Hausleiter J, Devine PJ, Gerber TC, Taylor AJ (2009) International, multidisciplinary update of the 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:224–232CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Seyfarth T et al (2006) 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study. Acta Radiol 47:36–42CrossRefPubMed Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Seyfarth T et al (2006) 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study. Acta Radiol 47:36–42CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R et al (2006) 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 16:818–826CrossRefPubMed Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R et al (2006) 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 16:818–826CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R et al (2006) 64-Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol 41:22–27CrossRefPubMed Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R et al (2006) 64-Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol 41:22–27CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf F, Cademartiri F, Loewe C et al (2009) Evaluation of coronary stents with 64-MDCT: in vitro comparison of scanners from four vendors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:787–794CrossRefPubMed Wolf F, Cademartiri F, Loewe C et al (2009) Evaluation of coronary stents with 64-MDCT: in vitro comparison of scanners from four vendors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:787–794CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf F, Feuchtner GM, Homolka P et al (2008) In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners? Eur J Radiol 68:465–470CrossRefPubMed Wolf F, Feuchtner GM, Homolka P et al (2008) In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners? Eur J Radiol 68:465–470CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Maintz D, Burg MC, Seifarth H et al (2009) Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT. Eur Radiol 19:42–492CrossRefPubMed Maintz D, Burg MC, Seifarth H et al (2009) Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT. Eur Radiol 19:42–492CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ertel D, Lell MM, Harig F, Flohr T, Schmidt B, Kalender WA (2009) Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 19:2357–2362CrossRefPubMed Ertel D, Lell MM, Harig F, Flohr T, Schmidt B, Kalender WA (2009) Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 19:2357–2362CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:117–121CrossRefPubMed Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:117–121CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 19:2576–2583CrossRefPubMed Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 19:2576–2583CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol 19:2896–2903CrossRefPubMed Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol 19:2896–2903CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Homolka P, Gahleitner A, Prokop M, Nowotny R (2002) Optimization of the composition of phantom materials for computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 47:2907–2916CrossRefPubMed Homolka P, Gahleitner A, Prokop M, Nowotny R (2002) Optimization of the composition of phantom materials for computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 47:2907–2916CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Menzel HSH, Teunen D (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Publication no EUR 16262 EN, European Commission, Luxembourg Menzel HSH, Teunen D (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Publication no EUR 16262 EN, European Commission, Luxembourg
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D et al (2009) Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1045–1050CrossRefPubMed Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D et al (2009) Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1045–1050CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnoldi E, Johnson TR, Rist C et al (2009) Adequate image quality with reduced radiation dose in prospectively triggered coronary CTA compared with retrospective techniques. Eur Radiol 19:2147–2155CrossRefPubMed Arnoldi E, Johnson TR, Rist C et al (2009) Adequate image quality with reduced radiation dose in prospectively triggered coronary CTA compared with retrospective techniques. Eur Radiol 19:2147–2155CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheth T, Dodd JD, Hoffmann U et al (2007) Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:933–938CrossRefPubMed Sheth T, Dodd JD, Hoffmann U et al (2007) Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:933–938CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pugliese F, Weustink AC, Van Mieghem C et al (2008) Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart 94:848–854CrossRefPubMed Pugliese F, Weustink AC, Van Mieghem C et al (2008) Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart 94:848–854CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun Z, Davidson R, Lin CH (2009) Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 69:489–495CrossRefPubMed Sun Z, Davidson R, Lin CH (2009) Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 69:489–495CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D et al (2006) Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27:2567–2572CrossRefPubMed Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D et al (2006) Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27:2567–2572CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW et al (2007) Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. Radiology 245:416–423CrossRefPubMed Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW et al (2007) Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. Radiology 245:416–423CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Haraldsdottir S, Gudnason T, Sigurdsson AF et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.030 PubMed Haraldsdottir S, Gudnason T, Sigurdsson AF et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2009.​05.​030 PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Das KM, El-Menyar AA, Salam AM et al (2007) Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Radiology 245:424–432CrossRefPubMed Das KM, El-Menyar AA, Salam AM et al (2007) Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Radiology 245:424–432CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:951–959CrossRefPubMed Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:951–959CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hecht HS, Zaric M, Jelnin V, Lubarsky L, Prakash M, Roubin G (2008) Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 101:820–824CrossRefPubMed Hecht HS, Zaric M, Jelnin V, Lubarsky L, Prakash M, Roubin G (2008) Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 101:820–824CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, Tamci B (2008) Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:56–63CrossRefPubMed Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, Tamci B (2008) Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:56–63CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Carrabba N, Bamoshmoosh M, Carusi LM et al (2007) Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 100:1754–1758CrossRefPubMed Carrabba N, Bamoshmoosh M, Carusi LM et al (2007) Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 100:1754–1758CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Boll DT, Merkle EM, Paulson EK, Fleiter TR (2008) Coronary stent patency: dual-energy multidetector CT assessment in a pilot study with anthropomorphic phantom. Radiology 247:687–695CrossRefPubMed Boll DT, Merkle EM, Paulson EK, Fleiter TR (2008) Coronary stent patency: dual-energy multidetector CT assessment in a pilot study with anthropomorphic phantom. Radiology 247:687–695CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Coronary artery stent imaging with 128-slice dual-source CT using high-pitch spiral acquisition in a cardiac phantom: comparison with the sequential and low-pitch spiral mode
verfasst von
Florian Wolf
Sebastian Leschka
Christian Loewe
Peter Homolka
Christina Plank
Ruediger Schernthaner
Dominik Bercaczy
Robert Goetti
Johannes Lammer
Guy Friedrich
Borut Marincek
Hatem Alkadhi
Gudrun Feuchtner
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1792-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2010

European Radiology 9/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.