Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Heart and Vessels 2/2014

01.03.2014 | Original Article

Benefits of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in routine clinical practice

verfasst von: Ahmad Farshid, Jaya Chandrasekhar, Donald McLean

Erschienen in: Heart and Vessels | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) is a new imaging technique involving three-dimensional rotation of the gantry around the patient with simultaneous left to right and craniocaudal movements. This allows complete imaging of the left or right coronary tree with a single acquisition run. Previous small studies have indicated that DARCA is associated with reduced radiation dose and contrast use in comparison with standard coronary angiography (SCA). We conducted a registry of unselected patients undergoing DARCA or SCA. DARCA was used in 107 patients and SCA in 105 patients. Mean number of acquisition runs was 2.6 for DARCA and 6.9 for SCA (P < 0.0001). Mean radiation dose (dose–area product, DAP) was 30.4 Gy cm2 for SCA and 15.9 Gy cm2 for DARCA (P < 0.0001). Mean contrast volume was 41.7 ml for SCA and 25.7 ml for DARCA (P < 0.0001). Case time for DARCA in the first half of the study was 20.8 ± 1.4 min compared with 15.2 ± 2.0 min in the second half of the study (P = 0.0015), suggesting a learning curve. In the DARCA group, 64 % of patients required only two acquisition runs for complete and satisfactory imaging. There were no adverse effects resulting from DARCA. Two cases are presented to illustrate the diagnostic ability of DARCA. DARCA was associated with a 48 % reduction in radiation dose and 36 % reduction in contrast volume in comparison with SCA, with comparable diagnostic ability.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Moses JW, Stone GW, Leon MB, Dangas G (2004) A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1393–1399PubMed Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Moses JW, Stone GW, Leon MB, Dangas G (2004) A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1393–1399PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein AJ, Garcia JA, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Wink O, Hattler B, Tsai TT, Chen SY, Hansgen A, Carroll JD (2011) Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:820–827PubMedCrossRef Klein AJ, Garcia JA, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Wink O, Hattler B, Tsai TT, Chen SY, Hansgen A, Carroll JD (2011) Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:820–827PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE, Maddux JT, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Groves BM, Van Den Heuvel P, Verheye S, Van Langenhove G, Vermeersch P, Van den Branden F, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD, Carroll JD (2009) Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73:753–761PubMedCrossRef Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE, Maddux JT, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Groves BM, Van Den Heuvel P, Verheye S, Van Langenhove G, Vermeersch P, Van den Branden F, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD, Carroll JD (2009) Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73:753–761PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Heron JC (1992) Estimation of effective dose to the patient during medical X-ray examinations from measurements of the dose-area product. Phys Med Biol 37:2117–2126PubMedCrossRef Le Heron JC (1992) Estimation of effective dose to the patient during medical X-ray examinations from measurements of the dose-area product. Phys Med Biol 37:2117–2126PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogaert E, Bacher K, Thierens H (2008) Interventional cardiovascular procedures in Belgium: effective dose and conversion factors. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:77–82PubMedCrossRef Bogaert E, Bacher K, Thierens H (2008) Interventional cardiovascular procedures in Belgium: effective dose and conversion factors. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:77–82PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Empen K, Kuon E, Hummel A, Gebauer C, Dorr M, Konemann R, Hoffmann W, Staudt A, Weitmann K, Reffelmann T, Felix SB (2010) Comparison of rotational with conventional coronary angiography. Am Heart J 160:552–563PubMedCrossRef Empen K, Kuon E, Hummel A, Gebauer C, Dorr M, Konemann R, Hoffmann W, Staudt A, Weitmann K, Reffelmann T, Felix SB (2010) Comparison of rotational with conventional coronary angiography. Am Heart J 160:552–563PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wall B, Haylock R, Jansen JTM, Hillier MC, Hart D, Shrimpton PC (2011) Radiation risks from medical X-ray examinations as a function of the age and sex of the patient. Health Protection Agency, Chilton Wall B, Haylock R, Jansen JTM, Hillier MC, Hart D, Shrimpton PC (2011) Radiation risks from medical X-ray examinations as a function of the age and sex of the patient. Health Protection Agency, Chilton
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin CJ (2007) Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol 80:639–647PubMedCrossRef Martin CJ (2007) Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol 80:639–647PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Grech M, Debono J, Xuereb RG, Fenech A, Grech V (2012) A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:576–580PubMedCrossRef Grech M, Debono J, Xuereb RG, Fenech A, Grech V (2012) A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:576–580PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirshfeld JW Jr (2011) Radiation exposure in cardiovascular medicine: how do we protect our patients and ourselves? Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4:216–218PubMedCrossRef Hirshfeld JW Jr (2011) Radiation exposure in cardiovascular medicine: how do we protect our patients and ourselves? Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4:216–218PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez-Menchero AE, Diaz JF, Sanchez-Gonzalez C, Cardenal R, Sanghvi AB, Roa-Garrido J, Rodriguez-Lopez JL (2012) Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl) 65:434–439CrossRef Gomez-Menchero AE, Diaz JF, Sanchez-Gonzalez C, Cardenal R, Sanghvi AB, Roa-Garrido J, Rodriguez-Lopez JL (2012) Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl) 65:434–439CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (1997) Radiological protection and safety in medicine. Pergamon Press, Oxford International Commission on Radiological Protection (1997) Radiological protection and safety in medicine. Pergamon Press, Oxford
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart D, Hillier MC, Wall BF (2007) Doses to patients from radiographic and fluoroscopic X-ray imaging procedures in the UK—2005 review. Health Protection Agency Hart D, Hillier MC, Wall BF (2007) Doses to patients from radiographic and fluoroscopic X-ray imaging procedures in the UK—2005 review. Health Protection Agency
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Chen J, Ting HH, Shah ND, Nasir K, Einstein AJ, Nallamothu BK (2009) Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 361:849–857PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Chen J, Ting HH, Shah ND, Nasir K, Einstein AJ, Nallamothu BK (2009) Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 361:849–857PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenberg MJ, Afilalo J, Lawler PR, Abrahamowicz M, Richard H, Pilote L (2011) Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction. CMAJ 183:430–436PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Eisenberg MJ, Afilalo J, Lawler PR, Abrahamowicz M, Richard H, Pilote L (2011) Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction. CMAJ 183:430–436PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398PubMedCrossRef Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, Chen SY, Carroll JD (2004) Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62:167–174PubMedCrossRef Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, Chen SY, Carroll JD (2004) Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62:167–174PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogita M, Sakakura K, Nakamura T, Funayama H, Wada H, Naito R, Sugawara Y, Kubo N, Ako J, Momomura S (2012) Association between deteriorated renal function and long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Vessels 27:460–467PubMedCrossRef Ogita M, Sakakura K, Nakamura T, Funayama H, Wada H, Naito R, Sugawara Y, Kubo N, Ako J, Momomura S (2012) Association between deteriorated renal function and long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Vessels 27:460–467PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Utsunomiya D, Fukunaga T, Oda S, Awai K, Nakaura T, Urata J, Yamashita Y (2011) Multidetector computed tomography evaluation of coronary plaque morphology in patients with stable angina. Heart Vessels 26:392–398PubMedCrossRef Utsunomiya D, Fukunaga T, Oda S, Awai K, Nakaura T, Urata J, Yamashita Y (2011) Multidetector computed tomography evaluation of coronary plaque morphology in patients with stable angina. Heart Vessels 26:392–398PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Harigaya H, Motoyama S, Sarai M, Inoue K, Hara T, Okumura M, Naruse H, Ishii J, Hishida H, Ozaki Y (2011) Prediction of the no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention using coronary computed tomography angiography. Heart Vessels 26:363–369PubMedCrossRef Harigaya H, Motoyama S, Sarai M, Inoue K, Hara T, Okumura M, Naruse H, Ishii J, Hishida H, Ozaki Y (2011) Prediction of the no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention using coronary computed tomography angiography. Heart Vessels 26:363–369PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Benefits of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in routine clinical practice
verfasst von
Ahmad Farshid
Jaya Chandrasekhar
Donald McLean
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2014
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Heart and Vessels / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0910-8327
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-2573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-013-0349-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Heart and Vessels 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.