Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2010

01.06.2010 | General Gynecology

Diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal, mislocated intrauterine devices

verfasst von: Osman Balci, Alaa S. Mahmoud, Metin Capar, Mehemet C. Colakoglu

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 6/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the predisposing factors, diagnosis and surgical treatment options of patients with intra-abdominal, mislocated intrauterine devices (IUDs).

Methods

The diagnosis and management of 18 patients with intra-abdominal, mislocated IUDs were analyzed in this retrospective study.

Results

Trained midwives inserted ten (55%) of the IUDs, while six (33%) were inserted by general practitioners and two (11%) by specialist gynecologists. Ten (55.5%) of the patients were diagnosed by gynecological examination and ultrasonography (USG); abdominal X-ray, in addition, was required in the other eight (44.4%). Eleven patients (61%) were managed by laparoscopy, whereas laparotomy was required in seven (39%). For all patients, laparoscopy was performed initially. No complication was encountered in any of the patients.

Conclusion

Persons who insert IUDs should receive adequate training before certification, because inadequate pelvic examination before insertion and inexperience of the inserting person might be predisposing factors for uterine perforation. If IUD strings are not visible during gynecologic examination, USG should be tried to locate the IUD and pelvic X-ray used only when USG fails to locate the IUD. Laparoscopy can be the first choice for removal.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozgun MT, Batukan C, Serin IS, Ozcelik B, Basbug M, Dolanbay M (2007) Surgical management of intra-abdominal mislocated intrauterine devices. Contraception 75:96–100CrossRefPubMed Ozgun MT, Batukan C, Serin IS, Ozcelik B, Basbug M, Dolanbay M (2007) Surgical management of intra-abdominal mislocated intrauterine devices. Contraception 75:96–100CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinberg EM, McCoy TW, Pasic R (2008) The perforated intrauterine device: endoscopic retrieval. JSLS 12:97–100PubMed Heinberg EM, McCoy TW, Pasic R (2008) The perforated intrauterine device: endoscopic retrieval. JSLS 12:97–100PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Morgan KW (2006) The intrauterine device: rethinking old paradigms. J Midwifery Womens Health 51:464–470CrossRefPubMed Morgan KW (2006) The intrauterine device: rethinking old paradigms. J Midwifery Womens Health 51:464–470CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Demir SC, Cetin MT, Ucunsak IF, Atay Y, Toksoz L, Kadayifci O (2002) Removal of intra-abdominal intrauterine device by laparoscopy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 7:20–23PubMed Demir SC, Cetin MT, Ucunsak IF, Atay Y, Toksoz L, Kadayifci O (2002) Removal of intra-abdominal intrauterine device by laparoscopy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 7:20–23PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Miranda L, Settembre A, Capasso P, Cuccurullo D, Pisaniello D, Corcione F (2003) Laparoscopic removal of an intraperitoneal translocated intrauterine contraceptive device. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 8:122–125PubMed Miranda L, Settembre A, Capasso P, Cuccurullo D, Pisaniello D, Corcione F (2003) Laparoscopic removal of an intraperitoneal translocated intrauterine contraceptive device. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 8:122–125PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikechebelu JI, Mbamara SU (2008) Laparoscopic retrieval of perforated intrauterine device. Niger J Clin Pract 11:394–395PubMed Ikechebelu JI, Mbamara SU (2008) Laparoscopic retrieval of perforated intrauterine device. Niger J Clin Pract 11:394–395PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Adoni A, Ben Chetrit A (1991) The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforation. Contraception 43:77–81CrossRefPubMed Adoni A, Ben Chetrit A (1991) The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforation. Contraception 43:77–81CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, Holzinger M, Beyth Y (2002) Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory? Contraception 66:105–108CrossRefPubMed Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, Holzinger M, Beyth Y (2002) Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory? Contraception 66:105–108CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat WHO (1987) Mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Geneva 7. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 753:1–91 WHO (1987) Mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Geneva 7. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 753:1–91
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kassab B, Audra P (1999) The migrating intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature. Contracept Fertil Sex 27:696–700PubMed Kassab B, Audra P (1999) The migrating intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature. Contracept Fertil Sex 27:696–700PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Roy KK, Banerjee N, Sinha A (2000) Laparoscopic removal of translocated retroperitoneal IUD. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 71:241–243CrossRefPubMed Roy KK, Banerjee N, Sinha A (2000) Laparoscopic removal of translocated retroperitoneal IUD. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 71:241–243CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Caliskan E, Ozturk N, Dilbaz BO, Dilbaz S (2003) Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 8:150–155PubMed Caliskan E, Ozturk N, Dilbaz BO, Dilbaz S (2003) Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 8:150–155PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal, mislocated intrauterine devices
verfasst von
Osman Balci
Alaa S. Mahmoud
Metin Capar
Mehemet C. Colakoglu
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1374-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2010

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

11.05.2024 Endometriumkarzinom Nachrichten

Ein höheres Alter bei der Diagnose eines Endometriumkarzinoms ist mit aggressiveren Tumorcharakteristika assoziiert, scheint aber auch unabhängig von bekannten Risikofaktoren die Prognose der Erkrankung zu verschlimmern.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Erhöhte Mortalität bei postpartalem Brustkrebs

07.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Auch für Trägerinnen von BRCA-Varianten gilt: Erkranken sie fünf bis zehn Jahre nach der letzten Schwangerschaft an Brustkrebs, ist das Sterberisiko besonders hoch.

Menopausale Hormontherapie für Frauen über 65?

07.05.2024 Klimakterium und Menopause Nachrichten

In den USA erhalten nicht wenige Frauen auch noch im Alter über 65 eine menopausale Hormontherapie. Welche positiven und negativen gesundheitlichen Konsequenzen daraus möglicherweise resultieren, wurde anhand von Versicherungsdaten analysiert.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.