Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2014

01.02.2014 | Gynecologic Oncology

Prospective evaluation of 3T MRI findings for primary adnexal lesions and comparison with the final histological diagnosis

verfasst von: He Zhang, Guo-Fu Zhang, Zhi-Yan He, Zheng-Yu Li, Gui-Xiang Zhang

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We prospectively investigated the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 Tesla (3T) for the detection of suspected primary adnexal masses in a large cohort of patients.

Methods

This prospective clinical study included 223 patients with suspected gynaecological disease who were referred for 3T MRI assessments before laparoscopy or laparotomy. Fifty-nine patients were excluded. All detected adnexal pathologies on MRI were categorized into the four groups (endometric cysts, teratomas, benign tumours and malignant tumours). Histological findings were used as the comparative reference standard. As measures to detect or rule out primary adnexal masses, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were determined by lesion-based evaluations.

Results

The reference standard method detected 141 primary adnexal lesions in 125 patients. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the lesion-based evaluations for endometric cysts, teratomas, benign lesions and malignant lesions were 92.8, 93.6, 95.1 and 94.4 %. Lesion-based evaluation yielded an accuracy of 90.3 %, sensitivity of 92.7 %, specificity of 89.3 %, PPV of 77.6 % and NPV of 96.8 % in differentiating malignancies from non-malignant lesions. The diagnostic value of 3T MRI for detecting malignancies was superior to that for benign tumours.

Conclusions

3T MRI well categorize the characteristics of primary adnexal lesions and may be a reliable modality for distinguishing malignancies from benign tumours.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Myers ERBL, Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Terplan M, Cline KE, Gray RN et al (2006) Management of adnexal mass. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2006(130):1–145 Myers ERBL, Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Terplan M, Cline KE, Gray RN et al (2006) Management of adnexal mass. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2006(130):1–145
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajkotia K, Veeramani M, Macura KJ (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of adnexal masses. Top Magn Reson Imaging 17:379–397PubMedCrossRef Rajkotia K, Veeramani M, Macura KJ (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of adnexal masses. Top Magn Reson Imaging 17:379–397PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin N, Grant LA, Sala E (2010) Adnexal masses: characterization and imaging strategies. Seminars Ultrasound CT MRI 31:330–346CrossRef Griffin N, Grant LA, Sala E (2010) Adnexal masses: characterization and imaging strategies. Seminars Ultrasound CT MRI 31:330–346CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, Kinkel K, Yu KK, Sica G et al (2000) Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging—multivariate analysis1. Radiology 214:39–46PubMedCrossRef Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, Kinkel K, Yu KK, Sica G et al (2000) Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging—multivariate analysis1. Radiology 214:39–46PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohaib SA, Mills TD, Sahdev A, Webb JAW, VanTrappen PO, Jacobs IJ et al (2005) The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Radiol 60:340–348PubMedCrossRef Sohaib SA, Mills TD, Sahdev A, Webb JAW, VanTrappen PO, Jacobs IJ et al (2005) The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Radiol 60:340–348PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Funt SA, Hann LE (2002) Detection and characterization of adnexal masses. Radiol Clin North Am 40:591–608PubMedCrossRef Funt SA, Hann LE (2002) Detection and characterization of adnexal masses. Radiol Clin North Am 40:591–608PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Adusumilli S, Hussain HK, Caoili EM, Weadock WJ, Murray JP, Johnson TD et al (2006) MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. Am J Roentgenol 187:732–740CrossRef Adusumilli S, Hussain HK, Caoili EM, Weadock WJ, Murray JP, Johnson TD et al (2006) MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. Am J Roentgenol 187:732–740CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Hatanaka Y, Harada M, Higashida Y, Takahashi M et al (1995) Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal us and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging. Radiology 194:557–565PubMed Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Hatanaka Y, Harada M, Higashida Y, Takahashi M et al (1995) Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal us and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging. Radiology 194:557–565PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Komatsu T, Konishi I, Mandai M, Togashi K, Kawakami S, Konishi J et al (1996) Adnexal masses: transvaginal us and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging assessment of intratumoral structure. Radiology 198:109–115PubMed Komatsu T, Konishi I, Mandai M, Togashi K, Kawakami S, Konishi J et al (1996) Adnexal masses: transvaginal us and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging assessment of intratumoral structure. Radiology 198:109–115PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Grab D, Flock F, Stöhr I, Nüssle K, Rieber A, Fenchel S et al (2000) Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Gynecol Oncol 77:454–459PubMedCrossRef Grab D, Flock F, Stöhr I, Nüssle K, Rieber A, Fenchel S et al (2000) Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Gynecol Oncol 77:454–459PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohaib SAA, Sahdev A, Trappen PV, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH (2003) Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 180:1297–1304CrossRef Sohaib SAA, Sahdev A, Trappen PV, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH (2003) Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 180:1297–1304CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bazot M, Nassar-Slaba J, Thomassin-Naggara I, Cortez A, Uzan S, Darai E (2006) MR imaging compared with intraoperative frozen-section examination for the diagnosis of adnexal tumors; correlation with final histology. Eur Radiol 16:2687–2699PubMedCrossRef Bazot M, Nassar-Slaba J, Thomassin-Naggara I, Cortez A, Uzan S, Darai E (2006) MR imaging compared with intraoperative frozen-section examination for the diagnosis of adnexal tumors; correlation with final histology. Eur Radiol 16:2687–2699PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Engelen MJA, Bongaerts AHH, Sluiter WJ, de Haan HH, Bogchelman DH, TenVergert EM et al (2008) Distinguishing benign and malignant pelvic masses: the value of different diagnostic methods in everyday clinical practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 136:94–101PubMedCrossRef Engelen MJA, Bongaerts AHH, Sluiter WJ, de Haan HH, Bogchelman DH, TenVergert EM et al (2008) Distinguishing benign and malignant pelvic masses: the value of different diagnostic methods in everyday clinical practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 136:94–101PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA, Rouzier R, Callard P, Bazot M (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a useful tool for characterizing ovarian epithelial tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:111–120PubMedCrossRef Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA, Rouzier R, Callard P, Bazot M (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a useful tool for characterizing ovarian epithelial tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:111–120PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chilla B, Hauser N, Singer G, Trippel M, Froehlich J, Kubik-Huch R (2011) Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions. Eur Radiol 21:1301–1310PubMedCrossRef Chilla B, Hauser N, Singer G, Trippel M, Froehlich J, Kubik-Huch R (2011) Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions. Eur Radiol 21:1301–1310PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Medeiros LR, Freitas LB, Rosa DD, Silva FR, Silva LS, Birtencourt LT et al (2011) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in ovarian tumor: a systematic quantitative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:67.e61CrossRef Medeiros LR, Freitas LB, Rosa DD, Silva FR, Silva LS, Birtencourt LT et al (2011) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in ovarian tumor: a systematic quantitative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:67.e61CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomassin-Naggara I, Toussaint I, Perrot N, Rouzier R, Cuenod CA, Bazot M et al (2011) Characterization of complex adnexal masses: value of adding perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging. Radiology 258:793–803PubMedCrossRef Thomassin-Naggara I, Toussaint I, Perrot N, Rouzier R, Cuenod CA, Bazot M et al (2011) Characterization of complex adnexal masses: value of adding perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging. Radiology 258:793–803PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Manganaro L, Fierro F, Tomei A, Irimia D, Lodise P, Sergi ME et al (2012) Feasibility of 3.0T pelvic MR imaging in the evaluation of endometriosis. Eur J Radiol 81:1381–1387PubMedCrossRef Manganaro L, Fierro F, Tomei A, Irimia D, Lodise P, Sergi ME et al (2012) Feasibility of 3.0T pelvic MR imaging in the evaluation of endometriosis. Eur J Radiol 81:1381–1387PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sala E, Kataoka MY, Priest AN, Gill AB, McLean MA, Joubert I et al (2012) Advanced ovarian cancer: multiparametric MR imaging demonstrates response- and metastasis-specific effects. Radiology 263:149–159PubMedCrossRef Sala E, Kataoka MY, Priest AN, Gill AB, McLean MA, Joubert I et al (2012) Advanced ovarian cancer: multiparametric MR imaging demonstrates response- and metastasis-specific effects. Radiology 263:149–159PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rieber A, Nüssle K, Stöhr I, Grab D, Fenchel S, Kreienberg R et al (2001) Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 177:123–129CrossRef Rieber A, Nüssle K, Stöhr I, Grab D, Fenchel S, Kreienberg R et al (2001) Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 177:123–129CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen J, Xia X, Lin Y, Zhu W, Yuan J (2011) Diagnosis of struma ovarii with medical imaging. Abdom Imaging 36:627–631PubMedCrossRef Shen J, Xia X, Lin Y, Zhu W, Yuan J (2011) Diagnosis of struma ovarii with medical imaging. Abdom Imaging 36:627–631PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim KA, Park CM, Lee JH, Kim HK, Cho SM, Kim B et al (2004) Benign ovarian tumors with solid and cystic components that mimic malignancy. Am J Roentgenol 182:1259–1265CrossRef Kim KA, Park CM, Lee JH, Kim HK, Cho SM, Kim B et al (2004) Benign ovarian tumors with solid and cystic components that mimic malignancy. Am J Roentgenol 182:1259–1265CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Togashi K (2003) Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of us, CT, and MRI. Eur Radiol 13:L87–L104PubMedCrossRef Togashi K (2003) Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of us, CT, and MRI. Eur Radiol 13:L87–L104PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sala E, Rockall A, Rangarajan D, Kubik-Huch RA (2010) The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the female pelvis. Eur J Radiol 76:367–385PubMedCrossRef Sala E, Rockall A, Rangarajan D, Kubik-Huch RA (2010) The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the female pelvis. Eur J Radiol 76:367–385PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Moyle P, Addley HC, Sala E (2010) Radiological staging of ovarian carcinoma. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 31:388–398PubMedCrossRef Moyle P, Addley HC, Sala E (2010) Radiological staging of ovarian carcinoma. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 31:388–398PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I, Tsuda Y, Yamashita K, Shibata T et al (1991) Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 180:73–78PubMed Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I, Tsuda Y, Yamashita K, Shibata T et al (1991) Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 180:73–78PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prospective evaluation of 3T MRI findings for primary adnexal lesions and comparison with the final histological diagnosis
verfasst von
He Zhang
Guo-Fu Zhang
Zhi-Yan He
Zheng-Yu Li
Gui-Xiang Zhang
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2990-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.