Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2014

01.08.2014 | Gynecologic Oncology

Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for the assessment of local aggressiveness of cervical cancer

verfasst von: Huadan Xue, Cui Ren, Jiaxin Yang, Zhaoyong Sun, Shuo Li, Zhengyu Jin, Keng Shen, Weixun Zhou

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively explore the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram in assessing local aggressiveness of cervical cancer.

Methods

53 patients with cervical cancer, including 7 cases at stage IB1, 17 cases at stage IB2 and 29 cases at stage IIA, were subjected to preoperative MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging with b values of 0 and 800 s/mm2. The average of mean ADC values (ADCmean), minimum ADC values (ADCmin) and the 5th to 85th percentile ADC values every 10 % (ADC5 %, ADC15 %, ADC85 %) were measured. ADC values were compared between subgroups according to pathologic subtype, histological differentiation, depth of cervical infiltration, and lymph node metastases.

Results

ADCmean and ADCmin for adenocarcinoma were 1,170.3 ± 97.8 × 10−6 and 748.7 ± 157.5 × 10−6 mm2 s−1, respectively, significantly higher than that of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (1,053.8 ± 134.3 × 10−6 and 615.6 ± 170.2 × 10−6 mm2 s−1, respectively). ADCmean and ADC5 %–ADC85 % of well or moderately tumor were significantly higher than poorly differentiated tumor, but ADCmin was not significantly different among different differentiated cervical cancer. Only ADC5 %–ADC45 % could discriminate well or moderately differentiated SCC from poorly differentiated SCC. ADC5 % for distinguishing well/moderately from poorly differentiated cervical cancer had a largest AUC (0.83). There was no statistical difference in ADC value for different depth of cervical infiltration or lymph node metastases.

Conclusions

ADC values are helpful in assessing pathologic subtype and the differentiation of cervical cancer.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Orfanoudaki IM, Kappou D, Sifakis S (2011) Recent advances in optical imaging for cervical cancer detection. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284:1197–1208PubMedCrossRef Orfanoudaki IM, Kappou D, Sifakis S (2011) Recent advances in optical imaging for cervical cancer detection. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284:1197–1208PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tong T, Yajia G, Huaying W, Weijun P (2012) Application of 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1113–1118PubMedCrossRef Tong T, Yajia G, Huaying W, Weijun P (2012) Application of 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1113–1118PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Biewenga P, van der Velden J, Mol BW, Stalpers LJ, Schilthuis MS, van der Steeg JW, Burger MP, Buist MR (2011) Prognostic model for survival in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Cancer 117:768–776PubMedCrossRef Biewenga P, van der Velden J, Mol BW, Stalpers LJ, Schilthuis MS, van der Steeg JW, Burger MP, Buist MR (2011) Prognostic model for survival in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Cancer 117:768–776PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Stenstedt K, Hellström AC, Fridsten S, Blomqvist L (2011) Impact of MRI in the management and staging of cancer of the uterine cervix. Acta Oncol 50:420–426PubMedCrossRef Stenstedt K, Hellström AC, Fridsten S, Blomqvist L (2011) Impact of MRI in the management and staging of cancer of the uterine cervix. Acta Oncol 50:420–426PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Duncan KA, Drinkwater KJ, Frost C, Remedios D, Barter S (2012) Staging cancer of the uterus: a national audit of MRI accuracy. Clin Radiol 67:523–530PubMedCrossRef Duncan KA, Drinkwater KJ, Frost C, Remedios D, Barter S (2012) Staging cancer of the uterus: a national audit of MRI accuracy. Clin Radiol 67:523–530PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamstra DA, Rehemtulla A, Ross BD (2007) Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: a biomarker for treatment response in oncology. J Clin Oncol 25:4104–4109PubMedCrossRef Hamstra DA, Rehemtulla A, Ross BD (2007) Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: a biomarker for treatment response in oncology. J Clin Oncol 25:4104–4109PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Punwani S (2011) Diffusion weighted imaging of female pelvic cancers: concepts and clinical applications. Eur J Radiol 78:21–29PubMedCrossRef Punwani S (2011) Diffusion weighted imaging of female pelvic cancers: concepts and clinical applications. Eur J Radiol 78:21–29PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Li S, Sun F, Jin ZY et al (2007) Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: technical improvement and preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1139–1144PubMedCrossRef Li S, Sun F, Jin ZY et al (2007) Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: technical improvement and preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1139–1144PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura K, Joja I, Nagasaka T et al (2012) The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADCmean) on primary cervical cancer is a predictive marker for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 127:478–483PubMedCrossRef Nakamura K, Joja I, Nagasaka T et al (2012) The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADCmean) on primary cervical cancer is a predictive marker for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 127:478–483PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tozer DJ, Jäger HR, Danchaivijitr N et al (2007) Apparent diffusion coefficient histograms may predict low-grade glioma subtype. NMR Biomed 20:49–57PubMedCrossRef Tozer DJ, Jäger HR, Danchaivijitr N et al (2007) Apparent diffusion coefficient histograms may predict low-grade glioma subtype. NMR Biomed 20:49–57PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Costantini M, Belli P, Rinaldi P et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness. Clin Radiol 65:1005–1012PubMedCrossRef Costantini M, Belli P, Rinaldi P et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness. Clin Radiol 65:1005–1012PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Itou Y, Nakanishi K, Narumi Y, Nishizawa Y, Tsukuma H (2011) Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer? J Magn Reson Imaging 33:167–172PubMedCrossRef Itou Y, Nakanishi K, Narumi Y, Nishizawa Y, Tsukuma H (2011) Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer? J Magn Reson Imaging 33:167–172PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Barajas RF Jr, Rubenstein JL, Chang JS, Hwang J, Cha S (2010) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging derived apparent diffusion coefficient is predictive of clinical outcome in primary central nervous system lymphoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:60–66PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Barajas RF Jr, Rubenstein JL, Chang JS, Hwang J, Cha S (2010) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging derived apparent diffusion coefficient is predictive of clinical outcome in primary central nervous system lymphoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:60–66PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Bai R, Sun H, Liu H, Wang D (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervical cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:858–862PubMedCrossRef Liu Y, Bai R, Sun H, Liu H, Wang D (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervical cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:858–862PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Payne GS, Schmidt M, Morgan VA et al (2010) Evaluation of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measurements as predictive biomarkers in stage 1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:246–252PubMedCrossRef Payne GS, Schmidt M, Morgan VA et al (2010) Evaluation of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measurements as predictive biomarkers in stage 1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:246–252PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang Y, Choi SH, Kim YJ et al (2011) Gliomas: histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging—correlation with tumor grade. Radiology 261:882–890PubMedCrossRef Kang Y, Choi SH, Kim YJ et al (2011) Gliomas: histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging—correlation with tumor grade. Radiology 261:882–890PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyriazi S, Collins DJ, Messiou C et al (2011) Metastatic ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: assessing chemotherapy response with diffusion-weighted MR imaging—value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients. Radiology 26:182–192CrossRef Kyriazi S, Collins DJ, Messiou C et al (2011) Metastatic ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: assessing chemotherapy response with diffusion-weighted MR imaging—value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients. Radiology 26:182–192CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McVeigh PZ, Syed AM, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Haider MA (2008) Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 18:1058–1064PubMedCrossRef McVeigh PZ, Syed AM, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Haider MA (2008) Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 18:1058–1064PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu-Rustum NR, Alektiar K, Iasonos A et al (2006) The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Gynecol Oncol 103:714–718PubMedCrossRef Abu-Rustum NR, Alektiar K, Iasonos A et al (2006) The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Gynecol Oncol 103:714–718PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander-Sefre F, Chee N, Spencer C et al (2006) Surgical morbidity associated with radical trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 101:450–454PubMedCrossRef Alexander-Sefre F, Chee N, Spencer C et al (2006) Surgical morbidity associated with radical trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 101:450–454PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pieterse QD, Maas CP, ter Kuile MM et al (2006) An observational longitudinal study to evaluate miction, defecation, and sexual function after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for earlystage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:1119–1129PubMedCrossRef Pieterse QD, Maas CP, ter Kuile MM et al (2006) An observational longitudinal study to evaluate miction, defecation, and sexual function after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for earlystage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:1119–1129PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Meirovitz M, Sade S, Dreiher J et al (2013) Is radical hysterectomy necessary in early cervical cancer? Gynecol Obstet Invest 76:158–162PubMedCrossRef Meirovitz M, Sade S, Dreiher J et al (2013) Is radical hysterectomy necessary in early cervical cancer? Gynecol Obstet Invest 76:158–162PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pluta M, Rob L, Charvat M et al (2009) Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 113:181–184PubMedCrossRef Pluta M, Rob L, Charvat M et al (2009) Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 113:181–184PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MK, Kim JW, Kim MA et al (2010) Feasibility of less radical surgery for superficially invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 119:187–191PubMedCrossRef Kim MK, Kim JW, Kim MA et al (2010) Feasibility of less radical surgery for superficially invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 119:187–191PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kodama J, Kusumoto T, Nakamura K et al (2011) Factors associated with parametrial involvement in stage IB1 cervical cancer and identification of patients suitable for less radical surgery. Gynecol Oncol 122:491–494PubMedCrossRef Kodama J, Kusumoto T, Nakamura K et al (2011) Factors associated with parametrial involvement in stage IB1 cervical cancer and identification of patients suitable for less radical surgery. Gynecol Oncol 122:491–494PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Zou QG, Xu HB, Liu F, Guo W, Kong XC, Wu Y (2011) In the assessment of supratentorial glioma grade: the combined role of multivoxel proton MR spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging. Clin Radiol 66:953–960PubMedCrossRef Zou QG, Xu HB, Liu F, Guo W, Kong XC, Wu Y (2011) In the assessment of supratentorial glioma grade: the combined role of multivoxel proton MR spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging. Clin Radiol 66:953–960PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Curvo-Semedo L, Lambregts DM, Maas M, Beets GL, Caseiro-Alves F, Beets-Tan RG (2012) Diffusion-weighted MRI in rectal cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:1365–1371PubMedCrossRef Curvo-Semedo L, Lambregts DM, Maas M, Beets GL, Caseiro-Alves F, Beets-Tan RG (2012) Diffusion-weighted MRI in rectal cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:1365–1371PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishie A, Tajima T, Asayama Y et al (2011) Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 80:e29–e33PubMedCrossRef Nishie A, Tajima T, Asayama Y et al (2011) Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 80:e29–e33PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Razek AA, Fathy A, Gawad TA (2011) Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic parameters of lung cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:248–252PubMedCrossRef Razek AA, Fathy A, Gawad TA (2011) Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic parameters of lung cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:248–252PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Matoba M, Tonami H, Kondou T et al (2007) Lung carcinoma: diffusion-weighted mr imaging—preliminary evaluation with apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 243:570–577PubMedCrossRef Matoba M, Tonami H, Kondou T et al (2007) Lung carcinoma: diffusion-weighted mr imaging—preliminary evaluation with apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 243:570–577PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Dzik-Jurasz A, Domenig C, George M et al (2002) Diffusion MRI for prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation. Lancet 27:307–308CrossRef Dzik-Jurasz A, Domenig C, George M et al (2002) Diffusion MRI for prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation. Lancet 27:307–308CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M et al (1999) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:53–60PubMedCrossRef Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M et al (1999) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:53–60PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Verma S, Rajesh A, Morales H et al (2011) Assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:374–381PubMedCrossRef Verma S, Rajesh A, Morales H et al (2011) Assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:374–381PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for the assessment of local aggressiveness of cervical cancer
verfasst von
Huadan Xue
Cui Ren
Jiaxin Yang
Zhaoyong Sun
Shuo Li
Zhengyu Jin
Keng Shen
Weixun Zhou
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3221-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.