Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2017

06.09.2017 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Major underestimation and overestimation of visual blood loss during cesarean deliveries: can they be predicted?

verfasst von: Ohad Gluck, Yossi Mizrachi, Michal Kovo, Michael Divon, Jacob Bar, Eran Weiner

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The surgeons’ visual estimation is the most widely used method for estimating blood loss (BL) while performing cesarean deliveries (CDs). Major BL underestimation may adversely influence obstetric decision making, and result in delaying interventions. Major BL overestimation may result in unnecessary costly interventions. Therefore, we aimed to identify independent predictors for major BL underestimation and overestimation during CDs.

Methods

All CDs performed between 11/2008 and 6/2016, in a university-affiliated hospital, were reviewed for demographic and surgical data, including the surgeons’ reported estimated BL (EBL). Calculated BL (CBL) was calculated by multiplying the calculated maternal blood volume by the percent of hematocrit decrease. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify independent risk factors for major BL underestimation (CBL−EBL ≥ 400 ml) and overestimation (EBL−CBL ≥ 400 ml).

Results

During the study period, 3655 CDs were analyzed, of which 420 met the criterion for major BL underestimation and 1214 for major BL overestimation. Urgent surgery (aOR = 2.83; 95% CI 2.06–3.89), general anesthesia (aOR = 2.39; 95% CI 1.71–3.33), and higher surgeon experience (aOR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.06) were found to be independent risk factors for major BL underestimation, while any previous CD (aOR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.33–0.67) decreased the risk of underestimation. Any previous CD (aOR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.05–1.58) and intra-abdominal adhesions (aOR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.11–1.70) were found to be independent risk factors for major BL overestimation, while urgent CD (aOR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.41–0.60) decreased the risk of overestimation.

Conclusion

Various factors can predict major underestimation and overestimation of BL during CDs. Recognizing these factors can assist in the interpretation of visual EBL and improve obstetric decision making.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of O (2006) Gynecologists: ACOG practice bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 108:1039–1047 American College of O (2006) Gynecologists: ACOG practice bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 108:1039–1047
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF (2006) WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 367:1066–1074CrossRefPubMed Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF (2006) WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 367:1066–1074CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sloan NL, Durocher J, Aldrich T, Blum J, Winikoff B (2010) What measured blood loss tells us about postpartum bleeding: a systematic review. BJOG 117:788–800CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sloan NL, Durocher J, Aldrich T, Blum J, Winikoff B (2010) What measured blood loss tells us about postpartum bleeding: a systematic review. BJOG 117:788–800CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stafford I, Dildy GA, Clark SL, Belfort MA (2008) Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(519):e511–e517 Stafford I, Dildy GA, Clark SL, Belfort MA (2008) Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(519):e511–e517
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Duthie SJ, Ven D, Yung GL, Guang DZ, Chan SY, Ma HK (1991) Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 38:119–124CrossRefPubMed Duthie SJ, Ven D, Yung GL, Guang DZ, Chan SY, Ma HK (1991) Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 38:119–124CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Larsson C, Saltvedt S, Wiklund I, Pahlen S, Andolf E (2006) Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:1448–1452CrossRefPubMed Larsson C, Saltvedt S, Wiklund I, Pahlen S, Andolf E (2006) Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:1448–1452CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothermel LD, Lipman JM (2016) Estimation of blood loss is inaccurate and unreliable. Surgery 160:946–953CrossRefPubMed Rothermel LD, Lipman JM (2016) Estimation of blood loss is inaccurate and unreliable. Surgery 160:946–953CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Withanathantrige M, Goonewardene M, Dandeniya R, Gunatilake P, Gamage S (2016) Comparison of four methods of blood loss estimation after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 135:51–55CrossRefPubMed Withanathantrige M, Goonewardene M, Dandeniya R, Gunatilake P, Gamage S (2016) Comparison of four methods of blood loss estimation after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 135:51–55CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ali Algadiem E, Aleisa AA, Alsubaie HI, Buhlaiqah NR, Algadeeb JB, Alsneini HA (2016) Blood loss estimation using gauze visual analogue. Trauma Mon 21:e34131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ali Algadiem E, Aleisa AA, Alsubaie HI, Buhlaiqah NR, Algadeeb JB, Alsneini HA (2016) Blood loss estimation using gauze visual analogue. Trauma Mon 21:e34131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuckerwise LC, Pettker CM, Illuzzi J, Raab CR, Lipkind HS (2014) Use of a novel visual aid to improve estimation of obstetric blood loss. Obstet Gynecol 123:982–986CrossRefPubMed Zuckerwise LC, Pettker CM, Illuzzi J, Raab CR, Lipkind HS (2014) Use of a novel visual aid to improve estimation of obstetric blood loss. Obstet Gynecol 123:982–986CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Al Kadri HM, Al Anazi BK, Tamim HM (2011) Visual estimation versus gravimetric measurement of postpartum blood loss: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283:1207–1213CrossRefPubMed Al Kadri HM, Al Anazi BK, Tamim HM (2011) Visual estimation versus gravimetric measurement of postpartum blood loss: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283:1207–1213CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Maslovitz S, Barkai G, Lessing JB, Ziv A, Many A (2008) Improved accuracy of postpartum blood loss estimation as assessed by simulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:929–934CrossRefPubMed Maslovitz S, Barkai G, Lessing JB, Ziv A, Many A (2008) Improved accuracy of postpartum blood loss estimation as assessed by simulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:929–934CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dildy GA 3rd, Paine AR, George NC, Velasco C (2004) Estimating blood loss: can teaching significantly improve visual estimation? Obstet Gynecol 104:601–606CrossRefPubMed Dildy GA 3rd, Paine AR, George NC, Velasco C (2004) Estimating blood loss: can teaching significantly improve visual estimation? Obstet Gynecol 104:601–606CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasertcharoensuk W, Swadpanich U, Lumbiganon P (2000) Accuracy of the blood loss estimation in the third stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 71:69–70CrossRefPubMed Prasertcharoensuk W, Swadpanich U, Lumbiganon P (2000) Accuracy of the blood loss estimation in the third stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 71:69–70CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Razvi K, Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS (1996) A comparison between visual estimation and laboratory determination of blood loss during the third stage of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 36:152–154CrossRefPubMed Razvi K, Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS (1996) A comparison between visual estimation and laboratory determination of blood loss during the third stage of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 36:152–154CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheerranichanunth P, Poolnoi P (2012) Using blood loss pictogram for visual blood loss estimation in cesarean section. J Med Assoc Thai 95:550–556PubMed Cheerranichanunth P, Poolnoi P (2012) Using blood loss pictogram for visual blood loss estimation in cesarean section. J Med Assoc Thai 95:550–556PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoong W, Karavolos S, Damodaram M, Madgwick K, Milestone N, Al-Habib A, Fakokunde A, Okolo S (2010) Observer accuracy and reproducibility of visual estimation of blood loss in obstetrics: how accurate and consistent are health-care professionals? Arch Gynecol Obstet 281:207–213CrossRefPubMed Yoong W, Karavolos S, Damodaram M, Madgwick K, Milestone N, Al-Habib A, Fakokunde A, Okolo S (2010) Observer accuracy and reproducibility of visual estimation of blood loss in obstetrics: how accurate and consistent are health-care professionals? Arch Gynecol Obstet 281:207–213CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Guasch E, Gilsanz F (2016) Massive obstetric hemorrhage: current approach to management. Med Intensiva 40:298–310CrossRefPubMed Guasch E, Gilsanz F (2016) Massive obstetric hemorrhage: current approach to management. Med Intensiva 40:298–310CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg CJ, Harper MA, Atkinson SM, Bell EA, Brown HL, Hage ML, Mitra AG, Moise KJ Jr, Callaghan WM (2005) Preventability of pregnancy-related deaths: results of a state-wide review. Obstet Gynecol 106:1228–1234CrossRefPubMed Berg CJ, Harper MA, Atkinson SM, Bell EA, Brown HL, Hage ML, Mitra AG, Moise KJ Jr, Callaghan WM (2005) Preventability of pregnancy-related deaths: results of a state-wide review. Obstet Gynecol 106:1228–1234CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouvier-Colle MH, Ould El Joud D, Varnoux N, Goffinet F, Alexander S, Bayoumeu F, Beaumont E, Fernandez H, Lansac J, Levy G et al (2001) Evaluation of the quality of care for severe obstetrical haemorrhage in three French regions. BJOG 108:898–903PubMed Bouvier-Colle MH, Ould El Joud D, Varnoux N, Goffinet F, Alexander S, Bayoumeu F, Beaumont E, Fernandez H, Lansac J, Levy G et al (2001) Evaluation of the quality of care for severe obstetrical haemorrhage in three French regions. BJOG 108:898–903PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Aksoy H, Aksoy U, Yucel B, Ozyurt SS, Acmaz G, Babayigit MA, Gokahmetoglu G, Aydin T (2015) Blood loss in elective cesarean section: is there a difference related to the type of anesthesia? A randomized prospective study. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 16:158–163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aksoy H, Aksoy U, Yucel B, Ozyurt SS, Acmaz G, Babayigit MA, Gokahmetoglu G, Aydin T (2015) Blood loss in elective cesarean section: is there a difference related to the type of anesthesia? A randomized prospective study. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 16:158–163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Butwick AJ, Carvalho B, El-Sayed YY (2014) Risk factors for obstetric morbidity in patients with uterine atony undergoing caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth 113:661–668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Butwick AJ, Carvalho B, El-Sayed YY (2014) Risk factors for obstetric morbidity in patients with uterine atony undergoing caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth 113:661–668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Heesen M, Hofmann T, Klohr S, Rossaint R, van de Velde M, Deprest J, Straube S (2013) Is general anaesthesia for caesarean section associated with postpartum haemorrhage? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57:1092–1102CrossRefPubMed Heesen M, Hofmann T, Klohr S, Rossaint R, van de Velde M, Deprest J, Straube S (2013) Is general anaesthesia for caesarean section associated with postpartum haemorrhage? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57:1092–1102CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiner E, Bar J, Fainstein N, Ben-Haroush A, Sadan O, Golan A, Kovo M (2014) The effect of a program to shorten the decision-to-delivery interval for emergent cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210(224):e221–e226 Weiner E, Bar J, Fainstein N, Ben-Haroush A, Sadan O, Golan A, Kovo M (2014) The effect of a program to shorten the decision-to-delivery interval for emergent cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210(224):e221–e226
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacob M, Conzen P, Finsterer U, Krafft A, Becker BF, Rehm M (1985) Technical and physiological background of plasma volume measurement with indocyanine green: a clarification of misunderstandings. J Appl Physiol 2007(102):1235–1242 Jacob M, Conzen P, Finsterer U, Krafft A, Becker BF, Rehm M (1985) Technical and physiological background of plasma volume measurement with indocyanine green: a clarification of misunderstandings. J Appl Physiol 2007(102):1235–1242
Metadaten
Titel
Major underestimation and overestimation of visual blood loss during cesarean deliveries: can they be predicted?
verfasst von
Ohad Gluck
Yossi Mizrachi
Michal Kovo
Michael Divon
Jacob Bar
Eran Weiner
Publikationsdatum
06.09.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4506-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Ambulantisierung: Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Hybrid-DRG

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Hybrid-DRG-Verordnung soll dazu führen, dass mehr chirurgische Eingriffe ambulant durchgeführt werden, wie es in anderen Ländern schon länger üblich ist. Die gleiche Vergütung im ambulanten und stationären Sektor hatten Niedergelassene schon lange gefordert. Aber die Umsetzung bereitet ihnen doch Kopfzerbrechen.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Harninkontinenz: Netz-Op. erfordert über lange Zeit intensive Nachsorge

30.04.2024 Harninkontinenz Nachrichten

Frauen mit Belastungsinkontinenz oder Organprolaps sind nach einer Netz-Operation keineswegs beschwerdefrei. Vielmehr scheint die Krankheitslast weiterhin hoch zu sein, sogar höher als von harninkontinenten Frauen, die sich nicht haben operieren lassen.

Welche Übungen helfen gegen Diastase recti abdominis?

30.04.2024 Schwangerenvorsorge Nachrichten

Die Autorinnen und Autoren einer aktuellen Studie aus Griechenland sind sich einig, dass Bewegungstherapie, einschließlich Übungen zur Stärkung der Bauchmuskulatur und zur Stabilisierung des Rumpfes, eine Diastase recti abdominis postpartum wirksam reduzieren kann. Doch vieles ist noch nicht eindeutig belegt.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.