Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 3/2010

01.05.2010 | Original article

Comparison of the outcomes between anatomical resection and limited resection for single hepatocellular carcinomas no larger than 5 cm in diameter: a single-center study

Erschienen in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Liver resection is a widely preferred treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). This study aimed to compare the survival impact of anatomical resection with that of limited resection, in patients with single HCCs no larger than 5 cm in diameter.

Methods

A cohort study was carried out on 209 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for a single HCC no larger than 5 cm in diameter between January 1994 and March 2007 at Osaka City General Hospital.

Results

The cumulative 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates in the anatomical resection group (n = 111) were 71 and 40%, respectively, both of which were significantly better than the 48 and 25% seen in the limited resection group (n = 98) (P = 0.0043 and P = 0.0232, respectively). Better effects of the anatomical resection on both overall and disease-free survival were seen in patients having HCC larger than 2 cm in diameter and in patients with moderately or poorly differentiated HCC. But no significant difference in either overall or disease-free survival was seen between the groups in patients with a HCC 2 cm or less in diameter or in the patients with well-differentiated HCC. Using Cox’s regression model, anatomical resection was confirmed to be an independent favorable factor for both overall and disease-free survival.

Conclusions

Anatomical resection is therefore recommended for histologically advanced single HCCs ranging from 2 to 5 cm in diameter.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Makuuchi M, Kokudo N, Arii S, Futagawa S, Kaneko S, Kawasaki S et al. Development of evidence-based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2008;38:37–51. Makuuchi M, Kokudo N, Arii S, Futagawa S, Kaneko S, Kawasaki S et al. Development of evidence-based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2008;38:37–51.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. General rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. Second English edition. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2003. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. General rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. Second English edition. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2003.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kosuge T, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Yamamoto J, Shimada K, Yamasaki S. Long-term results after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: experience of 480 cases. Hepatogastroenterology. 1993;40(4):328–32.PubMed Kosuge T, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Yamamoto J, Shimada K, Yamasaki S. Long-term results after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: experience of 480 cases. Hepatogastroenterology. 1993;40(4):328–32.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Miyagawa Y, Ishida K, Shimada R, Miyagawa S, et al. Prognostic significance of anatomical resection and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1999;86(8):1032–8.CrossRefPubMed Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Miyagawa Y, Ishida K, Shimada R, Miyagawa S, et al. Prognostic significance of anatomical resection and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1999;86(8):1032–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Ohtsbo T, Katsuragawa H, Fukuda C, Katagiri S. Effectiveness of systematized hepatectomy with Glisson’s pedicle transection at the hepatic hilus for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective analysis. Surgery. 2001;130(3):443–8.CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Ohtsbo T, Katsuragawa H, Fukuda C, Katagiri S. Effectiveness of systematized hepatectomy with Glisson’s pedicle transection at the hepatic hilus for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective analysis. Surgery. 2001;130(3):443–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Regimbeau JM, Kianmanesh R, Farges O, Dondero F, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J. Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery. 2002;131(3):311–7.CrossRefPubMed Regimbeau JM, Kianmanesh R, Farges O, Dondero F, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J. Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery. 2002;131(3):311–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, et al. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;242(2):252–9.CrossRefPubMed Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, et al. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;242(2):252–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho YB, Lee KU, Lee HW, Cho EH, Yang SH, Cho JY, et al. Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for small single hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:1766–9.PubMed Cho YB, Lee KU, Lee HW, Cho EH, Yang SH, Cho JY, et al. Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for small single hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:1766–9.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakai T, Shirai Y, Sakata J, Kaneko K, Cruz PV, Akazawa K, et al. Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1–T2 hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1356–65.CrossRefPubMed Wakai T, Shirai Y, Sakata J, Kaneko K, Cruz PV, Akazawa K, et al. Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1–T2 hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1356–65.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno S, Kubo F, Sakoda M, Hiwatashi K, Tateno T, Mataki Y, et al. Efficacy of anatomic resection vs nonanatomic resection for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma based on gross classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:493–500.CrossRefPubMed Ueno S, Kubo F, Sakoda M, Hiwatashi K, Tateno T, Mataki Y, et al. Efficacy of anatomic resection vs nonanatomic resection for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma based on gross classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:493–500.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Eguchi S, Kanematsu T, Arii S, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, et al. Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey. Surgery. 2008;143(4):469–75.CrossRefPubMed Eguchi S, Kanematsu T, Arii S, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, et al. Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey. Surgery. 2008;143(4):469–75.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanematsu T, Takenaka K, Matsumata T, Furuta T, Sugimachi K, Inokuchi K. Limited hepatic resection effective for selected cirrhotic patients with primary liver cancer. Ann Surg. 1984;199:51–6.CrossRefPubMed Kanematsu T, Takenaka K, Matsumata T, Furuta T, Sugimachi K, Inokuchi K. Limited hepatic resection effective for selected cirrhotic patients with primary liver cancer. Ann Surg. 1984;199:51–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagasue N, Yamanoi A, El-Assal ON, Ohmori H, Tachibana M, Kimoto T, et al. Major compared with limited hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma without underlying cirrhosis: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:638–46.CrossRefPubMed Nagasue N, Yamanoi A, El-Assal ON, Ohmori H, Tachibana M, Kimoto T, et al. Major compared with limited hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma without underlying cirrhosis: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:638–46.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou XD, Tang ZY, Yang BH, Lin ZY, Ma ZC, Ye SL, et al. Experience of 1000 patients who underwent hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;91(8):1479–86.CrossRefPubMed Zhou XD, Tang ZY, Yang BH, Lin ZY, Ma ZC, Ye SL, et al. Experience of 1000 patients who underwent hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;91(8):1479–86.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaibori M, Matsui Y, Hijikawa T, Uchida Y, Kwon AH, Kamiyama Y. Comparison of limited and anatomic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis C. Surgery. 2006;139(3):385–94.CrossRefPubMed Kaibori M, Matsui Y, Hijikawa T, Uchida Y, Kwon AH, Kamiyama Y. Comparison of limited and anatomic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis C. Surgery. 2006;139(3):385–94.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Itoh S, Kitagawa D, Kayashima H, Harimoto N, et al. Long-term favorable results of limited hepatic resections for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: 20 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(1):19–26.CrossRefPubMed Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Itoh S, Kitagawa D, Kayashima H, Harimoto N, et al. Long-term favorable results of limited hepatic resections for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: 20 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(1):19–26.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka K, Shimada H, Matsumoto C, Matsuo K, Nagano Y, Endo I, et al. Anatomic versus limited nonanatomic resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery. 2008;143:607–15.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka K, Shimada H, Matsumoto C, Matsuo K, Nagano Y, Endo I, et al. Anatomic versus limited nonanatomic resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery. 2008;143:607–15.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura H, Sano K, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M. Assessment of hepatic reserve for indication of hepatic resection: decision tree incorporating indocyanine green test. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12:16–22.CrossRefPubMed Imamura H, Sano K, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M. Assessment of hepatic reserve for indication of hepatic resection: decision tree incorporating indocyanine green test. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12:16–22.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamanaka N, Okamoto E, Oriyama T, Fujimoto J, Furukawa K, Kawamura E. A prediction scoring system to select the surgical treatment of liver cancer. Further refinement based on 10 years of use. Ann Surg. 1994;219(4):342–6.CrossRefPubMed Yamanaka N, Okamoto E, Oriyama T, Fujimoto J, Furukawa K, Kawamura E. A prediction scoring system to select the surgical treatment of liver cancer. Further refinement based on 10 years of use. Ann Surg. 1994;219(4):342–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Takasaki K, Kobayashi S, Tanaka S, Saito A, Yamamoto M, Hanyu F. Highly anatomically systematized hepatic resection with Glissonean sheath code transection at the hepatic hilus. Int Surg. 1990;75(2):73–7.PubMed Takasaki K, Kobayashi S, Tanaka S, Saito A, Yamamoto M, Hanyu F. Highly anatomically systematized hepatic resection with Glissonean sheath code transection at the hepatic hilus. Int Surg. 1990;75(2):73–7.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Terminology Committee of IHPBA. Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB Surg. 2000;2:333–9. Terminology Committee of IHPBA. Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB Surg. 2000;2:333–9.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S, Inoue K, Kobayashi K, Kojiro M, et al. Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. Hepatology. 2000;32(6):9–1224.CrossRef Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S, Inoue K, Kobayashi K, Kojiro M, et al. Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. Hepatology. 2000;32(6):9–1224.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen MS, Li JQ, Zheng Y, Guo RP, Liang HH, Zhang YQ, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing percutaneous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2006;243(3):321–8.CrossRefPubMed Chen MS, Li JQ, Zheng Y, Guo RP, Liang HH, Zhang YQ, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing percutaneous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2006;243(3):321–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamazaki O, Oka H, Manabe T, Kioka K, Kurai O, Murata K, et al. Comparison of the long-term results between surgical resection and local ablation for Child-Pugh A patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma of 5 cm or less in size: a single center study (in Japanese with English abstract). Kanzo (Acta Hepatologica Japonica). 2009;50:173–84.CrossRef Yamazaki O, Oka H, Manabe T, Kioka K, Kurai O, Murata K, et al. Comparison of the long-term results between surgical resection and local ablation for Child-Pugh A patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma of 5 cm or less in size: a single center study (in Japanese with English abstract). Kanzo (Acta Hepatologica Japonica). 2009;50:173–84.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon RT, Fan S, Lin IO, Wong J. Significance of resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical reappraisal. Ann Surg. 2000;231(4):544–51.CrossRefPubMed Poon RT, Fan S, Lin IO, Wong J. Significance of resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical reappraisal. Ann Surg. 2000;231(4):544–51.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Arii S, Tanaka J, Yamazoe Y, Minematsu S, Morino T, Fujita K, et al. Predictive factors for intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after partial hepatectomy. Cancer. 1992;69(4):913–9.CrossRefPubMed Arii S, Tanaka J, Yamazoe Y, Minematsu S, Morino T, Fujita K, et al. Predictive factors for intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after partial hepatectomy. Cancer. 1992;69(4):913–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawasaki S, Makuuchi M, Miyagawa S, Kakazu T, Hayashi K, Kasai H, et al. Results of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg. 1995;19(1):31–4.CrossRefPubMed Kawasaki S, Makuuchi M, Miyagawa S, Kakazu T, Hayashi K, Kasai H, et al. Results of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg. 1995;19(1):31–4.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikai I, Arii S, Kojiro M, Ichida T, Makuuich M, Matsuyama Y, et al. Reevaluation of prognostic factors for survival after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a Japanese nationwide survey. Cancer. 2004;101(4):796–802.CrossRefPubMed Ikai I, Arii S, Kojiro M, Ichida T, Makuuich M, Matsuyama Y, et al. Reevaluation of prognostic factors for survival after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a Japanese nationwide survey. Cancer. 2004;101(4):796–802.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi M, Guo RP, Lin XJ, Zhang YQ, Chen MS, Zhang CQ, et al. Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;245(1):36–43.CrossRefPubMed Shi M, Guo RP, Lin XJ, Zhang YQ, Chen MS, Zhang CQ, et al. Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;245(1):36–43.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of the outcomes between anatomical resection and limited resection for single hepatocellular carcinomas no larger than 5 cm in diameter: a single-center study
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2010
Erschienen in
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1868-6974
Elektronische ISSN: 1868-6982
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0253-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 3/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.